Руководство по выживанию в науке, полезные советы начинающим, новости из научной жизни и просто околонаучный треп
Версия VK: https://vk.com/ivory_zoo
Вопросы? Предложения? @ivory_zoo
Created
9 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net +405. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30,984–31,511 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 09:40
31,450
+22
15 Sept 2026, 10:21
31,428
+6
13 Sept 2026, 17:57
31,422
+9
11 Sept 2026, 20:57
31,413
+5
9 Sept 2026, 07:56
31,408
+27
5 Sept 2026, 22:00
31,381
+61
3 Sept 2026, 18:18
31,320
-9
2 Sept 2026, 13:47
31,329
+8
1 Sept 2026, 12:54
31,321
+14
31 Aug 2026, 15:54
31,307
+5
30 Aug 2026, 16:06
31,302
+37
29 Aug 2026, 15:13
31,265
+19
28 Aug 2026, 13:43
31,246
+26
27 Aug 2026, 11:34
31,220
-1
26 Aug 2026, 10:46
31,221
+8
25 Aug 2026, 07:23
31,213
+4
24 Aug 2026, 04:23
31,209
+5
22 Aug 2026, 12:24
31,204
+4
21 Aug 2026, 06:08
31,200
+7
20 Aug 2026, 08:24
31,193
first reading
Engagement
168 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.2%
avg views ÷ 31,450 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,220
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
86
of 168 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
168 (30 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
699,100
Reactions total
15,605
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 08:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,980
Videos
≈143
Links
≈5,390
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 17s
Average length
1m 03s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
31,680 reactions across 161 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
6,573
20.7%
❤
6,182
19.5%
🔥
3,979
12.6%
👍
3,731
11.8%
😁
3,541
11.2%
💯
1,950
6.16%
custom 5291988716192019328
1,257
3.97%
😱
745
2.35%
🤬
716
2.26%
😢
618
1.95%
👎
559
1.76%
🤯
270
0.852%
custom 5231345770837327069
263
0.83%
🎉
251
0.792%
🤔
221
0.698%
👌
174
0.549%
😭
140
0.442%
😨
113
0.357%
😐
110
0.347%
👏
102
0.322%
7 further kinds
185
0.584%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 167 of the 168 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,012 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
90
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 167 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
70
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ivoryzoo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 168 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#зоопарк_одобряет
И еще о выборах - есть новости, которые нас радуют: товарища Бочарова, ректора АлтГУ, избрали в местное заксобрание депутатом.
Как мы уже говорили, Алтайский гос - он очень интересный. Вуз это весьма молодой, брежневских времен. Под боком - могучие вузовско-научные города - Новосибирск и несколько подальше Томск, которые активно тянут к себе сильную абитуру. Казалось бы, в этой ситуации Барнеаполи…
#дорогая_редакция
По следам нашего недавнего поста о казарменно-лагерных порядках, которые сейчас вводят в общагах Новосибирского университета, нам пишут из МГУ:
Позавчера у нас в МГУ тоже ужесточили правила.
Нам запретили хранить в общагах электросамокаты/моноколеса/прочие средства передвижения с аккумулятором, и, что еще противнее — ставить в коридорах блоков общаг холодильники и шкафы (...)еще теперь в и так м…
#мы_ушли_из_зоопарка
Админы @rlabrats приехали на мобпункт и получают за свою сегодняшнюю шутку про мобилизацию по жо проходят первичную подготовку в соответствии со своей ВУС.
#зоопарк_одобряет
В БелГУ выяснили, какие генетические особенности повышают риск опасного осложнения беременности
Преэклампсия - одно из очень опасных осложнений беременности. Чаще всего оно возникает после 20-й недели и бьет сразу по нескольким системам организма, угрожая жизни и матери, и ребенка - это одна из главных причин смертности. Самое же неприятное заключается в том, что пока что ученые не знают до конца,…
#зоопарк_одобряет
Новый материал для дозиметрии - made in Ural
Люминесцентная дозиметрия - метод, позволяющий измерять дозу радиации по интенсивности свечения материала после облучения. Классика жанра - устройства на основе фторида лития, но у них есть ограничения: например, слабый отклик в режиме оптически стимулированной люминесценции (OSL). Поэтому поиск новых матриц, способных одновременно работать и в TL (терм…
#обозревая_происходящее
MDPI не открывается, авторизация на сервисах Elsevier виснет, местами лежит Википедия - и это мы еще роутер не включали реальные наблюдения сегодняшнего дня с некоторых провайдеров.
