Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ярослав Самойлов | Канал

Channel

Ярослав Самойлов | Канал

@yaroslav_samoylov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

41,012subscribers

-1,518 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001143918916
TypeChannel
Username@yaroslav_samoylov
DescriptionБесплатный курс “Мужчина: честная инструкция по применению. Без драм и манипуляций” clck.ru/3MMQEA Бесплатный курс «Стать психологом с нуля. Помогать себе и другим» (набор закрыт) первый в личку не пишу, инвестиций не предлагаю 4973777786
CreatedBetween 1 February 2016 and 31 October 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/yaroslav_samoylov

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

41,01242,53041,7716 August 20268 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 94 days, net -1,518. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40,784–42,758 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 03:1541,012-17
7 Nov 2026, 00:4041,029-31
5 Nov 2026, 23:5041,060-23
4 Nov 2026, 23:2941,083-34
4 Nov 2026, 02:5441,117-21
3 Nov 2026, 02:0941,138-19
1 Nov 2026, 23:2541,157-18
1 Nov 2026, 00:1741,175-16
30 Oct 2026, 22:5441,191-50
29 Oct 2026, 20:5641,241-51
28 Oct 2026, 21:1941,292-21
26 Oct 2026, 14:3841,313-17
25 Oct 2026, 15:2041,330-9
24 Oct 2026, 17:0841,339-19
23 Oct 2026, 16:4541,358-19
22 Oct 2026, 14:0141,377-21
21 Oct 2026, 09:2041,398-13
20 Oct 2026, 09:2741,411-25
19 Oct 2026, 08:0741,436-12
18 Oct 2026, 11:1841,448first reading

Engagement

121 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 41,012 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,310
53 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
53
of 121 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held121 (4 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total281,520
Reactions total29,146
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 09:52 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
263
Videos
27
Links
335

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
30s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

65,137 reactions across 117 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥29,74245.7%
💯9,41614.5%
❤‍🔥7,40211.4%
👍6,4349.88%
😁6,2839.65%
🙏1,8752.88%
💔9381.44%
👏7701.18%
🥰7441.14%
✍3530.542%
😍2930.45%
🏆1740.267%
💘1300.2%
💋1250.192%
🤓1090.167%
🤗950.146%
👌710.109%
⚡480.074%
😇440.068%
🤩430.066%
2 further kinds480.074%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 118 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65,616 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
304
across the posts below
Posts paid on
101
of 118 we hold a reading for · 86%
Most on one post
103
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yaroslav_samoylov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 121 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 24 of 53 posts held from the last 30 days (45.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 19:29 UTC≈2,390 views466 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026

всем на вас плевать вроде мысль очевидна, каждый зациклен на себе и своих проблемах тогда почему же мы так паримся о чужом мнении о нас почему страх публичных выступлений - один из самых больших в жизни потому что другие лишь активируют то что внутри нас и если внутри много стыда, самоосуждения и тд - то оно включается когда на нас «смотрят» а вцелом да, людям не до нас, 10 секунд подумают че-то и дальше снова …

🔥238💯111❤‍🔥74👍30🙏13

7 Nov 2026, 18:56 UTC≈2,550 views384 reactionsread 8 November 2026

большинство клиентов психологов это «у меня болит, помогите» как только человеку легчает, он делает вывод «нафиг тратить на это деньги дальше, есть вещи поважнее» есть продвинутые клиенты (их меньшинство), которые начинали с «болит» и продолжили «мне важно познавать себя» и они понимают, что когда с психологом стало скучно… то это большое начало, а не конец вашей работы

🔥188💯94❤‍🔥57👍36👏9

7 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTC≈2,510 views323 reactionsread 8 November 2026

проблемы в отношениях начинаются с убеждения: ну это же и так понятно ну это же очевидно если любит, то догадается Зачем объяснять/просить/уточнять ?!

💯178🔥92💔35🤗12😁6

6 Nov 2026, 18:51 UTC≈3,520 views447 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Photo

На свиданке вино без водки - деньги на ветер ! 👀 П.с. Скучно я живу! Очень!

