Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи

Channel

Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи

@ryzov_igor

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

46,663subscribers

-406 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291024810
TypeChannel
Username@ryzov_igor
DescriptionНаучу как с помощью переговоров повысить качество жизни! • Официальный сайт: https://ryzov.ru/ • Забирайте 🎁 руководство «Переговоры на каждый день» https://clck.ru/3QkKC6
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ryzov_igor

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

46,66347,08146,8726 August 2026 — 47,069 subscribers7 August 2026 — 47,081 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,079 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,067 subscribers11 August 2026 — 47,062 subscribers12 August 2026 — 47,061 subscribers13 August 2026 — 47,047 subscribers15 August 2026 — 47,041 subscribers16 August 2026 — 47,031 subscribers18 August 2026 — 47,026 subscribers19 August 2026 — 47,019 subscribers20 August 2026 — 46,997 subscribers21 August 2026 — 47,002 subscribers23 August 2026 — 47,003 subscribers24 August 2026 — 46,985 subscribers25 August 2026 — 46,977 subscribers26 August 2026 — 46,952 subscribers27 August 2026 — 46,953 subscribers28 August 2026 — 46,933 subscribers29 August 2026 — 46,910 subscribers30 August 2026 — 46,906 subscribers1 September 2026 — 46,915 subscribers2 September 2026 — 46,903 subscribers3 September 2026 — 46,907 subscribers5 September 2026 — 46,898 subscribers8 September 2026 — 46,926 subscribers11 September 2026 — 46,948 subscribers13 September 2026 — 46,962 subscribers14 September 2026 — 46,982 subscribers16 September 2026 — 46,974 subscribers18 September 2026 — 46,970 subscribers25 September 2026 — 46,941 subscribers3 October 2026 — 46,865 subscribers8 October 2026 — 46,856 subscribers12 October 2026 — 46,832 subscribers14 October 2026 — 46,839 subscribers15 October 2026 — 46,817 subscribers16 October 2026 — 46,810 subscribers17 October 2026 — 46,801 subscribers18 October 2026 — 46,788 subscribers19 October 2026 — 46,783 subscribers20 October 2026 — 46,778 subscribers21 October 2026 — 46,759 subscribers22 October 2026 — 46,748 subscribers23 October 2026 — 46,747 subscribers24 October 2026 — 46,736 subscribers25 October 2026 — 46,726 subscribers26 October 2026 — 46,716 subscribers27 October 2026 — 46,710 subscribers28 October 2026 — 46,701 subscribers29 October 2026 — 46,698 subscribers30 October 2026 — 46,692 subscribers31 October 2026 — 46,695 subscribers1 November 2026 — 46,689 subscribers2 November 2026 — 46,670 subscribers3 November 2026 — 46,663 subscribers6 August 20263 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 89 days, net -406. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,600–47,144 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 11:0546,663-7
2 Nov 2026, 12:3846,670-19
1 Nov 2026, 12:2846,689-6
31 Oct 2026, 12:3046,695+3
30 Oct 2026, 13:1546,692-6
29 Oct 2026, 13:2746,698-3
28 Oct 2026, 11:4846,701-9
27 Oct 2026, 13:1546,710-6
26 Oct 2026, 16:1146,716-10
25 Oct 2026, 15:0546,726-10
24 Oct 2026, 12:3546,736-11
23 Oct 2026, 10:1146,747-1
22 Oct 2026, 12:1046,748-11
21 Oct 2026, 02:1646,759-19
20 Oct 2026, 01:3846,778-5
19 Oct 2026, 03:5646,783-5
18 Oct 2026, 04:3746,788-13
17 Oct 2026, 06:2146,801-9
16 Oct 2026, 07:0446,810-7
15 Oct 2026, 09:2846,817first reading

Engagement

115 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 186 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.49%
avg views ÷ 46,663 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,630
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.79%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 115 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 37 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held115 (21 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total61,857
Reactions total1,100
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,130
Videos
≈535
Links
≈979