До конца выборов оставалось несколько часов...
РКН, анус себе заблокируй (с)
#их_нравы
38-летний турок пытался въехать в Германию якобы для работы в одном из ведущих технических вузов (KIT), но спалился на том, что в приглашении от KIT были грубые орфографические ошибки.
При допросе с пристрастием турецкий гость признался, что виза у него поддельная, купил он ее за 3000 евро, а ещё ему пообещали работу водителем за 4700 евро в месяц, не штурм (некоторые немецкие постдоки явно поперхнулись, …
#крамольные_мысли
*и ещё раз меланхолично*
Так вышло, что один из творческого коллектива Смотрителей когда-то имел удовольствие лично общаться с высшим руководством ФНС и слушать рассказ о том, как создавалась система налога на самозанятость.
Шли тогда от очень качественной социологии (настоящей, а не фуфла в духе "вылизать зад подогнать отчёт под желание начальства"). Выяснилось, что очень многие люди, работающие…
#асы_пиара #дорогая_редакция
"Результаты эксперимента оказались столь впечатляющими, что научную статью опубликовал второй по цитируемости в мире научный журнал Scientific reports"
Потому что первый по цитируемости в мире не взял, угу.
У ЕГПНИ появился конкурент по созданию рейтингов журналов
#обозревая_происходящее
РАН собирает предложения об оптимизации сети научных институтов. Первые (от СО РАН) уже прозвучали.
Напомним, в конце мая мы писали, что оптимизация практически неизбежна, как и о том, что вполне вероятно сопротивление РАН, особенно если речь пойдет о гипотетическом слиянии организаций между разными тематическими отделениями. Что мы и наблюдаем.
Как любит говорить @vatfor, "спасибо, что чит…
#их_нравы
"Целью данной дипломной работы является...":
чешский профессор Ярослав Клатик сделал из работы своей дипломницы научную статью, но:
-не взял ее в авторы и
-забыл удалить технические фразы, которые откровенно палят источник.
Во времена ИИшечки это прямо олдскул, но университет это предсказуемо не оценил: профессор покинул свои должности, хотя и пока не уволен.
🤣125custom 529198871619201932834👍15😁9🔥6😭5❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 168 posts we hold for @ivoryzoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
#опрос
Какой медианный балл ЕГЭ среди группы студентов-первокурсников вы считаете неприемлемо низким для ВО?
Некое значение выше 2209%
220-20014%
199-18020%
179-16019%
159-14012%
Ниже 1407%
Медианный балл значения не имеет16%
Свой вариант в комменты2%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 168 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 64 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Трудо выебудни российского молодого учёного @hard_scince_life · 545#97
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Русский research @trueresearch · 26,453 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 September 2026
Наука и университеты @naukauniver · 43,122 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
Научная Россия @scientificrussia · 41,189 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 30 August 2026
Первый университетский @msuthefirst · 28,017 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 September 2026
Sci_Career @sci_career · 30,335 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
Минобрнауки России @minobrnaukiofficial · 59,668 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
НОП.РФ @scienpolicy · 38,070 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Кипящий МИФИ @boilingmephi · 29,324 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 8 September 2026
Смотровая Военврача @dr_voenvrach · 44,530 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 28 August 2026
факультет @studyfaculty · 44,054 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
АНЧА БАРАНОВА @anchabaranova · 35,710 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 2 September 2026
Гуманитарные конференции @confhum · 25,620 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
Медач | Medical Channel @medach · 28,118 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Цитаты преподавателей @quotes_teacher · 47,684 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 26 August 2026
Поясни за мед @poyasni_za_med · 22,289 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 September 2026
Ordo Nexus @nexus_search · 66,521 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
Кот Шрёдингера @kot_sh · 24,832 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 September 2026
ОбОбраз @ob_obraz · 30,398 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026
Научные конференции РИНЦ @konferen · 32,079 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Фонд содействия инновациям @fasietalks · 22,493 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 September 2026
Алексей Савватеев и Родная Школа @alexei_savvateev · 34,048 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 3 September 2026
Химия – Просто @ChemistryEasy · 25,134 Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
БогданоV. О школе и не только @aboutschools · 25,760 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 September 2026
НЕЙРОГРАМОТНОСТЬ @edu4telegram · 40,932 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Зоопарк из слоновой кости” (@ivoryzoo), 31,450 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivoryzoo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.