Леонид Тальпис — практикующий психолог с высшим образованием. Последние 20 лет Леонид практикует и обучает своей авторской методологии — ВсеЛенской терапии.
Сайт: https://leonidtalpis.com/?ysclid=ms4dm3xrsn739437273
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net +867. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 61,856–63,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 09:59
63,300
+48
6 Nov 2026, 12:07
63,252
+46
5 Nov 2026, 12:50
63,206
+104
4 Nov 2026, 10:39
63,102
+43
3 Nov 2026, 13:08
63,059
+88
2 Nov 2026, 12:47
62,971
+75
1 Nov 2026, 15:20
62,896
+106
31 Oct 2026, 13:45
62,790
+88
30 Oct 2026, 13:45
62,702
+45
29 Oct 2026, 16:35
62,657
-17
28 Oct 2026, 16:05
62,674
-55
27 Oct 2026, 14:40
62,729
-47
26 Oct 2026, 15:51
62,776
+14
25 Oct 2026, 13:14
62,762
-50
24 Oct 2026, 14:15
62,812
-28
23 Oct 2026, 10:50
62,840
-3
22 Oct 2026, 13:31
62,843
-59
21 Oct 2026, 07:20
62,902
-11
20 Oct 2026, 02:29
62,913
+40
19 Oct 2026, 00:15
62,873
first reading
Engagement
140 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 191 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 63,300 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,440
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 140 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
140 (28 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
212,680
Reactions total
2,994
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
584
Videos
245
Links
641
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
38m 37s
Average length
50s
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
12,294 reactions across 135 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,119
57.9%
🔥
2,388
19.4%
👍
913
7.43%
❤🔥
800
6.51%
🙏
223
1.81%
😁
218
1.77%
👏
137
1.11%
🥰
129
1.05%
💯
114
0.927%
🕊
32
0.26%
🤩
31
0.252%
🤔
21
0.171%
😢
20
0.163%
😭
17
0.138%
🎉
16
0.13%
🐳
15
0.122%
👌
13
0.106%
🤯
13
0.106%
🦄
13
0.106%
🤗
12
0.098%
9 further kinds
50
0.407%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 140 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,294 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 34 posts held from the last 30 days (8.82%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🧠 Информации в нашей жизни всё больше, но почему ясности не прибавляется?
Иногда ищешь ответы, а после десятка статей и видео вопросов становится ещё больше. Один совет кажется убедительным, пока не услышишь противоположный. Как среди всего этого понять, что подходит именно вам?
Дело не только в количестве информации, а в том, что мы воспринимаем её через собственный опыт, убеждения и ожидания, порой даже не замеча…
Друзья, мне есть чем вас удивить.
🎉 ВСТРЕЧАЙТЕ НОВЫЙ СЕМИНАР!
ВсеЛенская терапия не стоит на месте, и новые продукты не заставляют себя ждать. С трепетом и радостью представляю вам
🟣 «ДОПОЛНЕНИЕ 8»!
В его программе я собрал вопросы, которым ранее мы не уделяли отдельное время: как мы привыкаем к давлению, что влияет на наши реакции и восприятие, как мы взаимодействуем с собой и другими людьми.
🗓️ 9–11 ноября пригл…
🧠 Состоянию не отдают приказы
— Успокойся! — говорим мы себе посреди тревоги.
— Не хочу, — отвечает что-то внутри.
То же и с «соберись», и с «не раскисай».
Мы так много говорим о состояниях не просто так. Состояние — это эмоции и ощущения в теле, а приказ приходит из головы. Тело его не понимает. Зато откликается на другое: на тепло, на воспоминание о любимых людях, на ощущение, что рядом безопасно.
Поэтому с со…
💫 Почему мы так много знаем об отношениях, но не умеем их строить?
Сегодня мы знаем о психологии отношений больше, чем когда-либо. Говорим о личных границах, сепарации и психологических травмах, знаем, какими должны быть здоровые отношения. Но этих знаний не всегда хватает, чтобы понимать друг друга и выстраивать близость.
Выбор партнёра тоже далеко не всегда осознанный. Помните, как мы обсуждали вчера: иногда за …
✈️ Можно ли сократить путь?
Обычно мы делаем так: сначала зарабатываем, добиваемся, копим, и только потом, когда цель достигнута, хотим наконец почувствовать то, ради чего всё это делалось. Хотим «Мерседес», а на самом деле хотим состояние, которое с ним связываем: удовлетворение, статус, свободу.
Но путь к этому состоянию можно существенно сократить, потому что состояние никак не связано ни с деньгами, ни с собств…
🪫 Что появляется, когда уменьшается напряжение
К вечеру нет сил, а сделано мало? Обычно нам кажется, что надо «поднажать». Но посмотрите с другой стороны: возможно, стоит заняться снижением напряжения.
