Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Румянцев Рулит

Channel

Румянцев Рулит

@drumyanzev

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,228subscribers

-580 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001453917782
TypeChannel
Username@drumyanzev
Created17 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 October 2026
Measurements held48
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/drumyanzev

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,22422,80822,5166 August 2026 — 22,808 subscribers7 August 2026 — 22,796 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,776 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,758 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,729 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,714 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,696 subscribers13 August 2026 — 22,684 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,668 subscribers16 August 2026 — 22,641 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,627 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,618 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,613 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,602 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,592 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,576 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,557 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,542 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,529 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,524 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,515 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,510 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,505 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,490 subscribers3 September 2026 — 22,476 subscribers5 September 2026 — 22,470 subscribers8 September 2026 — 22,438 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,423 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,411 subscribers14 September 2026 — 22,388 subscribers16 September 2026 — 22,367 subscribers18 September 2026 — 22,355 subscribers24 September 2026 — 22,306 subscribers3 October 2026 — 22,262 subscribers8 October 2026 — 22,273 subscribers12 October 2026 — 22,283 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,279 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,277 subscribers16 October 2026 — 22,270 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,252 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,247 subscribers19 October 2026 — 22,241 subscribers20 October 2026 — 22,233 subscribers21 October 2026 — 22,225 subscribers22 October 2026 — 22,224 subscribers23 October 2026 — 22,225 subscribers25 October 2026 — 22,227 subscribers26 October 2026 — 22,228 subscribers22,2286 August 202626 October 2026
48 measurements spanning 81 days, net -580. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,136–22,896 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 48
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Oct 2026, 06:4522,228+1
25 Oct 2026, 06:0922,227+2
23 Oct 2026, 11:3722,225+1
22 Oct 2026, 11:4922,224-1
21 Oct 2026, 08:4522,225-8
20 Oct 2026, 10:0622,233-8
19 Oct 2026, 09:5722,241-6
18 Oct 2026, 11:4722,247-5
17 Oct 2026, 11:4922,252-18
16 Oct 2026, 08:3522,270-7
15 Oct 2026, 08:2722,277-2
14 Oct 2026, 09:3122,279-4
12 Oct 2026, 21:3122,283+10
8 Oct 2026, 07:4022,273+11
3 Oct 2026, 17:2122,262-44
24 Sept 2026, 21:1722,306-49
18 Sept 2026, 17:5522,355-12
16 Sept 2026, 11:4122,367-21
14 Sept 2026, 19:5722,388-23
13 Sept 2026, 07:3722,411first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 85 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 22,228 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 18 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 October 2026
Posts held92 (23 July 2026 – 12 October 2026)
Views total54,020
Reactions total988
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Oct 2026, 20:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,414 reactions across 85 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,49727.7%
💯95917.7%
❤81815.1%
👍79614.7%
🤔68412.6%
😱2404.43%
🤩1893.49%
✍571.05%
❤‍🔥490.905%
🫡410.757%
💔310.573%
👏290.536%
⚡130.24%
👌80.148%
😍30.055%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,714 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 92 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drumyanzev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
2.17%
2 of 92 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
3,210
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
3,110
over 90 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VfnxxsSeAY130 September 202630 September 2026
2W5zFJyvD9T122 September 202622 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

12 Oct 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,130 views69 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Так, коллеги. Давайте немного подождем. Вот без всех этих истерик, что у нас теперь Яндекса не будет как источника трафика. ВБ и Озон живы. Последний даже раскатал свой кабинет на всех. Многие сервисы поднимаются. Такси работает, поиск работает, много чего еще работает. Спокойно. Не преувеличивайте масштаб пиздеца.

💯50❤7✍3🤔3🤩2🫡2❤‍🔥1😱1

12 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,750 views19 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Летом я писал про цифры VK AdBlogger и отдельно отметил шопсы. Это когда автор показывает товар в посте или клипе и получает процент с каждой продажи. Я тогда назвал это монетизацией доверия: человек покупает, потому что вещь посоветовал автор, которого он давно читает. Вот условия с сайта VK AdBlogger, чтобы было понятно, о каком пороге входа речь. 1. Подключиться можно от 100 подписчиков. Подходит и сообщество, и…

❤12🔥4👍3

11 Oct 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,290 views110 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥53💯42👍9⚡3👏1🫡1😱1

11 Oct 2026, 10:37 UTC≈2,660 views55 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Говорят, что уже по Мурино катаются 😁

