Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -282. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,030–6,396 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 12:27
6,072
-17
2 Nov 2026, 18:24
6,089
-6
30 Oct 2026, 10:57
6,095
-10
27 Oct 2026, 09:09
6,105
-3
24 Oct 2026, 02:56
6,108
-1
20 Oct 2026, 19:01
6,109
-7
17 Oct 2026, 10:16
6,116
-3
14 Oct 2026, 20:00
6,119
-8
11 Oct 2026, 14:15
6,127
-19
5 Oct 2026, 14:18
6,146
-18
27 Sept 2026, 22:41
6,164
-29
18 Sept 2026, 19:40
6,193
-16
14 Sept 2026, 14:59
6,209
-12
11 Sept 2026, 11:20
6,221
-21
7 Sept 2026, 03:17
6,242
-26
2 Sept 2026, 04:46
6,268
-10
30 Aug 2026, 02:05
6,278
-15
27 Aug 2026, 01:08
6,293
-8
24 Aug 2026, 05:54
6,301
-8
20 Aug 2026, 05:22
6,309
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 17 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.01%
avg views ÷ 6,072 subscribers
Avg views / post
365
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
44 (17 May 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
2,917
Reactions total
126
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
212
Videos
24
Links
265
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
975 reactions across 44 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
434
44.5%
🔥
339
34.8%
👍
66
6.77%
😁
31
3.18%
custom 5201945431206021481
30
3.08%
👏
19
1.95%
🐳
18
1.85%
🤩
12
1.23%
🤔
10
1.03%
💔
8
0.821%
😢
8
0.821%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 975 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 44 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @smmolga. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 May 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Охота на охваты начинается
— Что за «Охота на охваты»?
У нас тут в пн бесплатный движ стартует. Я буду каждый день выкладывать уроки. Вы напишете по ним тексты, которые потенциально соберут много просмотров в Вк. А ещё мы будем поддерживать друг друга: лайкать, и подписываться. Так что каждый автор получит дополнительный охват и ещё новых подписчиков найдёт. А может, и клиентов. Помимо этого, все участники качнут н…
Как продолбать всю движуху?
И так, уже в пн стартует движ «Охота на охваты». Там мы будем качать ваши странички в Вк.
Что там будет?
Начиная с пн, на моем канале будут выходить задания. Три из них будут посвящены написанию постов, и 2 направлены на нетворкинг. В вс мы подведём итоги движухи и обменяемся аудиторией.
Посты, которые вы напишете по заданиям, надо будет выложить на вашей страничке с определенными хешт…
ВКонтакте прямо сейчас очень ЛЕГКО набрать кучу просмотров. Эта площадка раздаёт охваты просто пачками.
Куда ни посмотри, у людей посты набирают миллион просмотров, 500 тысяч, 300 тысяч. Залетают посты даже на профессиональные узкие темы, которые, казалось бы, должны быть интересны только трём с половиной специалистам.
Но почему-то вокруг ВКонтакте сложился какой-то ореол таинственности.
Некоторые эксперты рассказ…
☝Скандалы, интриги, расследования для повышения вовлечения
Увидела тут рекомендацию: «Пишите скандальный контент, чтоб набрать комментов»
На первый взгляд совет действительно рабочий. Провокационный пост реально соберёт охваты и комменты.
Но есть нюанс
Дискуссии могут оказывать разный эффект с точки зрения построения комьюнити. Всё зависит от того, куда направлен гнев.
😠 Мы бесим друг-друга!
Контент может вызыв…
Устроим охоту на охваты?
В общем, я придумала бесплатную движуху «Охота на охваты»
Вот сразу ссылка на регистрацию: https://t.me/Oficerovabot?start=ohvat
А вот подробности:
Старт: 09.11 (в понедельник)
Суть: Я буду давать вам задания на написание текстов по специальным «охватным» формулам.
Вы будете писать по заданиям посты на своих страничках с нужными хештегами. Мы все будем читать ленту, которая образуется по…
Хотите качнуть охваты в ВК?
Мы снова готовим движуху: «Охота на охваты». Это бесплатный флешмоб, во время которого можно раскачать вашу страничку ВКонтакте с нуля. В прошлый раз 2 участницы получили миллион просмотров! Многие нашли новую аудиторию, а кое-кто даже умудрился клиентов найти и денег заработать.
