Рабочие споры, ответственность за других, чужие ожидания, собственные решения. Разговор о языке касается всего этого. В программе конференции “Язык формирует будущее” есть темы, которые можно примерить к своей жизни и работе. Собрали их в одном посте, чтобы вы могли выбрать, какие выступления хотите услышать. 🔸20 ноября · Екатерина Каширская — «У меня нет слов для того, что я чувствую» Об эмоциональном интеллекте в…

Channel
5 ПРИЗМ Академия | Коучинг, который меняет жизнь | 5 PRISM
@academ5prism
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
34,531subscribers
-1,002 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001397333605 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @academ5prism |
| Created | Between 1 November 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 61 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/academ5prism |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 06:56 | 34,531 | -12 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:19 | 34,543 | -15 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 03:39 | 34,558 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:47 | 34,563 | -10 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 00:15 | 34,573 | -15 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:15 | 34,588 | -31 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 34,619 | -24 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:30 | 34,643 | -31 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 22:16 | 34,674 | -40 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 01:49 | 34,714 | -9 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 00:59 | 34,723 | -29 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 04:16 | 34,752 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:36 | 34,758 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 05:06 | 34,765 | -14 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:30 | 34,779 | -13 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 23:45 | 34,792 | -8 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:10 | 34,800 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 17:36 | 34,806 | -6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 18:20 | 34,812 | +3 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:28 | 34,809 | first reading |
Engagement
208 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 171 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.992%
- avg views ÷ 34,531 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 342
- 51 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.51%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 51
- of 208 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 28 of 51 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 208 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 17,462 |
| Reactions total | 153 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 06:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 21m 31s
- Average length
- 1m 05s
Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
734 reactions across 122 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 340 | 46.3% | |
| 🔥 | 232 | 31.6% | |
| 👍 | 91 | 12.4% | |
| custom 6160968872003373731 | 27 | 3.68% | |
| 🎉 | 27 | 3.68% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 2.32% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 125 of the 208 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 734 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 51 posts held from the last 30 days (7.84%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Планировали договориться за пять минут. Закончили спором, к задаче так и не вернулись. Иногда в разговоре становится важнее отстоять свою правоту, чем понять, почему возникло разногласие. Мы уже подбираем следующий аргумент, пока собеседник ещё говорит. В карточках показываем, как обсуждение рабочих вопросов превращается в борьбу за власть и какой вопрос может помочь вернуться к делу. Этой теме посвящено выступлен…
🔥3👍2
«Проще самому сделать, чем десять раз объяснять». Знакомая мысль? Вы нанимаете сотрудников, делегируете задачи, ждёте инициативы. Но в итоге всё равно проверяете каждую деталь, вносите правки и принимаете решения за команду. А потом удивляетесь: почему никто не хочет брать ответственность? Иногда дело не в отсутствии инициативы у сотрудников, а в том, как выстроены процессы и коммуникация внутри команды. Если любую…
❤1🔥1custom 61609688720033737311
