Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мастерская Продуктовой стратегии Безуглого Дмитрия

Channel

Мастерская Продуктовой стратегии Безуглого Дмитрия

@product_advices

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,237subscribers

-136 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001083045286
TypeChannel
Username@product_advices
DescriptionКанал о создании и развитии цифровых продуктов и систем Автор канала - Дмитрий Безуглый (@Cless75), стратегический консультант, основатель Стратегической мастерской (http://master-strategy.ru/). По вопросам размещения рекламы просьба не беспокоить.
CreatedBetween 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/product_advices

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,2376,3736,3056 August 2026 — 6,373 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,372 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,358 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,348 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,345 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,340 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,335 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,327 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,320 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,315 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,305 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,289 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,287 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,281 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,285 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,280 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,279 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,274 subscribers18 October 2026 — 6,264 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,260 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,246 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,240 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,247 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,245 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,237 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net -136. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,217–6,393 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 21:116,237-8
2 Nov 2026, 18:586,245-2
31 Oct 2026, 03:526,247+7
27 Oct 2026, 21:106,240-6
24 Oct 2026, 14:066,246-14
21 Oct 2026, 16:346,260-4
18 Oct 2026, 03:146,264-10
14 Oct 2026, 23:516,274-5
11 Oct 2026, 22:426,279-1
5 Oct 2026, 09:546,280-5
26 Sept 2026, 21:376,285+4
17 Sept 2026, 23:176,281-6
13 Sept 2026, 21:406,287-2
9 Sept 2026, 20:406,289-16
4 Sept 2026, 15:166,305-10
1 Sept 2026, 09:056,315-5
29 Aug 2026, 05:436,320-7
25 Aug 2026, 22:126,327-8
22 Aug 2026, 12:266,335-5
19 Aug 2026, 05:356,340first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 4 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.58%
avg views ÷ 6,237 subscribers
Avg views / post
473
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held25 (4 May 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total1,419
Reactions total64
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
370
Videos
17
Links
474

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10m 31s
Average length
2m 38s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

275 reactions across 22 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12043.6%
🔥7527.3%
👍4516.4%
⚡207.27%
👀41.45%
👌31.09%
🎉20.727%
👏20.727%
👎10.364%
😁10.364%
🙊10.364%
🥰10.364%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
4.00%
1 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
878
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
905
over 23 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjcUM6MY115 May 202615 May 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 4 May 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC320 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Лучше сделанное чем идеальное )) Сегодня в 17:00 МСК — открытая встреча «Работа с будущим». Небольшой вопрос перед встречей. Вспомните ситуацию, когда вы уже понимали, что обстоятельства изменились, но продолжали действовать привычным способом. Что мешало изменить действия? Недостаток информации, неопределённость последствий или необходимость пересмотреть сами основания выбора? Сегодня разберём, как формируется буду…

❤2🎉2👏2

2 Nov 2026, 11:38 UTC420 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

В предыдущем посте я рассказал о результатах эксперимента над собой: солопренёрство, личные перемены, перестройка работы и параллельное развитие собственной системы инструментов с ИИ — экзокортекса. Краткое резюме: не работает )) Точнее, не работает попытка одновременно менять слишком многое, не имея устойчивых точек опоры. В конце поста я затронул различие между двумя типами изменений. Адаптивные изменения — когда м…

❤6🔥4👀1😁1

22 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC679 views46 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Адаптивные и трансформационные изменения В последние месяцы много сообщений, остались без ответа , в том числе от реально близких людей. По сути в параллель с консалтингом шла большая внутренняя перестройка, и на коммуникацию не было внутреннего ресурса. Спасибо всем, кто поздравил меня с днём рождения. Мне было тепло от слов и внимания , но нечего сказать в ответ, а дежурные фразы я не люблю чуть чуть меньше чем н…

🔥37❤9

9 Sept 2026, 11:58 UTC≈1,100 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

10–11 сентября буду на ProductSense’26 И снова без доклада. Раньше мне казалось диким подаваться за 5-6 месяцев, но сейчас темы в фокусе глубокого интереса значимо двигаются значимо за 2 недели. И не вижу смысла выступать с "протухшей" или сырой для меня темой в принципе. Нужны более значимые результаты )) Пойду смотреть как молодые "колышут басы" и ловить сигналы в клуарах ) От организаторов: В этом году конфе…

❤6👍4

7 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC≈1,250 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Сегодня в 17:00 — второе открытое событие летней мастерской. Тема: сигналы и тренды. Разбираем три вещи: чем сигнал отличается от шума и по каким двум критериям его отбирают; почему интуиция систематически ошибается там, где нужна точность; как тренд разваливается надвое при первой же проверке наблюдениями. Работаем с материалом участников, а не с примерами со слайдов. Если за эту неделю вам попадалось что-то, что по…

