Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
МегаМама Валентина Красникова
@megamama17
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
22,200subscribers
-118 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001258927889 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @megamama17 |
| Description | 🔸Мама 17 детей. Мама для мам 🔸Автор бестселера "Порядок раз и навсегда" 🔸Общественный деятель Гениальная готовка https://valentina-krasnikova.ru/gg.menu?utm_source=tg&utm_medium=channel А+ Включена РКН в перечень персональных страниц https://inlnk.ru/dn |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/megamama17 |
Topic
Parenting & family — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 09:26 | 22,200 | -2 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 08:41 | 22,202 | -2 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:38 | 22,204 | -12 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:36 | 22,216 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:10 | 22,218 | -1 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 08:00 | 22,219 | +2 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 22,217 | -8 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 22,225 | -5 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:18 | 22,230 | +19 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 22,211 | +7 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 22,204 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 22:19 | 22,203 | -8 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 22:29 | 22,211 | -4 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 22:06 | 22,215 | -14 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 00:17 | 22,229 | +60 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 00:28 | 22,169 | -9 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 22,178 | -3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 15:35 | 22,181 | +6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 12:44 | 22,175 | +4 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:10 | 22,171 | first reading |
Engagement
200 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.13%
- avg views ÷ 22,200 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 473
- 59 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.17%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 60
- of 200 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 59 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 200 (26 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 27,920 |
| Reactions total | 764 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈2,330
- Videos
- ≈2,370
- Links
- ≈2,190
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1h 13m
- Average length
- 55s
Measured directly from 80 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,736 reactions across 173 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,837 | 49.2% | |
| 🔥 | 1,179 | 31.6% | |
| 👍 | 292 | 7.82% | |
| 🤣 | 162 | 4.34% | |
| 💯 | 78 | 2.09% | |
| 😁 | 71 | 1.90% | |
| ❤🔥 | 38 | 1.02% | |
| 👏 | 24 | 0.642% | |
| 🥰 | 17 | 0.455% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 0.187% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 0.161% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 0.134% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.107% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 0.08% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 0.08% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 0.054% | |
| 🤨 | 2 | 0.054% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.027% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.027% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.027% | |
| 3 further kinds | 3 | 0.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 176 of the 200 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,736 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 60 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Будь, как русский танцор 😎 Девочки, прошло уже ПЯТЬ эфиров первой бесплатной недели тренинга "Гениальная уборка". Оглянитесь на себя неделю назад. Какие выводы вы для себя сделали? Главное правило "Гениальной уборки" - не пытаться спорить и сопротивляться. Не задавайте вопрос: "Зачем мне это?", "Что за ерунда?". НЕ ВСЕ ЛЕЖИТ НА ПОВЕРХНОСТИ Поверьте, каждый шаг "Гениальной уборки" имеет смысл. Это вы поймете позже…
❤3
Мини-тест для мам. Только отвечайте честно! 😁 Представьте, что завтра вы на два дня перестали отвечать на привычные бытовые вопросы. Что произойдёт? А. Домашние знают, что делать. Основные дела идут своим чередом. Б. В целом справятся, но телефон будет разрываться от вопросов. В. Без меня всё серьёзно застопорится. Какой вариант ближе к вашей семье? А теперь самое интересное: в одном доме отлично организовано пи…
