Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Индекс дятла

Channel

Индекс дятла

@dindex

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,246subscribers

-67 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001446285740
TypeChannel
Username@dindex
Created7 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/dindex

Growth

22,24622,31322,279.56 August 2026 — 22,313 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,305 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,300 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,291 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,275 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,262 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,255 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,259 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,260 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,256 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,258 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,256 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,252 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,251 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,246 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 16 days, net -67. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,236–22,323 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 09:4422,246-5
21 Aug 2026, 00:3222,251-1
20 Aug 2026, 01:5222,252-4
18 Aug 2026, 22:5822,256-2
16 Aug 2026, 18:3422,258+2
15 Aug 2026, 09:1822,256-4
14 Aug 2026, 00:3522,260+1
12 Aug 2026, 15:1622,259+4
11 Aug 2026, 13:3422,255-7
10 Aug 2026, 14:5122,262-13
9 Aug 2026, 12:3122,275-16
8 Aug 2026, 08:3622,291-9
7 Aug 2026, 08:2222,300-5
6 Aug 2026, 10:5022,305-8
6 Aug 2026, 02:4722,313first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.22%
avg views ÷ 22,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,050
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held27 (20 July 202621 August 2026)
Views total45,147
Reactions total952
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 08:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,199 reactions across 27 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍42335.3%
🔥41034.2%
31326.1%
🤔342.84%
👏141.17%
🤯50.417%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,199reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 27 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dindex. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
3.70%
1 of 27 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,280
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,150
over 26 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
22W5zFJg5xxZ128 July 202628 July 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC837 views30 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Один или трое — С какой цены начинать? — спросил фаундер — Зависит от количества людей в комнате В 2014 году Uber привлекал инвестиции. Рынок грозился вот-вот схлопнуться и команда уговаривала основателя взять первое предложение на 6 ярдов. Он отказался и через 2 месяца закрыл сделку на 17. В торгах это называют правилом комнаты. Если покупатель один — начинайте высоко. Цифра становится потолком, дальше вас будут

🔥149👍5🤔2

20 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC≈1,120 views30 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Премортем — А какие риски видите? — спросил фаундера — Да вроде никаких Оптимизм — золото для стартаперов. Если к нему прилагается управление рисками — вообще бесценно. Самый просто способ увидеть их — похоронить проект. Задаем себе вопрос: «Прошел год, продукт провалился, мы сидим на разборе. Что пошло не так?» Выписываем 20 причин. Из этого списка берем три, которые можно проверить за неделю за копейки. Через не

🔥18👍74🤯1

18 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈1,610 views66 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026

Пирамидка желаний За 20 лет варения в венчуре я познакомился с тысячами стартаперов. Интересно, что успеха добиваются те, кто движется по такой лесенке желаний: 1. Хочу разобраться в какой-то штуке. Есть интерес — нужно его накормить. 2. Хочу продукт. Сделать из хаотичной деятельности повторяемую, полезную штуку. Желательно еще и масштабируемую. 3. Хочу команду. Оказывается в продукте дофига стульев и если сидеть н

32🔥24🤔6👍4

17 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈1,830 views44 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Пролитый кофе — В письме битые ссылки. Это фейл, — пожаловался маркетолог — Так преврати его в подарок В 1966 году один ученый показал зрителям две записи викторины. На одной финалист опрокидывал на себя чашку кофе, на другой — нет. Первая им понравилась больше. Но вот если кофе проливал середнячок — симпатия к нему падала. Маркетологи чухнули это и превратили в прием «oops-email». Так Virgin Voyages за месяц до Ч

19👍14🔥9🤔2

14 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC≈2,080 views37 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026

Понять, улучшить, причастить — О чем писать? — спросил фаундер — Пиши, зачем сделал продукт Заметил, что люди с выручкой, командой, инвесторами не могут ответить, нафига все это замутили. Отсюда рождается беспомощность в историях и рекламе. А ведь есть всего 4 ответа, которые хотят слышать люди 1. Проблема. Сара Блейкли ненавидела. как колготки выглядят под белыми брюками — отрезала носки и сделала Spanx. Тоби Лют

20🔥8👍4🤔4🤯1

12 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈2,190 views50 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026

