А я переехала в город мечты Санкт-Петербург ☺️ после тренинга прошло 1.5 года. И скажи мне кто-нибудь тогда, что будет так, конечно, я бы не поверила.
🔥61❤11🤔2👍1

Channel
@nesovetchik
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
82,594subscribers
-627 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001434360571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @nesovetchik |
| Description | Канал для родителей, которые хотят выстроить доверительные отношения с детьми Начните отсюда: https://t.me/nesovetchik/306 Канал зарегистрирован в РКН – https://clck.ru/3EkCwn @nesovetchik_bot В личке ничего не продаю |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/nesovetchik |
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:18 | 82,594 | -46 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 03:19 | 82,640 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 82,650 | -35 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 82,685 | -89 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:01 | 82,774 | -68 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 09:35 | 82,842 | -20 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:47 | 82,862 | -26 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 82,888 | -31 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 82,919 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 82,925 | -16 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 82,941 | -28 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 82,969 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 82,971 | -28 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 04:09 | 82,999 | -11 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 83,010 | -30 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 83,040 | -34 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 83,074 | +14 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:12 | 83,060 | -19 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 83,079 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 83,083 | first reading |
36 posts held, back to 13 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (13 July 2026 – 14 September 2026) |
| Views total | 105,520 |
| Reactions total | 3,109 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Sept 2026, 21:25 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,497 reactions across 36 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5,430 | 72.4% | |
| 🔥 | 1,201 | 16.0% | |
| 😁 | 377 | 5.03% | |
| 👍 | 331 | 4.42% | |
| 💔 | 117 | 1.56% | |
| 🤩 | 21 | 0.28% | |
| 🤔 | 20 | 0.267% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,497 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 13 July 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А я переехала в город мечты Санкт-Петербург ☺️ после тренинга прошло 1.5 года. И скажи мне кто-нибудь тогда, что будет так, конечно, я бы не поверила.
🔥61❤11🤔2👍1
Знакомьтесь, это Настя (и это не круг анонимных алкоголиков) После затяжного декрета она обнаружила, что прежней версии себя уже нет… На предыдущую работу не хочется, а кем она хочет стать, когда «вырастет» – совершенно непонятно. Сейчас она успешно работает психологом, ведет клиентов и радуется, что наконец нашла дело своей жизни. А еще Лена. На ней было всё – уборка, готовка, дети, уроки, работа. Муж бесит. Не по…
❤50🔥18👍1
Все помнят туалеты без перегородок? Брр, вот что точно оставило психологическую травму целому поколению. В видео рассказала как общие туалеты повлияли на трудности с границами (хотя казалось бы, темы вообще не связаны между собой). И не забывайте регистрироваться на Вечеринку детских травм, там расскажу: – почему простое «нет» ощущается почти как преступление и как перестать чувствовать себя плохой после отказа – …
❤65😁15👍14🔥7
Ну наконец-то нормальная вечеринка 😂💃💃💃
😁91❤10👍6
Вы приглашены на главную вечеринку этой осени! Я прочитала абсолютно все ваши комментарии о том, что вас тревожит: предстоящие осенние болезни, совмещение быта, работы и детей, не с кем поговорить по душам, одна суета в жизни, нехватка времени на себя, огромное количество задач, страхи... всего не перечислить. Что ж, девочки, фейс-контроль пройден) Этот прекрасный мужчина открывает вам двери на главное событие это…
🔥112❤34👍4
Более 500 лайков за 5 часов, ну вы даете! А вы видели что творится в комментариях? Некоторые уже нашли пасхалки) Еще немного реакций и завтра рассказываю, что для вас придумала)
❤68🔥27👍2
Эта тайна стоит 777 ❤️ Наступил очередной …брь (сентябрь), впереди еще три БРЯ! А вместе с ним нас ждут домашки, вирусы, осенняя хмарь и прочие не всегда предсказуемые события. Я кое-что для вас готовлю, но просто так это не отдам. Пишите в комментариях – что у вас происходит в жизни, работе, отношениях, что вас сейчас тревожит? Скоро вы поймете, почему вопрос именно такой) Если вы набираете 777 реакций и я вижу ва…
❤850🔥78💔24🤩12🤔4
Где грань между «перестать быть хорошей девочкой» и «плевать на всех»? Недавно я написала пост о том как здорово маме иногда выбраться куда-то отдохнуть без детей. В ВК меня тут же упрекнули в том, что это не по-христиански и эгоистично. Что это за мать-перемать, которая бросила детей на мужа и укатила в Сочи 🤦♀️ Здесь мы видим сильную крайность – любое время на себя воспринимается как «наплевала на всех». Если н…
❤90🔥23💔6👍2
Один из самых недооценённых источников стресса у женщин – иметь огромный потенциал, но не иметь возможности его проявить История в тему. Как-то я искала дизайнера для оформления материалов и презентаций, чтобы вам было не только полезно, но и красиво. Встречаюсь с одним. Говорит – да я гений дизайна, работал с теми и с этими, мои работы – настоящие шедевры. Ладно, начинаем сотрудничать. Присылает мне этот товарищ И…
❤118🔥52👍22
Нагрянула в магазин за 5 минут до закрытия На маркетплейсах удобно заказывать (было): понравилось=забрал на пвз, не понравилось = отправил обратно. Но иногда хочется чего-то особенного, так случилось и с одними классными очками. Заказать из Москвы можно, но доставку отдельно оплати, забери, примерь, потом обратно отправь посылку, если не подошло + жди возврата. Заморачиваться не захотелось, тем более в августе уже …
❤114🔥52👍7
Пора менять обои Нравится вам это или нет, но за 11 школьных лет ваш мозг привык учиться именно с сентября (если со школой вам не повезло, то не только учиться, но и нервно вздрагивать от наступления 1 сентября). Мы долго приучали себя, что именно осенью пора начинать новое, ставить цели и собираться с силами. Но если вы мама, то вас легко может засосать в воронку стыковки расписаний школы, кружков, домашки… В этом…
❤95🔥36👍5
Начальник-самодур Когда я училась в аспирантуре, каждый понедельник начальник собирал нас и регулярно сливал «помойку» – да вы тупицы, я вам все гайки закручу, будете у меня... Атмосфера по понедельникам стояла мягко говоря недружелюбная. Благо оставшуюся неделю я его не видела, писала диссертацию, а потом и вовсе не пересекалась. Другая ситуация. Когда заведовала кафедрой в ВУЗе, со мной вместе работала методист. …
❤139💔28👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @nesovetchik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@nesovetchik edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлия Егорушкина о психологии” (@nesovetchik), 82,594 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nesovetchik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.