Учу вести продающий блог через профессиональные истории без жестких продаж
Сильные посты = у вас куча запросов «Куда платить?»
Курсы, МК — все, чтобы блог приносил денег:
https://afanasyeva.pro
Для связи: @help_me_blog
#UJSPW
https://clck.ru/3GBKcZ
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 41 days, net -411. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 28,922–29,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 16:42
28,984
-11
15 Sept 2026, 17:18
28,995
-23
14 Sept 2026, 00:41
29,018
-19
12 Sept 2026, 06:37
29,037
-18
9 Sept 2026, 21:58
29,055
-23
6 Sept 2026, 12:37
29,078
-24
4 Sept 2026, 00:54
29,102
-11
2 Sept 2026, 12:04
29,113
-7
1 Sept 2026, 11:53
29,120
-7
31 Aug 2026, 13:34
29,127
-11
30 Aug 2026, 13:24
29,138
-4
29 Aug 2026, 11:49
29,142
-10
28 Aug 2026, 13:32
29,152
-13
27 Aug 2026, 16:17
29,165
-11
26 Aug 2026, 16:47
29,176
-12
25 Aug 2026, 18:06
29,188
-18
24 Aug 2026, 17:47
29,206
-12
23 Aug 2026, 04:27
29,218
-15
21 Aug 2026, 13:18
29,233
-8
20 Aug 2026, 12:37
29,241
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.14%
avg views ÷ 28,984 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,780
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held
27 (5 July 2026 – 18 September 2026)
Views total
7,119
Reactions total
432
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 23:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
487
Videos
93
Links
87
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
36s
Average length
18s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,506 reactions across 27 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
1,351
38.5%
❤
1,275
36.4%
😁
418
11.9%
👍
171
4.88%
💯
100
2.85%
🥰
77
2.20%
😍
64
1.83%
👏
27
0.77%
😱
20
0.57%
🫡
2
0.057%
🤬
1
0.029%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,506 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 27 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @engageforsales. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 27 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 18 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Целый месяц пытаюсь найти себе подходящий парфюм. Пока безрезультатно, но как меня радуют отзывы на сайтах парфюмерии
Это же просто ибма:
«Это не просто аромат
это запах склада
Запах холодного утра
когда ты стоишь
в минусе
в долгах
и с уверенностью уровня ну как-нибудь вывезу»
Или
«Запах священника, который на исповеди выслушал грехи неверной жены и не простил их. Запомнил. Все до одного. Она исповедовалась. Он сл…
🎙🗣Если вы ведёте блог как в 2024 году — RIP вашим продажам
Сарафан шатается, клиенты отваливаются, конверсии падают. Охваты падают.
И дело не только в том, что у людей кончились деньги и докатилась пресловутая инфляция.
Просто налетело стадо черных лебедей и люди реально стали по-другому принимать решения о покупке.
В подкасте разбираю, что случилось с рынком за семь лет и почему по-старому продавать больше не вы…
Коллайдер, демоны и член.
Для интровертированного блогера я снимаю много видео. Я одних своих курсов сделала 20 штук. Впереди съемки еще двух курсов, и я поняла, что пора опять позаниматься речью.
Я пару лет назад занималась с актрисой, которая мне поставила звучание. С тех пор я перестала «садиться на связки» и вытаскиваю 5-6 часов говорения подряд. Теперь пришло время заняться дикцией.
Препод у меня бывший новос…
Спасибо за теплые слова о курсе про авторский стиль. Он,судя по другим отзывам из кастевов ,сильно зашел людям. Говорили, что стало гораздо понятнее, как вести свои блоги и блоги клиентов.
Хочу чуть более развернуто ответить про книги по маркетингу.
Наверное, есть какие-то основательные книги типа того же «Запуск», но я не слежу за новинками.
И если прямо ответить на вопрос « почему в книжных негусто» с книгами по…
У меня сегодня разошлись лосины прямо на на попе во время румынской тяги.