10 лет опыта против одного кейса — У меня 15 лет опыта, а выбрали новичка, — пожаловался продакт — А ты кейсы его видел? Мы научились пилить лендинги (спасибо ИИ) и пихаем туда логотипы, образование, бренды, а некоторые — даже хобби. Работает это хреново — у каждого появился красочный уголок тщеславия. Один маркетолог очень хотел попасть в AirBnB. У него был солидный стаж, крупные бренды и известные люди за плечам

🔥33👍106🤔1

11 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈2,150 views59 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Антимаркетинг — У нас копеешный бюджет, — сказал фаундер. — Как потратить? — Купи историю В июле наблюдал всплеск сумасшествия. Стартап Gumloop потратил маркетинговый бюджет на уличных музыкантов. Дали трубачам, скрипачам и прочим по $100, чтобы играли около офисов конкурентов, отраслевых конференций и мест скопления ЦА с табличкой бренда. Результат — сотни восторженных комментариев и 20% к продажам. В тех же мест

👍3310🤔10🔥6

8 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC≈2,370 views57 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Дети пурпурной линии — Собрал продукт за неделю, — похвастался фаундер. — Клод говори, что пушка — А сам-то как думаешь? В 2009-м у самолета Air France отключился автопилот. Летчикам стало казаться, что машина идет вниз и они три минуты тянули штурвал на себя. Задрали нос и привели к реальном падению. Таких ситуаций с 90-х было несколько десятков. Выросло поколение пилотов, обучавшихся на тренажерах. Они безупречн

👍36🔥129

7 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC≈2,240 views36 reactionsread 22 August 2026

M&Ms — менеджмент — Как уследить за всеми? — спросил фаундер стартапа. — В неделю по десять новых сотрудников выходит. — По быстрым сигналам Менеджер группы Van Halen требовал, чтобы за кулисами музыкантов ждала тарелка M&Ms без единого коричневого драже. «Звездный выпендреж», — подумал я. Оказалось — хитрый метод управления. «Если мы видели хоть одну коричневую конфету — проверяли все. Организатор на площадке не

👍295🔥1🤔1

6 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈2,100 views100 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026

Индекс дятла — Что останется человеку, когда ИИ научится писать, кодить и придумывать лучше нас? — спросил сын — Долбить Последние 5,5 лет каждый день я писал пост. Большинство — фигня; а некоторые разошлись стотысячными тиражами. Повторить это сейчас сложнее. Из-за ИИ. Когда начинаешь новое дело — проходишь путь: 1. Вау, первый результат. Сейчас захватим мир 2. Блин, не все так просто 3. Да нихрена я в этом не по

58👍26🔥12👏2🤔2

4 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC≈2,230 views29 reactions1 Starread 22 August 2026

Порог — Ты ж конверсию рубишь. Выпендриваешься? — пожурил маркетолог — Нет, ставлю порог В феврале я набирал людей на новую программу и написал в объявлении, кого не жду: «просто посмотреть» — иди в Ютуб; «расширить кругозор» — купи билет в музей; «подумаю» — читай Сократа. Казалось, что добавил трение. Но ведь оно бывает двух сортов: 1. Бюрократическое. Двенадцать поле, ИНН, «менеджер свяжется в течение 3 дней».

👍15🔥86

3 Aug 2026, 06:57 UTC≈2,260 views77 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Подскажи, куда идти — Двадцать встреч, все послали, — пожаловался фаундер — А ты спросил, куда идти? Предприниматели слышат «нет» в 4-10 раз чаще, чем «да». И дальше, начинают отрабатывать возражения — почему не подошло, чего не хватает, что добавить... Так усаживают клиента на скамью подсудимых. И чтобы спрыгнуть, он называет первые попавшиеся, безопасные причины — дорого, вернемся в сентябре и, конечно, подумаю.

🔥46👍1714

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @dindex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,169 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 80,150
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 175,593
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
Упал, поднялся — блог Славы Рюмина
@ruminblog · 61,549
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Корытин выкручивает конверсии
@nmiacm · 60,466
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Максим Спиридонов
@mspiridonov · 64,213
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 August 2026
Дизраптор
@disruptors_official · 71,491
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Нескучные Финансы
@noboring_finance · 65,825
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Индекс дятла” (@dindex), 22,246 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dindex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.