😁331👍49💔31💯18😇18

6 Nov 2026, 17:47 UTC≈3,580 views478 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026

Завидую людям, которые делятся успехами: -развелся после 20 лет брака и счастлив -сбросила 15 кг лишнего веса и радостна -бросил/а алко -бросил/а курить А мне что делать если ничего из списка и не было….😅😅😅

😁353💯66🤗33😘16💋10

6 Nov 2026, 07:46 UTC≈3,810 views405 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026

богатые - плохие, хорошие были бедными в фильмах, на которых мы выросли. а еще плохие герои в кино - всегда мужчины — в том числе Так формируются/укрепляются убеждения людей — крутой герой курит сигарету - лучшая реклама никотина

🔥224👍82💯75😁22🙏2

5 Nov 2026, 17:14 UTC≈3,890 views612 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Photo

Я присоединяюсь к благодарности Ярославу! Шесть лет назад, я тоже прошла Путь Женщины, на тот момент мне и полнилось 50 лет и вскоре вышла замуж и очень счастлива в отношения! Спасибо Ярослав! Мы твои вечные фанаты 🙏🌺❤️

❤‍🔥342🔥178👍51😍31🙏10

5 Nov 2026, 16:21 UTC≈3,770 views567 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ярослав, БЕСКОНЕЧНО БЛАГОДАРЮ ВАС ЗА ПУТЬ ЖЕНЩИНЫ! Все встало на свои места 💗💗💗

🔥313😍119❤‍🔥86🙏31👍18

5 Nov 2026, 09:22 UTC≈4,040 views933 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026

Мои поводы для радости В 17 лет: мне улыбнулась девочка в ответ В 37 лет: врач жкт/гастроэнтеролог восхитился результатами моих гастро- и колоноскопии 🤝

😁576👍158🔥133💯41🏆25

5 Nov 2026, 07:39 UTC≈4,150 views108 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026
Poll

Был ли опыт с*ксуализированного нас*лия по отношению к вам?

  1. Да38%
  2. Нет62%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

💔86🙏15⚡7

4 Nov 2026, 19:38 UTC≈4,500 views557 reactions1 Starread 8 November 2026

их заблокировали все бывшие, у родственников они в черном списке они такие: «че-то скучно, поспорить бы с кем-то…. О, точно. С психологом Ярославом…. Он меня пока что не заблокировал» — Так я вижу вырывающих слова из контекста, все время пытающихся спорить

😁354💯92🔥83👍25⚡3

4 Nov 2026, 19:18 UTC≈4,560 views610 reactions2 Starsread 8 November 2026

юмор на первых этапах отношений - это тоже декорации защитный слой способ вызывать эмоции у другого человека (или в паре между людьми) женщинам нравятся «мужчины с чувством юмора» чувство юмора - это определенный способ мыслить, конструировать слова в предложения не надо влюбляться в чувство юмора смотрите в способ мышления без юмористического оттенка если мужчина много шутит - значит он создает невидимый слой…

🔥334💯154👍82🙏33😁7

Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @yaroslav_samoylov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@yaroslav_samoylov edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 September 2026
Most recent edit
15 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @yaroslav_samoylov as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 October 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
12 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Nov 2026, 07:39 UTCAnonymous Poll1,750 voters approx.

Был ли опыт с*ксуализированного нас*лия по отношению к вам?

  1. Да38%
  2. Нет62%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTCAnonymous Poll2,210 voters approx.

Вас били родители в детстве?

  1. Да57%
  2. Нет43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

19 Sept 2026, 15:40 UTCAnonymous Poll2,430 voters approx.

Чувствуете ли вы себя одиноким человеком?

  1. Скорее да48%
  2. Скорее нет53%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

25 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTCAnonymous Poll2,870 voters approx.

Ваши отношения с алко?

  1. Не пью вообще41%
  2. Пью редко48%
  3. Пью часто11%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Aug 2026, 13:11 UTCAnonymous Poll2,230 voters approx.