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 07s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,403 reactions across 110 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,00429.5%
❤98528.9%
👍79623.4%
💯2356.91%
🤣942.76%
🤯601.76%
😁571.67%
👎361.06%
❤‍🔥320.94%
🤬310.911%
👌300.882%
👏120.353%
🙏120.353%
🤝90.264%
🤔50.147%
😢40.118%
🎉10.029%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 111 of the 115 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,403 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 115 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ryzov_igor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 115 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.87%
1 of 115 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,930
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,090
over 114 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJspCQh12 October 20262 October 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (28.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 12:28 UTC555 views16 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Как малому бизнесу вести переговоры с монстрами? Друзья, представьте: вы владелец небольшого магазина, кафе, ресторана или салона красоты. А вокруг настоящие акулы бизнеса 🦈 Крупные поставщики диктуют свои условия, партнёры выкручивают руки, а конкуренты пытаются отвоевать ваших клиентов. Как в таких условиях защищать свои интересы? Как вести переговоры с теми, кто значительно сильнее вас? 🗓️ Уже 10 ноября я буду…

🔥7❤6❤‍🔥3

4 Nov 2026, 09:11 UTC670 views50 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Почему чем больше вы оправдываетесь, тем слабее становится ваша позиция? Друзья, хочу разобрать с вами один из распространённых приёмов жёстких переговоров – обесценивание. Представьте ситуацию👇🏼 Мария – молодой, инициативный сотрудник отдела маркетинг, у неё хорошее образование, пять лет опыта работы в крупных компаниях. ❌ Но её руководитель периодически использует в разговоре такие фразы: — Машенька, ты, навер…

🔥41❤8🤬1

3 Nov 2026, 13:25 UTC877 views12 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

📅 Расписание мероприятий на ноябрь и декабрь 2026 года Друзья, впереди два насыщенных месяца! Будем встречаться в разных городах, разбирать сложные переговорные ситуации и, конечно, много практиковаться. Напоминаю: переговоры – это навык, который можно и нужно развивать! И лучший способ это сделать – не просто изучать техники, а применять их на практике. Поэтому приглашаю вас на мои ближайшие выступления, открытые…

👍4🔥4❤3😢1

3 Nov 2026, 06:29 UTC≈1,180 views96 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Поезд Санкт-Петербург Москва, св. Заходит в мое купе мужчина под 60 и сходу начинает со мной трындеть. О… как же я хочу тишины. На мою просьбу не реагирует. Начинает мне рассказывать про всемирный заговор, про тупых америкосов (в стиле Задорнова), которые ни истории, ни географии не знают. Я применяю любимый прием, чтобы «говорун» замолк: Не могли бы напомнить год вхождения на трон Николая 2? Конспиролог завис, ч…

🤣52🔥28😁12❤4

2 Nov 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,350 views48 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026
Video

Не бойтесь повторять свою позицию в переговорах! #рызов_короткооважном Есть простой, но очень эффективный приём – «Заезженная пластинка» Собеседник давит, повышает голос, уводит разговор в сторону, пытается сбить вас с толку? Не нужно каждый раз искать новые аргументы, оправдываться или менять свою позицию Спокойно возвращайтесь к главной мысли столько раз, сколько потребуется Помните: если собеседник не принял в…

🔥28❤13👍7

1 Nov 2026, 05:56 UTC≈1,810 views17 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Москва! 12 декабря тренинг «Жесткие переговоры» Жёсткие переговоры - это не про то, когда кричат и стучат кулаком по столу, и даже не про то, когда один давит, а другой сопротивляется Это про любую ситуацию, где есть конфликт интересов, где другая сторона не собирается просто так отдавать вам то, что вам нужно, и где цена вопроса – деньги, условия, отношения или репутация. Мы все ведём жёсткие переговоры каждый де…

❤8🔥5👍4

29 Oct 2026, 08:35 UTC≈1,740 views31 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Жесткие переговоры от Игоря Рызова. Познакомилась с данным спикером через книги «Переговоры с монстрами» и «Кремлевская школа переговоров». Игорь топ России. На тренинге было много упражнений, что меня сильно порадовало. Узнала несколько дополнений к своему арсеналу в общении с «танками». Инсайты: 1. Много говорит и спешит ответить новичок. 2. Сила молчания позволит раскрыться собеседнику самому. 3. ПАУЗА. Не на…

