Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мари про запуски

Channel

Мари про запуски

@mari_zapuski

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

75,903subscribers

-1,671 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001396320878
TypeChannel
Username@mari_zapuski
DescriptionБлог для предпринимателей без FOMO. Показываю, как все делать легче в бизнесе через ИИ и вайбкодинг. Автор instagram.com/mariafonina Модератор @mashtab_sherif https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6756ea8935130d7236420630&registryType=bloggers
CreatedBetween 1 June 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/mari_zapuski

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

75,90377,57476,738.56 August 2026 — 77,574 subscribers6 August 2026 — 77,574 subscribers7 August 2026 — 77,559 subscribers8 August 2026 — 77,531 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77,516 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77,477 subscribers10 August 2026 — 77,446 subscribers12 August 2026 — 77,430 subscribers13 August 2026 — 77,401 subscribers14 August 2026 — 77,362 subscribers16 August 2026 — 77,284 subscribers17 August 2026 — 77,242 subscribers18 August 2026 — 77,196 subscribers19 August 2026 — 77,148 subscribers20 August 2026 — 77,111 subscribers21 August 2026 — 77,055 subscribers23 August 2026 — 77,056 subscribers25 August 2026 — 77,012 subscribers25 August 2026 — 76,965 subscribers26 August 2026 — 76,912 subscribers28 August 2026 — 76,833 subscribers29 August 2026 — 76,825 subscribers30 August 2026 — 76,791 subscribers31 August 2026 — 76,751 subscribers1 September 2026 — 76,687 subscribers2 September 2026 — 76,621 subscribers3 September 2026 — 76,576 subscribers5 September 2026 — 76,496 subscribers9 September 2026 — 76,306 subscribers11 September 2026 — 76,173 subscribers13 September 2026 — 76,101 subscribers15 September 2026 — 76,044 subscribers17 September 2026 — 75,992 subscribers19 September 2026 — 75,903 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -1,671. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75,652–77,825 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:1975,903-89
17 Sept 2026, 02:2275,992-52
15 Sept 2026, 04:3876,044-57
13 Sept 2026, 12:4176,101-72
11 Sept 2026, 16:1876,173-133
9 Sept 2026, 01:1776,306-190
5 Sept 2026, 18:2276,496-80
3 Sept 2026, 14:3676,576-45
2 Sept 2026, 07:0776,621-66
1 Sept 2026, 05:4476,687-64
31 Aug 2026, 06:1376,751-40
30 Aug 2026, 04:1676,791-34
29 Aug 2026, 03:1476,825-8
28 Aug 2026, 01:1476,833-79
26 Aug 2026, 22:3776,912-53
25 Aug 2026, 23:2376,965-47
25 Aug 2026, 01:1577,012-44
23 Aug 2026, 13:5777,056+1
21 Aug 2026, 21:0777,055-56
20 Aug 2026, 13:3777,111first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.23%
avg views ÷ 75,903 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,490
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held56 (6 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total153,650
Reactions total4,318
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 02:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
449
Videos
64
Links
146

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,416 reactions across 55 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,89246.2%
🔥2,84633.8%
❤‍🔥5786.87%
👏4545.39%
😁3444.09%
🎉1812.15%
😢690.82%
🕊520.618%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,416 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 55 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mari_zapuski. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 56 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,640 views140 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Сейчас почувствовала огромное удовлетворение от работы. То, что я сейчас делала, в наше время считается НИШЕВО 🤌 Писала вебинар по базе в ИИ с самого утра (для предзаписи Лабс). Писала целиком без ИИ, вручную, от первой до последней буквы). Закончила и почувствовала такой кайф от хорошо выполненной работы) Все, что касается текстов в соцсетях и именно моих личных каких-то вещей из личного опыта, пишу сама. Даже на …

❤76🔥33❤‍🔥31

23 Sept 2026, 14:52 UTC≈2,640 views207 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Я думала, меня уже сложно удивить 🤌 В ЛАБС Лара пришла в 61 год. В начале августа она не умела написать ни строчки кода. До ЛАБС тридцать лет управляла людьми: фитнес с 88-го, свой клуб в Ростове-на-Дону с 97-го без стартового капитала, потом 5 клубов и сеть в Москве. Я хорошо умела ставить задачи, принимать работу и разбирать чужие ошибки. Всё это — руками других. Летом она открыла АНО «Энергия Зрелости» — для т…

