#vacancy #python #optimization #operationsresearch #scheduling #senior #remote #parttime #datascience #algorithms Senior Operations Research / Optimization Engineer — Production Scheduling Remote | Part-time | Project-based Compensation: around $7,000 for part-time, depending on experience and workload. Telleqt is looking for a Senior Optimization Engineer for a manufacturing automation project in Thailand. We are b…

Channel
Data Science Jobs
@datasciencejobs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,024subscribers
+497 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001321264581 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @datasciencejobs |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/datasciencejobs |
Topic
Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 22,024 | +10 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:41 | 22,014 | +24 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 21,990 | +33 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 21,957 | +51 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:58 | 21,906 | +24 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 21,882 | +28 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:27 | 21,854 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 21,851 | +8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:03 | 21,843 | +23 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:56 | 21,820 | +9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:07 | 21,811 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:27 | 21,801 | +23 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 21,778 | +19 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 21,759 | +12 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:22 | 21,747 | +21 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 21,726 | +16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:49 | 21,710 | +12 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 21,698 | +21 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 21,677 | +17 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:12 | 21,660 | first reading |
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 11.8%
- avg views ÷ 22,024 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,600
- 18 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 18
- of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 44 (19 June 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 46,840 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 20.5%
- 9 of 44 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 8
- posts carrying an erid · 8 distinct tokens
- Median views · ads
- 2,570
- over 9 measured posts
- Median views · rest
- 4,570
- over 35 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjcxR5eB | 1 | 23 July 2026 | 23 July 2026 |
| 2VtzqxXkYRZ | 1 | 12 August 2026 | 12 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFGE4Juo | 1 | 2 September 2026 | 2 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFHEouWZ | 1 | 1 September 2026 | 1 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFHtQqLm | 1 | 2 September 2026 | 2 September 2026 |
| 2W5zFHzJkpR | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJ8pXLM | 1 | 31 August 2026 | 31 August 2026 |
| 2W5zFJnBgaD | 1 | 2 September 2026 | 2 September 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 3 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Почему одни ML/LLM-проекты живут в проде и приносят деньги, а другие умирают на этапе пилота? 16 сентября пройдёт онлайн-конференция «ИИ-Трансформация» от AlpinaGPT — про эффективные практики внедрения ИИ в бизнес-процессы. Впервые покажут закрытое исследование: внедрение ИИ дало больше 32,5 млн ₽ экономии в год. Андрей Дороничев (экс-Google / YouTube, основатель Bioptic) эксперты из МТС (MWS AI), Skyeng, mymeet a…
Привет! 🎸🤖 Мы в FunCorp создаём новый музыкальный технологический продукт для тех, кто поёт и играет на гитаре. Идея: дать живому музыканту возможность играть с AI так, чтобы это ощущалось как репетиция с настоящей группой — а не игра под статичную фонограмму. Ищем в команду ML-Инженера 💻 Нам нужен человек, который сам играет и по-настоящему увлечён музыкой — иначе просто не услышит, где AI звучит неправильно :) Ч…
Как будут развиваться технологии искусственного интеллекта в ближайшие годы? Какие исследовательские идеи уже превращаются в работающие продукты? С какими задачами сегодня сталкиваются AI-команды? 17 сентября в Москве пройдёт AI R&D DAY — конференция для исследователей, разработчиков, руководителей R&D-команд и специалистов, которые создают и внедряют передовые решения на основе ИИ. В центре программы — NextGenAI, п…
Готов ускорить город кодом? Участвуй в Хакатоне* Московского транспорта! • Когда: 25 сентября – 3 октября • Формат: онлайн + офлайн • Команды от 3 до 5 человек • Призовой фонд 4 000 000 ₽ Выбери свой трек из 4 актуальных задач Транспортного комплекса столицы: ✦ Резервная одометрия по модели ✦ ИИ-прогноз загрузки трамвайных маршрутов ✦ Предиктор изменений в графике движения городского транспорта ✦ Геймификация д…