Проходили ли Вы мой курс «Путь Женщины»?

  1. Да, проходила62%
  2. Нет, не проходила38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTCAnonymous Poll3,180 voters approx.

В интимной близости с мужчиной вам важнее

  1. чтобы М управлял. Нравится быть управляемой в этом процессе42%
  2. чтобы М был заботлив, внимателен, нежен, аккуратен47%
  3. чтобы М отдавал инициативу вам3%
  4. я М и хочу увидеть результаты опроса7%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Психолог Говорит
@psihfucktor · 2,562
#1
Артем Репецкий
@artemrepetskyi · 25,101
#2
TANIA_GOVORIT
@tania_govorit_channel · 20,680
#3
Любовник Голубев
@lovergolubev · 109,803
#4
Секреты Анабеллы
@anabella_secrets · 11,111
#5
ОИПП | Онлайн Институт Практической Психологии
@oinpp_world · 9,212
#6
БЕЛЯЕВА 👽 PROGRESS
@beliaevaprogress · 3,219
#7
Алла Пилипюк | Психолог
@alla_pylypiuk · 1,942
#8
Влад Шарловский
@vlad_sharlovsky · 3,098
#9
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 485,626
#10
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 746,083
#11
Екатерина Брост | Системная психология
@psiholog_brost · 2,128
#12
Психолог с веслом Ирина Сумина ОИПП
@psychologist_irina1205 · 355
#13
«ВНИМАНИЕ» первый онлайн клуб.
@vnimanieonline · 385
#14
MMARGO
@mmargosavchuk · 116,621
#15
Юлия Ивлиева
@amelisoul_master · 102,207
#16
SASHA BELAIR
@ab_chat · 134,918
#17
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии
@petrosipovprivate · 48,049
#18
Зина Гегамовна 🫂 Психолог. Психотерапевт.
@zinashamoyan · 69,932
#19
Психолог Александр Шахов
@alex_shahov_fg · 33,432
#20
Аяз
@AyazShabutdinov · 177,760
#21
МАРК БАРТОН🔴жизнь
@womancan_mb · 83,006
#22
Женщина и реализация | Наталия Терсен
@NataliaTersen · 699
#23
Психолог Сексолог МАКС БЛЭК
@m_sovetnik · 58,628
#24
Тата Феодориди
@TatFeodoridy · 59,841
#25
Ксения Бородина
@borodylia0803 · 894,864
#26
2️⃣ Inna Tliashinova |ТРЕНАЖЕРЫ ДЛЯ ПОДСОЗНАНИЯ!
@trener_podsoznanie · 47,058
#27
Карина Исхакова
@karinapronastavnichestvo · 19,613
#28
«В поле мастера» Юлии Ивлиевой
@amelisoul_master_julia · 37,264
#29
Женские хитрости 2.0
@zamizh_za_bogatogo · 8,413
#30
Максим Лукьянов
@maksimlukianov · 3,250
#31
Mikhail Saidov
@MikhailSaidov · 55,589
#32
КОНТЕНТ ДЛЯ ПСИХОЛОГА |ПОСТЫ,СТОРИС,РИЛС
@storis_psy · 10,787
#33
Психология с Мадиной 🧚🏻‍♀️☀️
@Madinapsyc · 200
#34
Трансерфинг реальности
@transerfing_realnosti_tyt · 148,464
#35
Менталочка по полочкам
@mentalochka_daily · 1,864
#36
Канал Ирины Подрез
@ipodrez · 28,845
#37
Богатый Папик
@Denis_Baiguzhin · 27,851
#38
Слепокурова Наталия про свой Путь к Лучшей Версии Себя!!!
@natalislepokurova · 328
#39
O svidaniyah 🖤
@o_svidaniyah_tg · 27,774
#40
Метод Лабковского
@labkovskiy · 186,005
#41
Анна Протасова
@reiraofficial · 103,312
#42
Канал Елизаветы Устюговой
@ElizavetaUstyugova · 26,318
#43
Екатерина Любимова ♥️
@lubimova_kate · 33,304
#44
druma_helena
@druma_helena · 5
#45
Sofia Stuzhuk
@sofia_stuzhuk_official · 298,931
#46
Психология денег. Татьяна Озорнина. Реализация предназначения| Маркетинг| Мышление | Расстановки|Телесная терапия| Реализация
