Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ольга Берг о психологии 💌

Channel

Ольга Берг о психологии 💌

@olga_bergpsyy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,569subscribers

-99 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537796023
TypeChannel
Username@olga_bergpsyy
DescriptionCEO института психологии @berg_institute • Создатель образовательных проектов • Психотерапевт и супервизор • Автор бестселлеров Бомборы Сайт https://bergolga.ru/lectures Книги https://bombora.ru/books/author/olga_berg/ РНК https://clck.ru/3QEenE
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/olga_bergpsyy

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,49315,66815,580.57 August 2026 — 15,668 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,665 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,658 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,651 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,650 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,638 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,635 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,630 subscribers15 August 2026 — 15,620 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,623 subscribers17 August 2026 — 15,618 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,615 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,618 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,615 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,607 subscribers24 August 2026 — 15,622 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,614 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,606 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,605 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,596 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,587 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,579 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,566 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,567 subscribers4 September 2026 — 15,564 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,547 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,537 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,550 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,545 subscribers2 October 2026 — 15,493 subscribers7 October 2026 — 15,538 subscribers11 October 2026 — 15,535 subscribers14 October 2026 — 15,515 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,514 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,511 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,509 subscribers18 October 2026 — 15,508 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,507 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,501 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,504 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,506 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,503 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,501 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,526 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,534 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,522 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,523 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,514 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,539 subscribers31 October 2026 — 15,553 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,570 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,571 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,570 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,566 subscribers5 November 2026 — 15,565 subscribers6 November 2026 — 15,570 subscribers7 November 2026 — 15,569 subscribers15,5697 August 20267 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 92 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,467–15,694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 13:5015,569-1
6 Nov 2026, 15:5615,570+5
5 Nov 2026, 19:1715,565-1
4 Nov 2026, 16:3615,566-4
3 Nov 2026, 15:4015,570-1
2 Nov 2026, 14:0815,571+1
1 Nov 2026, 16:2015,570+17
31 Oct 2026, 16:5815,553+14
30 Oct 2026, 17:1615,539+25
29 Oct 2026, 15:0915,514-9
28 Oct 2026, 16:1615,523+1
27 Oct 2026, 18:0515,522-12
26 Oct 2026, 16:5815,534+8
25 Oct 2026, 20:2115,526+25
24 Oct 2026, 18:4515,501-2
23 Oct 2026, 18:2815,503-3
22 Oct 2026, 17:4815,506+2
21 Oct 2026, 11:4615,504+3
20 Oct 2026, 06:3915,501-6
19 Oct 2026, 04:5815,507first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 67 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.98%
avg views ÷ 15,569 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,240
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held61 (19 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total23,617
Reactions total1,014
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 17:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,130
Videos
≈415
Links
≈628

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 24s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,219 reactions across 61 posts, in 39 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,98261.6%
❤‍🔥33710.5%
👎1675.19%
🔥1404.35%
👍902.80%
💯682.11%
👀451.40%
🤬411.27%
🤔341.06%
🥴300.932%
😢290.901%
🙏240.746%
🥰240.746%
💊210.652%
🕊190.59%
😍190.59%
💘170.528%
😐160.497%
🤣140.435%
🤪140.435%
19 further kinds882.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,219 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 61 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @olga_bergpsyy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 61 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (36.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 10:09 UTC418 views30 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Провела встречу в рамках клинических семинаров 💪🏻 Шикарный был кейс про мужскую сексуальную перверсию, отправлю группе две дополнительные статьи на эту тему. Мне кажется это идеальное комбо Кейс + Теория и логика случая+ Дополнительный материал В начале декабря приду с анонсами нового сезона

❤25👏4👎1

6 Nov 2026, 09:57 UTC741 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026

И кстати тут можно подумать о модном занятии боксом у женщин сегодня 🤔 Сразу можно и не связать это с функцией отца, но если мы присмотримся, то чаще увидим в перчатках женщин, у кого сложности с/в личной жизнью , а значит и невидимый след отца находится

❤11💯3👎1🤔1

6 Nov 2026, 09:53 UTC736 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Папина дочка или ты вся в отца! Сегодня в боте ушла рассылка с примером, как отец влияет на многие жизненные процессы. Я взяла фильм «Малышка на миллион» И хочу с вами поделиться фрагментом из книги, где как раз описано, как меняется жизнь героини, когда появляется «символическое удочерение».

