Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кухня запусков 24-26 августа

Channel

Кухня запусков 24-26 августа

@zapusk4

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

5,757subscribers

-151 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001401577977
TypeChannel
Username@zapusk4
CreatedBetween 1 February 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/zapusk4

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 7 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@zapusk4/461 · this entry18 Oct 2025, 16:07 UTC@gorod_zapuskov/42218 Oct 2025, 16:25 UTC1.0018 minutes
@gorod_zapuskov/4255 Nov 2025, 07:51 UTC@zapusk4/464 · this entry5 Nov 2025, 14:06 UTC1.006.3 hours
@gorod_zapuskov/42612 Dec 2025, 12:18 UTC@zapusk4/465 · this entry12 Dec 2025, 12:42 UTC1.0024 minutes
@gorod_zapuskov/42913 Dec 2025, 15:24 UTC@zapusk4/468 · this entry13 Dec 2025, 15:57 UTC1.0033 minutes
@gorod_zapuskov/43617 Dec 2025, 17:43 UTC@zapusk4/474 · this entry17 Dec 2025, 17:47 UTC1.004 minutes
@gorod_zapuskov/43712 Feb 2026, 17:47 UTC@zapusk4/475 · this entry12 Feb 2026, 18:07 UTC1.0020 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@gorod_zapuskov12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0019 minutes@gorod_zapuskov (11–1)
@school_marigalanter12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0031 minutes@school_marigalanter (11–1)
@kuhnya_zapuskov12 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0020 minutesthis entry (10–2)
@mari_mashtabiruet11 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0062 minutes@mari_mashtabiruet (11–0)
@maripro202410 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.7 hours@maripro2024 (8–2)
@making_money_with_Mari9 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.7 hours@making_money_with_Mari (6–3)
@dom_deneg_mari7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.993.8 hours@dom_deneg_mari (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 56 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 12 October 2025 to 9 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 8, the earliest publisher we hold is @zapusk4 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 7 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,7575,9085,832.57 August 2026 — 5,908 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,908 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,904 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,898 subscribers16 August 2026 — 5,895 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,888 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,884 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,882 subscribers29 August 2026 — 5,871 subscribers1 September 2026 — 5,863 subscribers5 September 2026 — 5,859 subscribers10 September 2026 — 5,846 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,838 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,829 subscribers28 September 2026 — 5,814 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,799 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,779 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,775 subscribers18 October 2026 — 5,771 subscribers21 October 2026 — 5,770 subscribers26 October 2026 — 5,765 subscribers29 October 2026 — 5,763 subscribers2 November 2026 — 5,762 subscribers5 November 2026 — 5,757 subscribers7 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net -151. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,734–5,931 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 05:155,757-5
2 Nov 2026, 06:205,762-1
29 Oct 2026, 21:365,763-2
26 Oct 2026, 23:095,765-5
21 Oct 2026, 12:505,770-1
18 Oct 2026, 12:165,771-4
15 Oct 2026, 11:355,775-4
12 Oct 2026, 17:495,779-20
5 Oct 2026, 18:375,799-15
28 Sept 2026, 11:205,814-15
19 Sept 2026, 05:155,829-9
14 Sept 2026, 08:415,838-8
10 Sept 2026, 10:375,846-13
5 Sept 2026, 11:205,859-4
1 Sept 2026, 18:055,863-8
29 Aug 2026, 22:485,871-11
27 Aug 2026, 06:035,882-2
24 Aug 2026, 01:035,884-4
20 Aug 2026, 04:455,888-7
16 Aug 2026, 19:195,895first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 24 June 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.21%
avg views ÷ 5,757 subscribers
Avg views / post
185
1 post measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 October 2026
Posts held23 (24 June 2025 – 8 October 2026)
Views total185
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Oct 2026, 15:43 UTC185 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

😢Принято решение, что в этом году будет последний поток обучения по нейросетям и ИИ-агентам ЛАБС 🗓️ Расписание: 9 октября предобучение. Поможем вам разобраться в базе и подключить все сервисы: установим VPN,выберем свою главную нейросеть, зарегистрируемся, установим все программы, создадим ИИ-агента 12 октября основная программа: 1 неделя — ваш ИИ-сотрудник. 2 неделя — создадите сайт: лендинг, квиз, калькулятор. 3…

28 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC263 viewsread 4 November 2026

Если вы когда-либо у меня обучались на программах: • Масштаб (все потоки 2020-2025) • Мастер • Годовые программы 2024, 2025 Я провожу Большую переквалификацию продюсеров и экспертов. Собираю все, что изменилось с окончания вашего обучения по сегодняшний день, и что с этим делать. Какие сейчас форматы, проекты хорошо продаются, и каким образом. Все, что вам нужно знать на сегодняшний день. Хочу, чтобы вы были актуа…

