Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Антон Кузнецов | Философ

Channel

Антон Кузнецов | Философ

@anton_philosophy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

8,120subscribers

+24 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001670856664
TypeChannel
Username@anton_philosophy
Created20 February 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/anton_philosophy

Growth

8,0948,1208,1076 August 2026 — 8,096 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,100 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,094 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,102 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,104 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,112 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,111 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,108 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,114 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,113 subscribers3 September 2026 — 8,120 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net +24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,090–8,124 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 22:218,120+7
31 Aug 2026, 19:588,113-1
29 Aug 2026, 05:278,114+6
26 Aug 2026, 03:548,108-3
23 Aug 2026, 13:148,111-1
20 Aug 2026, 02:138,112+8
16 Aug 2026, 18:258,104+2
13 Aug 2026, 01:448,102+8
9 Aug 2026, 23:428,094-6
6 Aug 2026, 15:318,100+4
6 Aug 2026, 06:198,096first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 12 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.2%
avg views ÷ 8,120 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,590
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.14%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held20 (12 May 202622 August 2026)
Views total14,350
Reactions total737
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3,086 reactions across 20 posts, in 47 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥1,15437.4%
🎉38112.3%
😢1514.89%
💯1354.37%
😍1354.37%
🤣1133.66%
1043.37%
832.69%
🍾762.46%
💔742.40%
😎511.65%
🤬511.65%
🤩461.49%
💘381.23%
🤔381.23%
🙏361.17%
🌚351.13%
💩341.10%
🏆331.07%
🤓300.972%
27 further kinds2889.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,086 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 May 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

22 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈2,100 views157 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @philosophycafemoscowPhoto

Где Антон Кузнецов?

🤣72😎51🙈9🏆7🌚5🤓5🐳2🤷‍♂2

22 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈2,500 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Сижу перед Столджаром и он меня в упор не видит))

🌚30💅7🤩7🐳2🗿2❤‍🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC≈4,270 views158 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Никогда бы не подумал, что снова окажусь на Галапагосских островах — да ещё и на том же корабле. На этот раз в роли организатора воркшопа The Distribution of Consciousness. Состав собрался весьма представительный: Дэвид Чалмерс, Нед Блок, Станислас Дехаен, Питер Годфри-Смит, Тим Бейн, Дэниел Столджар, Кит Франкиш, Энди Кларк и др. В первый день выступали Питер Годфри-Смит с докладом «Какое значение может иметь биоло

❤‍🔥7339🎉1611🤨5🤩4💅32

15 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈5,480 views373 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Дэвид Чалмерс, Нед Блок, Клаудиа Пассос и Сюзан Кейри летим вместе черти куда. Лето очень интенсивное и в плане науки, и в плане моих горных приключений. Возможно, в ближайшие дни оживлю канал, чтобы рассказывать о нашем воркшопе на тему дистрибуции сознания относительно младенцев, животных и машин. Если рассказывать не получится, заранее прошу прощения. В этот раз на мне много организаторских обязанностей и все очен

❤‍🔥240😍5330💋18👀12🎉6🤩5🥱3

31 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC≈7,450 views175 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Во "Frontiers in Psychology" вышла наша статья «Peirce's revenge on the Chinese Room» о главном аргументе против сознания ИИ — о Китайской Комнате Сёрла. Мы пытаемся показать, что комната Серла в том виде, в каком она сформулирована, не может пройти Тест Тьюринга. А если ее доработать так, чтобы она проходила, то уже априорный вывод об отсутствии понимания и сознания не проходит. Также отдельно рассматривается вопрос

🎉88❤‍🔥4521🍾7🥱4👌2💘2🤝2

29 Jul 2026, 12:09 UTC≈5,510 views93 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @mspiridonov

Что, если ИИ прикончит человечество по чистой случайности – слишком старательно выполнив нашу же криво сформулированную задачу? Без злого умысла и даже без пресловутого восстания машин. В свежем выпуске “Визионеров” мы обсудили это и многое другое с философом Антоном Кузнецовым, исследователем сознания из МГУ. Поговорили о будущем трезво – без апокалиптической истерии, но и без розовых очков. Если хотите понять, по

❤‍🔥4716👌8🤗5🥴4😱4💩3💯2

3 Jul 2026, 09:23 UTC≈27,800 views61 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Завтра 4 июля в 18:00 читаю лекцию о свободе воли здесь https://sarenok.ru/264-svoboda-voli Приходите, чтобы узнать, почему пришли — по собственной воле или по принуждению слепого закона.

❤‍🔥45😍6💩3😐3💘2💋1🥱1

25 Jun 2026, 07:57 UTC≈7,900 views76 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Запись стрима о дебатах Савватеева и Никитина про абиогенез. Сами дебаты скучные и печальные, смотреть их не рекомендую. А вот стрим задним фоном включить можно, чтобы узнать какие-то философские интересности и просто послушать дискуссию. П.С. Иван, в моей диссертации супервентность и ее производные употреблены не 16, а 159 раз 💀 https://youtu.be/54Vd4CTRMQA?is=EyiIkd_0oQP3EN7L https://youtu.be/54Vd4CTRMQA?is=EyiIkd

🫡22🤓19💘10💩7👌6💊3😨3🗿2

24 Jun 2026, 14:38 UTC≈6,040 views51 reactionsread 28 August 2026

В этом году вновь всплеск интереса к теме свободы воли. Буду читать лекцию о ней на площадке "Сааренок" 4 июля в 18:00 Приходите по свободному волению или по несвободному велению. Анонс Поведение людей сильно отличается от поведения камней. Это заставляет верить в наличие дополнительной и не вполне физической регуляции, которую могут называть свободой воли. И эта свобода сразу становится проблемой из-за того , что

❤‍🔥33💘8🤷‍♂6🥴3🐳1

20 Jun 2026, 12:36 UTC≈5,630 views216 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Скоро канал вернется в философское русло. А пока фото с сегодняшней гонки. Я жив и цел (психически). Очень рекомендую Гардзе-Тибетский автономный округ. Сюда пропуск не нужен, но фактически это Тибет.

❤‍🔥140🙏29😍23🆒1043🏆3💘2

19 Jun 2026, 11:36 UTC≈5,290 views247 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Сейчас в Китае. Вместе с Артемом Бесединым приняли участие в большой международной конференции по сознанию животных. А завтра участвую в этапе мировой серии по скайраннингу в Ядинг Даоченг. Тут очень красиво и очень высоко. Посмотрим как без акклиматизации это делать)

❤‍🔥156😍51💯1610🤯4🦄3💊2🤩2

19 Jun 2026, 00:51 UTC≈4,740 views348 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @philosmsuofficialPhoto

В номинации «За проекты в области философии» премию получает философский подкаст «Неискусственный интеллект» и его ведущий, к.ф.н., доцент кафедры ИЗФ Антон Кузнецов!

🎉206🍾59🏆23🤩23❤‍🔥15💩9💯7🥱3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @anton_philosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Антон Кузнецов | Философ” (@anton_philosophy), 8,120 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/anton_philosophy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.