Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net -1,690. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,922–40,119 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 20:55
38,175
-8
4 Nov 2026, 22:46
38,183
-21
3 Nov 2026, 21:16
38,204
-25
2 Nov 2026, 18:19
38,229
-24
1 Nov 2026, 16:24
38,253
-112
31 Oct 2026, 19:08
38,365
-43
30 Oct 2026, 18:56
38,408
-12
29 Oct 2026, 21:49
38,420
-55
28 Oct 2026, 23:51
38,475
-55
27 Oct 2026, 19:56
38,530
-30
26 Oct 2026, 20:56
38,560
-32
25 Oct 2026, 17:44
38,592
-14
24 Oct 2026, 15:29
38,606
-20
23 Oct 2026, 18:56
38,626
-35
22 Oct 2026, 21:55
38,661
-30
21 Oct 2026, 19:58
38,691
-29
20 Oct 2026, 16:28
38,720
-19
19 Oct 2026, 19:39
38,739
-18
18 Oct 2026, 16:28
38,757
-10
17 Oct 2026, 18:09
38,767
first reading
Engagement
133 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 178 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.27%
avg views ÷ 38,175 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
57 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.17%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
57
of 133 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 56 of 57 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
133 (31 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
92,892
Reactions total
2,909
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,050
Videos
≈914
Links
≈725
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 32s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,976 reactions across 132 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
4,554
57.1%
🔥
2,129
26.7%
🥰
251
3.15%
💯
237
2.97%
👍
220
2.76%
🤣
119
1.49%
🎉
106
1.33%
👌
94
1.18%
😍
85
1.07%
😁
60
0.752%
🤩
56
0.702%
👏
43
0.539%
🤔
11
0.138%
🤯
11
0.138%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 132 of the 133 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,976 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.752%
1 of 133 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,420
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,950
over 132 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJqVKj5xcH5FSL7aqLZRoMRSY7zuCkkfufcEvXs
1
19 August 2026
19 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 57 posts held from the last 30 days (7.02%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
ИНСТРУКЦИЯ:
- Переходите в закрытый канал «Думай и богатей»;
- ссылка в последнем посте на приложение
- Включайте колыбельную в наушниках перед сном вместо скроллинга ленты;
- Если уснете во время прослушивания, это нормально;
- Утром начинайте замечать, какие подарки и возможности появляются у вас в пространстве.
До встречи на втором дне ретрита ЗАВТРА В 11:00
🔴ВСЕ В КАНАЛЕ
Сегодня обязательно включите колыбельную изобилия.
❗️Я открыл ее специально для вас в своем приложении. В доступе будет до конца ретрита.
Кому дать инструкцию, где скачать приложение и найти колыбельную? Собираем 100 🔥 и дам доступ
💰Когда до зарплаты еще десять дней, мозгу становится сложнее
Представьте, что до зарплаты осталось десять дней, а на карте три тысячи рублей.
Нужно купить продукты, оплатить интернет, ребенку нужны деньги на школьную поездку. И еще непонятно, чем закончится история с ремонтом машины.
Вы садитесь работать. Открываете документ, пытаетесь сосредоточиться, но мысленно все время возвращаетесь к деньгам.
Психологи и э…
Итого ⬇️
✅3 практики заполнены
✅Онлайн комьюнити у Леши растет
✅+ 30.000 за 3 дня
Вот так 2 минутное видео меняет человека и его результаты
А что будет на ретрите 😍💸💸💸💸
Регистрируйтесь, дорогие, НАЧАЛО УЖЕ ЗАВТРА В 11:00
ЗАНЯТЬ МЕСТО
Как стать богатым?
Мощнейший инсайт будет для тех кто чувствует дефицит.
Запись до завтра, до 16:00 ❤️
Регестрируйтесь на ретрит, переходите в канал и слушайте подкаст на ночь ( 6 мин )
https://muradyanacademy.ru/retreat
💲Где ваши деньги? Вы знаете?
Я сейчас не о внешних накопителях или факторах. В банке, на карте, в недвижимости, - это понятные категории.
Я О ДРУГОМ
О Вашем потенциале. Умениях и навыках, которыми чаще всего не пользуются. Потому что думают:
❌Что это ерунда;
❌Что деньги можно заработать только большим трудом;
❌Что вы недостаточно хороши;
✅Я всегда помогал людям. Чувствовал, что в этом моя супер сила, но долго не…
🔥23❤12
Showing the 12 most recent of 133 posts we hold for @ymuradyan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 7 posts on @ymuradyan as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
18 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
47 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
3
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Кто хочет первым послушать и почувствовать на себе эффект?
Я оооочень хочу72%
Заинтриговали37%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 133 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@ymuradyan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@alena named in 1 post, 19 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
5 ПРИЗМ Академия | Коучинг, который меняет жизнь | 5 PRISM @academ5prism · 34,543#1
ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНЫХ КОУЧЕЙ И НАСТАВНИКОВ @fpcoach · 7,582#2
Мемперия Катерины Побоженко | Шаблоны и оригиналы | Мемы в REELS @formemas · 210,191#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
5 ПРИЗМ Академия | Коучинг, который меняет жизнь | 5 PRISM @academ5prism · 34,543 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Седа Каспарова @Seda_Kasparova_news · 254,896 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
Яна Логвина. Трансформация души, тела, бизнеса. @yanaformeTG · 18,824 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 4 October 2026
Артем Сенаторов печатает... @senatorov_art · 30,390 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 September 2026
Центр трансформации и развития личности Анастасии Анисимовой @neirografica_formagiclife · 149 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Маркетинг. Александра Гуреева @alexandra_gureeva · 21,314 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 23 September 2026
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии @petrosipovprivate · 48,070 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 August 2026
Алексей Ситников @drSit · 100,182 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
AI Эксперт: бизнес, агенты, доход @ii_ekspert · 43,961 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Mikhail Saidov @MikhailSaidov · 55,645 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Тата Феодориди @TatFeodoridy · 59,842 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Хакаматон — программы Ирины Хакамада 🈺 @hakamatonproject · 30,469 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
Нейросети для предпринимателя @neural_for_business · 41,957 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Вика Дмитриева @vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 260,893 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Нейросети для бизнеса @neuralforbusiness · 24,853 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026
Джон Кехо | Официальный канал @johnkehoe · 68,885 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Радислав Гандапас @radislavgandapascom · 52,606 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Ицхак Пинтосевич - Психология Торы @Isaac_Pintosevich · 27,400 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
«В поле мастера» Юлии Ивлиевой @amelisoul_master_julia · 37,299 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Переход в ТАК. Мудрость @perexodvtak · 96,600 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 August 2026
Татьяна Мужицкая и все-все-все @muzhitskaya · 162,490 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Ксения Мосунова | Зов Рода @zovroda_mosunova · 24,879 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
💭Инсайтовская форточка @garikovainsight · 23,390 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
Татьяна Демьяненко @prodemyanenko · 35,587 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 83 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юра Мурадян” (@ymuradyan), 38,175 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ymuradyan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.