Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -329. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59,973–60,400 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 12:56
60,022
-67
15 Sept 2026, 13:39
60,089
+22
13 Sept 2026, 20:40
60,067
-3
12 Sept 2026, 00:17
60,070
-21
9 Sept 2026, 18:18
60,091
-37
6 Sept 2026, 10:15
60,128
+3
3 Sept 2026, 23:01
60,125
+8
2 Sept 2026, 14:56
60,117
-22
1 Sept 2026, 17:43
60,139
-7
31 Aug 2026, 20:38
60,146
-8
30 Aug 2026, 22:15
60,154
-15
29 Aug 2026, 18:38
60,169
-23
28 Aug 2026, 15:38
60,192
+15
27 Aug 2026, 15:35
60,177
-21
26 Aug 2026, 12:14
60,198
-9
25 Aug 2026, 12:48
60,207
+4
24 Aug 2026, 13:52
60,203
-9
22 Aug 2026, 21:22
60,212
+12
20 Aug 2026, 14:02
60,200
-24
19 Aug 2026, 12:36
60,224
first reading
Engagement
180 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.28%
avg views ÷ 60,022 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,570
111 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
112
of 180 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 110 of 111 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held
180 (5 August 2026 – 20 September 2026)
Views total
285,041
Reactions total
8,614
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 15:38 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,310
Videos
≈1,850
Links
≈1,450
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9h 50m
Average length
10m 22s
Measured directly from 57 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,308 reactions across 173 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6,785
41.6%
🔥
5,016
30.8%
❤🔥
2,033
12.5%
🤣
718
4.40%
👍
618
3.79%
💯
263
1.61%
😁
254
1.56%
🥰
174
1.07%
👏
111
0.681%
🙏
87
0.533%
😍
75
0.46%
🎉
56
0.343%
🤩
32
0.196%
😢
19
0.117%
💋
18
0.11%
👌
13
0.08%
😱
10
0.061%
🤔
10
0.061%
🤯
8
0.049%
🥴
8
0.049%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 176 of the 180 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,334 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 180 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как разрушить отношения с мужчиной Овном?
Сказав все это, добавлю, если он вас действительно выбрал и принял, вы пара, вы в браке, он любит, это, по моим наблюдениям, те мужчины, которые будут биться за семью до последнего!
И вообще, если вы ему нужны, вцепится мертвой хваткой.
Вообще, опыт с мужчиной (любого знака зодиака), который вас любит и который не любит-это два вообще разных опыта.
Интересно не эту тему бол…
ВЫ ЭТОГО ЖДАЛИ! 8 ТОПОВЫХ ТЕРАПЕВТИЧЕСКИХ ГРУПП! 🔥
Здравствуйте-здравствуйте, мои дорогие, мои великолепные!
Я знаю, как вы каждый раз ждете открытия новых групп, потому что групповой формат у нас зарекомендовал себя просто великолепно!
Потому что, когда вы приходите проработать свой вопрос в группу, с вами приходят еще 9-12 человек и каждый со своей историей, со своим запросом. И в каждом вы находите что-то свое.…
Кризис истерика. Фантазии. Иллюзии.
Невыбранность. Отвергнутость.
Рекомендую серию моих мастер классов «Надлом личности»
Поверьте, это самый бюджетный и быстрый способ вытащить себя за волосы из этого болота.
Ссылка 👉🏼 НАДЛОМ
Над супербуком пока работаю 🔥
Поддерживайте эфиры огнями! #эфир
‼️Внимание мошенники!!!
В очередной раз мошенники добавляют подписчиков в свой канал под видом моего!
Не доверяйте! Никакого канала по проекту «Рука об Руку», Privat Group, про Инвестиции и Криптовалюту НЕТ!
👉🏼 Пожалуйтесь на канал как на мошенников
👉🏼 Нажмите кнопку СПАМ и ВЫЙТИ.
Прикрепляю фото фейкового канала выше 👆🏼
Я не добавляю вас ни в какие инвестпроекты!
В мои проекты вы заходите сами по ссылке из офи…
Гайд «Сексуальная переписка. Флирт в переписке по типам личности» - реально рабочий инструмент!
Как отмечают участники программы ГЕРОИ2 подойдет не только для начального этапа отношений😉🔥
ПРИОБРЕСТИ ГАЙД
ОН ТАК ФЛИРТУЕТ ИЛИ ОН ДОЛБА*Б?
Если вы хоть раз писали человеку что-то откровенное и ждали, что он растает или ответит взаимностью - а в ответ получали просто холодный одинокий смайлик или односложное предложение.
Или случалось наоборот: он писал вам, осыпал комплиментами в переписке, 100500 смс в день, после чего вы либо влюблялись без памяти, либо вообще были в шоке от напора и в легком непонимании «что он хочет?…
ЕСТЬ ЛЮДИ, КОТОРЫМ Я МОГУ ДОВЕРИТЬ ВАС КАК СЕБЕ
Я много лет говорю о психологии, разбираю ваши истории, отвечаю на вопросы, создаю программы, и прекрасно понимаю одну вещь: иногда следующего поста, эфира или даже курса уже недостаточно. Нужен человек напротив, который возьмет именно вашу историю и пойдет разбираться в нее вместе с вами. Индивидуально и глубоко.
И здесь я ооочень придирчивая.
Потому что психологу в…
Родился малыш, ему уже 5.5 мес.
Я сама психолог и обожаю свою работу. НО!
С появлением малыша как будто ушли ВСЕ деньги из моей жизни... Я нахожусб сейчас в зависимости от своего мужчины и меня это просто раздражает,потому что ранее я зарабатывала хорошие деньги и не зависела ни от кого... Как с этим справиться? Ощущение что скатываюсь в депрессию, но как психолог выгребаю себя, но не до конца как будто
Showing the 12 most recent of 180 posts we hold for @TatFeodoridy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@TatFeodoridy edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 September 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Зина Гегамовна 🫂 Психолог. Психотерапевт. @zinashamoyan · 71,035 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Вика Дмитриева @vikadmitrieva_psiholog · 266,589 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Наташа Жукова.Рядом 🫂 @zhukova_ryadom · 28,164 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Наталья Жукова² @NatalliaZhukova2 · 49,671 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
Наталья Касарина @kasarinan · 28,991 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
Fedor Belogai @belogaifedor · 39,457 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Психолог Сексолог МАКС БЛЭК @m_sovetnik · 59,602 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Психолог Николай Баранов @nibaranovpsy · 34,869 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Ярослав Самойлов | Канал @yaroslav_samoylov · 41,942 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Ярослава Рындина @yarapsy · 24,406 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
МАРК БАРТОН🔴жизнь @womancan_mb · 84,581 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Федоренко Павел | Тревога FM @szmclub · 32,541 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
Артем Репецкий @artemrepetskyi · 25,425 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Юлия Егорушкина о психологии @nesovetchik · 82,485 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Mindspa | Самопомощь @mindspa_ru · 34,832 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026
Инна Белова @belovainnapsy · 79,073 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Астролог Чукреева на связи @astrolog_chukreeva · 24,270 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Мария Бразговская @MBrazgovskaia · 56,295 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Альберт Сафин @safin4 · 68,648 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Валера Гут | Ψ и AQ @gutvaleriy · 29,181 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
Надежда Асанова|Психология @asanna_news · 34,643 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 3 September 2026
Анастасия ko_sha @koshechkiklub · 26,570 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Римма Карамова @karamova_fm · 31,191 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Дмитрий Гухман | Сексология @idemvmeste_dimagukhman · 69,829 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 55 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тата Феодориди” (@TatFeodoridy), 60,022 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/TatFeodoridy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.