🔥35❤11👍5🫡4

11 Oct 2026, 10:18 UTC≈2,610 views69 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Есть идея для стартапа.

👍27🔥22🤔8💯5❤3😱3🫡1

11 Oct 2026, 09:20 UTC≈2,800 views78 reactionsread 12 October 2026

После удара по дата-центру во Владимире Яндекс прилег еще сильнее, чем вчера. В метрику и директ не зайти. При этом бюджеты продолжают откручиваться, и реклама показывается. Если учесть, что Яндекс сейчас основной источник трафика, очень интересно к чему это все приведет. Допустим добьют последние дата-центры. Что тогда будет? Остановится весь Яндекс? Тогда VK реклама просто лопнет от наплыва рекламодателей, как и …

🤔40😱26❤8🔥3👍1

9 Oct 2026, 12:44 UTC≈2,920 views90 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video

Чисто я с командой в последние месяцы

💯61🔥12🤩8❤6❤‍🔥2👏1

8 Oct 2026, 13:59 UTC≈2,740 views23 reactions1 Starread 12 October 2026
Photo

Первые результаты открутки рекламы на канал в Максе. На удивление через ВК показы идут сильно бодрее Яндекса. Стоимость подписки плюс минус одинаковая. Это в узкой нише. Во ВКонтакте лучше всего пока работает автомат. Интересы мимо, но это узкая ниша. Если трафик на сайт вести, то автомат тоже дает лучше результаты, но интересы, хоть и хуже, работают. Ждем, что будет на дистанции

🔥14❤4✍3🤔2

7 Oct 2026, 16:05 UTC≈2,750 views41 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Дополню, покопался в деталях. Там интереснее, чем просто «те же объявления». 1. Реклама таргетируется не на аудиторию канала, а на конкретного человека. Система сама ищет нужных людей среди читателей разных каналов, так что в одном и том же канале каждый может видеть свою рекламу. Короче, это уже перфлюенс, а не просто таргет. 2. Объявления показываются прямо в интерфейсе под контентом каналов. 3. Есть оптимизация…

🔥27💯7❤‍🔥5👍2

7 Oct 2026, 10:35 UTC≈3,230 views69 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Photo

Вот это поворот. Яндекс вслед за VK выкатил возможность запускать таргетированную рекламу в Максе. То есть те же объявления. Если учесть, что в Яндексе обучение по сравнению с VK круто работает, то это может стать супер прорывом. Го тестить.

🔥48👍12💯8❤‍🔥1

6 Oct 2026, 15:03 UTC≈2,710 viewsread 12 October 2026
Photo

🚀 VK Реклама 2027: рабочие стратегии для роста заявок и эффективности Приглашаем рекламные агентства, специалистов по трафику и маркетологов на бесплатную офлайн-конференцию в Санкт-Петербурге! ✅ Вместе с представителями VK Рекламы разберём: 🔥 Какие инструменты, настройки и форматы креативов выбирают рекламодатели в разных категориях 🔥 Что делать, если стоимость заявки выходит за рамки KPI 🔥 Как продвигать сложные…

5 Oct 2026, 16:26 UTC≈2,580 views76 reactionsread 12 October 2026

Я много в последнее время думал о том, как устроены современные рекомендательные алгоритмы. И наконец могу это сформулировать. Нынешние ленты новостей опираются на эмоции — это ключевой фактор ухода поста или рилса в виралку. При этом эмоции надо понимать максимально широко. Это не обязательно юмор или хайп — это весь возможный спектр. Каждый раз, когда вы думаете, «залетит» ли мой пост или нет, просто проверьте е…

💯34❤22👍13🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @drumyanzev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

23 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTCAnonymous Poll296 voters

Вы участвуете в премиях и рейтингах?

  1. Да, участвую17%
  2. Нет, никогда71%
  3. Подумываю участвовать, но пока не пробовал13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

22 Sept 2026, 13:05 UTCAnonymous Poll639 voters

По последним опросам маркетологи и другие причастные к нише, больше всего боятся потерять работу из-за ИИ по сравнению с другими профессиями. А вы боитесь?

  1. Да!17%
  2. Вообще нет, ИИ меня не победить.60%
  3. Я не маркетолог и не причастный25%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Sept 2026, 17:56 UTCAnonymous Poll1,350 voters approx.

За кого голосовали?

  1. Новые люди41%
  2. КПРФ19%
  3. ЛДПР7%
  4. Справедливая Россия5%
  5. ЕДРО12%
  6. Другие партии23%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

20 Sept 2026, 11:42 UTCAnonymous Poll863 voters

Ходили на выборы?

