— Системный психолог
— Доктор психологических наук, PsyD
— Автор метода Эмоциональная зрелость (15 лет)
— Общественно-политический деятель
Регистрация канала в реестре РКН https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67877b9d506f967728059c2e&re
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
50 measurements spanning 80 days, net -1,586. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,849–47,911 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 50
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Oct 2026, 04:27
46,087
-28
24 Oct 2026, 01:20
46,115
-23
22 Oct 2026, 23:44
46,138
-25
21 Oct 2026, 18:18
46,163
-12
20 Oct 2026, 14:11
46,175
-18
19 Oct 2026, 16:42
46,193
-19
18 Oct 2026, 15:45
46,212
-3
17 Oct 2026, 17:45
46,215
-22
16 Oct 2026, 18:30
46,237
-26
15 Oct 2026, 16:09
46,263
-31
14 Oct 2026, 16:57
46,294
-34
13 Oct 2026, 05:56
46,328
-23
9 Oct 2026, 00:57
46,351
-92
4 Oct 2026, 14:15
46,443
-186
26 Sept 2026, 05:20
46,629
-140
19 Sept 2026, 11:56
46,769
-37
17 Sept 2026, 01:38
46,806
-50
15 Sept 2026, 02:20
46,856
-50
13 Sept 2026, 13:15
46,906
-46
11 Sept 2026, 20:57
46,952
first reading
Engagement
103 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 163 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.05%
avg views ÷ 46,087 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,330
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 103 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 October 2026
Posts held
103 (1 August 2026 – 24 October 2026)
Views total
72,140
Reactions total
2,097
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
25 Oct 2026, 15:19 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,470
Videos
≈793
Links
≈595
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
51m 06s
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,209 reactions across 97 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,825
61.6%
🔥
984
15.8%
❤🔥
596
9.60%
😍
243
3.91%
🙏
127
2.05%
🕊
92
1.48%
😁
68
1.10%
😢
52
0.837%
💔
48
0.773%
💯
45
0.725%
👍
44
0.709%
🥰
40
0.644%
🤗
17
0.274%
🤔
12
0.193%
👏
6
0.097%
🎉
4
0.064%
🤩
4
0.064%
🤷♀
2
0.032%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 101 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,590 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 24 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 103 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vaniamarkovich. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 103 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 24 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Как 9 типов личности собираются в отпуск / командировку?
В продолжение поста выше 😅
Есть эннеатипы, которые, скорее всего, НЕ заблудились бы в незнакомом городе) например:
– 6 (вряд ли бы там оказались)
– 5 (всё досконально изучат до отправления)
– 1 (важно не ошибиться и не подвести других)
Так что, если в вашем окружении такие есть – смело езжайте хоть на край света!
Тест «Первый шаг к пониманию своего эннеатип…
«Неужели мы и правда не подходим друг другу?»
90% пар однажды задаются этим вопросом, по разным причинам и на разных этапах.
Да, и правда есть типы людей, которым будет очень сложно в отношениях друг с другом.
И да, есть типы, разные как день и ночь – но в потенциале у них очень красивая связь!
Вот это и помогает увидеть эннеаграмма – какой вы, какой ваш партнёр, какие могут быть сложности и как понять друг друга.…
А как вы проявляете любовь?
Сколько же красоты в нашей непохожести друг на друга! Иногда, чтобы в отношениях стало больше тепла, достаточно посмотреть на близкого чуть иначе:
👉 не через «ты меня не слышишь и не понимаешь»
👉 а через «мы видим мир по-разному, и я хочу узнать тебя»
Вы уже знаете, что у всех нас разные ведущие центры. И если для одного проявление любви – комплименты и записки утром, то для другого – мо…
😅 Коротко о том, как ведут себя разные эннеатипы в одной ситуации
Видели, как вам понравилась эта рубрика! Первая часть здесь ❤️
А в видео – новая ситуация и разбор: какой эннеатип как реагирует и почему.
Как определить свой тип?
В закрытом канале «Психология Эннеаграммы» вас ждут:
– тест «Первый шаг к понимаю своего типа»
– файл про совместимость
– подкасты и разборы, в которых узнаете себя
– описание ВСЕХ эннеат…
Представьте: перед вами лезут вне очереди. Ваша реакция?