❤23👍7🔥1

27 Oct 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,780 views18 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Клиенты требуют скидки, партнёры пересматривают условия, а договорённости остаются только на словах. Знакомо? Друзья, сегодня, когда каждый считает деньги, умение вести переговоры становится особенно важным. Ведь одна неудачная беседа может стоить Вам выгодного контракта, повышения зарплаты или прибыли, которую Вы могли бы получить И здесь важно понимать разницу между продавить и убедить: 👉🏼 Можно настоять на своё…

🔥10❤‍🔥4❤2👍2

27 Oct 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,510 views2 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤2

27 Oct 2026, 08:03 UTC≈1,800 views59 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026

Манипулятор сам попался в свою ловушку. Как такое возможно? Коллеги, есть одна интересная закономерность: когда человек пытается манипулировать другими, он сам становится уязвимым для манипуляций. Был у меня товарищ, человек обеспеченный, и когда он заходил в дорогой бутик, продавцы сразу начинали предлагать ему самые дорогие вещи: «Это эксклюзивная коллекция!», «Такие вещи могут позволить себе далеко не все!» Обы…

❤25🔥16👍11❤‍🔥6👎1

26 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTC≈1,850 views36 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

Ваше преимущество перед конкурентами – это уверенность в себе #короткооважном_рызов@ryzov_igor

👍17🔥14❤‍🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 115 posts we hold for @ryzov_igor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ryzov_igor edited 12 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 21 posts on @ryzov_igor as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
10 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
21 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
6 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
8

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTCAnonymous Poll215 voters

Кто ваш монстр?

  1. Начальник / вышестоящий27%
  2. Клиент или заказчик19%
  3. Партнер по бизнесу5%
  4. Чиновник / банк / «система»14%
  5. Близкие: друзья, родственники23%
  6. Да у меня их целая коллекция)32%

