Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 42 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,018–1,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 21:19
1,020
-2
14 Sept 2026, 20:18
1,022
-5
11 Sept 2026, 03:56
1,027
-2
5 Sept 2026, 22:21
1,029
-2
2 Sept 2026, 04:18
1,031
-2
27 Aug 2026, 07:35
1,033
+2
24 Aug 2026, 14:08
1,031
+3
20 Aug 2026, 23:26
1,028
-1
17 Aug 2026, 16:34
1,029
-2
14 Aug 2026, 18:28
1,031
-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:47
1,034
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:35
1,034
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 6 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
530 reactions across 14 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
157
29.6%
👍
124
23.4%
❤
74
14.0%
😁
57
10.8%
🤬
40
7.55%
💯
24
4.53%
🤨
13
2.45%
😐
10
1.89%
⚡
9
1.70%
🤩
4
0.755%
💔
3
0.566%
😱
3
0.566%
🫡
3
0.566%
👀
2
0.377%
🤣
2
0.377%
☃
1
0.189%
👎
1
0.189%
🙈
1
0.189%
🙏
1
0.189%
🤝
1
0.189%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 530 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 March 2025 to 22 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
54
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 14 we hold a reading for · 86%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yandex_guk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 March 2025 to 22 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Соотносим места показа и вид размещения.
Что к чему относится, если РСЯ отключен?
Особенно интересует:
Что такое «сети - эксклюзивное размещение».
В чем разница между «поиск - карты» и «сети - карты»?
upd
Ответ от Яндекса:
Место показа «Карты» - это смешанный вид размещения, который использует технологии Поиска и Сетей. Когда пользователь задает поисковый запрос, например «салон красоты рядом», то показ в што…
Изменение атрибуции для покупок на Озоне
Оказывается, с 1 июня поменялись правила атрибуции Яндекс Директа для заказов на Озоне.
Ранее к Директу относились все покупки в магазине после перехода с рекламы.
Теперь, если ссылка в объявлении ведёт на товар, конверсией считается покупка только этого товара или его вариаций.
Если ссылка в объявлении ведёт на магазин или каталог, то конверсией считается покупка товаров и…
Снижение вознаграждения в ЕЛаме с 1 октября (-3% с бюджета маркируемой рекламы, например, с РСЯ и Яндекс Бизнеса).
По закону о сборе 3%, если бюджеты рекламодателя проходят через агентство как доход (как в ЕЛама), то плательщиком 3% должно быть агентство, то есть ЕЛама, как «первый получатель денег» в цепочке.
Но ЕЛама, чтобы компенсировать свои траты, предлагает эти 3% удерживать с клиента или специалиста, которые…
Автотаргетинг & Ключевые фразы по одинаковым поисковым запросам.
Сравниваем показы по одним и тем же поисковым запросам в рамках одной кампании/группы. Где нужно - сверяем квалификацию лида.
И отдаем победу автотаргетингу ▪️
Меняем ссылку в Мастере кампаний (небольшой апгрейд)
1) Открываем кампанию МК в двух вкладках (в одной будем вносить изменения, из второй копировать некоторые элементы)
2) Сохраняем тексты (про этот способ с видео писала ранее, но теперь всегда слетает пятый заголовок):
- Добавляем к каждому заголовку и тексту по любому символу
- Меняем ссылку
- После везде нажимаем «Вернуть как было»
- Пятый заголовок копируем из …
День репостов
(мои последние публикации)
Чек-лист: что делать, если кампания с оплатой за конверсии не обучается (в канале «Громов о контексте»)
https://t.me/ya_gromov/516
Как продвигаться в Яндекс Картах через Директ: ответы на частые вопросы (в канале Яндекс Рекламы | Обучение)
https://t.me/yndx_ed/2822
Что делать, если у кампании, запущенной в Яндекс Картах, мало показов? (в канале Яндекс Рекламы | Обучение)
ht…
Почему результаты рекламы зависят не только от специалиста по рекламе.
В этом месяце совместно с Яндексом опубликовали две статьи по разным нишам: стоматология и производство одежды.
Оба этих направления (как и любые другие) объединяет один посыл: насколько важен комплексный подход в продвижении бизнеса.
Результаты Яндекс Директа по одному и тому же проекту могут сильно отличаться в зависимости от большого количес…
Памятка по рекламе маркетплейсов через Яндекс Директ
▪️ Доступные типы кампаний
Единая перфоманс-кампания
Мастер кампаний «Продажи на маркетплейсе»
Мастер кампаний «Конверсии и трафик» и «Товарная кампания» (с костылями)
▪️ Доступные рекламируемые страницы и типы объявлений
Для МК «Продажи на маркетплейсе»
Для Озона и Яндекс Маркета:
• прямая ссылка на МП на товары - все, один или несколько выбранных (при интегр…
❤22🔥15👍8🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @yandex_guk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Яндекс Реклама ПРО @yndx_ed · 56,438 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
Яндекс для предпринимателей @yandexbusiness · 78,837 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Яндекс Реклама @YANtech · 49,841 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Гук Светлана • Яндекс Реклама” (@yandex_guk), 1,020 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yandex_guk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.