Буду возмущаться43%
Буду нервничать, но ничего не скажу35%
Пойду договариваться19%
Скорее всего, даже не замечу12%
Иногда я тот человек, что лезет вне очереди 👀14%
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Ведущие компании используют эннеаграмму при найме людей
1. В США работает Институт Эннеаграммы, который обучает топ-менеджеров.
2. В Оксфорде и Гарварде знания по психологии Эннеаграмме включены в программы обучения.
3. Крупнейшие HR-агентства США и Европы используют инструмент для подбора руководителей.
4. Бизнес-школы по всему миру включают Эннеаграмму в курсы по построению эффективных команд.
На этой неделе мы с…
Люди объявили облаву на медведей.
Оголодавшие и испуганные медведи всё чаще выходят к людям. После неурожая, пожаров и вырубок Тайги в лесах не хватает привычной пищи: ягод, кедровых орехов, лосося. Животные лишь пытаются выжить, ища еду у мусорных контейнеров, на свалках, в садах.
Да, люди боятся за себя и своих близких – это правда страшно. Но разве единственный выход – убивать?
Но вместо решения вопроса мирным …
😅 Коротко о том, как ведут себя разные эннеатипы в одной ситуации
А вы бы как отреагировали?
Пишите в комментариях – и мы разберем самую частую реакцию: что за ней стоит, как проявляется внутри и внешне, каким эннеатипам она свойственна.
❤40😁26🔥14❤🔥4😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @vaniamarkovich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@vaniamarkovich edited 8 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 October 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Представьте: перед вами лезут вне очереди. Ваша реакция?
Буду возмущаться43%
Буду нервничать, но ничего не скажу35%
Пойду договариваться19%
Скорее всего, даже не замечу12%
Иногда я тот человек, что лезет вне очереди 👀14%
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Уже нашлось то самое дело по душе – и я им занимаюсь37%
Знаю, чего хочу, но занимаюсь другим21%
В поиске, но чувствую, что уже близко!19%
Надежды почти нет…13%
Не понимаю, моё это дело или нет18%
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Можно не общаться месяцами и всё равно быть близкими65%
Можно говорить друг другу неприятную правду32%
Проводить много времени вместе9%
Быть собой, не боясь, что тебя осудят86%
Разделять интересы друг друга43%
Свой вариант напишу в комментариях1%
The shares total 236%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 24 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
MMARGO @mmargosavchuk · 117,458 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
Зина Гегамовна 🫂 Психолог. Психотерапевт. @zinashamoyan · 70,156 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Сабина Филина | Домашние тренировки @sabintag · 68,001 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
мысли о жизни | алина солопова @alinasinspiration · 30,925 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 6 September 2026
Анна Протасова @reiraofficial · 100,914 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 August 2026
SATI ETHNICA @SatiEthnica108 · 37,546 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026
Fedor Belogai @belogaifedor · 38,869 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
ОШО | Путь внутрь @oshorussian · 23,012 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
матерь бложья (и кошачья) @mitroshinablogging · 158,035 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
SASHA BELAIR @ab_chat · 135,769 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
БЕЛАЯ КОМНАТА (Whiteroom) @belajakomnata · 29,400 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Anastasiya Bulatkina | АСТРОЛОГ✨ @anastasiya_bulatkina · 20,641 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 25 September 2026
MIRÁVI family @vladamiravi · 19,675 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 September 2026
ДОКТОР АБАКУМОВ @drabakumof · 144,962 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
ILONA DROZH @ilona_dr · 22,316 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 September 2026
Развитие с Игорем Будниковым: марафоны и обучающие курсы @welcomebackhome · 27,770 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 September 2026
Психолог Марк Бартон @markbarton_mb · 87,665 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Chek_Fit @chek_fit · 53,198 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 24 August 2026
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии @petrosipovprivate · 48,284 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Елена Вайс @helen_wize1 · 18,637 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 October 2026
52 недели богатства | pro.finansy @weeks52wealth · 32,159 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 5 September 2026
Ксения Мосунова | Зов Рода @zovroda_mosunova · 25,046 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
Мари про запуски @mari_zapuski · 74,677 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
Елизавета Бабанова | Женский Расцвет @elizavetababanovacom · 26,051 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Вания Маркович | «Симург»” (@vaniamarkovich), 46,087 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vaniamarkovich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.