Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Игорь Манн

Channel

Игорь Манн

@mann_igor

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,509subscribers

-17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001042796156
TypeChannel
Username@mann_igor
DescriptionКлуб бизнес-помощи «Лучше!» 👉🏼 https://abit-better.ru/#tarifplan УВЕДОМЛЕНИЕ Nº 025257 https://knd.gov.ru/licenseid=675807969d804a279b29a4a2&registryType=bloggersPe
Created7 April 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mann_igor

Growth

29,50929,54529,5277 August 2026 — 29,526 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,526 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,530 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,529 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,533 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,531 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,524 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,518 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,528 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,532 subscribers16 August 2026 — 29,540 subscribers17 August 2026 — 29,545 subscribers18 August 2026 — 29,541 subscribers19 August 2026 — 29,536 subscribers20 August 2026 — 29,511 subscribers21 August 2026 — 29,516 subscribers22 August 2026 — 29,509 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net -17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,504–29,550 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 19:0729,509-7
21 Aug 2026, 12:1329,516+5
20 Aug 2026, 11:1329,511-25
19 Aug 2026, 14:3729,536-5
18 Aug 2026, 17:4329,541-4
17 Aug 2026, 17:0829,545+5
16 Aug 2026, 14:5229,540+8
14 Aug 2026, 21:0429,532+4
13 Aug 2026, 10:0429,528+10
12 Aug 2026, 11:4429,518-6
11 Aug 2026, 11:4229,524-7
10 Aug 2026, 11:1429,531-2
9 Aug 2026, 11:5129,533+4
8 Aug 2026, 11:4029,529-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:1729,530+4
7 Aug 2026, 01:4529,526no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:3929,526first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.71%
avg views ÷ 29,509 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,680
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held32 (20 July 202621 August 2026)
Views total43,807
Reactions total596
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 06:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,280
Videos
361
Links
997

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 33s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

699 reactions across 32 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥30243.2%
25035.8%
👍10615.2%
👏314.43%
😁101.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 699reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC831 views12 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

▶️ Почему вы? Не «потому что у нас качественно». Не «потому что у нас большой опыт». Не «потому что мы профессионалы». А почему клиент должен выбрать именно вас? 🗣️Это один из самых важных вопросов в бизнесе. И, как показывает практика, далеко не у всех есть на него хороший ответ. 🎤 Сегодня я отдаю вам мой эфир «Почему вы?» Разберём, как сформулировать своё отличие, проверить его и использовать так, чтобы вас бы

6🔥6

20 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC986 views10 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

В маркетинге предприниматели делают одинаковые ошибки😰 Мои наблюдения подтверждают маркетологи Лидмашины. Они часто проводят консультации и не перестают удивляться: ошибки в работе с рекламой, контентом и соцсетями как под копирку. И самое обидное — все недочёты лежат на поверхности, просто бизнесу их трудно заметить изнутри. Проверьте себя с помощью серии постов, которая вышла в телеграм-канале Лидмашины. Это

4👍3🔥3

20 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC990 views9 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Прочитал статью на РБК о том, как понимание и владение ИИ влияет на доходы сотрудников. Коротко: если ты на ты с ИИ, получать будешь больше коллег. Но при этом не отменяется необходимость владения другими навыками. ИИ - ускоритель и улучшатель. Но не волшебная таблетка. Я лично смотрю на него как на еще один навык, который надо освоить на нужном мне уровне. PS какие навыки нужны ещё? Смотри книгу «Номер 1» (лучше

👍63

19 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC≈1,220 views64 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

100 дней 100 отжиманий - ✅ Челендж изменил на 200 дней. Отжаться 61 раз за раз не смог. Пока рекорд 45. Отжимаемся дальше.

🔥42👍165👏1

19 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC≈1,290 views14 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Video

🔍 Кажется, мы немного переизобретаем наш клуб «Лучше!» 💬Мы с Александром, моим партнером по клубу сегодня сели и поговорили о том, каким должен быть «Лучше!», чтобы в него хотелось не просто заходить послушать хороший эфир. А чтобы хотелось участвовать. Меньше просто смотреть. ✔️Больше пробовать. ✔️Больше знакомиться. ✔️Больше делать вместе. Кое-что мы уже запустили — и результат оказался настолько интересным, чт

7🔥4👍3

19 Aug 2026, 06:41 UTC≈1,240 views44 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Скажи мне, какая у тебя любимая книга по маркетинг, и я скажу, какой у тебя маркетинг.