🔥163❤34👏6😁4

22 Sept 2026, 05:24 UTC≈3,580 views202 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Сегодня еду на встречу с СЕО. Дело было так. Мне написала в тг незнакомая женщина: в Москве ли я и работаю ли я ментором по ИИ в бизнесе. Прислала целый список вопросов, был ли у меня опыт работы с первыми лицами компаний (есть такой опыт), что входит в услугу, стоимость и тд. Они ищут человека, кто будет лично, офлайн обучать СЕО пользоваться ИИ. Опубликую мой оффер, который им отправила, в подписке Клабс. Видимо,…

❤104🔥68❤‍🔥30

21 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈3,960 views192 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

Я никогда такого еще не видела 🤌 Город Белорецк, около 60 000 жителей. Соляная комната с пробным сеансом за 350 руб., освоили вайбкодинг в Лабс. ▶ проработали путь клиента и игровой мир ▶ сделали игровой тест на 30 секунд @Polzasoli_bot ▶ создали мини-игру с подарками ▶ завайбкодили лендинг со звуком моря ▶ подключили авто-оплату через сайт и бота через Prodamus и мгновенные уведомления владельца ▶ сделали рефералк…

❤93🔥73❤‍🔥24😢2

21 Sept 2026, 08:54 UTC≈4,930 views306 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Я переехала в Россию 🇷🇺 Последние 3 года в основном жила в Дубае, и провела лето в Армении. Спасибо этим гостеприимным странам, которые как родных приняли нас с семьей (у меня двое детей). Уже написала посты в личный канал о личных причинах: Пост о переезде Пост о причинах А тут все-таки больше экспертный канал меня как экспэрта 🤌 Поэтому о рабочем. Казалось бы, я живу в будущем, и искусственный интеллект "там" с…

❤183🔥77👏22😢21😁2❤‍🔥1

19 Sept 2026, 15:31 UTC≈5,030 views39 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Даты проекта по вайбкодингу и ии-агентам: 1 октября — старт продаж 12 октября — старт проекта Записаться в предзапись В этот раз в Лабс будет живой офлайн тариф, впервые за год ❤️‍🔥

❤18❤‍🔥11🔥8😁2

17 Sept 2026, 10:01 UTC≈5,480 views288 reactions4 Starsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Ура! Мне одобрили аккаунт разработчика в Apple! Это значит, приложение Клабс скоро станет мобильным. Какой кайф самой решать, какие фишки туда ставить. Приложению неделя, и вот что там изменилось за неделю: — просмотренные эфиры отмечаются как Просмотрено автоматически после порога 90 процентов просмотра видео — подключенные агенты теперь легко вытягивают эфиры — отмена квеста (если квест запустили по ошибке, под к…

❤151👏70❤‍🔥43🔥24

16 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC≈4,500 views79 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

pov: твой первый день в моей команде Представь, что ты попал в рабочий чат, где люди и ии-агенты общаются вместе, спорят, разбирают задачки... 🙂

❤47🔥18🎉9😁4😢1

15 Sept 2026, 16:54 UTC≈4,950 views131 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Каждый день мы тратили по 2-3ч, на техническую работу для клиентов. Я даже не представляла, что столько людей ошибается в почте при покупке онлайн-проектов. Ежедневно это было на 2-3ч срочной работы, чтобы поправить доступы. Также много времени уходит, чтобы снавигировать человека: где искать какую-то информацию, где смотреть нужный эфир. Но! У нас в службе заботы ОДИН человек и НОЛЬ технических специалистов в ком…

🔥75❤31❤‍🔥21😁3🎉1

10 Sept 2026, 10:19 UTC≈7,620 views155 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Год назад один человек изменил мою жизнь. И прежней она не будет. Лето 2025. Я в Дубае. Запускаю курс по запускам, и чувствую что мне нужен новый этап в работе. Я чую что-то новое, но пока не понимаю, что это. 6 июля 2025 в Дубай приехал Феликс, и между делом спросил: а ты еще не вайбкодишь? — Вайб...? Что? Что это такое?, — ответила я. Он открыл Gemini (нейросеть), ввел туда промт, и на моих глазах получился сай…