🔥3
Вы думаете, я вас научу убираться? Всё гораздо глубже! Смотрите, что происходит. Женщина с утра до вечера пашет. Готовит, моет, стирает, убирает. Устала как собака! А результата нет! Вот вообще! Сегодня всё убрала, завтра опять то же самое. И так годами! И самое обидное, что никто этого не замечает. Дети разбросали, муж прошёл мимо, все поели, разошлись. А ты опять на кухне. И никто даже не подумал, сколько ты сего…
❤4
❌ НЕ ТРОГАЙТЕ ДЕТЕЙ пока не научитесь конструктивной рефлексии Это я повторяю много раз на бесплатной неделе. Почему? Потому что мы очень легко и неосознанно скатываемся в критику. А для детской мотивации это губительно. Хочу показать вам великолепную работу участницы прошлого потока 🔥 Сколько уверенности, спокойствия, адекватности, а главное - любви в ее голосе. Горжусь, восхищаюсь, люблю ❤️ P.S. по секрету 😉 В…
❤10
ЭТУ РАКОВИНУ НЕ СПАСТИ! ИЛИ ВСЁ-ТАКИ МОЖНО? Девочки, я думала, что хуже этой кухни уже ничего быть не может. Но тут у нас РАКОВИНА! Она НЕ ОТМЫВАЕТСЯ! Вообще! А вы же знаете, какое значение имеет раковина для ГУмничек! И я, между прочим, тоже ГУмничка! Но что теперь? Сидеть, страдать и ждать новую кухню? НЕТ! Включаем тумблер: «КАК МНЕ ЭТО СДЕЛАТЬ?» 💪 Будем думать, как даже эту ужасную зону сделать удобной, кра…
👍2🔥2
Вы даже не представляете, на что способны! Сегодня на эфире мы с вами прошли тест на профпригодность. Казалось бы, шуточный! Но я прямо на эфире доказала, что компетенции топ-менеджера крупной компании — это те самые компетенции, которые необходимы современной маме! Хотите поспорить? 😁 Приходите на повтор сегодня в 18:00 мск! И ещё кое-что хочу сказать. Сегодня было несколько очень эмоциональных моментов. Я гово…
❤4
Я сегодня беспощадна 🫥 Я все знаю про женщин! 🔗 НА ЭФИР
Вы должны взять у меня самое ценное - ваше время! Залетаем! 🔗 НА ЭФИР
А теперь представьте, что вы УЖЕ работаете топ-менеджером. Только зарплату вам почему-то не платят! 😂 И компания у вас очень интересная. Сотрудники могут не выполнять поручения. Рабочий день начинается ещё до завтрака и заканчивается далеко за полночь. Начальство регулярно требует внимания, а в отпуск вся компания едет вместе с вами! Узнали? 😁 А ведь я сейчас совершенно серьёзно! Мама — это не уборщица. Мама — это…
❤3
Пошли бы работать руководителем в «Газпром»?
- Конечно! Где подписать договор? 😂20%
- Хочу, но страшно не справиться28%
- Нет, такая ответственность не для меня37%
- Мне и дома работы хватает15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📞 АЛЛО, ВАМ ЗВОНЯТ ИЗ ГАЗПРОМА Представьте, вам звонят из «Газпрома» и говорят: «Мы рассмотрели вашу кандидатуру и готовы предложить вам руководящую должность. Хорошая зарплата, серьёзная ответственность, большие перспективы». Согласились бы? Только давайте честно! Не надо сейчас скромничать и говорить: «Ой, я не справлюсь, куда мне!» Представьте, что вам действительно предлагают стать руководителем в одной из к…
Showing the 12 most recent of 200 posts we hold for @megamama17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@megamama17 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 12 October 2026
- Most recent edit
- 12 October 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Пошли бы работать руководителем в «Газпром»?
- Конечно! Где подписать договор? 😂20%
- Хочу, но страшно не справиться28%
- Нет, такая ответственность не для меня37%
- Мне и дома работы хватает15%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
А ТЫ РОСКОШНАЯ МАМА?
- 💎 Да! Дети считают меня сокровищем. Особенно когда я сплю!4%
- 👑 Конечно! Королева дома. Правда, корона иногда сползает от усталости.22%
- 💃 Я роскошная женщина! Просто дети пока не в курсе.22%
- 😂 Пока экономвариант: готовлю, стираю, убираю. Где мой люкс?26%
- ❤️ А можно сначала узнать, что входит в комплектацию?37%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой бардак мешает тебе жить полной, спокойной, размеренной жизнью?
- Бардак в мире. Стабильности нет 😃20%
- Бардак в процессах в семье. Все куда-то спешат, опаздывают, ищут, просят, ждут 😠28%
- Бардак в голове. Не могу организовать сама себя. Много делаю, но не вижу результата 😵💫56%
- Бардак в сердце. Раздражаюсь на близких за вечный беспорядок. Жалею себя, требую от них 😐38%
- Бардак дома. Всех все устраивает, кроме меня. Бьюсь, борюсь, не сдаюсь 🫡44%
- У меня везде порядок!2%
- Свой вариант напишу в комментариях2%
The shares total 190%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Признавайтесь, как болеете вы? 😁
- Лежу. Реально лежу. Я достигла просветления 😇37%
- Раз уж я дома, быстренько разберу один шкаф16%
- Лежу, но мысленно уже переставила половину квартиры16%
- Какая болезнь? У меня дети 😂48%
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что вам больше всего интересно читать и смотреть у меня?
