Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Lily Aspen

Channel

Lily Aspen

@lilyAspen

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

79,227subscribers

+442 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001594888214
TypeChannel
Username@lilyAspen
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/lilyAspen

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

78,48779,22778,8577 August 2026 — 78,785 subscribers8 August 2026 — 78,789 subscribers9 August 2026 — 78,766 subscribers10 August 2026 — 78,740 subscribers11 August 2026 — 78,654 subscribers12 August 2026 — 78,655 subscribers13 August 2026 — 78,582 subscribers14 August 2026 — 78,542 subscribers16 August 2026 — 78,510 subscribers17 August 2026 — 78,487 subscribers18 August 2026 — 78,575 subscribers19 August 2026 — 78,670 subscribers20 August 2026 — 78,673 subscribers21 August 2026 — 78,731 subscribers22 August 2026 — 78,792 subscribers24 August 2026 — 78,811 subscribers25 August 2026 — 78,815 subscribers26 August 2026 — 78,865 subscribers27 August 2026 — 78,906 subscribers28 August 2026 — 78,944 subscribers29 August 2026 — 78,985 subscribers30 August 2026 — 79,014 subscribers31 August 2026 — 79,037 subscribers1 September 2026 — 79,020 subscribers2 September 2026 — 79,057 subscribers3 September 2026 — 79,051 subscribers5 September 2026 — 79,191 subscribers8 September 2026 — 79,115 subscribers11 September 2026 — 79,111 subscribers13 September 2026 — 79,122 subscribers14 September 2026 — 79,211 subscribers16 September 2026 — 79,204 subscribers19 September 2026 — 79,227 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +442. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78,376–79,338 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:2079,227+23
16 Sept 2026, 18:2279,204-7
14 Sept 2026, 23:4279,211+89
13 Sept 2026, 07:3879,122+11
11 Sept 2026, 13:1979,111-4
8 Sept 2026, 20:2079,115-76
5 Sept 2026, 15:3879,191+140
3 Sept 2026, 13:4179,051-6
2 Sept 2026, 10:1379,057+37
1 Sept 2026, 08:4479,020-17
31 Aug 2026, 10:0779,037+23
30 Aug 2026, 06:3679,014+29
29 Aug 2026, 09:4678,985+41
28 Aug 2026, 12:0678,944+38
27 Aug 2026, 12:4278,906+41
26 Aug 2026, 12:3478,865+50
25 Aug 2026, 13:3878,815+4
24 Aug 2026, 13:0378,811+19
22 Aug 2026, 23:3878,792+61
21 Aug 2026, 15:3678,731first reading

Engagement

287 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.33%
avg views ÷ 79,227 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,810
184 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
202
of 287 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held287 (5 August 202620 September 2026)
Views total1,068,640
Reactions total24,797
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken21 Sept 2026, 00:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,900
Videos
467
Links
1,190

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 21 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 44m
Average length
23m 26s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

36,251 reactions across 262 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
17,19247.4%
❤‍🔥6,01716.6%
🔥5,56515.4%
😁3,2348.92%
💯1,2133.35%
👍7862.17%
😱6621.83%
🥰6151.70%
🤩1660.458%
👀1590.439%
👏1540.425%
😢1210.334%
🎉1090.301%
🗿1000.276%
🌚640.177%
🤯610.168%
🤬170.047%
🤔160.044%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 263 of the 287 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36,251 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 287 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
213
across the posts below
Posts paid on
63
of 263 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
104
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lilyAspen. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 287 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 19:35 UTC≈2,660 views27 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Девочки из Стамбула, молю, посоветуйте мастера по наращиванию волос и маникюр/педикюр, пожалуйста 🙏🏻

20❤‍🔥7

20 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC≈4,500 views209 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Спасибо что делитесь опытом. Мы только что заплатили за перевес багажа 900 долларов 🤡 (и оплатим еще раза четыре за ближайшие месяцы). Так что скоро видимо тоже все будет помещаться в одну сумку 😅 Господи, сделай меня минималистом

116😁64😱22❤‍🔥6🔥1

20 Sept 2026, 13:33 UTC≈4,370 views144 reactionsread 21 September 2026

7 переездов мне помогли. Сейчас вся наша с мужем жизнь входит в 4 чемодана. И то это у меня ещё лежит огромный баул с вещами которые надо отдать, так что возможно уже даже в 3 чемодана…) Всякая крупная бытовая техника находится на складе А так мы налегке, время сейчас такое, что если придется уезжать, то надо успеть все собрать за считанные часы Когда мы зимой переезжали, у нас было 38 коробок и сумок (после то

💯71🔥3331❤‍🔥7👍1🤔1

20 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈4,230 views82 reactions1 Starread 21 September 2026

От неформалки неформалке шлю приветик! 😂 та же история. Воображаемые суб личности веселиться

48😁27❤‍🔥7

20 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC≈4,190 views99 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Forwarded from @refi_mari

«Брошенная корзина» реально помогает. У меня бывают такие фантазии о том, как я В ОБРАЗЕ НЕФОРМАЛКИ пойду на молодежный концерт иииии…. Все эти образы приходят ночью в основном и когда я все это получаю на вб, я в ахуе) потому что я половину в «адекватном» сознании не заказала бы никогда, половина мне не нужна, половину я даже не помню что смотрела 😁 Больше ночью не оформляю заказы

😁61💯1716❤‍🔥5

20 Sept 2026, 10:49 UTC≈4,630 views152 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Пока не знаю, думаю стоит искать альтернативные источники дофамина как минимум, собирать корзины и оплачивать только через 72 часа и только если можешь назвать то, что в корзине лежит, посмотрим что из этого сработает (возможно ничего) 🤡 если кто-то справился с компульсивным шоппингом - пишите как и что вам помогло?

