Channel
@biolapki
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,216subscribers
+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001187960122 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @biolapki |
| Created | 25 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/biolapki |
Recorded in 2019 as “Біоинформатика и лапки | バイオインフォマティクスと足” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:57 | 2,216 | +5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 16:38 | 2,211 | +4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:48 | 2,207 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:28 | 2,205 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 11:42 | 2,204 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 08:08 | 2,203 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 2,201 | +2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:18 | 2,199 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 2,202 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 2,203 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 2,198 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 2,198 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
176 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 79 | 44.9% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 23.9% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 18.8% | |
| 🤔 | 15 | 8.52% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 2.27% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ахахха ахахха Что за хрен с горы этот Дороничев и какая масонская ложа либобкома назначила его главным русскоязычным экспертом по ии? Я узнал про его существование сегодня из ленты твитура. Иван Оселедец, Илья Суцкевер, Руслан Салахутдинов такие: ну да, ну да, мы тут просто погулять вышли *варламов -- иноагент и червь-пидор
👍7❤1👎1
IQDOC полностью находится в России 🇷🇺 Наши пользователи часто задают вопрос – является ли IQDOC полностью российским проектом и где обрабатываются данные. Отвечаем: весь вычислительный контур IQDOC AI полностью локализован. Это модифицированная локальная модель, которая работает на нашем сервере. Там же базы данных клинреков и других документов, с которыми нейросеть работает. То есть мы не так называемый "враппер", …
👍5
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5
Вы не обязаны бояться. Конфликты с пациентами не должны превращаться в войну всех против всех, а ваши записи и документы — в бесполезную макулатуру. Закон создан, чтобы защищать и врача тоже. Но то, что написано на бумаге, не всегда автоматически работает в вашу пользу. Проблема не в вашей невнимательности. Просто юридическая система работает по своим правилам — и врачам эти правила обычно никто нормально не объясн…
❤2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍11❤2
Два факта про котика: 1. Любит нестандартные инженерные решения. 2. Ненавидит собирать мебель. Лучше так, чем забивать саморезы молотком, в чем тоже грешен.
🤔8
https://youtu.be/4hoOvq0Ip-4?is=fAOaQGC7GKPtF3Ps
❤1
https://youtu.be/pLmcXD3eWT4?is=aVBKyc91yLYPws__
❤1
https://youtu.be/Vt0XWeH6T44?is=Fa-6wGOFLEpzMQ_7
🔥1
Но кто если не он?
🔥1
Кто же? И как доставать популяризацию детям? Вопрос хороший и простой и у меня есть ответ. Научпоп конон-панчин-стайл полезен только для создания культа личности популяризатора и обьективно распространению научных знаний и пониманию важности научных знаний у магглов только вредит. Детям пульверизацию от конона-панчина-топлеса доставать вообще не нужно, бросьте каку. Вы же не хотите вырастить сектантов бога новуки? …
👍16
Сообщество Equality, кстати, действительно является религиозной сектой, пунч тут попал в точку.
👍4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @biolapki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Стоит ли мне прогнуться под изменчивый мир и сделать свою ллмку (днк или не днк)?
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Биоинформатика и лапки” (@biolapki), 2,216 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biolapki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.