❤15👎1

5 Nov 2026, 15:31 UTC936 views34 reactionsread 7 November 2026

«Невроз ребенка возникает в постели родителей»

😐16👍11❤6👎1

5 Nov 2026, 14:54 UTC980 views19 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Семинар уже через неделю! Я напомню, что мы будем говорить об отце, но через призму того, как он повлиял на ваше женское желание. С тем каким он был и не был вовсе, в вашей реальной жизни мы ничего не сделаем 🤷🏼‍♀️ но мы можем придать новый СМЫСЛ этим событиям То, что вам до сих пор не давало покоя и казалось причина неудач в женской судьбе, может иначе начать звучать и стать лишь частью вашей биографии🤷🏼‍♀️ Вы …

❤18👎1

4 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC≈1,070 views83 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Мне кажется мы тоже должны это обсудить! Я помню, как я пришла на сессию и не знала, что сказать, моя сессия закончилась через 5 мин 🤣 И это было лучшее, что можно было для меня сделать. Поэтому да, нам иногда нужно пожертвовать тем, что мы нравимся, чтобы действительно помочь клиенту. Лучше мы не будем нравится, но будем помогать.

🔥43❤23❤‍🔥10💯4👍2👎1

3 Nov 2026, 17:25 UTC≈1,290 views122 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Депрессия! В корне депрессии - лежит горе, которое не было прожито. И знаете есть люди, в жизни которых были утраты, а депрессии у них нет. Только вот почему-то их близкие чахнут прям на глазах, вдруг ребенку или внучке ставят депрессию Как так? А просто 🤷🏼‍♀️ свое горе можно поместить в другого! В народе это называется порчей и сглазом 😉

❤69👀25🔥19💔5🤔3👎1

2 Nov 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,360 views47 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Voice message

Что делать, если клиент приходит с жалобой «Я плохой /Я плохая» Как строить клиническую работу, куда целиться - рассказала в подкасте. Коллеги, часто приходят с такой формой страдания к вам в терапию?

❤37👍9👎1

1 Nov 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,490 views54 reactions1 Starread 7 November 2026

Дописала семинар, завтра отдам дизайнеру🩷 Сразу скажу, особенно новым моим читателям, не ждите от меня легкой информации, я буду рассказывать очень неочевидные вещи. Но если вы внимательно послушаете вы поймёте главное - ЛОГИКУ! Мне не интересно рассказывать вещи из серии очевидных, мне интересно собрать информацию так, чтобы она произвела эффект, дала сдвиг! Например, вам станет понятно почему женщина жертвует со…

❤53👎1

31 Oct 2026, 11:55 UTC≈1,460 views66 reactionsread 7 November 2026
File

📌Коллеги, делюсь пособием по работе с истерической структурой Теория не должна быть оторвана от кабинета, при этом каждый случай СИНГУЛЯРЕН! Это пособие ориентир с мире особого истерического желания, которое выходит на сцену в кабинете психолога, требуя к себе особого отношения, особых условий работы и прочего. В конце пособия есть список литературы. 📹И дополнительное видео на YOUTUBE «Истеричка, все есть, а счас…

❤‍🔥40❤18🥰7👎1

29 Oct 2026, 17:07 UTC≈1,630 views34 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Мне кажется классная традиция, следить за мировыми новостями из мира психологии! Сегодня статья от французских коллег про современные симптомы ИСТЕРИИ! Не смогла сохранить, поэтому делюсь ссылкой - https://shs.cairn.info/revue-francaise-de-psychanalyse-2026-2-page-413?lang=fr

❤33👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @olga_bergpsyy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @olga_bergpsyy as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
14 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
36 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Наташа Жукова.Рядом 🫂
@zhukova_ryadom · 27,418
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Мария Бразговская
@MBrazgovskaia · 55,844
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
Тата Феодориди
@TatFeodoridy · 59,841
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Елена Новоселова
@novoselova_time · 21,516
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 September 2026
Наталья Жукова²
@NatalliaZhukova2 · 55,980
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
Анетта Орлова | Философия жизни
@anettaorlova · 40,040
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 4 September 2026
Школа Семейных Отношений Яны Катаевой
@yanakataeva · 29,156
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Здоровые отношения | Анна Саночкина
@sanochkina_anna · 25,136
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 September 2026
Жизнь и тело с Оксаной
@telo_psy · 22,374
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Зина Гегамовна 🫂 Психолог. Психотерапевт.
@zinashamoyan · 69,970
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
АЛЕКСАНДРА АЛЕКСЕЕВА - путь к процветанию
@psyaal · 38,361
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
ПСИХОСОМАТИКА | Екатерина Тур
@dr_ekaterinatur · 23,957
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
Ирина Меркулова | Профессия психолог
@psy_professional · 25,386
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Начинающие психологи
@new_psycholog · 19,371
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
Институт психологии Life Practic
@psypractic_ru · 33,070
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 15 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ольга Берг о психологии 💌” (@olga_bergpsyy), 15,569 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/olga_bergpsyy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.