102🤩24😁16👍6❤‍🔥4

20 Sept 2026, 10:46 UTC≈4,410 views47 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Это уровень Бог)) как к нему приблизиться. Как не покупать🤣🤣🤣

😁3313💯1

20 Sept 2026, 10:42 UTC≈4,380 views114 reactionsread 21 September 2026

Я выкидываю и раздаю легко, но следующий уровень это в целом не покупать лишнего, чтобы выкидывать и раздавать было нечего 😭

🔥6531😁15❤‍🔥3

20 Sept 2026, 10:41 UTC≈4,300 views121 reactionsread 21 September 2026

У меня другая детская "травма": мне жалко выкидывать вещи, которые давно не ношу, как будто "у них есть душа и я их предаю".. в детстве я всё одушевляла 🙄🤷‍♀️💔

💯8238👍1

20 Sept 2026, 10:29 UTC≈4,600 views366 reactionsread 21 September 2026
Video

После того, как вчера я паковала вещи 12 часов я дала себе слово завязывать с онлайн шоппинги для «воображаемых версий себя» - типа пастель, бумага, планшет на случай если я вдруг стану художницей, шмотки, которые увидела у инфлюенсоров и тд. С моими компульсивными тенденциями такой шоппинг это жесть 😭😭😭 а пока мы кочевники тем более. Вчера когда разбирала все эти вещи и раскладывала на стопки, что летит с нами, а чт

213💯87👍54❤‍🔥8😁4

19 Sept 2026, 05:06 UTC≈6,110 views121 reactionsread 21 September 2026
File

И сам чек-лист

70❤‍🔥27🔥21👍3

19 Sept 2026, 05:03 UTC≈6,350 views109 reactions1 Starread 21 September 2026
File

ПОМЕХИ ИНТУИЦИИ Самые чувствительные люди, которых я встречала за десять лет практики, доверяют себе МЕНЬШЕ ВСЕХ. Обычно ситуация такая: я все чувствую, но себе не доверяю и поэтому себя не слушаю. А потом огребаю. В этом выпуске я объясняю, почему так. И разбираю пять помех, которые ты принимаешь за интуицию. ТРЕВОГА. ЖЕЛАНИЕ. СТРАХ. ЧУЖОЕ, которое прилипает к вам, если энергетические и эмоциональные границы не

68❤‍🔥30👍11

Showing the 12 most recent of 287 posts we hold for @lilyAspen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Анастасия ko_sha
@koshechkiklub · 26,570
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
💭Инсайтовская форточка
@garikovainsight · 23,823
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
Римма Карамова
@karamova_fm · 31,191
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
Наталья Касарина
@kasarinan · 28,991
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
Андреященко Евгения. Aevgeniya
@aevgeniya_offical · 22,644
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
Alina Shpak
@alishka_shpak · 28,288
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 9 September 2026
Зинануёбтвоюмать
@zinanuebtvoumatt · 30,716
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 6 September 2026
БЕЛАЯ КОМНАТА (Whiteroom)
@belajakomnata · 26,266
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Артем Репецкий
@artemrepetskyi · 25,425
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 September 2026
Канал Ирины Подрез
@ipodrez · 29,426
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Михаил Фатеев
@mihailfateev · 22,885
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 September 2026
Канал Елизаветы Устюговой
@ElizavetaUstyugova · 25,222
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
Ольга Гогаладзе
@profinansy · 577,646
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Миллион на недвижимости
@million_na_nedvijke · 29,268
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Валера Гут | Ψ и AQ
@gutvaleriy · 29,181
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 September 2026
Записки Василиски
@vasilisa_delicia · 24,006
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
O svidaniyah 🖤
@o_svidaniyah_tg · 28,194
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
Дневник Аминема
@aminanewss · 22,869
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
Ольга Чебыкина
@chebykina_o · 26,878
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 September 2026
Наташа Жукова.Рядом 🫂
@zhukova_ryadom · 28,164
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 9 September 2026
Anyuta_Rai
@anyuta_rai_channel · 29,393
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Алена и Америка
@alena_america · 27,657
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 September 2026
Алина говорит
@alina_telling · 28,478
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
Астролог Чукреева на связи
@astrolog_chukreeva · 24,270
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Lily Aspen” (@lilyAspen), 79,227 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lilyAspen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.