🤖 AI Agent Engineering: Build a Production Coding Agent — новый курс на Mentorix Соберёте coding-агента с нуля: agent loop, tool calls, отбор контекста по репозиторию, песочница с правами и откатом. ⚙️ Внутри: устройство шага агента, самопроверка тестами, остановка там, где нужно решение человека 🧩 Практика в изолированных контейнерах, чекеры на детерминированной mock-модели — без API-ключей. Проверяется трейс аген…
Тот самый курс по ML, который прошли 200 000 человек. Теперь — в новой версии С 2016 по 2022 год специализация «Машинное обучение и анализ данных» на Coursera была входным билетом в профессию — через неё прошли больше 200 000 человек. С тех пор AI ушёл далеко вперёд, и набор тем, которые нужно знать сегодня, изменился. Поэтому Виктор Кантор с командой MLinside обновил программу и перевыпустил специализацию заново — …
Product Lead (Predictions & ML) в Adapty, $75–90k/год + бонус от роста направления, полная удалёнка Adapty — платформа монетизации подписок для мобильных приложений. Через нас проходит больше $2B подписочной выручки в год, нами пользуются больше 20 000 приложений. Мы делим продукт на стримы и сейчас собираем аналитику и ML под одного владельца. Вся мобильная реклама держится на одном разрыве: выручка от привлечённо…
🚀 Приглашаем на третий конкурс по археологии от Phystech.Genesis. 🗓 Подача заявок до 30 сентября, 23:59 мск 👨💻 Работа над решениями — октябрь–ноябрь 2026 🔝 Реальные данные — реальный вызов 🔥 Призовой фонд 30 000 000 ₽ Организаторы уже провели два конкурса— теперь очередь третьего. В нём модели участников будут находить объекты и в рельефе, и на поверхности, и под землёй — в культурном слое и материке. ⚡️ Ждём ком…
#вакансия #системныйаналитик #мидл+ #DWH #удаленка #middle Вакансия: Системный аналитик (DWH) Компания: Сентикор Солюшнс Формат: Удаленный РФ Вилка: до 355 000 гросс Аккредитованная IT-компания Centicore в поисках системного аналитика в финтехпроект Требования: Опыт работы с реляционными и нереляционными СУБД (предпочтительно GreenPlum, BDP/S3-like) Знание SQL – на уровне написания сложных запросов, знание оконн…
3 дня. 60 откликов. 1 оффер. Очень интересный кейс произошёл у команды Софи - ии-ассистента для поиска работы. К ним в поддержку написала девушка, которая отписалась от продукта ещё месяц назад: «Мне прислали оффер!» Начали разбираться - оказывается, она пользовалась только 3 тестовыми днями. То есть за 3 дня ии-ассистент успел сделать 60 откликов. Потом она отписалась. А уже позже - из этих откликов её позвал…
🔥 Твоё ИИ-решение — в одной из крупнейших энергетических компаний России Получи подготовленные данные и разработай ИИ-ассистента для энергетики на соревновании от «Интер РАО» при поддержке «Яндекса». Лучшие проекты смогут стать частью экосистемы компании. Призовой фонд — 750 000 рублей. Регистрация открыта до 27 сентября. Стартуем 28 сентября. Разработай концепт проекта: самые сильные идеи участники доработают под…
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @datasciencejobs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@datasciencejobs edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 13 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 13 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@datasciencejobs named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 4 posts, 27 August 2026 – 4 September 2026 · confirmed gone 16 September 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@foranalysts · 36,592
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
@dev_connectablejobs · 27,712
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
@KarpovCourses · 27,435
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
@ai_machinelearning_big_data · 280,944
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
@choicy_work · 26,923
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 September 2026
@ya_jobs · 32,725
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
@zarubezhom_jobs · 102,748
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
@data_secrets · 93,709
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 17 August 2026
@remotejun · 26,491
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 September 2026
@datascienceiot · 42,655
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
@young_june · 73,877
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
@relocateme · 34,242
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 3 September 2026
@Relocats · 32,719
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 5 September 2026
@data_analysis_ml · 50,594
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
@postypashki_old · 45,116
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 August 2026
@python_job_interview · 24,871
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
@jobforjunior · 84,945
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
@cryptovalerii · 30,815
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
@machinelearning_interview · 30,292
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
@llm_under_hood · 29,104
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
@gonzo_ML · 24,321
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Data Science Jobs” (@datasciencejobs), 22,024 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/datasciencejobs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.