30🔥14

18 Aug 2026, 12:04 UTC≈1,370 views14 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Красивый сайт — не значит хороший. Прежде чем заняться визуалом, нужно сделать много «скучных» дел: • изучить собственный бизнес; • проанализировать предложения конкурентов; • поговорить с сотрудниками; • опросить клиентов. Только тогда сайт будет продавать. Мой соавтор, ведущий аналитик Лидмашины Тимур Азизов ни разу не пропустил подготовительный этап. Говорит, что его не заменить даже самым большим опытом. А

6👍5👏3

17 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,370 views7 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

▶️ Вы выбрали — мы начинаем По результатам голосования первой темой недели открытых эфиров стал ЛИЧНЫЙ БРЕНД И ПОЗИЦИОНИРОВАНИЕ . И это очень символично, потому что сейчас в клубе как раз идёт сезон личного маркетинга — мы глубоко разбираем, как заявлять о себе, выделяться и привлекать «своих» клиентов. Поэтому сегодня начинаем с основы основ — позиционирования. Без него не работает ни личный бренд, ни контент, ни

🔥43

14 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,590 views19 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Poll

На какую тему вы бы хотели посмотреть полезные эфиры

  1. Цели и привычки35%
  2. Личный бренд48%
  3. ИИ30%
  4. Продажи, работа с оффером, инструменты маркетинга45%

The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥114😁4

14 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,500 views18 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

🎁 Со следующей недели открываю свои эфиры для всех. ❗️но только на 7 дней На одну неделю мы откроем доступ к моим бесплатным эфирам в канале клуба бизнес-помощи «Лучше!». Будут разборы, практические темы, мои инструменты и подходы к маркетингу и бизнесу. Можно будет просто прийти, послушать, задать свой вопрос и забрать то, что пригодится именно вам. Обычно эти эфиры проходят внутри клуба. А теперь я решил сдела

🔥134👍1

13 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,550 views15 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Миссия нужна не всем. Но некоторым — обязательно☝️ Например, если бизнес растёт и набирает новичков в команду, без миссии трудно. Я уж не говорю о борьбе с конкурентами. А самое вредное, что можно сделать — придумать просто красивую миссию. В хорошем бизнесе миссия уже есть. Её просто нужно найти и сформулировать. Директор Лидмашины Анастасия Мартынова рассказала, как это сделать. Теорию и практику найдёте в кейс

8👍4🔥3

12 Aug 2026, 09:19 UTC≈1,610 views12 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

⌛ «Серьёзно? Опять не я? Ведь я же тащу все проекты на себе». Ты смотришь на повышение и внутри просто закипаешь. Потому что ты знаешь, сколько раз именно ты вытаскивал ситуацию. Когда всё горело — звонили тебе. Когда был сложный клиент — отдавали тебе. Когда нужно было срочно придумать решение — снова ты. И вот наступает момент, когда выбирают человека на ступень выше. И выбирают не тебя. Самое обидное? Иногд

🔥102

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @mann_igor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Aug 2026, 12:51 UTCAnonymous Poll194 voters

На какую тему вы бы хотели посмотреть полезные эфиры

  1. Цели и привычки35%
  2. Личный бренд48%
  3. ИИ30%
  4. Продажи, работа с оффером, инструменты маркетинга45%

The shares total 158%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 148,082 of 1,585,381entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Алексей Ситников
@drSit · 99,043
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
Радислав Гандапас
@radislavgandapascom · 53,404
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Татьяна Черниговская
@tvchernigovskya · 110,554
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
99 франков. Маркетинг
@marketolog_marketing · 82,489
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Нескучные Финансы
@noboring_finance · 65,865
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Оскар Хартманн
@Oskar_Hartmann · 94,112
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Игорь Манн” (@mann_igor), 29,509 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mann_igor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.