Но, нам нужна ваша помощь. Заполните, пожалуйста, анкету:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSe8m9zlnO9…
«Ваша речь похожа на плохо пережёванную пищу»
В общем, рассказываю историю. Как-то раз одна женщина захотела пойти ко мне в личную работу. Мы решили предварительно созвониться, чтобы обсудить её проект, условия и всё такое.
Задаю первый вопрос:
— Какой продукт вы продаёте?
Женщина открывает рот, и оттуда вылетает всё, кроме ответа на мой вопрос. Она начала рассказывать про сына, про его девушку (ужасную), про его…
Как любовь помогла мне найти клиентов?
Изначально я была таргетологом. Любила писать суперпрофессиональные посты в духе: «Алгоритм парсинга аудитории беременных».
В общем, контент хороший, ценный, но ни фига непонятный. Фото свои не выкладывала, не шутила, о личном не писала.
Только парсинг-таргет-KPI
Однажды 14-го февраля я внезапно решила написать пост о любви.
Выкладывать было страшно. А вдруг аудитория выска…
Что вы сделаете, если срочно понадобится 200 тысяч?
У меня была такая ситуация лет пять назад.
На тот момент я только родила вторую дочь. Времени стало меньше и от части проектов пришлось отказаться. Доход сильно упал. А расходы выросли. Финансовая подушка стремительно таяла.
Вот что делать? Новых клиентов не взять, времени нет. Цены не поднять, они и так высокие. А насчет делегирования я заморочилась задолго до р…
Почему важно продвигаться именно в ВК?
→ Эту площадку точно не забанят. Не страшно вкладывать усилия.
→ В Вк есть виральный охват. А это значит, тут можно получить подписчиков бесплатно. В отличии от того же Макса.
→ Тут есть способы монетизации, которые недоступны в других соцсетях. Те же шопсы и вк-доны. Фактически, вы можете зарабатывать в Вк абсолютно без экспертизы. Например, сделать сообщество, посвященное д…
— Создавать свой паблик уже поздно
Знаете, когда я впервые услышала эту фразу? В далёком 2014-м году
На тот момент я была ноунеймом. Клиентов не было. Иногда получалось каким-то чудом найти заказчиков, но вот продать им было адски сложно.
В общем, тревожно мне жилось. Не было уверенности в том, что получится заработать нужную сумму.
И тут… о, чудо! Меня берут в агентство. Я думала: «Наконец-то все мои проблемы буд…
Сейчас любой человек может получить миллион просмотров в Вк. Для этого не нужно быть звездатым блогером, достаточно просто соблюдать несколько правил.
Больше скажу: у меня залетают даже продающие посты. Я прямо сейчас отключила в сообществе рекламу, потому что мне достаточно того потока людей, который приходит с залетевших продающих постов. Тем более, что подписываются очень заинтересованные люди.
Как же получить э…
❤9🔥8
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @smmolga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Телегу замедляют больше полугода. Изменилось ли как-то ваше отношение к потреблению контента?
Нет, я и раньше не сидел в телеге и сейчас не сижу3%
Нет, я как сидел в телеге, так и сижу64%
Я намного меньше сижу в телеге, читаю только любимых авторов17%
Я теперь больше сижу в Максе9%
Я теперь больше сижу в Вк9%
Я теперь больше сижу в Тенчате1%
Я внезапно больше сижу в инсте12%
Оля, ты не угадала, я напишу в комментах как у меня дела3%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 17 May 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@smmolga named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@content_for_sales named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026 · confirmed gone 3 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Света Афанасьева @engageforsales · 28,427 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
Ленивый продюсер. Блог. @lazyproducer · 25,688 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Румянцев Рулит @drumyanzev · 22,167 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
Тина, прокачай @tin_moss · 22,944 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
Маркетинг. Александра Гуреева @alexandra_gureeva · 21,313 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 September 2026
Корытин выкручивает конверсии @nmiacm · 60,737 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Церебро life @cerebrotg · 19,247 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 October 2026
Инструменты маркетолога @profit_maker · 45,456 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
SMM с Дамиром Халиловым @damirkhalilov · 23,111 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Молянов @molyanov_blog · 31,058 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Телеграм Петроченкова @petrochenkow · 46,529 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026
Канал Игоря Зуевича @zuevichigor · 39,738 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ольга Офицерова” (@smmolga), 6,072 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smmolga.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.