  1. Конечно!62%
  2. Не хожу на выборы38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTCAnonymous Poll1,050 voters approx.

Сейчас многие селлеры пострадали из-за уничтожения складов и повышения отчислений маркетплейсам. Как вы думаете, начнут ли они заводить свои собственные интернет-магазины, как это было 15-20 лет назад?

  1. Да! Это наиболее разумный вариант44%
  2. Нет. Затраты все равно больше, чем на маркетплейсах35%
  3. Я не знаю.23%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

5 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTCAnonymous Poll1,010 voters approx.

Вчера и сегодня положили кучу ВПН. Вы заметили?

  1. Да. С трудом справляюсь27%
  2. Нет. Всё, как было73%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 12 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM
@dnative · 80,319
#1
Суровый Питерский форум
@surrrovo · 6,113
#2
Руслан.txt
@ruslantxt · 37,230
#3
Креатив со звездочкой
@creative · 133,737
#4
Нечаев Данил
@content_for_sales · 1,707 (as read 20 September 2026)
#5
Точка доступа к трафику
@targetingschool · 2,964 (as read 20 September 2026)
#6
#тыжэксперт
@tyzhexpert · 14,799
#7
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 46,808
#8
Корытин выкручивает конверсии
@nmiacm · 60,712
#9
Франкель про жизнь и бизнес
@ffrankel · 7,964
#10
Ленивый продюсер. Блог.
@lazyproducer · 25,757
#11
Света Афанасьева
@engageforsales · 28,622
#12
Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 254,282
#13
Молянов
@molyanov_blog · 30,673
#14
Ольга Офицерова
@smmolga · 6,108
#15
Павликов опять что-то написал
@potok_ads · 71,256
#16
Алексей Ткачук — Личный блог
@tkachuk_aliaksey · 4,680
#17
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 125,071
#18
Связи решают by Наталия Франкель
@svyzireshayut · 6,892
#19
Лоцманов на связи
@lotsmanov_channel · 7,341
#20
Маша Полуянова
@mashapoluyanova · 64,066
#21
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,545
#22
Хайлайты | Журнал про инфобиз и edtech
@infohilights · 21,026
#23
Вакансии. Суровый Питерский Форум
@surovowork · 8,170
#24
Лёша Золотов
@lexeytoday_blog · 16,884
#25
К чёрту блогерство!
@glavsasha · 4,100
#26
Запуски по Антонову
@antonov_launch · 8,884
#27
Саша Чижов
@blogsmm · 38,099
#28
Ивентология
@iventologia · 6,300
#29
Дмитрий Кот и его Маркетинг Продающий
@marketingforever · 10,209
#30
Церебро life
@cerebrotg · 19,117
#31
Максим Ильяхов (Главред)
@glvrdru · 69,374
#32
Инструменты маркетолога
@profit_maker · 45,535
#33
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 971,458
#34
Татьяна Маричева
@tm_producer · 31,095
#35
Корбут и коллеги
@coreboot_marketing · 6,796
#36
Архитектор Брендов • Ильяна Левина
@ilyana_levina · 11,033
#37
Oleg Torbosov
@TorbosovLife · 107,015
#38
лидер мнений среди удобрений
@lider · 177,102
#39
Елена Коварская: продажи из соц. сетей
@marketingprodazhi · 1,930
#40
Telegram Ads | Ирина Нумизматка
@irina_trafik · 14,959
#41
Артем Сенаторов печатает...
@senatorov_art · 30,623
#42
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,909
#43
Люся Еж
@eji4kaa · 1,680
#44
Наталья Гриценко про маркетинг
@target_nata · 21,768
#45
Вакансии. Белый EdTech&Elearn
@whiteedtechwork · 3,442 (as read 20 September 2026)
#46
Продюсирует Жуковский
@ZhukovskyPro · 1,643
#47
Инфоцыганские мемы
@infomem · 8,854
#48
Хуяркетинг | АлёМаркетинг от Алёны и ко
@WhoMarketing · 12,141
#49
Бескромный
@dbeskromny · 152,635
#50
Александр Львов
@boringmarketer · 7,590
#51
Телеграм по Антонову
@antonovtg1 · 9,431
#52
Александра Дорофеева | Бизнес в онлайн
@ed_growth · 4,109
#53
Илья Еремин | Контент-маркетинг
@bzdynko · 4,213
#54
Мумладзе считает так
@alena_mumladze · 1,471
#55
Продажи в переписке. Говорухин
@money_from_text · 11,669
#56
Мари про новости
@mari_novosti · 6,217
#57
Полина Бондарева про контекст
@pbondareva · 19,542
#58
Мари, ну что?
@mari_vse · 18,477
#59
Аяз
@AyazShabutdinov · 178,294
#60
Гавриков Говорит про: маркетинг, бизнес, саморазвитие
@gavrikovgovorit · 12,732
#61
Коллекция дней Тимы
@timkadyrovvv · 17,356
#62
Гнусный Маркетинг
@gnusnyi_marketing · 6,847
#63
Седа Каспарова
@Seda_Kasparova_news · 255,965
#64
ПроПродукт для образованцев
@proproduct_edtech · 791
#65
Богдан Ефремов
@bogdanmarketing · 6,876
#66
Сделаемская школа
@sdelaem_education · 12,754
#67
Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 172,697
#68
Кайф-сёрфинг. 💰 + ❤️
@kaifsurfing · 4,122
#69
Канал TargetHunter
@targethunter · 10,205
#70
Ксения Гладышева-Колтуненко
@ksugladysheva · 369
#71
Про трафик без прогрева | блог Red Bananas
@redbananas_tg · 2,985
#72
Дарья Манелова 🧠💵
@dariamanelova · 8,554
#73
Диджитал-склад
@digital_storage · 2,835
#74
Телеграф Сургая | Вайб-маркетинг
@surgaygraf · 10,335
#75
Реклама заработает: маркетинг с Иваном Варламовым
@sales_smb · 8,567
#76
Академия Студии Чижова
@chizhov_academy · 1,707
#77
{Иноземцев}
@boringeditor · 3,648
#78
Тёмная сторона / Темнографика
@temno · 79,351
#79
Mikhail Tokovinin
@mtokovinin · 108,772
#80
Ласло про клубы
@gabany · 3,398
#81
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,617
#82
Антон Власов
@vlasov_blog · 5,057
#83
Максим Спиридонов
@mspiridonov · 68,684
#84
Белый канал
@firstwhitechannel · 3,351
#85
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 571,291
#86
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 123,811
#87
Ну ок, допустим by Франкель
@nu_ok_dopustim · 872
#88
Канал Ирины Подрез
@ipodrez · 29,145
#89
PODREZ EDUCATION
@podrezeducation · 7,425
#90
Мемперия Катерины Побоженко | Шаблоны и оригиналы | Мемы в REELS
@formemas · 208,564
#91
Мария Губина | Растить экспертный бизнес и не кукукнуться
@maria_azconsult · 9,270
#92

