Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Битрикс24 для бизнеса

Channel

Битрикс24 для бизнеса

@bitrix24_ru

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,332subscribers

-157 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001083358790
TypeChannel
Username@bitrix24_ru
Created11 January 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bitrix24_ru

Growth

29,33129,49929,4156 August 2026 — 29,489 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,489 subscribers6 August 2026 — 29,486 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,492 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,499 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,493 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,499 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,496 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,484 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,465 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,467 subscribers15 August 2026 — 29,465 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,457 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,426 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,413 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,410 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,405 subscribers22 August 2026 — 29,389 subscribers24 August 2026 — 29,387 subscribers25 August 2026 — 29,378 subscribers26 August 2026 — 29,364 subscribers27 August 2026 — 29,369 subscribers28 August 2026 — 29,354 subscribers29 August 2026 — 29,352 subscribers30 August 2026 — 29,345 subscribers31 August 2026 — 29,331 subscribers1 September 2026 — 29,340 subscribers2 September 2026 — 29,337 subscribers4 September 2026 — 29,338 subscribers7 September 2026 — 29,332 subscribers29,3326 August 20267 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 32 days, net -157. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,306–29,524 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 02:5629,332-6
4 Sept 2026, 08:2229,338+1
2 Sept 2026, 17:5429,337-3
1 Sept 2026, 18:2329,340+9
31 Aug 2026, 19:4729,331-14
30 Aug 2026, 18:3529,345-7
29 Aug 2026, 18:2729,352-2
28 Aug 2026, 18:3429,354-15
27 Aug 2026, 19:2829,369+5
26 Aug 2026, 16:2429,364-14
25 Aug 2026, 19:4729,378-9
24 Aug 2026, 17:5729,387-2
22 Aug 2026, 23:2329,389-16
21 Aug 2026, 12:1729,405-5
20 Aug 2026, 14:1229,410-3
19 Aug 2026, 12:5329,413-13
18 Aug 2026, 12:2629,426-31
17 Aug 2026, 09:5529,457-8
15 Aug 2026, 16:4329,465-2
14 Aug 2026, 01:4629,467first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.08%
avg views ÷ 29,332 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,370
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026
Posts held29 (27 July 20264 September 2026)
Views total42,680
Reactions total505
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Sept 2026, 01:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 36s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

718 reactions across 29 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥13518.8%
😁10314.3%
9413.1%
❤‍🔥8111.3%
👍719.89%
🤩405.57%
👏375.15%
🤝375.15%
💯314.32%
👌121.67%
🎉111.53%
🤨91.25%
custom 535708022546314958881.11%
👎70.975%
🤓70.975%
50.696%
🏆50.696%
😎50.696%
🤔50.696%
🥰50.696%
5 further kinds101.39%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 718 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 29 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bitrix24_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,150 views22 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

ИИ в компании есть у всех. А что по пользе, коллеги? Малому и среднему бизнесу можно начать с нескольких сценариев, которые с минимальными затратами закроют до 80% автоматизации и при этом не требуют найма программистов: 🟣 Берите не любую задачу, а ту, что съедает время каждый день: типовые отчёты, однотипные ответы клиентам, подготовка КП. 🟣 Не изобретайте велосипед: хватит готового решения, встроенного в почту

7custom 53570802254631495886👍5👏2💯2

2 Sept 2026, 09:50 UTC≈1,500 views17 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

Работаем так же четко, как хотим, чтобы работала наша экипировка на человеке Dragonfly — производитель одежды и экипировки для экстремальных видов спорта и активного отдыха из Екатеринбурга. Команда отвечает за полный цикл производства: от выкройки до продажи. Чтобы справляться с объемом задач и клиентов, Dragonfly перенесли работу в Битрикс24. Задачи, CRM, База знаний, мессенджер, корпоративный портал — система ин

🔥7❤‍🔥5👍31🤗1

1 Sept 2026, 07:54 UTC≈1,780 views55 reactionsread 7 September 2026

А у кого день начался не с Битрикс24? Собираем реакции для поддержки всех, кто вместе с рабочим днем стартанул и новый учебный год. 🤝 Это я. Работа + школа 🔥 Только работа 👍 Напишу вариант в комментариях

🔥33🤝14👍51👌1👏1

31 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,980 views23 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Forwarded from @egoshin_kedprofVideo

