Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 87 days, net -233. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,194–9,497 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
2 Nov 2026, 04:47
9,229
-6
30 Oct 2026, 13:39
9,235
-9
27 Oct 2026, 20:39
9,244
-21
24 Oct 2026, 17:45
9,265
-15
21 Oct 2026, 09:06
9,280
-8
18 Oct 2026, 10:59
9,288
-8
15 Oct 2026, 10:16
9,296
-7
12 Oct 2026, 07:16
9,303
-12
5 Oct 2026, 23:57
9,315
-22
28 Sept 2026, 22:42
9,337
-26
19 Sept 2026, 13:40
9,363
-7
14 Sept 2026, 23:37
9,370
-11
11 Sept 2026, 15:02
9,381
-10
6 Sept 2026, 15:56
9,391
-8
2 Sept 2026, 13:37
9,399
-9
30 Aug 2026, 07:44
9,408
-9
27 Aug 2026, 08:23
9,417
-14
24 Aug 2026, 00:53
9,431
-6
20 Aug 2026, 14:23
9,437
-2
17 Aug 2026, 10:59
9,439
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 20 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.51%
avg views ÷ 9,229 subscribers
Avg views / post
601
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.998%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 October 2026
Posts held
12 (20 May 2025 – 26 October 2026)
Views total
601
Reactions total
6
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Nov 2026, 08:27 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,140
Videos
≈61
Links
≈156
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
20s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
810 reactions across 12 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
317
39.1%
🔥
200
24.7%
👍
128
15.8%
😁
48
5.93%
❤🔥
39
4.81%
🤣
25
3.09%
💯
18
2.22%
😍
8
0.988%
😘
5
0.617%
🤗
5
0.617%
🥰
5
0.617%
🙏
4
0.494%
👀
3
0.37%
💋
3
0.37%
👏
2
0.247%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 810 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2025 to 26 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Приветствуем 👋
Если вы хотели учиться на психолога - для себя или как профессия, - это для вас:
последний набор в этом году - до 31 октября
следующий будет не раньше чем через год
понимаем, звучит как маркетинговая уловка, но это не так
🔗 УЗНАТЬ ПОДРОБНОСТИ
🔐 Открытый вебинар «Фантазии: источник желаний и красок жизни под запретом»
Почти у каждой женщины есть картинка в голове, которую она не рассказывала никому. Ни мужу, ни подруге, ни психологу.
И рядом с этой картинкой всегда живут три вопроса: со мной всё нормально? это измена? а если у меня такого нет — со мной что-то не так?
Фантазия — не план и не намерение. Это то место, откуда берётся желание. И запирается о…
🔮 Приглашаем вас на открытый вебинар
«Метафорические карты: для себя и для работы с клиентами»
Встречу проведёт Ярослав Самойлов.
📅 28 мая (четверг)
⏰ 19:00 мск
На вебинаре поговорим о том, почему МАК для многих специалистов становятся одним из самых любимых инструментов в работе.
Метафорические карты помогают увидеть то, что человек не всегда может сразу объяснить словами: чувства, внутренние конфликты, страхи, …
🔴Эфир с преподавателем
Для практикующих и будущих психологов: «Психолог в профессии и в жизни: где границы и как не навредить?»
Коллеги, приглашаем вас на прямой эфир с Еленой Караберовой, который состоится сегодня, 19 марта, в 18:00 (мск) в Instagram* Института
На вебинаре мы разберем практические кейсы и найдем ответы на ключевые вопросы:
1️⃣Страх навредить: главный страх в профессии - как работает механизм гип…
Любовь и близость: в чем разница ?
1. Любовь - это про тебя, близость - про другого
Любовь - твое внутреннее состояние. Твои чувства, эмоции, восприятие. Любовь живет внутри тебя, даже если человека нет рядом
Ж говорит "я его люблю" и описывает свои чувства: как тоскует, как думает о нем, как ей хорошо рядом. Это про ее внутренний мир. Про то что он вызывает в ней
Любовь может быть односторонней. Можно любить тог…
Бесплатный курс «Как стать психологом с нуля. Помогать себе и другим. Достойно зарабатывать. Получить международный диплом МВА»
Успейте записаться бесплатно
* Осталось мало мест
Мы взрослеем не тогда, когда становимся серьёзнее.
А когда перестаём бежать — от себя, от ответственности, от правды.
⠀
✍🏻Поделитесь в комментариях, у вас был такой переломный момент?
⠀
Чат для поиска своего психолога клиентами и поиска клиентов психологами, а также людей для практики
Для тех, кто еще учится в моем институте
Если вы уже закончили учебу - это пространство не для вас ❤️
Новая ссылка (с 17:15)
Ссылка для вступления
Ссылка для вступления
Ссылка для вступления
* Через 24 часа ссылка будет скрыта
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @oinpp_world. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ярослав Самойлов | Канал @yaroslav_samoylov · 41,138 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 29 August 2026
Ирина Меркулова | Профессия психолог @psy_professional · 25,405 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Smart | Медиа про психологию @smart_inc_psy · 23,317 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Артем Толоконин | Биоэнергосоматика @bioenergosomatic · 20,326 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 28 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОИПП | Онлайн Институт Практической Психологии” (@oinpp_world), 9,229 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oinpp_world.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.