Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +121. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,180–17,427 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 17:56
17,374
-24
16 Sept 2026, 13:20
17,398
+2
14 Sept 2026, 20:37
17,396
+6
13 Sept 2026, 10:22
17,390
+7
11 Sept 2026, 10:39
17,383
+9
8 Sept 2026, 18:17
17,374
-11
5 Sept 2026, 10:20
17,385
+6
3 Sept 2026, 13:41
17,379
-2
1 Sept 2026, 06:54
17,381
-6
31 Aug 2026, 03:59
17,387
+4
30 Aug 2026, 04:04
17,383
+10
29 Aug 2026, 03:54
17,373
-5
28 Aug 2026, 02:33
17,378
-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:26
17,381
+11
26 Aug 2026, 08:55
17,370
+2
25 Aug 2026, 07:42
17,368
+2
24 Aug 2026, 07:55
17,366
+11
22 Aug 2026, 17:18
17,355
-2
21 Aug 2026, 10:02
17,357
-1
20 Aug 2026, 12:04
17,358
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.28%
avg views ÷ 17,374 subscribers
Avg views / post
744
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.74%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
28 (25 June 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
3,719
Reactions total
139
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:18 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
763 reactions across 28 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
303
39.7%
❤
218
28.6%
👍
83
10.9%
😁
46
6.03%
👏
24
3.15%
👌
19
2.49%
😍
18
2.36%
🆒
15
1.97%
🍾
14
1.83%
😱
13
1.70%
🤝
10
1.31%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 763 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
3.57%
1 of 28 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,740
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,450
over 27 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGZ7ND7
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 27 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Человек 50 написали мне с одним и тем же вопросом
После поста про поездку в Точка Банк почти все спрашивали одно: что там было конкретно и что я оттуда вынес.
Честно, не ожидал такого интереса) Но я и сам не ожидал, что программа окажется настолько плотной.
«Стажировка» — это не экскурсия по офису и не выступление со сцены. Ты садишься рядом с лидерами кругов и разбираешь, как у них на самом деле устроены найм, пр…
Двадцать писем, три встречи — и вы разбираетесь в маркетинге лучше своего маркетолога
Множество разговоров с предпринимателями про привлечение клиентов — про одно и то же. Маркетинг работает плохо, все клиенты приходят по сарафану или по рекомендациям.
То есть по неуправляемым каналам. Ну не можем мы удвоить там бюджет и получить рост продаж.
А приводит это к тому, что в кризис заказы падают — и вы ничего с этим с…
Что делать собственнику, когда выручка начала падать
В 2026 году каждый собственник столкнулся с падением продаж. Очевидно, что на бизнес влияют кризис, ограничения в продвижении и снижение платёжеспособности клиентов.
Но самое страшное для собственника, что команда не знает, как изменить ситуацию. Она что-то тестирует, усиливает продажи, но выручка не растёт.
В этот момент собственнику важно не давить на команду,…
Команда, привет!
Хочу поделиться как поучаствовал в бизнес-стажировке в Точка Банке. Впервые за долгое время был не спикером, а учеником
Обычно это я стою у доски и разбираю чужие бизнесы. А тут я внимательно слушал.
Меня пустили внутрь всех отделов компании и рассказили пошагово как они работают. Особенно круто прошла часть в отделе продаж. Не «презентация о том, как у нас всё классно устроено», а по-настоящему: …
Новый бизнес — самый дорогой способ не решать старую задачу
Часто вижу одну и ту же картину. Бизнес работает несколько лет, выручка стоит на месте, собственник подустал — и запускает что-то новое. Другой рынок, свежее направление, «вот там-то точно пойдёт».
У нас в сообществе «Команда А» я провожу открытые разборы бизнеса. На одном разбирали бухгалтерскую компанию: у собственницы 16 лет опыта, чуть больше 60 клиент…
Сейчас, чтобы продать, мы с командами часто идём в холодные звонки и рассылки.
И часто у своих ребят вижу одну и ту же картину: отправили одно сообщение, позвонили пару раз, конверсии нет — бросили.
У нас в сообществе «Команда А» был созвон с Ольгой Бондаревой, основателем агентства Modum Up. Как раз про это.