Подкаст с AI-лидом в Битрикс24: как делать продукты на ИИ-агентах и не сломаться в проде У меня в гостях Сергей Нотевский - руководитель AI-платформы в Битрикс24. Команда Сергея отвечает за ИИ-инфраструктуру из 100+ GPU, на которой работают он-прем модели и автономные агенты крупнейшего бизнес-сервиса страны. А еще я называю Сергея "отцом кэширования контекста в России") Так как он разработал опенсорс скилл по этой

🔥106🤩4🤝2🏆1

28 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC≈2,280 views26 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

Руководители, проверка связи 👍 — было 😂 — буквально сегодня 🔥— все мы немного Пыльный Глеб Пользуясь случаем, напоминаем про пост выше

😁15🔥7👍4

27 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈2,530 views13 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Я думал, это твоя задача И другие фразы, из-за которых горят дедлайны. Записали короткий видеокурс — 7 уроков про то, как перестать терять задачи и договорённости: 🌀 как ставить задачи, чтобы их не переспрашивали (есть и лайфхаки с ИИ) 🌀 как сотруднику не забывать поручения и видеть, что важно прямо сейчас 🌀 как руководителю контролировать всё без вечного «ну как там, готово?» 🌀 как работать вместе над проектами

👍63🔥3😁1

26 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC≈2,330 views29 reactionsread 7 September 2026

Выбираем самую жизненную жизнь 👌— задачи теряются где-то между «обсудили на встрече» и «ну я думал, ты сделаешь» 🤝 — договорились, но никто не записал, и теперь у каждого своя версия реальности 🔥 — приходится лично догонять каждого с вопросом «ну как там, готово?» 👍— сотрудник говорит «вы не говорили», а ты точно помнишь, что говорил. 🙏 — задачи есть, сроки есть, но кто за что отвечает — загадка вселенского масштаба

💯18🔥5👌3🤝2😁1

25 Aug 2026, 14:55 UTC≈2,380 views50 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

🌴Ответ очевиден

😁27👏97❤‍🔥2🔥2🤨1🤩1🥰1

24 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,720 views12 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

А вы куда? На Кудыкину Гору 😎 Рассказываем, как туристический комплекс и сафари-парк «Кудыкина Гора» объединил все клиентские процессы в едином контуре. Команде помог наш партнер-интегратор «Первый Бит». ✔Автоматизация бронирования объектов размещения Для гостиницы, домиков, банного комплекса и других объектов были настроены отдельные воронки в CRM. Теперь заявки с сайта автоматически попадают в систему и превраща

4👍4❤‍🔥2🔥1😁1

21 Aug 2026, 08:18 UTC≈2,470 views20 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Photo

Это что, ИИ-диспетчер? 😱 Рассказываем, как компании автоматизируют рутину с помощью Битрикс24 Вайбкод — «Финтерия» разработали собственного ИИ-ассистента для постановки задач. — «Цифровой Поток» создали приложение по контролю поставок материалов. — Alister сделали отдельное приложение для автоматизации графиков оплат и контроля дебиторской задолженности. Смотрите подробности в карточках и делитесь своими кейсами

👍6🤨3❤‍🔥2🔥2🎉1💔1💯1🤔1

20 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC≈2,680 views82 reactionsread 7 September 2026

Говорят, что сегодня День Лени Поставьте реакцию, если вы его не заметили, потому что работали.

😁41🔥12💯10🤝7😎4👌3custom 53570802254631495882🎉1

19 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC≈2,730 views34 reactionsread 7 September 2026
Video

Собери главное из обсуждения в чате Рома попросил, а BitrixGPT сделал😎 Забрал всю рутину на себя и помог сосредоточиться на важных проектах. Смотрите подробнее в ролике и ставьте 🔥 за такую автоматизацию процессов.

🔥158👍5👌2😁2👏1🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @bitrix24_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 08:47 UTCAnonymous Poll134 voters

Где вы читаете деловые новости? 🧐

  1. Коммерсантъ15%
  2. Ведомости5%
  3. Forbes21%
  4. РБК42%
  5. Известия4%
  6. ТАСС7%
  7. Rusbase2%
  8. Inc1%
  9. Напишу свой вариант в комментариях37%

The shares total 134%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 13 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Олег Шевелев
@olegcloser · 35,047
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Александр Высоцкий
@alexander_visotsky · 36,939
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
Нескучные Финансы
@noboring_finance · 66,324
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Яндекс для предпринимателей
@yandexbusiness · 79,030
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Битрикс24 для бизнеса” (@bitrix24_ru), 29,332 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bitrix24_ru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.