- Про тебя, Валя ❤️ Жизнь, семья, поездки, общественная деятельность, что происходит за кадром31%
- О воспитании детей и отношениях с ними54%
- Про порядок в жизни: дом, голова, сердце67%
- Об отношениях в семье, мужа и жены39%
- О деньгах, работе, представлении женщин35%
- Практические советы, находки и лайфхаки51%
- Люблю размышления о вашей жизни23%
- Я вообще за всех 😄 Поэтому и сижу здесь24%
The shares total 324%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🎒 КТО У ВАС СОБИРАЕТ ПОРТФЕЛЬ? Только честно. Органы опеки школьных рюкзаков сегодня отдыхают 😁
- Ребёнок сам — я даже не знаю, что там лежит. И это прекрасно 😂46%
- Вместе — он собирает, я пока ещё одним глазом контролирую 👀28%
- Мама — потому что «сам» означает три карандаша, игрушку и отсутствие математики 😁12%
- Какой портфель?! Мы ещё психологически не вышли из июля 😂21%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 200 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@dvenedelileta · 16,701#1
@pogodki_12 · 6,150#2
@daryashkola1 · 4,871#3
@Dasha_Chernenko · 92,031#4
@mom_for_Jesus · 2,211 (as read 21 September 2026)#5
@kris_psyhology · 6,172#6
@vse_mamy_zdes · 4,774#7
@kakdelarodila · 6,647#8
@julia_i_timosha · 11,090#9
@mamaaadorogaya · 855#10
@irinajetter · 927#11
@httpelenahomee · 1,531 (as read 21 September 2026)#12
@HappyElena108 · 1,325#13
@metodforexperts · 353 (as read 21 September 2026)#14
@greenlearn_new · 7,615#15
@beloborodova_sokolova · 2,370#16
@kurochkiclub · 867#17
@katherinemuraveva · 18,803#18
@budni_akucherki · 2,381 (as read 21 September 2026)#19
@prosto_mamaSpB · 2,249#20
@you_can_everythingg · 3,135#21
@olga_gnotes · 1,750#22
@LyudaKobzeva · 1,262#23
@knshu23 · 66,805#24
@nik_dina_ul · 1,103#25
@TanyaHristianka · 1,056#26
@neuro_brain_kids · 1,886#27
@EvgeniaDolgintseva · 5,432#28
@olyafedulova · 7,905#29
@shamilahmadullin · 177,416#30
@valentinapaevskaya · 228,880#31
@sve_flymama · 42,695#32
@GodlyGirl · 2,458 (as read 21 September 2026)#33
@tam_gde_tixo · 3,515#34
@aldobrotaa · 1,749#35
@mamazonija · 72,835#36
@lumicube · 7,688#37
@nadyadronova_doterra · 1,828#38
@beliekirpichiki · 1,904#39
@kolomiytsevacom · 10,039#40
@jenDolya · 1,509 (as read 21 September 2026)#41
@secret_poryadka · 5,075#42
@semero_po_lavkam_blog · 17,192#43
@videotca_Andrea · 282,306#44
@drnasonova · 1,375 (as read 21 September 2026)#45
@domashnee_obuchenie · 11,147#46
@verapediatr8 · 3,487#47
@ollasergeevna · 732#48
@letstrojnee · 1,950#49
@mi_mi_channel · 3,595#50
@sadhana_fest · 658#51
@glokekaterina · 1#52
@evseeva_nati_psiholog · 10,111#53
@miryanka_is · 1,235#54
@ncatyadom · 5,034#55
@vse_sbudetca · 10,977#56
@booksvitalia · 2,393#57
@natalkoz_fm · 67,306#58
@Vera_and_Leo_recommend · 8,733#59
@yudintsevai · 2,669 (as read 21 September 2026)#60
@delgatori · 2,641#61
@KornilovaSchoolMsk · 300#62
@iskrennegolosizhizn · 155 (as read 21 September 2026)#63
@dorogi_vetra · 246#64
@markelovaosteopat · 1,492#65
@mamaMelnik_67 · 1,175#66
@AleksandrArchakov · 4,175#67
@v_poiskah_nebasnyh_perspektiv · 1,013#68
@otchepro0 · 21,765#69
@mariya_nytriciolog · 162 (as read 21 September 2026)#70
@nadezhdiinaa · 11,780#71
@tBuMRPALqO5iMDIy · 11,784#72
@o_zozh · 2,029#73
@jcwork · 4,567#74
@keyco_s · 51,558#75
@zoshni · 495#76
@kantfam · 22,324#77
@avocadogreen · 3,140#78
@lifehacksofking · 8,364#79
@katerrina_fessenko · 1,873#80
@kaolinia · 600#81
@PRO_ElizavetaLove · 1,875#82
@semero_po_lavkam_father_blog · 5,407#83
@kids_music_player · 6,860#84
@ProskuryakovaElena · 847 (as read 21 September 2026)#85
@the_world_upside_down · 501#86
@kladovkapoeticheskaia · 3,696#87
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Dasha_Chernenko · 92,031
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 August 2026
@sve_flymama · 42,695
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 28 August 2026
@natalkoz_fm · 67,306
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 August 2026
@mamazonija · 72,835
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
@shamilahmadullin · 177,416
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“МегаМама Валентина Красникова” (@megamama17), 22,200 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/megamama17.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.