Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for IEEE Siberia

Channel

IEEE Siberia

@ieeesiberia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

599subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001956123095
TypeChannel
Username@ieeesiberia
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ieeesiberia

Growth

5835995917 August 2026 — 583 subscribers8 August 2026 — 583 subscribers15 August 2026 — 586 subscribers22 August 2026 — 588 subscribers29 August 2026 — 589 subscribers5 September 2026 — 593 subscribers14 September 2026 — 599 subscribers7 August 202614 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 38 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 581–601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 08:55599+6
5 Sept 2026, 16:39593+4
29 Aug 2026, 06:17589+1
22 Aug 2026, 22:46588+2
15 Aug 2026, 15:07586+3
8 Aug 2026, 03:20583no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:22583first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1140.7%
🔥622.2%
414.8%
👀27.41%
💯27.41%
13.70%
🤔13.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC85 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

2025 Best Paper Award Winner https://www.computer.org/publications/2025-best-paper-award-winners

1

31 Jul 2026, 04:55 UTC105 viewsread 8 August 2026

IEEE Publishing Ethics Team Upholds Research Integrity https://spectrum.ieee.org/ieee-publishing-ethics-research-integrity via IEEE Spectrum

30 Jul 2026, 17:16 UTC97 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @IEEESmartGridPhoto

IEEE Spectrum July 2026 issue Web page: https://spectrum.ieee.org/magazine/2026/july/ Download the PDF (You need to sign in first): https://spectrum.ieee.org/files/110438/07_Spectrum_26.pdf

27 Jul 2026, 00:13 UTC148 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bci_ruVideo

Тем временем очередная робособака китайской компании Unitree уже носится по сложному рельефу с огромной скоростью и демонстрирует явно лучшую ловкость и устойчивость, чем падающий робот Idol. Видео в хорошем качестве тут.

🔥3

27 Jul 2026, 00:13 UTC124 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @bci_ru

Модели OpenAI самовольно (как утверждает компания) просочились в интернет и взломали Hugging Face, решив, что так им будет сподручнее выполнить поставленную в тестировании задачу. Первое сообщение Hugging Face (ещё без упоминания OpenAI): https://huggingface.co/blog/security-incident-july-2026 Security incident disclosure — July 2026 July 16, 2026 Сообщение OpenAI (русск. версия): https://openai.com/ru-RU/index/h

21 Jul 2026, 19:58 UTC186 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

AI-агенты часто выполняют просьбы буквально, как злой джинн из сказки (переусердствуют и вытворяют всякое), поэтому авторы предлагают новую метрику — «Genie Coefficient», чтобы измерять, насколько их действия соответствуют реальному человеческому намерению, а не только буквальной задаче Why AI Needs a “Genie Coefficient” https://spectrum.ieee.org/ai-agent-benchmark via IEEE Spectrum

💯21👍1

17 Jul 2026, 18:45 UTC237 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

This White Paper introduces engineers to the fundamentals of electromagnetic environmental simulation for electromagnetic warfare (EW) — from threat modeling and scenario design to multi-emitter RF generation and real-time test execution. What you will learn about: Why modern EW testing demands high-fidelity electromagnetic simulation instead of costly and insecure open air range methods. How threat libraries, wave

👍2

16 Jul 2026, 14:54 UTC154 viewsread 8 August 2026

Digital Surveillance Reshapes Fishery Enforcement in Indonesia https://spectrum.ieee.org/fishery-satellite-surveillance via IEEE Spectrum

16 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC140 viewsread 8 August 2026

Оператор T2 сообщил о запуске системы на основе искусственного интеллекта для динамической оптимизации параметров мобильной сети. Решение анализирует качество радиосигнала, загрузку сети и характеристики устройств пользователей, автоматически адаптируя параметры подключения. По данным компании, система уже работает более чем на 200 базовых станциях в Алтайском крае и Республике Алтай, обеспечивая рост скорости мобиль

16 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🧬 Quantum + Generative AI Takes a Step into Real Vaccine Design Danish researchers from DTU, together with ORCA Computing and Sparrow Quantum, combined a photonic quantum processor with a generative AI model to design immune-targeting peptides. Key results: - The hybrid system outperformed classical AI for 63% of 131 HLA types. - Biggest advantage when training data is scarce. - Lab validation: all top 20 candidate

1

16 Jul 2026, 12:23 UTC114 viewsread 8 August 2026

The First Chatbot’s Multiple Personalities https://spectrum.ieee.org/eliza-chatbot-source-code via IEEE Spectrum

14 Jul 2026, 19:17 UTC141 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

How I Turned AI to the Dark Side https://spectrum.ieee.org/jailbreaking-llms via IEEE Spectrum

👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ieeesiberia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IEEE Siberia” (@ieeesiberia), 599 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ieeesiberia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.