16 measurements spanning 16 days, net -108. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,879–30,019 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 19:15
29,895
-8
20 Aug 2026, 15:51
29,903
-4
19 Aug 2026, 12:44
29,907
+3
18 Aug 2026, 11:44
29,904
-6
17 Aug 2026, 14:14
29,910
-11
16 Aug 2026, 07:46
29,921
-20
14 Aug 2026, 18:07
29,941
-9
13 Aug 2026, 10:06
29,950
-15
12 Aug 2026, 09:02
29,965
-9
11 Aug 2026, 09:03
29,974
-3
10 Aug 2026, 12:21
29,977
-15
9 Aug 2026, 15:12
29,992
-6
8 Aug 2026, 12:01
29,998
-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:54
29,999
-4
6 Aug 2026, 06:50
30,003
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:47
30,003
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.2%
avg views ÷ 29,895 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,240
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
19 (15 July 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
42,380
Reactions total
1,391
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,280
Videos
≈449
Links
≈334
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
3,871 reactions across 14 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,300
59.4%
🔥
773
20.0%
❤🔥
289
7.47%
💯
282
7.28%
👏
88
2.27%
🙏
45
1.16%
🥰
43
1.11%
💔
29
0.749%
😁
16
0.413%
😍
6
0.155%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,871reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Господи, наконец это говорю не я 💔🥹 стоило потерпеть два месяца, чтобы услышать это от других людей, понимая, что предвзятости тут быть не может.
Терапия работает по следствием. Это ни хорошо, ни плохо. Это отдельная работа, у которой тоже много плюсов. Но созданная фрактальная технология позволяет увидеть механизм целиком! И это ключевое отличие, потому что это совершенно другой уровень понимания себя и как следств…
Силы приходят после
Вдохновение и смыслы тоже приходят после
Сначала действие без великого смысла, энергии и вдохновения)) к сожалению, порядок именно такой
Мне бы такой заряд бодрости и сил на всё 🔥 Вы прям героиня!
У меня последнее время прям апатия какая-то, но я начала возвращаться в прежний рабочий режим, хоть и тяжело, но мы справимся 💪🏻 женщины — это сила
Работаю почти без выходных, много часов в день. И кажется, складывается вся новая система воедино.
Иду к вам с небольшими итогами затишья. Это было хорошее решение — дать фокус одной площадке и работе с продуктом.
— Увидела наконец, как и куда будет развиваться новая школа и программа «Онтология личности». Какие будут направления дальше, зачем, во что это будет расти.
— Собрала в инсте заново страницу. Тысячу лет н…
Пришла с чистосердечным 🙊 я хочу на время вас оставить 🥹💔надеюсь, вы не обидитесь, у меня есть уважительная причина 🙊🥲
Короче, я же начала снимать рилсы для инсты, и че то начало получаться. И сейчас я хочу через них выстроить продажу на августовские лекции. Очень интересный для меня эксперимент.
Но так как помимо этой задачи у меня еще огромный пласт работы по продукту — съемки уроков и живые семинары со студентам…
Как сохранить психическую устойчивость, трезвость взгляда и способность принимать решения в эпоху высокой турбулентности
В кризис есть два ключевых направления, которые помогают выжить:
1. Устойчивая психика
2. Правильные действия
На первом вебинаре «Как не сойти с ума в эпоху безумия» разберем:
1. Психические особенности нового времени. Чем оно характерно и как в нем жить
2. Коридор устойчивости: как создать себе…
Много лет подряд вы приходите ко мне за единственным, что очень ценится — за моим особым видением.
Как я вижу ту или иную ситуацию, какую стратегию могу предложить для ее решения, какая обстановка вокруг, что в это время стоит и не стоит делать, как уверено двигаться сквозь любые обстоятельства и выходить из них победителем.
В 2022 году мы выпустили серию антикризисных вебинаров, которые позволили выстоять и вырост…
❤43🔥20
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @ipodrez. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 364,499 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Седа Каспарова @Seda_Kasparova_news · 256,525 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Арина Алекс. REELS и продажи @ArinaAlexx · 115,653 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
Вика Дмитриева @vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 269,240 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Тата Феодориди @TatFeodoridy · 60,200 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
матерь бложья (и кошачья) @mitroshinablogging · 159,845 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Ольга Гогаладзе @profinansy · 581,841 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Михаил Гребенюк @grebenukm · 262,694 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Шелуша Фуд | @shelusha_food | Маша Шелушенко @shelusha_food · 327,192 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
MMARGO @mmargosavchuk · 121,123 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
SASHA BELAIR @ab_chat · 136,107 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
PRO.FINANSY @profinansy_post · 63,194 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Зина Гегамовна 🫂 Психолог. Психотерапевт. @zinashamoyan · 72,019 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Неудобный психолог @mamaterapia · 61,696 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
ШЕРГИНА Юрист Финансовый советник @LawAndFinance · 69,605 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Регина Доктор | Здоровье @regina_doctor · 109,091 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Юлия Ивлиева @amelisoul_master · 105,702 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Мари про запуски @mari_zapuski · 77,055 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Академия PRO.FINANSY @profinansy_academy · 83,765 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Анастасия Тарасова Nastya_Docs @nastya_docs · 156,083 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
Катерина Ленгольд @Katerinalengold · 71,728 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
Анна Протасова @reiraofficial · 92,382 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
Завтрак с Килиной @zavtrak_s_Kilinoy · 62,955 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
ДОКТОР АБАКУМОВ @drabakumof · 147,924 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
Меседу про детство @meseduprodetstvo · 79,843 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Канал Ирины Подрез” (@ipodrez), 29,895 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ipodrez.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.