Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сердце архетипа | Психолог Татьяна Галич

Channel

Сердце архетипа | Психолог Татьяна Галич

@dalivvah

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,121subscribers

-40 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001304923889
TypeChannel
Username@dalivvah
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dalivvah

Growth

3,1213,1613,1417 August 2026 — 3,161 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,160 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,152 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,151 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,145 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,140 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,139 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,136 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,137 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,131 subscribers11 September 2026 — 3,121 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 35 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,115–3,167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 06:013,121-10
6 Sept 2026, 05:173,131-6
1 Sept 2026, 21:173,137+1
30 Aug 2026, 01:533,136-3
27 Aug 2026, 01:243,139-1
24 Aug 2026, 05:133,140-5
17 Aug 2026, 10:593,145-6
14 Aug 2026, 05:283,151-1
11 Aug 2026, 04:343,152-8
8 Aug 2026, 05:523,160-1
7 Aug 2026, 09:323,161first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 04s
Average length
46s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

219 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7534.2%
🔥6328.8%
😁2712.3%
🤣2310.5%
👏73.20%
🥰73.20%
😍62.74%
❤‍🔥52.28%
👍41.83%
custom 527153853005983431210.457%
🤔10.457%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dalivvah. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC65 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

4🔥1custom 52715385300598343121

7 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC73 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

Вот мои длинные размышления о семейной системной травме и о роли терапевта в этом процессе

🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 14:52 UTC84 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Что я вчера делала до глубокой ночи? Ну правильно. Перечитывала Бредбери и роняла слезы. Асегодня написала для новостного издания комментарий о детях и ИИ. Поэтому, у нас сегодня будет продолжение темы. Уделите немного времени своей жизни и вернитесь к рассказу, который я вчера вспоминала, "Электрическое тело я пою!" Особенно, если вы - практикующий психолог. Само название - это первая строка из культового стихотв

4

6 Aug 2026, 19:27 UTC141 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Иду из магазина с продуктами. Меня обгоняют два парня, поворачиваются ко мне и спрашивают: - Девушка, а вам какие мужчины нравятся? Ну вот только одно самое важное качество! - Умные. Они так удивились, что сбились с интонации заигрывания. Задумались. - А если вот страшный, но умный? - И что? Если умный, то умеет себя подать и собой заинтересовать. А потом уже становится интересно и все. - А если красивый, но тупой?

🤣177

6 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC136 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

9🔥6❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 13:29 UTC137 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Давала недавно для РИАМО комментарий и не могу не поделиться своими размышлениями ➡️ Повод: в Южной Корее сделали андроидов для любви и дружбы. Красивых — даже по меркам корейских поп-айдолов. То есть таких, что смотришь и думаешь: ну всё, человек как биологический партнёр окончательно проиграл конкуренцию. Силикон, пластик, алгоритмы — и никаких тебе носков на полу. И вопрос, разумеется, повис в воздухе: не вытесн

5👍4

5 Aug 2026, 11:41 UTC161 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥1510🥰7❤‍🔥4

5 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC159 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Почувствуйте через фото, какое у нас жаркое солнце сегодня.

11🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC167 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣62🤔1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @dalivvah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Психолог Александр Шахов
@alex_shahov_fg · 34,200
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
Potential • Саморазвитие
@PotentialSelf · 40,211
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 30 August 2026
Карина Рихтере Мамазония
@mamazonija · 73,987
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сердце архетипа | Психолог Татьяна Галич” (@dalivvah), 3,121 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dalivvah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.