Решил поделиться важными инсайтами с вами всеми:
Ольга показала цифры по своим проектам: одно сообщение д…
Всем хорошего воскресенья!
У меня классные новости: я вошёл в совет директоров компании Metta (https://www.metta.ru/). Лидер в России на рынке офисных кресел, с выручкой более 4 млрд и невероятно амбициозными планами роста. Вместе мы строим международный Health Tech-бренд для тех, кто много работает и хочет, чтобы это не вредило здоровью!
Я помогаю с формированием топ-команды в России, Турции, Германии и других стр…
Мой самый сильный рост случился не внутри компании
Слушайте, честно: всё, что я делал сам, росло линейно. А скачки каждый раз приходили от людей, которые мне формально конкуренты.
Миша Воронин строит «Атланты», я строю «Команду А». Бьёмся за одного и того же предпринимателя. А в июне я выступал у него в Сочи — полный зал, люди стояли в проходах.
В одиночку я бы такую конференцию не собрал.
Вот мысль, до которой я…
Отправьте своему руководителю, а то че он молчит!
Британские учёные добрались до обратной связи на рабочем месте. И это не опрос и не очередная колонка — настоящий эксперимент, опубликованный в Management Science. Всё по-взрослому.
Читал и расстраивался. Не потому, что я против обратной связи — я как раз двумя руками за. А потому, что в описанных ситуациях слишком часто узнавал себя.
А дочитав, поймал себя на стра…
«Если мне заблокируют Claude, я перееду в другую страну!»
Это сказал мне друг-предприниматель, который широко использует нейросети в своём бизнесе. А мало того, что Claude не открывается без VPN, так ещё он иногда блокирует пользователей из РФ, если видит подозрительную активность.
Как же я его понимаю!
Всё потому, что раньше в бизнесе мы мыслили только результатами — есть прибыль или нет, остальное вторично. Но с…
Вчера выступал в Волгограде на Альфа-Конфе!
Альфа-Банк как всегда круто все организовал и пришло почти 2000 человек! Я со сцены обещал зрителям скинуть памятку — про то, как создать видение компании и нанять сильных людей.
Держите, готово!
Это не конспект, а рабочая тетрадь. Первая часть — как сформулировать видение, чтобы за ним шли: три упражнения и поля для заполнения. Вторая — восемь шагов найма сильных: где и…
🔥13❤3🍾1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @howtomake10x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 27 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Кирилл Фомичев @fomichevkirill · 28,567 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 September 2026
Телеграмма от Максима Юрина @yumaks · 42,473 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 29 August 2026
Павел Гительман @potok_gitelman · 38,135 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026
Кутергин в огне 🔥 @kutergin_on_fire · 61,804 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Мир без границ с Кондрашовым @kondrworld · 54,211 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Sokolovskiy @sokolay · 109,626 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 August 2026
Чирков Максим @maxchirtop · 49,652 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 August 2026
Демидов сейчас @justdemidovit · 43,579 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 6 September 2026
Mikhail Tokovinin @mtokovinin · 108,209 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 15 August 2026
Гуринович делится! @gurinovich_shares · 29,494 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Александр Кравцов | Следующий уровень @akravtsovcom · 33,200 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
Стартап дня. Александр Горный. @startupoftheday · 60,449 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
Михаил Гребенюк @grebenukm · 258,153 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
kyrillic @kyrillic · 61,020 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
Всевидящее Шоко @vseshoko · 25,806 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 September 2026
Игорь Манн @mann_igor · 29,383 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
Без aspera @bezaspera · 73,225 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
The Edinorog 🦄 @Theedinorogblog · 43,821 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 August 2026
Оскар Хартманн @Oskar_Hartmann · 94,220 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
Kumar & Solo @solokumi · 37,644 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026
Бизнес-клуб «Атланты» @bc_atlanty · 31,376 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
Павел Недостоев / дилер впечатлений @pavelnedostoev · 30,288 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 7 September 2026
ХУЦПА <-> Женя Давыдов @hutzp · 45,406 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Вправо Вверх 📈 Михаил Табунов @bossofyourboss · 27,735 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 45 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Виталий Крылов - Команда А” (@howtomake10x), 17,374 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/howtomake10x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.