Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 41% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,843–15,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 03:07
14,961
+10
6 Nov 2026, 00:18
14,951
-3
4 Nov 2026, 21:26
14,954
-2
3 Nov 2026, 22:09
14,956
+1
2 Nov 2026, 20:07
14,955
-7
1 Nov 2026, 16:37
14,962
-1
31 Oct 2026, 13:57
14,963
+6
30 Oct 2026, 14:36
14,957
-9
29 Oct 2026, 13:59
14,966
-6
28 Oct 2026, 12:57
14,972
+12
27 Oct 2026, 13:59
14,960
+1
26 Oct 2026, 15:46
14,959
+2
25 Oct 2026, 17:14
14,957
+4
24 Oct 2026, 14:56
14,953
-1
23 Oct 2026, 13:55
14,954
-4
22 Oct 2026, 16:06
14,958
-26
21 Oct 2026, 11:00
14,984
-7
20 Oct 2026, 08:17
14,991
+52
19 Oct 2026, 11:15
14,939
+1
18 Oct 2026, 09:28
14,938
first reading
Engagement
47 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.54%
avg views ÷ 14,961 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,130
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 47 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
47 (3 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
6,771
Reactions total
139
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 18:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
674
Videos
90
Links
601
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
6m 58s
Average length
1m 00s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,411 reactions across 47 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5350702035819833989
747
52.9%
custom 5231151573891059894
366
25.9%
custom 5429213037263340515
271
19.2%
😁
27
1.91%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 47 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,411 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 47 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @irina_trafik. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 47 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
6.38%
3 of 47 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
731
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,820
over 44 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvA8svK
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2VtzqvS39yQ
1
3 November 2026
3 November 2026
2VtzqvyBMDm
1
2 September 2026
2 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 47 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
У меня есть клиент-ювелир, который делает потрясающие изделия, но довольно редко предоставляет мне новые фото/видео товара, чтобы можно было использовать их для рекламы.
И если для рекламы в Максе или Авито я могу сделать ему фото ювелирных изделий через нейронку, то в Telegram Ads лучше использовать в рекламе видео. И я тут начала осваивать создание видео через нейронку, сделала ему уже несколько видео-креативов.
…
В последнее время Авито Реклама радует своими обновлениями.
Во-первых, наконец-то появился дневной рекламный бюджет у группы! Раньше был вечный пересчет бюджета за период и неудобное продление группы. К этому, конечно, привыкаешь, но дневная лимитка сильно удобнее и ее прям не хватало. Радуюсь, что они наконец сделали эту элементарную вещь. Я все группы переделала заново, чтобы использовать эту обнову.
Во-вторых, в…
🚨⚡️ В Авито Рекламе появилась своя рекламная сеть (аналог РСЯ). Пока в бета-версии. Разбираю нюансы.
Авито выкатил внешнюю рекламную сеть Авито (РСА), которая показывает вашу рекламу на сайтах и в приложениях партнеров с учетом заданных настроек аудитории.
Включается это в настройках группы через ползунок «Показы в рекламной сети Авито».
Собрала вам известные на данный момент технические ограничения и правила рабо…
Но есть минусы:
1) Стратегия обучается 14 дней - собирает данные о тех, кто совершает целевое действие. Оценивайте результат после обучения и без необходимости не меняйте настройки.
2) Авито рекомендует выбрать целевым действием событие, которое приносит от 15 конверсий в день: так стратегия быстрее обучится и найдёт больше пользователей, готовых совершить действие.
3) Для стратегии «Максимум конверсий» нужен бюдже…
⚡️ 🤍 В Авито Рекламе теперь можно оптимизироваться по конверсиям при рекламе сайта.
Это реально важное обновление. Для этого нужно установить счетчик (пиксель) на сайт и настроить событие. Вцелом, так же, как и в других таргет-системах.
Подробнее в справке Авито https://ads-help.avito.com/ads/max-conversions
Сложная ситуация продолжается
Яндекс Директ все еще не работает, но директологи верят, что это продлится не долго и все починят. Многие сервисы работают со сбоями, но уже ситуация гораздо лучше.
Уроки моей онлайн-школы тоже пару дней были не доступны, но Продамус ХЛ быстро починили. Продлила ученикам доступ к урокам курса по Авито Рекламе на месяц.
