Channel

Нейроинтерфейсы

@bci_ru

On this record: Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,413subscribers

+37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1001634978355
Type	Channel
Username	@bci_ru
Created	27 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded	6 August 2026
Last confirmed live	11 September 2026
Measurements held	12
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegram	t.me/bci_ru

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

LIFT feed
@liftfeed · Channel1,452 subscribers

Growth

12 measurements spanning 36 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,367–6,420 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
11 Sept 2026, 04:36	6,413	+1
5 Sept 2026, 21:01	6,412	-2
1 Sept 2026, 11:34	6,414	+9
29 Aug 2026, 05:34	6,405	+2
26 Aug 2026, 05:03	6,403	+7
22 Aug 2026, 23:43	6,396	+4
19 Aug 2026, 22:52	6,392	+6
16 Aug 2026, 16:26	6,386	+1
12 Aug 2026, 21:28	6,385	-1
10 Aug 2026, 02:13	6,386	+13
7 Aug 2026, 01:45	6,373	-3
6 Aug 2026, 06:19	6,376	first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 29 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

220 reactions across 26 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
👍	68	30.9%
❤	64	29.1%
❤‍🔥	24	10.9%
😁	21	9.55%
🔥	13	5.91%
🤯	7	3.18%
👌	5	2.27%
👎	5	2.27%
🕊	3	1.36%
🤝	3	1.36%
🤔	2	0.909%
🥴	2	0.909%
💘	1	0.455%
💯	1	0.455%
🥰	1	0.455%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 228 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC158 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Forwarded from @neuronovostiPhoto

Могут ли биомаркеры боли заменить опыт пациента? В исследовании, опубликованном в Nature Neuroscience, представили критический анализ использования нейровизуализации и биомаркеров для диагностики боли. Главный аргумент исследователей: невозможно создать объективный тест, который доказал бы наличие или отсутствие боли у конкретного человека и смог ее объективно измерить, а биомаркеры могут быть лишь вспомогательным и…

❤2

Signed Sergei Shishkin

11 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC224 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

В постере даётся обзор шести наших исследований, но их было уже девять. Анализ результатов двух из них (Vasilyev et al. - исследование физиологичесиких механизмов квази с использованием МЭГ, Svirin et al. - риалтайм ИМК с тензодатчиком и новыми движениями) ещё не совсем завершён, а вот исследование, где испытуемые делали квази или представляли движения на фоне саккад, я, честно говоря, просто забыл. Хотя постер о нем…

🔥2❤1

Signed Sergei Shishkin

11 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC325 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На XXV Съезде Физиологического общества им. И.П. Павлова, который сейчас проходит в Москве, завтра (в среду, 12 августа) будет два постера про квазидвижения: - Шишкин С.Л., Яшин А.С., Иванов Л.А., Кондур А.А., Бобров Д.А., Слюнькова Е.В., Габузов Г.Г., Лукьянов Е.С., Шевцова Ю.Г., Свирин Е.П., Васильев А.Н., Бобров П.Д., Котов С.В. Квазидвижения: от изучения фундаментальных свойств до трансляции в клинику. — PDF см.…

❤7

Signed Sergei Shishkin

9 Aug 2026, 17:19 UTC623 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Forwarded from @neuronovostiPhoto

Найден участок мозга для общей работы рук и рта во время еды Американские нейробиологи обнаружили в коре мозга мышей специализированную зону с двумя отдельными типами нервных клеток, которая координирует совместную работу рук и рта во время еды. Один тип клеток отвечает за силу и точность самих движений – например, за то, с каким усилием рука подносит еду ко рту. Второй синхронизирует движения рук и челюсти по време…

❤‍🔥17🤯7👍2❤1

Signed Sergei Shishkin

7 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC783 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Photo

Большое спасибо за репост! Для поддержки работы необходимо перейти по ссылке и нажать на кнопку Upvote 🫶

❤5👍2

Signed Sergei Shishkin

7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC757 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ссылка на Hugging Face для тех, кто не увидел: https://huggingface.co/papers/2608.01481

👍4❤3

Signed Sergei Shishkin

7 Aug 2026, 14:26 UTC695 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026

⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️ Поддержите на Hugging Face крутую статью по интерпретируемому (!) декодированию воспринимаемой речи по МЭГ коллег из Центра биоэлектрических интерфейсов ВШЭ! Interpretable MEG Decoding of Perceived Speech: Cortical Sources and the Stimulus Features That Drive Retrieval by Ilia Semenkov, Daria Kleeva, Ivan Dakhtin, Zarina Maksudova, Alex Ossadtchi

👍16❤3😁1

Signed Sergei Shishkin

7 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC672 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Forwarded from @neuroexmachinaPhoto

