Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -408. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,355–20,885 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 15:22
20,416
-13
17 Sept 2026, 06:41
20,429
-4
15 Sept 2026, 09:40
20,433
+1
13 Sept 2026, 16:16
20,432
-8
11 Sept 2026, 20:42
20,440
-14
9 Sept 2026, 08:39
20,454
-20
6 Sept 2026, 00:37
20,474
-22
3 Sept 2026, 20:40
20,496
-24
2 Sept 2026, 09:44
20,520
-9
1 Sept 2026, 06:28
20,529
-13
31 Aug 2026, 08:37
20,542
-3
30 Aug 2026, 09:58
20,545
-17
29 Aug 2026, 12:35
20,562
-6
28 Aug 2026, 11:29
20,568
-5
27 Aug 2026, 12:25
20,573
-8
26 Aug 2026, 15:32
20,581
-17
25 Aug 2026, 16:53
20,598
-6
24 Aug 2026, 13:18
20,604
-30
22 Aug 2026, 17:45
20,634
-15
21 Aug 2026, 11:45
20,649
first reading
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.64%
avg views ÷ 20,416 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
77 (16 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
34,558
Reactions total
736
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 00:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 35s
Average length
42s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,005 reactions across 76 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,789
59.5%
🔥
364
12.1%
👍
236
7.85%
🙏
177
5.89%
😢
67
2.23%
😍
56
1.86%
🥰
50
1.66%
💯
49
1.63%
👏
48
1.60%
❤🔥
34
1.13%
😁
29
0.965%
🤔
28
0.932%
😨
18
0.599%
😱
16
0.532%
🏆
9
0.3%
⚡
5
0.166%
🕊
5
0.166%
😭
5
0.166%
💔
4
0.133%
💘
4
0.133%
6 further kinds
12
0.399%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 76 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,005 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Я календарь переверну...»: на каком этапе отношений вы сейчас?
Продолжаю кушать кактус14%
Держусь из последних сил, чтобы не написать4%
Застряла в дне сурка: умом всё понимаю, а тело ломает28%
Перевернула этот календарь, но внутри пока пустота41%
Свободна и полностью восстановилась18%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🗓 Я календарь переверну — и снова… бывший?
3 сентября в 12ч по мск я не научу вас носить сомбреро
Я проведу живой вебинар:
🔤Как отпустить нездоровую привязанность🔤
Вы получите на эфире:
⚫️Понимание, почему вас тянет к нестабильным партнёрам.
⚫️Объяснение телесной привязанности и срывов.
⚫️Осознание, почему вас ломает и как это остановить.
⚫️Ваши желания.
⚫️Понимание "кто я".
⚫️Жизнь без боли и зависимости.…
1 сентября позади. Соцсети заполнены идеальными семейными фотографиями, но для женщин, ушедших из токсичных отношений, этот период часто превращается в очередное поле боя.
Многие мамы удивляются: почему бывший, который месяцами не интересовался жизнью ребенка, вдруг устраивает показательные выступления на школьной линейке? Требует фотоотчеты, покупает дорогие подарки и пытается контролировать каждый шаг?
Здесь нет …
Почему вы продолжаете обнимать кактус? 🌵
Можно уйти от человека физически, заблокировать
его везде, но продолжать жить в тотальной
созависимости. Наш новый мультфильм —
как раз об этой ментальной ловушке.
Мы создали образ человека-кактуса не просто так.
Это идеальная метафора нестабильного, эмоционально
недоступного партнера. Героиня плачет, ранится о шипы,
но продолжает сжимать его в объятиях, искренне веря:
«Ес…
"Я календарь переверну — и снова третье сентября". День, когда календарная шутка стала народной приметой финала. Символично, что именно в этот день мы проводим эфир о том, как разорвать нездоровую привязанность.
Второго сентября у вас действительно было всё всерьёз. А третьего наступило утро, которое разделило жизнь на до и после. Когда обещания превращаются в тишину, а человек, без которого не дышалось, вдруг стан…
Подкаст "Вас бросают по одному сценарию. Он записан в вашем детстве"
🔥Приходите 3 сентября в 12 ч по мск на новый живой вебинар:
"Как отпустить нездоровую привязанность"
✅ Регистрация
Подкаст "Почему вы продолжаете ждать Нарцисса и не можете его отпустить"
🔥НОВЫЙ живой вебинар:
"Как отпустить нездоровую привязанность"
✅ Зарегистрироваться
Этот мультфильм показывает суть нездоровой
привязанности
Посмотрите на белку Риту. Она готова терпеть
дискомфорт, боль, игнорировать свои базовые
потребности и здравый смысл — только бы
удержать того, к кому она так сильно прикипела.
Ей кажется, что ее мир рухнет, а жизнь потеряет
всякий смысл.
Когда привязанность перерастает в зависимость,
мы точно так же отдаем авторство своей жизни в
чужие руки.
Мы перестаем с…
2 сентября в 19ч по мск состоится единственный повтор вебинара "5 причин, почему у вас не получается создать отношения" Иду на повтор
Почему мы продолжаем выбирать партнеров, с которыми приходится не жить, а постоянно бороться? Почему соглашаемся на эмоциональные качели и верим обещаниям, которые раз за разом превращаются в тишину?
Этот эфир для тех, кто запутался, устал от вечного напряжения и хочет понять, как на…
Сегодня 29.08 в 19ч по мск состоится последний повтор вебинара "Как освободиться от тревожности"
✅ Иду на вебинар
❤20
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @semenenkon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@semenenkon edited 13 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
«Я календарь переверну...»: на каком этапе отношений вы сейчас?
Продолжаю кушать кактус14%
Держусь из последних сил, чтобы не написать4%
Застряла в дне сурка: умом всё понимаю, а тело ломает28%
Перевернула этот календарь, но внутри пока пустота41%
Свободна и полностью восстановилась18%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Карина Рихтере Мамазония @mamazonija · 73,813 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Артем Репецкий @artemrepetskyi · 25,425 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Надежда Семененко. Психология отношений” (@semenenkon), 20,416 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/semenenkon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.