❗️Бесплатный курс «Секретный элемент дисциплины и послушания» 🔻
https://my.mamazonka.ru/secret-element?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=chat&utm_campaign=element
Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67b3fafbec74ea6cc4d3e182
Created
Between 1 December 2018 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
42 measurements spanning 72 days, net -1,328. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72,960–74,686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Oct 2026, 02:46
73,159
-27
17 Oct 2026, 03:20
73,186
-13
16 Oct 2026, 04:18
73,199
-39
15 Oct 2026, 01:19
73,238
-33
13 Oct 2026, 19:37
73,271
-102
10 Oct 2026, 05:57
73,373
-90
6 Oct 2026, 02:36
73,463
-68
30 Sept 2026, 18:55
73,531
-282
18 Sept 2026, 08:16
73,813
-73
16 Sept 2026, 01:00
73,886
-35
14 Sept 2026, 07:17
73,921
-30
12 Sept 2026, 12:17
73,951
-36
10 Sept 2026, 09:17
73,987
-60
7 Sept 2026, 04:57
74,047
+21
4 Sept 2026, 09:17
74,026
-10
2 Sept 2026, 20:44
74,036
-8
1 Sept 2026, 20:08
74,044
-8
31 Aug 2026, 19:35
74,052
-15
30 Aug 2026, 21:07
74,067
-8
29 Aug 2026, 18:17
74,075
first reading
Engagement
212 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 149 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.40%
avg views ÷ 73,159 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,020
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.848%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
87
of 212 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 73 of 80 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026
Posts held
212 (3 August 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Views total
81,739
Reactions total
647
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Oct 2026, 17:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,850
Videos
≈496
Links
≈1,590
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
54m 44s
Average length
1m 57s
Measured directly from 28 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,926 reactions across 184 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,183
61.4%
🔥
513
26.6%
👏
126
6.54%
😁
38
1.97%
🥰
34
1.77%
😢
20
1.04%
😍
7
0.363%
🤔
3
0.156%
🎉
2
0.104%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 185 of the 212 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,926 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 197 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mamazonija. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 212 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 18 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🤫 Приоткрою секрет: мы открываем школу супергероев для детей
Каждый родитель сталкивался с этой ситуацией – пытаетесь помочь ребенку в моменты, когда он не хочет что-то делать, когда не получается и он расстраивается, «психует». Слова до него не «долетают», объяснения раздражают еще больше.
И из попытки помочь начинается новый конфликт.
В моменты сильных эмоций разговоры не работают, он вас просто не слышит. А к…
🛟Сегодня последний день доступа к записи практикума про силу воли и дисциплину
На практикум «Как воспитать у ребенка силу воли и дисциплину» пришли родители с разными ситуациями, но общим вопросом «Он не хочет ничего делать, бросает дело, чуть стало сложнее. Это лень или характер?».
На самом деле, не то и не другое.
👉 Это может быть клубок из эмоций, которые накрывают ребенка в момент трудности – страх, гнев, неоп…
Ну всё, вы меня вынуждаете 😏
Вообще-то я готовила этот материал только для участников практикума. Но читаю ваши вопросы: «Не может сам», «При первой трудности бросает», «Без меня ничего не делает» — и понимаю, что делиться нужно со всеми.
🎁 «Как помочь ребенку справиться самому: алгоритм для родителей»
Внутри — что сказать и сделать, когда ребенок застрял, чтобы поддержать его и не перехватить всю задачу на себя.
…
🎁 Пройдите тест «Не хочу, но надо»: как справляется ваш ребенок?
За «не хочу», «не буду» и «потом» скрывается не лень, а конкретные стратегии справляться с трудностями.
Ребенок может их избегать, может «нападать», например, обвиняя других в том, что получил двойку или откладывать.
И когда мы это понимаем, то становится ясно, что давлением, уговорами, контролем можно добиться выполнения дела, но саму причину не убр…
😤 Ребенок делает только то, что хочет – как это исправить?
Для многих родителей это проблема, что ребенок делает только то, что хочет.
Но «хотеть» – это важная составляющая нашей личности, откуда берутся наши желания, мечты и перевоплощаются в цели и планы, которые мы достигаем.