Пожалуйста, скажите, что это все железные мышцы, которые порвали нейлон.😅😅 Тогда эта история выглядит хотя бы брутально.
Потому что если виновата хлипкость ткани, то получится что я светила своей пятой точкой пару наклонов за просто так😆
И да, я доделала все равно все подходы. Д - дисциплина.
Я проспорила пиво Леше
Вот тут мы выясняли, такая ли боль — писать годаааами об одном и том же.
И по лайкам мой ответ выиграл.
И даже в комментариях писали, что покупали мои продукты только чтобы закрыть эту боль.
И все равно при этом пиво пьет Леша.
Шо за несправедливость?
Дальше читают те, кому интересно, как я и Леша готовим прогревы к своим курсам.
С чего все началось: у меня по кастдевам через одного люди п…
Мы тут с подругой обсуждали, какой будет следующий тренд на фигуру?
Мое пожелание:на накаченные квадры🦾
Ее - на обвисший живот после двух родов😅
Но шутки шутками, а правда интересно.
Ведь в массовой культуре как? То, что становится массовым - перестает цениться и быть в моде.
Раньше была эра дородного тела, потому что если у тебя есть жирок — значит, есть деньги на еду. Что было редкость и роскошь не для всех.
П…
Разрешите наш спор с мужем насчет вас😅
Для чистоты эксперимента не буду говорить чья где точка зрения
Один из нас считает, что у экспертов и маркетологов большая боль — одни и те же смыслы писать с разных ракурсов и находить идеи как писать об одном и том же вдолгую. И готовы платить за решение этой боли.
Второй считает, что не такая уж это и проблема. Вернее, она есть, но платить за ее решение люди не будут.
Отп…
🎙🗣Деньги в блоге лежат кое-где.
В одном секретном месте.
И это не трафик.
В подкасте рассказываю, где в экспертном бизнесе точка Д.
С вас лайки и поддержка формата.
Как сохранить мой сериальчик, так 70 штук пересылок, как лайкнуть, так ленимся. Ладно-ладно, я запомню😈
😁75💯14❤5🥰2😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @engageforsales. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ленивый продюсер. Блог. @lazyproducer · 26,044 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Маркетинг. Александра Гуреева @alexandra_gureeva · 21,578 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 September 2026
маркетинговый бутерброд @kotelkreativov · 27,413 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 September 2026
Корытин выкручивает конверсии @nmiacm · 60,309 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Трус Юлия про бизнес @trusprobusiness · 37,739 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Неудобный психолог @mamaterapia · 61,486 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Канал Игоря Зуевича @zuevichigor · 39,591 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Румянцев Рулит @drumyanzev · 22,355 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
Подруга маркетолог (Маргарита Захарова) @marketing_dir · 34,350 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
Маша Полуянова @mashapoluyanova · 65,022 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Ольга Любимцева @olubimtseva · 23,879 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 17 September 2026
Система Богатства @batudmi · 31,224 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
Телеграм Петроченкова @petrochenkow · 47,331 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026
Татьяна Маричева @tm_producer · 31,380 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Инструменты маркетолога @profit_maker · 45,843 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 27 August 2026
Олег Шевелев @olegcloser · 35,044 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Павликов опять что-то написал @potok_ads · 72,751 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 August 2026
кабинет маркетолога @youtube_marina · 49,816 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
̶Д̶о̶к̶т̶о̶р̶ Андрей Курпатов @kurpatov_tg · 71,149 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Канал Ирины Подрез @ipodrez · 29,426 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Бачинская @bachinskaya_oxana · 69,728 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Молянов @molyanov_blog · 30,350 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Нейросети для предпринимателя @neural_for_business · 42,632 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Продюсер Курчанов @kurchanov_prod · 29,177 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 37 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Света Афанасьева” (@engageforsales), 28,984 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/engageforsales.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.