Channel
@centroidall53608
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
841subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001634516231 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @centroidall53608 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/centroidall53608 |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 841 | +1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:03 | 840 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 841 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 839 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
86 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 33.7% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 25.6% | |
| custom 5244599271113631648 | 8 | 9.30% | |
| 🐳 | 6 | 6.98% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 5.81% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 5.81% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 5.81% | |
| custom 5197369328235730356 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.16% | |
| 🥴 | 1 | 1.16% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 86 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Новый геймджем для пользователей ИИ 😇. Проводится в рамках «Цифрового прорыва». Что-то я не помню от них активности после закрытия «Сезона ИИ», сейчас поискал и увидел, что были хакатон по противодействию фейкам, и хакатон по прикладным БЯМ-решениям в Омске 😇 Кейс(-ы), понятно, заранее не публикуются (на самом соревновании нужно будет сделать игру за 8 часов любыми способами). Я думаю так. Сам факт геймджема на 8 …
👍2
Выиграл Т-банкомат, хотя на TURBO ML CONF не пошел. Видимо, время его собирать 😅 Большое спасибо T-Bank Research за банкомат, и очень крутые лекции на школе им. Б.Т. Поляка. *в посте выше: это был мюон, но с нюансами. Слушал пятый+ раз, но каждый раз как в первый )
❤15🤣1
Posted without readable text
custom 52445992711136316486🎉1
🤖 Ваш ответ на большие вызовы! Студенты, объявляем старт приёма заявок на ежегодную научно-технологическую программу «Большие вызовы». С 9 по 29 ноября она объединит в Научно-технологическом университете «Сириус» молодых исследователей со всей страны для работы над актуальными задачами науки и технологий. Участников программы ждёт проектная работа в междисциплинарных командах, в том числе на базе масштабного лабора…
👍3
Крутая программа в Сириусе. Проекты, возможно, сейчас не известны, но рекомендую рассмотреть возможность
👍5😈1
Крутая foundation model для табличек подъехала 🎅 https://t.me/datarascals/571
🔥2
Новое слово в геймдеве - @LossMonkeyBot https://t.me/effectiveautism/52 (писят два)
🤔5🔥3
Хочу обратить внимание — при подаче заявки на стипендию Альфа-Банка, статьи дают 0.5-1 балл достижений, а выступления на конференциях - 0.25 👍 Надеюсь, публикация в proceedings конференции у них считается как статья, иначе все мл статьи остаются. (Можно предположить, что там считают, что конференции проще слопить, чем статьи — статья остается опубликованной, а конференция может быть без записи? 🤔) btw, https://t.m…
👍3
Хотелось бы написать немного инфоцыганских* мыслей в канал. За последнее время видел три источника, по разным темам, призывавших, в общем, пользоваться точным значением слов при речи и чтении источников. > Михаил Гребенюк — про предпринимательство и саморазвитие, автор проекта "Поколение" (ссылка) Апеллировал к значению и происхождению слова "точность" по словарю, чтобы подчеркнуть важность фокуса при построении пл…
❤10custom 52445992711136316482😢1
Отбор на Лето с AIRI продлили до 29 мая 10:00.
🐳6❤4
Дайджест мероприятий от «опять центроидов» на ближайшее время 🙏. До 29 мая 10:00 — дедлайн отбора на очень крутую школу по машинному обучению «Лето с AIRI». Для подачи заявки нужно написать Research Proposal. 28 мая — встреча про NGINX в НИУ ВШЭ. (Есть опции других встреч в другие дни.) 28 мая — онлайн-лекция про психометрику от Института образования ВШЭ. Полезно, чтобы узнать больше про системы оценивания. До 28…
👍7😭5custom 51973693282357303561
🎲 Как провести выходные в Уфе: Игры, турниры, квесты с призами и старт карьеры в геймдеве В воскресенье, 26 апреля, в Уфе пройдёт Фестиваль полезных игр — праздник для тех, кто любит играть, создавать игры и обучать через игровые механики. Вход свободный, по регистрации. Фестиваль объединяет три больших блока: видеоигры и настолки, фиджитал-соревнования и турниры, деловую программу. Гостей ждут конкурс детских прое…
👍2🥴1
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @centroidall53608. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“опять центроиды” (@centroidall53608), 841 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/centroidall53608.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.