И если вдруг получается внутреннего «хочуна» задушить, жизнь напоминает бег по кругу. Мы куда-то бежим-бежим, а зачем и почему, не понятн…
[Подкаст] «У вас такой способный ребёнок! Если бы только постарался…»
Слышали такое от учителей?
Вы нанимаете репетиторов, покупаете развивающие курсы, ищете лучшую школу, вкладываете деньги и время.
А ребенок по-прежнему не садится за уроки сам, бросает дело при первой трудности и даже не хочет разобраться, подумать, приложить усилие.
Обычно родители думают «Он же способный! Если бы только старался…». И совершенно…
🎥Запись практикума про силу воли и дисциплину – отдам в добрые руки!
Вчера мы завершили совершенно новый практикум «Как воспитать у ребенка силу воли и дисциплину» с инструкциями, что делать, чтобы он рос приспособленным к жизни и готовым самостоятельно справляться с трудностями.
И знаете, какой вывод за эти 2 дня я сделала – почему ребенок растет “тепличным”, готов делать только то, что хочет, а трудностей старает…
⚠️ ПОДКЛЮЧАЙТЕСЬ к повтору эфира, как «включить» силу воли у ребенка
Мы начинаем повтор финального эфира на практикуме про силу воли.
Разбираем конкретные инструменты, как обучать ребенка прикладывать усилия и справляться самому мягко, без конфликтов, давления и «соберись».
Последняя возможность подключиться, не пропускайте.
https://my.mamazonka.ru/vhod_marafon?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=channel&utm_campaign=…
😱"А в 9 лет еще не поздно развивать силу воли? А в 14?"
Сегодня мы завершили практикум «Как воспитать у ребенка силу воли и дисциплину» и разобрали конкретные последовательные шаги, что делать в каждой ситуации, когда ребенок сталкивается с трудностью: не хочет, пробует и не получается, теряет интерес и т.д.
👉 И третий способ, когда мы не делаем уступки «сделаю сама» и не давим «пока не сделаешь, не уйдешь» показа…
Карина Рихтере Мамазония pinned «🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴 Активируем навык: ребенок справляется с трудностями САМ Мы начинаем последний эфир практикума! Подключайтесь и не пропускайте готовые инструменты, чтобы ребенок учился справляться сам и в следующий раз захотел попробовать сам. А также возможность…»
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
Активируем навык: ребенок справляется с трудностями САМ
Мы начинаем последний эфир практикума!
Подключайтесь и не пропускайте готовые инструменты, чтобы ребенок учился справляться сам и в следующий раз захотел попробовать сам.
А также возможность пообщаться лично, разобрать ваши вопросы и ситуации:
https://my.mamazonka.ru/vhod_marafon?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=channel&utm_campaign=marafon
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 212 posts we hold for @mamazonija. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@mamazonija edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
👀 Какие у вас были отношения с мамой в детстве? Считаете, что они повлияли на то, как вы воспитываете своих детей? Ваши ситуации пишите в комментарии 👇
Помню, как мне ее не хватало, хочу быть доступной мамой61%
С мамой были подругами, а мне воспитывать сложно6%
Мама часто срывалась, теперь и я тоже44%
Росла не с мамой, стараюсь дать ребенку все6%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Мы уже так много разобрали про диалог с ребенком и в семье.
🤔 Для кого крик все еще остается самым эффективным способом добиться послушания?
Для меня6%
Уже не кричу28%
Пытаюсь спокойно, но иногда помогает только крик67%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 212 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 18 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ирина Меркулова | Профессия психолог @psy_professional · 25,521 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Психологи Козыревы. ДНК Академия бережного воспитания @natalkoz_fm · 67,981 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
Детский психолог Света Гончарова 🇺🇦🇨🇦 @sve_flymama · 43,074 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
УмноШкола Шамиля Ахмадуллина @knshu23 · 67,185 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Юлия Егорушкина о психологии @nesovetchik · 81,560 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Академия Ukids @ukids_academy · 54,255 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
Шамиль Ахмадуллин | УМНОШКОЛА @shamilahmadullin · 178,234 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Адоньева про похудение @adonevabody · 47,208 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
МегаМама Валентина Красникова @megamama17 · 22,175 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
Надежда Семененко. Психология отношений @semenenkon · 20,226 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Карина Рихтере Мамазония” (@mamazonija), 73,159 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mamazonija.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.