"Почему я узнаю об этом только сейчас?" Сотрудник говорит, что команда не успевает к сроку. Руководителю важно понять, почему проблема всплыла так поздно. Но от его первой реакции может зависеть, как скоро сотрудник решится сообщить о следующей. Что изменится в разговоре, если сначала спросить: "Что мешает уложиться в срок и где нужна помощь?" На конференции "Язык формирует будущее" об этом поговорим с Александром…
Начали обсуждать, как решить проблему. Закончили спором о том, кто здесь главный. Так бывает дома, в команде и на деловых переговорах. Аргументов становится больше, голоса — громче, а договориться всё труднее. В какой-то момент важнее уже настоять на своём, чем найти решение. На конференции «Язык формирует будущее» об этом расскажет Илья Шмелев — кандидат психологических наук, старший преподаватель НИУ ВШЭ, Busines…
❤1🔥1
Почему ребёнок «не слышит», и при чём тут мы 👂 «Сколько раз повторять?», «Ты меня вообще слушаешь?» Кажется, что ребёнок упрямится или специально игнорирует. Но часто дело не в нём, а в том, как и когда мы к нему обращаемся. Александр Колмановский, семейный психолог и преподаватель МГУ, считает, что ребёнок перестаёт слышать, когда слова взрослого звучат как постоянный фон из требований. Тогда он «отключает звук»,…
🔥2
Почему одни слова помогают договориться, а другие превращают разговор в борьбу? За привычными фразами стоят эмоции, ожидания и способы реагировать, которые мы не всегда замечаем. Разобраться в них помогает психология. Конференция «Язык формирует будущее» организована при поддержке Центра управления и коммуникаций НИУ «Высшая школа экономики». Центр развивает образовательные программы в области коммуникаций, перего…
❤4🔥3custom 61609688720033737312
Можно ли развивать страну, не развивая человека? 🌍 За большими изменениями всегда стоят люди: их знания, способности, идеи и желание двигаться вперёд. Психологи и коучи помогают людям лучше понимать себя, раскрывать свои возможности и справляться с трудностями. ⚡️ Но есть ли сегодня общая система, которая объединяет эту работу? Как развивается сама профессия и какие возможности ждут специалистов в будущем? Поговор…
❤4
Язык формирует будущее🧠 Носители русского различают синий и голубой быстрее тех, у кого для них одно слово. Дети, с которыми много разговаривают, лучше справляются со своими эмоциями. А внутренний голос, которым мы хвалим или ругаем себя, часто звучит словами из детства. Об этом три дня будут говорить на конференции «Язык формирует будущее», которую Академия 5 Prism проводит вместе с НИУ ВШЭ. 📆 19–21 ноября · онла…
❤4👍3custom 61609688720033737311
Какой монстр чаще всего мешает вашим планам? 👻 Самозванец, Перфекционист, Катастрофизатор или Откладыватель? На квесте «Побег от внутренних монстров» вы встретитесь с каждым из них. С теми, кто пугает, препятствует профессиональному развитию. И научитесь с ними договариваться. 👉 Пройти квест
❤3👍1
Вас хвалят за проект, а внутри звучит: «Просто повезло» 🎭 Если узнали себя, вы в хорошей компании. Такие мысли бывают у опытных врачей, руководителей и известных актёров. ⬇️ В карусели разобрали, откуда берётся самозванец и какие вопросы помогают сделать его тише. 👻 Самозванец один из монстров нашего хэллоуинского квеста. Проверьте, получится ли у вас от него сбежать. 👉 Пройти квест
❤5👍2🔥2
Кажется, у каждого из нас есть свой внутренний монстр 👾 Один заставляет переживать о том, что скажут окружающие. Другой рисует тревожные сценарии будущего. Третий убеждает, что лучше даже не пытаться, чтобы не ошибиться. А четвёртый предлагает оставить всё как есть. Даже если это «как есть» уже давно не устраивает. Узнал кого-нибудь?👀 Мы в Академии 5 Prism решили посмотреть на привычные страхи под другим углом и …
❤4🔥2🎉1
Showing the 12 most recent of 208 posts we hold for @academ5prism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 5 posts on @academ5prism as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 1 October 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 16 October 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 21 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 4
Polls
The 6 most recent of 22 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что выберете?
- Да, остаюсь при своём91%
- Нет, теперь выбрал(а) бы другую9%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто такой же?
- Я😅90%
- Я знаю полностью механизм10%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
КТО ИЗ НИХ КАЖЕТСЯ ВАМ ОПАСНЕЕ?
- А39%
- Б26%
- В35%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто уже прошел наш праздничный квест?
- Я прошел и получил подарки50%
- Я только собираюсь6%
- Что за квест44%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Кто уже прошел квиз, сколько правильных ответов вы дали про нашу академию?