❤10👀3👍1

18 Jul 2026, 12:18 UTC≈1,410 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Точки притяжения вместо прогнозов Когда ИИ пишет «стратегию» за минуту, ценность в работе над управленческими решениями смещается. Возможностей избыток — главная работа выбрать, на чём сфокусироваться, и не придумать еще одну галлюцинацию и запутать себя. 22 июля открываем летний поток мастерской «Стратегия компании, Форсайт и Экосистема» — для тех, кто создаёт продукты и развивает компании. Первая сессия открытая. Ч…

❤3🔥3👌2⚡1

4 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC≈1,380 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Выложил в открытый доступ инструмент, который гоняю у себя каждый день, — движок расшифровки речи и разметки по спикерам. Что делает: берёт запись встречи, превращает в текст с таймкодами (faster-whisper), разделяет реплики по говорящим (pyannote) и узнаёт голоса по «отпечатку» (voiceprint). Можно поднять свой узел, задать в конфиге свои источники и приёмники — и раскидать обработку на несколько машин. Хорошо работа…

⚡9❤9🔥6👍2

4 Jul 2026, 13:14 UTC≈1,020 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Написал первое письмо под брендом SapioDo . Коротко суть: доступ к знанию мы выиграли — а способность им пользоваться, кажется, теряем. Сначала знание охраняли гейткиперы, потом его обрушил в цене интернет, а теперь пришёл третий соблазн — «спросил ИИ = знаю». Но ИИ собирает, а не проверяет. Проверяет практик. Там же рассказал, почему закрываю бо́льшую часть курсов — и почему это не про провал, а про сдвиг: от «запи…

❤8👍3🔥1

2 Jul 2026, 10:25 UTC≈1,010 views26 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Начинаю здесь регулярную историю — по-честному я устал строить "маркетинговую поверхность ", и быть сапожником без сапог ) Я строю платформу для работы со знаниями. Не «запускаю» и не «презентую» — строю, каждый день постараюсь рассказывать что получается что нет . И буду показывать процесс и методологию без глянца: что уже работает, что сломано, что понял по дороге. Где я сейчас : — рабочее ядро живёт на lab.maste…

❤13🔥9👍3🥰1

2 Jul 2026, 09:47 UTC905 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Не благодарите! Если вдруг есть что спросить у Fable, спрашивайте! У вас на это есть в рамках аккаунта клода ровно пять дней.

❤4

26 Jun 2026, 12:34 UTC≈1,200 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Хочу поделиться хорошей новостью: вместе с коллегами мы собираем единый каталог продуктовых каналов — открытую подборку, куда может попасть любой автор, который пишет о продукте. Наш канал уже внутри, и мне важно рассказать вам, зачем всё это. В нашей теме много сильных авторов: про продукт, исследования, метрики, управление командами и карьеру. Но найти их непросто — хорошие каналы рассыпаны по всему Telegram, а бо…

🔥6👍4❤3👎1

15 Jun 2026, 07:56 UTC≈1,110 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @LogachevaEQPhoto

😂👍👍❤️👌😅😊😊😍😘 15 июня в 18:00 ч. Приглашаю вас обсудить тему: «Как делегировать, когда всё вокруг меняется: доверие, контроль и результат в нестабильные периоды» Обсудим, как продавать идеи, ставить задачи и сохранять команду, когда приоритеты постоянно меняются. Где проходит граница между микроменеджментом и поддержкой? Как не выгорать, когда ответственность остаётся, а контроль приходится отпускать? У меня в гостя…

❤5👍5🔥3👌1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @product_advices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🔥 Дмитрий Ирешев: AI • Продукты • Проекты
@dmitrii_ireshev_Agile_PMP · 35,203
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
RUTUBE | Лучшее
@rutubeshow · 17,334
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 September 2026
Про Управление
@ProYpravlenca · 34,269
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 6 September 2026
Black product owner | Тигран Басеян о продакт менеджменте и стартапах
@blackproduct · 21,363
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Product Management & AI
@ruspm · 25,022
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 14 September 2026
Epic Growth — рост продуктов
@epicgrowth · 26,083
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 September 2026
Индекс дятла
@dindex · 22,235
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 21 September 2026
ProductDo: практика продакта
@productdo · 24,917
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 17 September 2026
Fresh Product Manager
@FreshProductGo · 19,876
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 29 September 2026
Продукторий Владимира Меркушева
@vladimir_merkushev · 21,847
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 September 2026
Нормально делай, нормально будет / Саша Клименко
@normalno_delaj · 21,619
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 September 2026
GoPractice!
@gopractice · 29,394
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 9 September 2026
pmclub — учим управлять
@pmclub · 20,714
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 September 2026
Про Проекты и карьеру в ИТ | Романова
@proProject1 · 40,198
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мастерская Продуктовой стратегии Безуглого Дмитрия” (@product_advices), 6,237 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/product_advices.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.