По таргету в Максе тоже пока все сложно. Ранее я писала, что можно…
Продолжаю про таргет в Максе
Неожиданно для нас всех Яндекс объявил, что через него теперь тоже можно запускать рекламу в Максе.
Итого теперь рекламу можно запускать на выбор: через новый рекламный кабинет ВК или через Яндекс Директ. Так как мы, таргетологи, 2 дня уже мучаемся с ВК, то часть из нас ломанулась проверять, как же будет все работать через Яндекс.
Но проблема с открутом рекламы остается и в Яндексе. Пр…
Хочу поделиться тем, что сейчас с Макс Рекламой.
5ого числа она появилась, и я сразу запусти первые объявления потестировать. В чате таргетологов Макса мы активно обсуждаем что как у кого.
Сейчас все, кто настроил рекламу в Макс-каналы практически не получают показы. Даже если выбрать очень широкую аудиторию. Но это не из-за того, что в Максе нет аудитории. Ее там очень много. Просто пока какой-то баг. Они поспешил…
Кто хочет протестировать рекламу в Максе, напишите мне @nymizmatka
- ваш Макс-канал
- какой есть бюджет на тест
- какую ца хотите видеть в канале
Тестовый бюджет реализую за очень дешевый прайс.
📲 Обсуждаем таргет в MAX в этой группе
❤️🔥 Таргетированная реклама в MAX стала доступна с сегодняшнего дня.
Можно создавать рекламные кабинеты и рекламировать свои Макс-каналы в других Макс-каналах.
Трафик можно вести как на каналы в MAX и посты в них, так и на внешние сайты.
Реклама показывается прямо в Макс-каналах так же, как и в Telegram Ads. Можно просто рекламный текст, а можно текст + фото (как и в Telegram Ads)
По настройкам таргетинга: гео, …
Рассказываю про Banner in Bot в Telegram Ads
Пол месяца назад в Telegram Ads в разделе Target Users появился новый формат размещения Banner in Bot. Выбираешь там каналы конкурентов, и реклама показывается подписчикам этих каналов, но не внутри каналов, а в любых чат-ботах, которыми эти люди пользуются.
Раньше, чтобы показать рекламу в чат-ботах, у нас был только вариант Target Bots. И это была та еще боль. Способов…
Showing the 12 most recent of 47 posts we hold for @irina_trafik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@irina_trafik edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
25 August 2026
Most recent edit
25 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @irina_trafik as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
24 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Камилла про бизнес и маркетинг @camilla_business · 18,660 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 October 2026
Наталья Гриценко про маркетинг @target_nata · 21,680 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
Слава КРАСАВА @smmmarketolog · 19,009 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 1 October 2026
TGStat.ru — Аналитика Telegram-каналов и чатов @TGStat · 132,411 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
Кудряшов Дмитрий @redsmm · 22,329 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 September 2026
Tribute | Монетизация контента @TributeNewsRU · 48,869 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 25 August 2026
Хайлайты | Журнал про инфобиз и edtech @infohilights · 20,965 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 September 2026
Официальный канал Телеметра - Telemetr.me @telemetr_me · 37,096 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 1 September 2026
Церебро life @cerebrotg · 19,247 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 October 2026
Румянцев Рулит @drumyanzev · 22,157 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
Система Богатства @batudmi · 30,703 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
Алекс Мерзляков @alexmerzliakov · 20,748 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 4 October 2026
Ксения Баранова | PRO ИИ-технологии🔥 @xb_prosmm · 62,821 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Сергей Нагорный | Маркетинг и Нейросети @gora_academy · 19,976 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 3 October 2026
Света Афанасьева @engageforsales · 28,427 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
маркетинговый бутерброд @kotelkreativov · 26,665 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 23 September 2026
Телеграм Петроченкова @petrochenkow · 46,529 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 26 August 2026
Корытин выкручивает конверсии @nmiacm · 60,737 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Ленивый продюсер. Блог. @lazyproducer · 25,688 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
Максим Хирковский @maksimhirk · 19,562 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 October 2026
Жаркова Лиля | Реклама WB и Ozon @target_i_pr · 20,250 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 28 September 2026
Канал Игоря Зуевича @zuevichigor · 39,741 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 August 2026
Трус Юлия про бизнес @trusprobusiness · 36,990 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 31 August 2026
Татьяна Маричева @tm_producer · 30,727 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Telegram Ads | Ирина Нумизматка” (@irina_trafik), 14,961 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irina_trafik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.