9 Jul 2026, 09:29 UTC145 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Продажи второго сезона вебинаров по ИИ открыты! 🥳 Что изменилось в мире нейросетей за последний квартал? Обсудим это на новых эфирах. После этих вебинаров вы начнете использовать ИИ на продвинутом уровне (даже если сейчас знания на нуле) и войдете в 5% самых подкованных пользователей мира. У вас будут самые актуальные способы работы с нейросетями на июль 2026 года. Готовьтесь: скоро знакомые начнут обращаться к вам…

22 Jun 2026, 09:02 UTC481 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

В этом году я официально сменила нишу и... больше не обучаю запускам. Хотя до сих пор ими занимаюсь 🤍 В этом году я: — создала реферальную программу для участников обучений, сама, за час, без программистов и бесплатно — создала 2 обучающих платформы — переехала на них с ГК — разрабатываю свое приложение, и тоже без программистов — сильно снизила расходы на бизнес и сократила команду, многие места заняли цифровые сот…

4 Mar 2026, 12:00 UTC500 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

ИИ-сотрудники за 20к. Мой опыт. Месяц, как в нашей команде появились ии-сотрудники. Про — проджект, Лумо — продавец, Ио — личный ассистент, Кью — куратор. Работают круглосуточно, зп не просят)) Кроме на токены, 10-20 тыс руб в мес, что все равно дешевле любого сотрудника на свете. Как мы раньше без них жили — уже не представляем)) В Трэдс пишут: — Не может такого быть! Что, они у вас и команду пинают? Отвечу. Наш…

16 Feb 2026, 16:12 UTC309 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как сэкономить 15+ часов в неделю или ТОП-10 способов использования ИИ в жизни и в бизнесе 1. Написать пост в соцсети сами: 20 мин думать о чем писать, 15 мин пялиться в пустой экран, 10 мин написать черновик, удалить, написать заново, еще 10 мин редактировать, потом показать подруге и переписать с ИИ: 7 мин 2. Планирование семейной поездки сами: 40 мин гуглить «куда поехать с детьми», 30 мин сравнивать отели на тр…

14 Feb 2026, 07:05 UTC257 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Продажи вебинаров по ИИ открыты 🥳 • 21 февраля, «ИИ в жизни» — 3 990 руб. • 23 февраля, «ИИ в бизнесе» — 5 990 руб. • Комплект из двух — 7 990 руб • На все позиции действует рассрочка 0% на 6 мес через Т-Банк Запись — будет. Срок доступа к ней — 1 год. После вебинаров вы сможете пользоваться как профи любой нейросетью (даже с 0) и освоите ИИ на уровне 5% пользователей мира. — полный обзор лучших моделей, чем поль…

13 Feb 2026, 18:28 UTC262 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

14 февраля — не только про любовь, но и про роботов 💞 Завтра в 10:00 мск Мари откроет продажи на вебинары по ИИ для жизни и бизнеса. Будете ждать такую валентинку? 😏

12 Feb 2026, 18:07 UTC380 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

810 000 000 человек используют ChatGPT, но знали ли вы, что он уже даже не базовый минимум? 😅 На этой неделе я установила ИИ-агента. Это не чат-бот и не сервис для текстов. Это полноценный сотрудник, который сидит в чате и общается с моей командой как живой человек. Пишет сообщения, задает вопросы, напоминает о дедлайнах. Я дала ему задачу: заменить проджект-менеджера в запуске нового продукта. Того самого человека…

17 Dec 2025, 17:47 UTC566 viewsread 4 November 2026

С какими целями приходят на интенсив по вайбкодингу? Собрали несколько историй участников, которые только вчера пришли в ЛАБС: ▪️Татьяна — режиссер-документалист с 1,6 млн подписчиков на YouTube. Хочет приложение для своего проекта про народы России ▪️Диля — владелица онлайн-школы. Хочет свою CRM для работы с учениками, чтобы уйти с дорогой платформы ▪️Анна — продюсер телеграм-канала Павла Гительмана. Хочет дашборд…

15 Dec 2025, 19:12 UTC453 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Узнайте сейчас, что сможете завайбкодить в ЛАБС 💅 Специально для вас сделали сайт, где вы выбираете свою нишу и роль, а мы придумываем, как повысить вашу ценность для клиентов и добиться ВАУ эффекта в продуктах. УЗНАТЬ МОЖНО ЗДЕСЬ ОСТОРОЖНО! Слишком гениально🔥😅

14 Dec 2025, 14:22 UTC487 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

«Мне за эту разработку такууууую премию дадут!» Друзья, ребята, коллеги — представляем вам обзор на свежеиспеченную 🍞 платформу ЛАБС. Платформу, где прямо сейчас учатся 550+ участников и все работает ЗА-МЕ-ЧА-ТЕЛЬ-НО🤌 А самое главное, что Мари завайбкодила ее сама. 🩶Раньше: плати миллион, жди полгода, ругайся с разработчиками 🩷Сейчас: вы сами можете сделать сервис, где клиенты покупают, смотрят уроки, задают вопро…

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @zapusk4. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@zapusk4 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кухня запусков 24-26 августа” (@zapusk4), 5,757 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zapusk4.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.