❤82🔥49🎉18👏4😁2

7 Sept 2026, 21:18 UTC≈5,910 views122 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Важный разговор. Как изменится моя подписка Клабс 5 месяцев назад запустила свою подписку, или клуб, иными словами. Все это время наблюдала, тестировала, пробовала. Что ж... 2 года назад я была права... В подписке не нужно еще одно обучение. Для этого есть другие проекты. А мой девиз "Понимать не обязательно" для подписки должен превратиться в "Уметь не обязательно". Или даже... Уметь не обязательно. Тратить много…

🔥61❤39👏16❤‍🔥5🎉1

7 Sept 2026, 10:25 UTC≈5,100 views109 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Сколько денег и времени у меня ушло на такую анкету • анкету заполнили на сейчас 720 участников • я делала ее полностью сама на подписке claude за 200$ в месяц (но анкета только маленькая часть из всего, что я там делаю) • ушло 3 дня: 1 на идею и первую тестовую версию, 2 я записала видео, 3 на проверку на ошибки, последние правки и выкладку (около 2ч в 1 и 2 день) • промт в конце анкеты генерирует нейронка по моим …

❤60🔥33👏15😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @mari_zapuski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@mari_zapuski edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Мари, ну что?
@mari_vse · 18,528
#1
Мари про новости
@mari_novosti · 6,275
#2
Егор Пыриков
@egorpyrikov · 43,688
#3
Ньюми
@newme_channel · 2,355
#4
Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 258,153
#5
Татьяна Маричева
@tm_producer · 31,380
#6
PODREZ EDUCATION
@podrezeducation · 7,511
#7
Александр Турчинович
@turchinovich · 8,827
#8
Хайлайты | Журнал про инфобиз и edtech
@infohilights · 21,237
#9
Корытин выкручивает конверсии
@nmiacm · 60,309
#10
Карина Исхакова
@karinapronastavnichestvo · 19,631
#11
Мари про 2024 🐉
@maripro2024 · 2,000
#12
Ленивый продюсер. Блог.
@lazyproducer · 26,044
#13
Канал Артема Дюкарева
@artemdykarevchannel · 4,684
#14
Roman Zayneev
@infobiz_roma · 9,349
#15
Инфоцыганские мемы
@infomem · 8,996
#16
Запуски по Антонову
@antonov_launch · 9,552
#17
Дарья Юрьева💎
@YurevaLife · 1,344
#18
Аня Каменец #makesense
@kamenetsanya · 2,668
#19
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 47,331
#20
Лёша Золотов
@lexeytoday_blog · 17,336
#21
Таня Кейн
@tanya_keyn · 7,506
#22
Мари масштабирует
@mari_mashtabiruet · 5,649
#23
Даниил Тур
@tur_daniil · 5,903
#24
Алекс Мерзляков
@alexmerzliakov · 17,660
#25
ARIKOVA PRO. ЯРД на AI
@arikovapro · 10,414
#26
Сеньор генеративщик 🏴‍☠️
@ai_senior · 1,889
#27
Высшая Лига Маркетинга | Глеб Яскевич
@infogleb · 13,752
#28
Влад Морозов | Про инфобизнес
@bymorozov1 · 7,245
#29
АНА МАВРИЧЕВА | Личный бренд
@anamavricheva · 35,827
#30
Павел Ширяев 🧠 Маркетинг и нейросети
@pavelshiriaev · 19,321
#31
Senatorov-GPT
@senatorovgpt · 4,343
#32
КОСМОС ДЛЯ ТЕБЯ❤️‍🔥
@kosmostvoi · 1,244
#33
Люся Еж
@eji4kaa · 1,683
#34
🟢Родочинская в сети
@julia_rodochinskaya · 19,435
#35
Мария Сухоруких
@klienti_vtg · 25,073
#36
Виола.
@instalova_viola · 7,149
#37
К чёрту блогерство!
@glavsasha · 3,983
#38
Телеграм по Антонову
@antonovtg1 · 9,606
#39
Семейка ботов
@FamilyBots · 709,671
#40
Сергей Косенко
@Kosenkosergei · 58,239
#41
Иван Шелевей | Взрослый инфобизнес | ПЦ BIRCH
@birchcenter · 1,700
#42
DNative — блог Ткачука про SMM
@dnative · 81,416
#43
Играю свой Sims в жизни | Ирина Муравьева
@partners_zapuski_muraveva · 2,023
#44
Sokolovskiy
@sokolay · 109,626
#45
Кухня запусков 3.0
@kuhnya_zapuskov · 4,119
#46
Психолог на вайбе
@ura_vibe · 5,427
#47
Ян Сташкевич
@stashkevichyan · 9,014
#48
MMARGO
@mmargosavchuk · 119,670
#49
Аяз
@AyazShabutdinov · 179,791
#50
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 577,646