- 10%
- 20%
- 30%
- 411%
- 511%
- 656%
- 722%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А теперь вопрос к вам: с какого года вы с 5 Prism? 👀
- 2019–202128%
- 2022–202316%
- 2024–202520%
- с начала 202616%
- только знакомлюсь20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 208 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@ymuradyan · 38,139#1
@fpcoach · 7,582#2
@fokinacoach · 13,207#3
@delaykakcoach · 10,839#4
@psy5prism · 2,283#5
@olga_rybina_coach_1 · 5,593#6
@mariyadovnar_channel · 10,250#7
@MariaDombrovan · 7,905#8
@GYMforCOACH · 3,042#9
@Erickson_Coaching · 5,837#10
@aleksandrapritsker · 8,424#11
@GalaLetasProject · 1,489#12
@dunina_alina · 2,050#13
@coaching_week · 3,232#14
@academy_goriachev · 2,714#15
@malilo_elena · 5,595#16
@kozlovaevgeniya_psy · 5,291#17
@sellmorecoach · 789#18
@CoachingHubPlatform · 2,949#19
@Seda_Kasparova_news · 254,815#20
@coach_accelerator · 1,490#21
@skopets_molodets · 305#22
@coachmentor_rus · 2,655#23
@coachclub_freeswim · 1,500#24
@alfalida_club · 1,612#25
@coaching21centure · 5,081#26
@waycoach · 645#27
@grebenukm · 251,797#28
@CoachLebedevaMCC · 2,136#29
@masterskaycoacha · 1,604#30
@elvorobyeva · 3,009#31
@coacharu · 1,425#32
@olyakvaratskheliya · 1,692#33
@whistle_expert · 1,811#34
@pro100psychology · 4,491#35
@Katerinalengold · 71,146#36
@iakuban · 7,200#37
@maratsales · 443#38
@podrezeducation · 7,410#39
@galavdos · 995#40
@copracticum · 481#41
@bellakim_tg · 921#42
@neirografica_formagiclife · 149#43
@super_vision2021 · 446#44
@academy_2win · 695#45
@centerchelokidi · 1,126#46
@zzakatov · 965#47
@icoach_space · 2,369#48
@kouchegarka · 2,155#49
@exe_coach · 1,520#50
@parfenova_coach · 4,281#51
@domcoach_msk · 768#52
@scbc_ru · 709#53
@Coach4pacific · 653#54
@arkcoaching · 1,565#55
@ipodrez · 28,850#56
@coachcentryug_news · 2,196#57
@kopylov_talks · 335#58
@career_practice · 4,110#59
@my8keys4success · 398#60
@igor_shazhko · 3,297#61
@julia_rodochinskaya · 19,012#62
@coachingforbusiness · 1,249#63
@dairycoachneurologist · 3,376#64
@mastermindproject · 6,322#65
@lilianavarrete · 981#66
@amelisoul_master_julia · 37,279#67
@ura_vibe · 4,910#68
@biz_networking1 · 10,336 (as read 2 September 2026)#69
@storis_psy · 10,794#70
@TatFeodoridy · 59,841#71
@igralila_online · 661#72
@ivleva_coach · 2,164#73
@muradyangames · 5,716#74
@amelisoul_master · 102,207#75
@MikhailSaidov · 55,641#76
@frilanser_nadya · 274#77
@profinansy · 566,916#78
@vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 260,868#79
@anamavricheva · 35,201#80
@gmastersalliance · 1,445#81
@mari_vse · 18,418#82
@muzhitskaya · 162,411#83
@mmargosavchuk · 116,621#84
@senatorov_art · 30,376#85
@petrosipovprivate · 48,061#86
@easybillions · 5,160#87
@mastermind_groups_info · 2,313#88
@ab_chat · 134,918#89
@kromberger_v · 14,416#90
@annamaltcevaav · 1,539#91
@formemas · 210,348#92
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 2 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@ymuradyan · 38,139
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
@hakamatonproject · 30,456
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
@drSit · 100,154
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 15 August 2026
@gutvaleriy · 29,753
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
@kurpatov_tg · 70,430
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
@TatFeodoridy · 59,841
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
@telo_psy · 22,374
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
@myshlenie_kurpatov · 42,846
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
@sanochkina_anna · 25,136
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
@kintellect · 35,896
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
@Seda_Kasparova_news · 254,815
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 10 August 2026
@zovroda_mosunova · 24,873
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 September 2026
@kurpatov_chtodelat · 33,866
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@PsychologiesRussia · 53,150
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
@psy_professional · 25,386
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
@podsoznanie_lebedko · 20,445
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 September 2026
@yanakataeva · 29,156
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@ii_ekspert · 43,948
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
@MinistryoSHE · 78,801
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 September 2026
@radislavgandapascom · 52,597
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@markbarton_mb · 87,380
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
@prodemyanenko · 35,575
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
@novoselova_time · 21,516
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 September 2026
@garikovainsight · 23,383
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“5 ПРИЗМ Академия | Коучинг, который меняет жизнь | 5 PRISM” (@academ5prism), 34,531 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/academ5prism.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.