Вместе с этим в жизнь приходит много важного:
⚡️ Силы. Они уходили на контроль и сопротивление, а теперь остаются на дело. Когда внутреннее напряжение уходит, высвобождается много энергии: хочется что-то делать, появ…
💫 Как понять, туда ли вы идёте?
Вы многое делаете, и многое у вас получается. Но хочется, чтобы это ещё и наполняло. Знакомая история?
Для этого у жизни в качестве компаса есть удовлетворение. Он показывает, туда ли вы идёте. Если идёте не туда, появляется недовольство. Если туда — чувствуете, что живёте своей жизнью.
Если этого хочется больше, можно проверить, на что вы сейчас опираетесь.
В ноябре в Клубе ВсеЛен…
🧭 Ясности может не быть. На что опереться?
Вы помните, что вопрос, который не решается на вашей частоте, имеет решение на следующей. Но чтобы туда шагнуть, нужно выйти из привычного, а что там дальше, заранее не видно.
Шагать в неизвестность страшно каждому. Но пока не сделаешь первый шаг, дорога не появится. А потому мы не ждём, пока уйдёт страх, а шагаем в неизвестность, пока он рядом.
Проще к этому подступитьс…
Пять дней «ВсеЛенки» позади. Спасибо, что были с нами 🤍
Сегодня завершился онлайн-семинар «ВсеЛенская терапия» с Леонидом Тальписом.
За эти дни мы исследовали привычные реакции, работали с запросами, наблюдали за демонстрациями и пробовали применять инструменты в практике.
🌍 За каждым вопросом была своя история. Отношения, важное решение, желание лучше понять себя или найти другой способ действовать в знакомой ситу…
Иногда решения нет там, где вы его ищете — оно уровнем выше.
Вчера мы говорили о том, почему рядом с разными людьми проявляемся по-разному. Сколько ни разбирай каждого человека и каждую реакцию, легче не становится.
Это как радио. Вы крутите делаете звук громче, ещё громче. Но музыки как не было, так и нет. Потому что дело не в громкости. Дело в частоте.
С жизнью то же самое. Вы многое делаете, и результат есть:
💰…
❤65🔥47👍21🎉3❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 140 posts we hold for @vselenskayaterapiya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@vselenskayaterapiya edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 September 2026
Most recent edit
28 September 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 7 posts on @vselenskayaterapiya as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
2 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@vselenskayaterapiya named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@edinenie_prime_era named in 6 posts, 19 August 2026 – 28 August 2026 · confirmed gone 13 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Универсальный Метод Наталии Кондратьевой @metodouniversal · 4,709#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мастерская Сергея Финько @sverhcheloveksf · 28,700 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
«В поле мастера» Юлии Ивлиевой @amelisoul_master_julia · 37,279 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Алла Филина. Путь Героя @yourgreatlife · 49,053 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Канал ❤️🔥Инны Маруниной @energy_marunina · 55,006 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Зина Гегамовна 🫂 Психолог. Психотерапевт. @zinashamoyan · 69,970 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Юлия Ивлиева @amelisoul_master · 102,207 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
партия любви @SMpodcast · 37,309 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 1 September 2026
2️⃣ Inna Tliashinova |ТРЕНАЖЕРЫ ДЛЯ ПОДСОЗНАНИЯ! @trener_podsoznanie · 47,043 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
Бачинская @bachinskaya_oxana · 70,101 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Психолог Николай Баранов @nibaranovpsy · 35,056 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Школа Михаила Агеева @ageevschool · 54,821 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
Переход в ТАК. ДОМ @prostovtak · 25,173 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 14 September 2026
Сергей Кулаков | Космопсихология @cosmopsychologyonline · 26,051 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
Настя Мажирина @amazhirina · 20,603 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 September 2026
Светатерапия Светланы Казиной 🚀 (психология, философия, эзотерика). @SvetaTherapy · 22,119 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 20 September 2026
Лига Свободных Душ @novostizhizn · 24,684 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Жизнь и тело с Оксаной @telo_psy · 22,374 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
ЮЛИЯ ХАДАРЦЕВА 🕊️ | Расстановки @JuliaKhadartseva · 38,309 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 31 August 2026
Sasha Vidit @f_sasha_vidit · 20,634 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 September 2026
Психосоматика на пальцах🙌 @sanzharovvadym · 70,968 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
Антон Мажирин - духовный терапевт @AntonPrednaznachenie · 40,038 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
Остеопатия души @osteopatiya_dushi · 46,817 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Неудобный психолог @mamaterapia · 60,873 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
Соло Татьяна об энергии ⚡️ @tanyaSOLOenergo · 47,128 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 91 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ВсеЛенская Терапия Леонида Тальписа” (@vselenskayaterapiya), 63,300 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vselenskayaterapiya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.