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM
@dnative · 80,319
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 August 2026
Церебро life
@cerebrotg · 19,117
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 October 2026
Слава КРАСАВА
@smmmarketolog · 19,177
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
Фадеевщина | ffad.ru
@ffadru · 25,921
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 23 September 2026
Маша Полуянова
@mashapoluyanova · 64,066
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Павликов опять что-то написал
@potok_ads · 71,256
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
Роман Тарасенко
@romarketing · 22,418
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 September 2026
Алина говорит
@alina_telling · 28,342
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 46,808
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026
Корытин выкручивает конверсии
@nmiacm · 60,712
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
SMM с Дамиром Халиловым
@damirkhalilov · 23,137
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Кудряшов Дмитрий
@redsmm · 22,036
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 September 2026
Трус Юлия про бизнес
@trusprobusiness · 37,311
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Максонская ложа (Канал)
@nomarketolog · 26,998
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
Саша Чижов
@blogsmm · 38,099
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
Камилла про бизнес и маркетинг
@camilla_business · 18,739
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 October 2026
Света Афанасьева
@engageforsales · 28,622
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Хайлайты | Журнал про инфобиз и edtech
@infohilights · 21,026
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
Ленивый продюсер. Блог.
@lazyproducer · 25,757
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 172,697
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 12 August 2026
Промт дня (Приручаем ChatGPT, Midjourney и другие нейросети)
@ai2smm · 59,240
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
Руслан Гамзатов | AI маркетинг
@AIGamzatov · 33,652
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 8 September 2026
Игорь Манн
@mann_igor · 28,943
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
Артем Сенаторов печатает...
@senatorov_art · 30,623
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 40 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Румянцев Рулит” (@drumyanzev), 22,228 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drumyanzev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.