@TatianaOzornina11 · 382
#47
Седа Каспарова
@Seda_Kasparova_news · 254,651
#48
Артем Сенаторов печатает...
@senatorov_art · 30,347
#49
ГУЗЕЛЬ САФИНА | психолог
@guzelsafinaa · 4,829
#50
Airin про отношения
@wqsjQ4Giexo0MGIy · 10,743
#51
Джафар | Миллионы на контенте
@Mr_ReelsRoyce · 10,420
#52
Психолог / супервизор Татьяна Гандзюк
@psihologiyaotnosheniytatya · 320
#53
Алина Гесс
@alinaguess · 106,924
#54
️Психолог Наташа Янчак️
@nataly_yanchak · 1,775
#55
Максим Шарапенко | Психолог
@mak_sharo · 16,355
#56
ALENA YANCHEVSKAYA
@alenayanchevskaya · 130,669
#57
АНА МАВРИЧЕВА | Личный бренд
@anamavricheva · 35,166
#58
Молодой Папа
@yongpapa · 10,576
#59
Псидваноль Развитие
@psy20_official · 23,659
#60
Meta Spirituality Official
@metaspiritualityofficial · 11,912
#61
FELIKSOVNA ❤️‍🔥
@roskoshnayawoman · 296
#62
Записки какого-то мужика
@zapiski_man3 · 31,240
#63
Познание Себя с Индирой Ян
@poznanie_indira · 237
#64
Perception
@perception_by_nk · 17,201
#65
Мария Кудрявцева | Психология
@kudriavtcevapsy · 302
#66
ВсеЛенская Терапия Леонида Тальписа
@vselenskayaterapiya · 63,436
#67
Психолог в горах🌄
@lasatiani · 332
#68
Магия Чисел/Нумерология️️
@nadinnymerolog · 396
#69
Мила Левчук о любви
@milalevchuk · 48,284
#70
Институт Практической Психологии Константина Дыкина
@ippkd · 1,174
#71
Смс любимому
@smsloveyou · 496
#72
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 566,678
#73
NLP SPACE
@nlp_pro · 1,619
#74
PODREZ EDUCATION
@podrezeducation · 7,404
#75
ЮЛИЯ ХАДАРЦЕВА 🕊️ | Расстановки
@JuliaKhadartseva · 38,276
#76
ТОЧКА ОПОРЫ психолога
@loginova_psy · 294
#77
Александр Палиенко
@alexanderpalienko · 68,247
#78
Виктория Боня
@bonyaviktorya · 612,300
#79
Мария Бразговская
@MBrazgovskaia · 55,825
#80
SENSE ME DANCE
@sensemedancecom · 63,129
#81
Доктор Зубарева / Doctor Zubareva
@doctor_zubareva · 400,128
#82
Мари про новости
@mari_novosti · 6,120
#83

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Артем Репецкий
@artemrepetskyi · 25,101
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Андреященко Евгения. Aevgeniya
@aevgeniya_offical · 20,703
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
Психолог Сексолог МАКС БЛЭК
@m_sovetnik · 58,628
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Психолог Александр Шахов
@alex_shahov_fg · 33,432
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 3 September 2026
Богатый Папик
@Denis_Baiguzhin · 27,851
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 September 2026
Канал Елизаветы Устюговой
@ElizavetaUstyugova · 26,318
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
Екатерина Любимова ♥️
@lubimova_kate · 33,304
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
МАРК БАРТОН🔴жизнь
@womancan_mb · 83,006
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
INNA DE ALMEIDA
@inna_de_almeida · 60,079
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ярослав Самойлов | Канал” (@yaroslav_samoylov), 41,012 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yaroslav_samoylov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.