#51
Артем Сенаторов печатает...
@senatorov_art · 31,418
#52
Канал Ирины Подрез
@ipodrez · 29,426
#53
SASHA BELAIR
@ab_chat · 134,036
#54
Oleg Torbosov
@TorbosovLife · 107,515
#55
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии
@petrosipovprivate · 49,068
#56
Седа Каспарова
@Seda_Kasparova_news · 257,316
#57
Женя Старилова | Про контент
@jane_starilova · 6,797
#58
Нелли Армани 👁️
@nelly_armani8 · 8,979
#59
Tinder — продюсер & эксперт
@tinder_tm · 29,271
#60
Юлия Ивлиева
@amelisoul_master · 104,420
#61
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 123,731
#62
Михаил Дашкиев
@mikhaildashkiev · 43,880
#63
Вика Дмитриева
@vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 266,589
#64
Мама, я в рекламе
@mamayavreklame · 2,188
#65
кабачковая икра по акции
@sale_caviar · 192,936
#66
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 282,390
#67
Катерина Ленгольд
@Katerinalengold · 71,428
#68
Mikhail Saidov
@MikhailSaidov · 54,694
#69
Света Афанасьева
@engageforsales · 28,984
#70
Лена Королева | про контент и коммуникацию
@pro_ekspertov_with_love · 602
#71
Христосенко
@easybillions · 5,258
#72
Я — предприниматель
@dashkievpro · 21,205
#73
Психология в бизнесе. Вероника Кромбергер
@kromberger_v · 14,694
#74
Анонс Физического Журнала Корытин
@jornkor · 1,707
#75
Евгения Гормаш про бизнес и продажи
@evgeniagormash1 · 5,463
#76
Юра Мурадян
@ymuradyan · 39,275
#77
DinaMeet
@dina_dinameet · 4,764
#78
Козлова о важном
@kozlovaevgeniya_psy · 5,289
#79
Вания Маркович | «Симург»
@vaniamarkovich · 46,769
#80
АИБ | Ассоциация экспертов в области обучения, предоставляемого посредством интернет-ресурсов
@ainfobis · 3,833
#81
Мемперия Катерины Побоженко | Шаблоны и оригиналы | Мемы в REELS
@formemas · 199,740
#82

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Егор Пыриков
@egorpyrikov · 43,688
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 August 2026
Мария Солодар | Интернет-маркетинг и фриланс
@marketing_Solodar · 22,142
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
Татьяна Маричева
@tm_producer · 31,380
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Нейросети для бизнеса
@neuralforbusiness · 25,264
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
Tinder — продюсер & эксперт
@tinder_tm · 29,271
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 September 2026
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии
@petrosipovprivate · 49,068
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Хайлайты | Журнал про инфобиз и edtech
@infohilights · 21,237
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
Chek_Fit
@chek_fit · 53,630
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
матерь бложья (и кошачья)
@mitroshinablogging · 159,673
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
AI Эксперт: бизнес, агенты, доход
@ii_ekspert · 44,512
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Аяз
@AyazShabutdinov · 179,791
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Ленивый продюсер. Блог.
@lazyproducer · 26,044
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Ответы от Оли Гогаладзе
@pravda_pro_finansy · 36,578
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 1 September 2026
Канал Ирины Подрез
@ipodrez · 29,426
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Артем Сенаторов печатает...
@senatorov_art · 31,418
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
Павел Гительман
@potok_gitelman · 38,135
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мари про запуски” (@mari_zapuski), 75,903 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mari_zapuski.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.