🔊🧠 Декодирование воспринимаемой речи из МЭГ: может ли декодер быть точным и одновременно интерпретируемым? Сегодня хочу рассказать о нашем новом препринте про интерпретируемое декодирование речи из МЭГ. 🎧 Задача Есть МЭГ 27 человек, слушавших четыре разные истории. Мы нарезаем МЭГ и аудио на 3-секундные сегменты и по каждому сегменту МЭГ ищем, какой из 1005 тестовых аудиофрагментов человек слушал. Но это не прост…

👍5❤3🔥1

Signed Sergei Shishkin

6 Aug 2026, 19:07 UTC788 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Михаил Лебедев по-английски рассказывает о том, как хорошо летают голуби-биодроны, которым помогает ИИ. Его внимательно слушает голубь, но никуда не летит, так как находится в клетке: https://youtu.be/DZ-BI_YbR5U

😁18👎4🕊3

Signed Sergei Shishkin

4 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC795 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Forwarded from @ivoryzooPhoto

#кросскультурная_коммуникация Но есть и хорошие новости - кажется, человечество-таки пережило 4 августа 2026 не совсем так, как это предвидел гениальный золотоглазый внук ведьмы Рэй Бредбери в своих «Марсианских хрониках» (самым младшим научным сотрудникам в этом канале дешифруем: одном из самых знаменитых научно-фантастических рассказов-антиутопий ХХ века). Точно стоит перечитать, если вдруг вы еще не. Пять минут …

❤15🥴1

Signed Sergei Shishkin

4 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC774 viewsread 12 August 2026

Forwarded from @liftfeed

Про туннельные нанотрубки в ЦНС, еще один канал связности клеток мозга, помимо синапсов, э/полей и диффузии. ТНТ могут переносить молекулы и органеллы между нейронами, играя роль в гомеостазе и различных нарушениях, что делает их потенциальной мишенью для терапии. — Текущая картина и открытые вопросы. Небольшой, но оч. интересный обзор. “В более широком смысле, ТНТ могут заставить переосмыслить сам коннектом. Одна и…

Signed Sergei Shishkin

4 Aug 2026, 12:06 UTC593 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Forwarded from @neuronovostiPhoto

Магнитные наночастицы вместо электрода Российские учёные из Сколтеха, Института цитологии и генетики СО РАН и других научных центров научились регулировать частоту дыхания и сердечных сокращений мыши при помощи беспроводной стимуляции блуждающего нерва. Источником электростимуляции послужили нетоксичные магнитные микрочастицы, которые играли роль крошечных электродов в нервной ткани. Этот активно исследуемый подход…

👍7

Signed Sergei Shishkin

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @bci_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

IEEE Siberia
@ieeesiberia · 5932 posts Доказательное образование
@lingvoexperiment · 1691 post Sberloga Jobs Full
@sberlogajobsfull · 3971 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

LIFT feed
@liftfeed · 1,4525 posts Новости нейронаук и нейротехнологий
@neuronovosti · 17,7844 posts Прикладная когнитивная наука 2026 | летняя школа | HSE UX LAB
@appcogsci · 6732 posts Институт AIRI
@airi_research_institute · 13,5361 post Антон Кузнецов | Философ
@anton_philosophy · 8,1571 post Лебедев про мозг
@augmented_brain · 6,1011 post Магистратура "Когнитивные нейронауки и нейротехнологии" МЭГ-центра МГППУ и НГУ
@CogNeuroMag · 3041 post Зоопарк из слоновой кости
@ivoryzoo · 31,4081 post Мозг из машины
@neuroexmachina · 1871 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Центральное Болото
@iraq_rusproj · 23,8397 posts ШМУ "Медицинские нейротехнологии"
@LIFTschool · 5031 post АХ | нейроИИшница
@neuroAIshnitsa_AKh · 2,5871 post История науки по-пацански
@patsanscience · 3441 post Академические хроники: 300 лет РАН
@ras300year · 6441 post Голубь Скиннера | Дария Клеева
@skigeon · 1,9191 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Новости нейронаук и нейротехнологий
@neuronovosti · 17,7844 posts LIFT feed
@liftfeed · 1,4522 posts Магистратура "Когнитивные нейронауки и нейротехнологии" МЭГ-центра МГППУ и НГУ
@CogNeuroMag · 3041 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дубынин о мозге 🧠
@dubininvaofficial · 44,257
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026

Sci_Career
@sci_career · 30,311
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026

Ordo Nexus
@nexus_search · 66,457
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026

Зоопарк из слоновой кости
@ivoryzoo · 31,408
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Нейроинтерфейсы” (@bci_ru), 6,413 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bci_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.