Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Кирилл Максимов

Channel

Кирилл Максимов

@kev_official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,597subscribers

+196 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001741141727
TypeChannel
Username@kev_official
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/kev_official

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

14,26414,61014,43714,5977 August 20266 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net +196. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,212–14,662 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 18:0914,597-4
5 Nov 2026, 19:1714,601-9
4 Nov 2026, 22:3614,610+10
3 Nov 2026, 22:5914,600+1
2 Nov 2026, 23:2814,599-5
2 Nov 2026, 01:2014,604+3
1 Nov 2026, 02:4014,601+7
31 Oct 2026, 04:3814,594+5
30 Oct 2026, 06:0614,589+7
29 Oct 2026, 04:0914,582-6
28 Oct 2026, 04:1614,588-3
27 Oct 2026, 01:4614,591-7
26 Oct 2026, 03:2714,598+1
25 Oct 2026, 05:5014,597-7
24 Oct 2026, 03:0614,604-6
23 Oct 2026, 01:2114,610+2
22 Oct 2026, 00:2114,608+3
20 Oct 2026, 18:5814,605-1
19 Oct 2026, 16:5014,606+2
18 Oct 2026, 18:5714,604first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.12%
avg views ÷ 14,597 subscribers
Avg views / post
456
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 24 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held80 (11 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total10,939
Reactions total569
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 17:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 16s
Average length
43s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,857 reactions across 78 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤57731.1%
🔥53028.5%
👍37620.2%
💯22212.0%
❤‍🔥1186.35%
🎉130.7%
🤩100.539%
🥰50.269%
😁30.162%
😐30.162%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 78 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,857 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 80 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kev_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (4.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC168 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Рост происходит через задачи. Нет другого варианта расти, как брать задачи, которые кажутся трудными или даже невыполнимыми. Тут есть два ключа: 1. Задача всегда приходит по силам. 2. Задача всегда приходит с решением. Воспринимать задачу как игру оптимально. Играть с интересом оптимально. Избежать игры невозможно. Ты уже в ней с первым вздохом. Стратегия подходить к игре без ожиданий открывает скрытые локации…

🔥8👍4💯4❤2

5 Nov 2026, 14:17 UTC255 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥6🔥5👍2❤1🎉1🤩1

5 Nov 2026, 13:37 UTC277 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Нет упаковки — нет продукта Таковы правила. Упаковка - это не просто шапочка профиля. Это: ⁃ общее позиционирование ⁃ тон вашего общения в соцсетях ⁃ чёткие сегменты клиентов, которых вы выбираете ⁃ уникальность продукта, которую считывают клиенты ⁃ сильный и понятный оффер. Даже если вы считаете, что упаковка у вас есть, её полезно время от времени пересматривать, потому что на рынке и в жизни происходят изм…

👍6🔥5❤4🥰2

5 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC295 views44 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥22💯9👍6❤‍🔥5🎉2

5 Nov 2026, 05:07 UTC312 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Вместо плана – хаотичные задачи Ежедневно мы заняты тем, что не ведет нас к деньгами. Мы либо не держим фокус внимания, либо не знаем, как последовательно выстроить систему бизнеса - что делать и в какой последовательности. Где-то что-то посмотрели бесплатное, не разобрались до конца, сделали наполовину, результат не получили и опять сидим без клиентов и денег. Потому что системы так и нет. Для тех, кому в этом н…

❤7🔥7👍4

2 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC409 views16 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Где слабое звено на пути к деньгам Разберем цепочку из видео выше Мы взрослые люди и обычно знаем, сколько нам нужно денег на все потребности (финансовая цель) и когда реалистично их получить (дедлайн). Остается план и регулярные действия по этому плану. У части людей получается составить реальный план. Например, вы планируете коллаборацию (или рекламу) и знаете, что к вам в канал придет новая аудитория в количе…

💯6❤4👍3🔥3

2 Nov 2026, 06:50 UTC419 views31 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Video

Начинаем неделю правильно

❤15💯10🔥6

31 Oct 2026, 08:28 UTC518 views34 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

В космическом научном центре NASA висит плакат с пчелами, на котором написано: "Аэродинамическое тело пчелы не приспособлено летать, но хорошо, что пчела об этом не знает". Законы физики и аэродинамические принципы гласят, что ширина крыльев пчелы слишком мала, чтобы удержать ее огромное тело в полете, но пчела об этом не знает. Она не думает. Она просто делает.

🔥16❤13👍5

30 Oct 2026, 10:31 UTC516 views27 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Как сделать первые продажи на высокий чек В подтверждение тому, о чем говорил выше: продажи возможны на встрече с клиентом, где вы ведете правильный диалог. 📌 Наш новый кейс: Елена помогает людям с хроническими заболеваниями кожи убирать проблему без использования мазей и медикаментов. Результаты у клиентов есть, но у самой Елены не было регулярных продаж длительных программ. У нас она внедрила способ продажи в об…

❤10🔥8👍6❤‍🔥3

29 Oct 2026, 13:17 UTC524 views44 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥23👍9❤‍🔥8❤4

29 Oct 2026, 11:00 UTC504 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

«Почему я опять наелась на ночь и себя ненавижу?» С такой мыслью человек может искать помощь. Заходит в профиль специалиста, а там: — когнитивно-поведенческая терапия; — эриксоновский гипноз; — научный подход; — работа с РПП. Методы и квалификация важны. Но сначала человеку нужно понять: «Вы работаете с тем, что происходит со мной?» Он ищет помощь с конкретной проблемой, а видит названия инструментов. Попробуйте …

❤10👍8💯4🔥3

28 Oct 2026, 15:15 UTC483 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Соцсети ведёте, контент публикуете, а клиентов нет. Что проверить? Одна из возможных причин — человек не узнаёт в ваших публикациях свою ситуацию. Вы рассказываете о методах и инструментах, а ему непонятно, с какой задачей к вам обращаться. Но дело может быть и в другом. Например, ролики привлекают людей, которым интересно посмотреть, но ваша услуга им не нужна. Или человек заинтересовался, зашёл в профиль — и не…

🔥6❤5👍5❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @kev_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@kev_official edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @kev_official as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
14 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
31 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Практическая психология для женщин - PSY-инженерия. Официальный канал Марты Николаевой-Гариной
@marta_ng · 23,347
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 September 2026
Система Богатства
@batudmi · 30,705
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
Карина Рихтере Мамазония
@mamazonija · 72,835
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Ксения Баранова | PRO ИИ-технологии🔥
@xb_prosmm · 62,863
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Кирилл Максимов” (@kev_official), 14,597 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kev_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.