ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНЫХ КОУЧЕЙ И НАСТАВНИКОВ pinned a photo

Channel
ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНЫХ КОУЧЕЙ И НАСТАВНИКОВ
@fpcoach
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,503subscribers
-65 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001861807194 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fpcoach |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fpcoach |
Topic
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:41 | 7,503 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 7,504 | +7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:01 | 7,497 | -5 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 7,502 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:42 | 7,508 | -8 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:53 | 7,516 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 7,530 | -9 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 7,539 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 7,543 | -12 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 16:55 | 7,555 | -21 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 7,576 | +7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 7,569 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 7,567 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 7,568 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 7,568 | first reading |
Engagement
45 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.21%
- avg views ÷ 7,503 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 466
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 3.51%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 45 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 45 (27 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,061 |
| Reactions total | 213 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 23:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 20m 28s
- Average length
- 2m 55s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
757 reactions across 42 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 333 | 44.0% | |
| 👍 | 173 | 22.9% | |
| 🔥 | 88 | 11.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 59 | 7.79% | |
| 🙏 | 27 | 3.57% | |
| 👏 | 21 | 2.77% | |
| ✍ | 20 | 2.64% | |
| 🥰 | 12 | 1.59% | |
| 🤝 | 9 | 1.19% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.528% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.396% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 0.396% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.396% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.264% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 757 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.22%
- 1 of 45 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 439
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 584
- over 41 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2SDnjeeBFK1 | 1 | 14 August 2026 | 14 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
🔵Вы отучились на коуча, у вас есть метод, инструменты и желание работать. Но клиентов нет или они появляются от случая к случаю. А когда разговор заходит о деньгах, что-то внутри сжимается, и вместе с ценой словно исчезает уверенность в своем профессионализме. 🔵Это знакомая история для многих коучей. Постоянный поиск клиентов вместо стабильной практики. Попытки выйти на платежеспособную аудиторию, которые ни к чему …
❤2👍2🙏2
Уважаемые коллеги, ✅ 10 сентября Комитет по науке ФПКиН и Центр дополнительного образования НИУ ВШЭ приглашают вас на круглый стол «Оценка эффективности коучинга: подходы, методы, проблемы». 👍 Поговорим о том, что стоит за доказательным подходом в коучинге, как оценивать результаты работы, какие методы уже существуют и где заканчиваются корректные выводы и начинаются мифы. В центре дискуссии: 🔵что такое доказател…
👍5❤🔥2❤1🔥1
Как коучу перестать работать по бартеру? 🎙 Мария Курдина, глава Комитета по наставничеству, и Ольга Смольникова, заместитель главы Комитета по наставничеству, в подкасте предлагают задать себе несколько вопросов, которые помогут разобраться в этой теме. А еще делятся, что можно сделать уже сейчас, чтобы начать работать с этим запросом. Как вы работаете с этой темой? ➡️ Записаться на персональное интервью ➡️ Узнат…
❤6👍3✍2
💛 Активно готовимся к деловому сезону и плавно выходим из летнего режима, у нас большие планы! ✅ Уже сейчас команда Федерации входит в активную фазу подготовки к IV Всероссийской научно-практической конференции «Коучинг и наставничество: теория и практика», которая пройдет 3-5 февраля 2027 года, и Конкурсу коучей, который мы проведем осенью. ✅ 14 сентября стартует практический тренинг для коучей про продвижению «Ка…
❤8🔥5👍3🤩3
💛 Ольга Рыбина, Председатель Наблюдательного совета, рассказывает о трех важных стратегических линиях развития Федерации. Полную запись открытой встречи «О развитии Федерации: изменения, решения и планы» вы можете найти на сайте. ➡️ Стать членом Федерации Мы ВКонтакте | Мы в Максе
❤5🔥3👍1
Дорогие коллеги, напоминаем Через час — в 13:00 (мск) 💛 Увидимся на групповой супервизии с Натальей Шишкиной. Участие только для членов ФПКиН. ➡️ Стать членом ФПКиН
❤4👍1
Одна из самых неприятных ловушек начинающего коуча: чем меньше уверенности в собственной профессиональной ценности, тем ниже цена, чем ниже цена, тем сложнее самому воспринимать себя в качестве специалиста, за работу которого можно брать достойные деньги. Но проблема не только в самооценке. ✔️ Коучу действительно бывает сложно ответить на простой вопрос: «А за что именно клиент мне платит?» Потому что «я провожу коу…
❤13👍13💯3
В профессии наступает момент, когда новые техники перестают быть главным источником роста. Гораздо важнее становится возможность посмотреть на свою практику со стороны, разобрать сложный клиентский случай, понять, что происходит в работе не только с клиентом, но и с самим коучем. Именно для этого существует супервизия. ✅ 25 августа приглашаем вас на групповую супервизию ФПКиН с Натальей Шишкиной, главой Комитета по…
❤🔥7👍2✍1❤1
💛 В августе в Санкт-Петербурге прошла встреча членов ФПКиН с Марией Фокиной, членом Президиума ФПКиН, главой Комиссии по этике, Коуч Мастером ФПКиН. За чашкой чая говорили о том, что действительно волнует коллег: обсуждали рабочие вопросы, делились опытом и разбирали сложные ситуации. 💙 Получился живой профессиональный разговор без формальностей и заранее заданной повестки. Именно такие встречи помогают лучше узна…
❤🔥13❤12👍3🥰2🔥1
Что делает жизнь наполненной? Почему человек продолжает жить по инерции, даже когда давно перестал чувствовать себя живым? Можно ли начать сначала, если кажется, что все важное уже произошло? Эти фильмы исследуют именно такие темы. Они помогают глубже понимать внутренние кризисы, поиск смысла и моменты, когда человек решается изменить свою жизнь. 🎥 Первый день моей жизни (2023) Четыре человека, потерявшие желание …
❤🔥13✍7❤5👍2
Коллеги, у нас прекрасная новость! 💙 В чате членов Федерации появился специальный раздел «Активности». ✅ Теперь каждый участник чата может раз в месяц рассказать о своих событиях, мероприятиях и услугах, чтобы коллеги знали, чем вы занимаетесь и что создаете. Это отличная возможность быть заметнее внутри профессионального сообщества, делиться своими проектами и находить новых участников, клиентов и партнеров. Мы …
🔥9❤8👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @fpcoach. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@fpcoach edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 18 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 18 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@academ5prism · 35,236
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
@ymuradyan · 39,308
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 30 August 2026
@gutvaleriy · 29,181
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
@tvchernigovskya · 110,424
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
@marketing_dir · 34,350
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
@MikhailSaidov · 54,694
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
@kvestkayf · 33,274
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 4 September 2026
@dubininvaofficial · 44,337
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 28 August 2026
@yourgreatlife · 45,682
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
@Katerinalengold · 71,428
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 20 August 2026
@fond78_msp · 27,588
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 September 2026
@Inpsycho · 31,398
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ФЕДЕРАЦИЯ ПРОФЕССИОНАЛЬНЫХ КОУЧЕЙ И НАСТАВНИКОВ” (@fpcoach), 7,503 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fpcoach.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.