The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 115 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ПЕРЕГОВОРНАЯ СРЕДА | Канал
@ryzovperegovory · 9,206
#1
Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 252,122
#2
Продажи в переписке. Говорухин
@money_from_text · 11,680
#3
Игорь Манн
@mann_igor · 27,469
#4
Гений переговоров | Ольга Грищенко
@kotperegovor · 42,874
#5
Виталий Голицын
@VitalyGolitzyn · 26,748
#6
🥜БЕЛОЧКИНА ПРО ПРОДАЖИ🥜
@belochkinanastassia · 16,703
#7
Анастасия Солнцева / Охотники за продажами
@avsoln · 5,307
#8
Ольга Абрамова про переговоры
@HRD_mediator · 28,323
#9
Александр Кандеев
@factor_prodazh_channel · 4,095
#10
Ольга Паратнова. Руководитель Разумный
@trenerolgaparatnova · 10,420
#11
Академия продаж
@b2bsales_academy · 1,813
#12
Нечто | Сообщество предпринимателей
@nechto_community · 23,110
#13
Константин Смирнов - Переговоры для ТОПов
@kvsmirnovtrener · 2,047
#14
Скворцов. Продай себя дорого
@nastavnik_scvortcov · 5,106
#15
Оперштаб Игорь Рыбаков
@rybakovigor · 149,224
#16
Лёша Золотов
@lexeytoday_blog · 16,848
#17
Молянов
@molyanov_blog · 31,079
#18
Катерина Уколова💰
@UkolovaEkaterina · 8,291
#19
Андрей Осокин
@OsokinOsokin · 19,092
#20
Трус Юлия про бизнес
@trusprobusiness · 37,015
#21
Радислав Гандапас
@radislavgandapascom · 52,630
#22
Олег Шевелев
@olegcloser · 35,368
#23
Oleg Torbosov
@TorbosovLife · 106,816
#24
Максим Батырев
@Maxim_Batyrev · 20,711
#25
Седа Каспарова
@Seda_Kasparova_news · 255,089
#26
Евгений Колотилов, 1000 инсайтов по продажам
@kolotiloff1 · 8,313
#27
Владимир Якуба
@vyakuba · 49,137
#28
Михаил Дашкиев
@mikhaildashkiev · 44,854
#29
Продажник +1
@floor_99 · 7,421
#30
Маргулан Сейсембай
@MargulanSeissembai · 207,233
#31
Оскар Хартманн
@Oskar_Hartmann · 93,856
#32
Как продать слона. Ася Барышева
@abarysheva777 · 2,859
#33
Я — предприниматель
@dashkievpro · 22,165
#34
Корытин выкручивает конверсии
@nmiacm · 60,726
#35
Путь эксперта. Свобода и деньги
@wayexpert · 1,083
#36
Усы Кузина. Тренажер вашей публичности
@clubspeaker · 4,370
#37
Аветов
@avetov · 14,444
#38
Альберт Тютин | Хакинг продаж
@sales_hacking_1 · 5,479
#39
Архитектор Брендов • Ильяна Левина
@ilyana_levina · 11,011
#40
SeniorPomidor
@saleseniorpomidor · 6,843
#41
Владимир Моженков. Про бизнес
@vmozhenkov · 6,861
#42
Фокус на бизнес
@nechto_hard · 13,906
#43
Телеграм Петроченкова
@petrochenkow · 46,596
#44
100%Шпирт
@Shpirt100 · 5,230
#45
Алсу Бикбаева. Консалтинг ИТ-компаний
@aterracons · 5,231
#46
Максим Спиридонов
@mspiridonov · 69,313
#47
Заметки продавца B2B
@Salesnotes · 16,677
#48
Павликов опять что-то написал
@potok_ads · 71,001
#49
Сергей Бойлерная
@kostenkovru · 8,555
#50
А что, так можно было? Максина Юлия
@achtotakmozhno · 3,538
#51
Нескучные Финансы
@noboring_finance · 64,725
#52
План продаж — Михаил Графский
@s_a_l_e_s · 3,795
#53
Sokolovskiy
@sokolay · 109,351
#54
Дмитрий Норка | Доверие | Лидерство | Продажи
@dnorca · 6,760
#55
Марина Вострикова про бизнес и сервис
@bizservis · 7,755
#56
Губкин | Про AI и B2B-продукты
@gubkin_business · 12,145
#57
Вдумчиво о продажах
@nikolaevsales · 5,369
#58
Максим Левченко
@levchenko_realty · 25,095
#59
Артур | Бородатый РОП
@Art_BoostSales · 314
#60
Удивительная жизнь Ольги Грищенко
@expertgameworld · 6,162
#61
Поставьте в график
@frolova_i_experty · 7,255
#62
Алексей Ситников
@drSit · 100,125
#63
Регулярный менеджмент для руководителей (Евгений Севастьянов)
@regularmanagement · 22,739
#64
Павел Палагин. Нейроэффективность
@neuromencom · 8,242
#65
Канал Ильи Балахнина
@ilyabalahnin · 13,879
#66
Club 500
@journal500 · 19,445
#67
Евгения Семыкина I Про новые точки роста для себя и бизнеса
@JANE_SEMYKINA · 2,497
#68
Евгений Фролов про системный бизнес
@frolov_evgenii · 9,324
#69
Аяз
@AyazShabutdinov · 177,893
#70
Школа кинетического имиджа Валентина Шишкина
@valentin_shishkin · 26,129
#71
Александр Львов
@boringmarketer · 7,573
#72
ИИ + Отделы Продаж | Ильнур Сагдатуллин
@scriptsales · 1,692
#73
Александр Высоцкий
@alexander_visotsky · 36,719
#74
Хайлайты | Журнал про инфобиз и edtech
@infohilights · 20,975
#75
МАСШТАБ | Канал о бизнесе
@insajty_v_masshtabe · 3,011
#76
Инструменты маркетолога
@profit_maker · 45,484
#77
Я — РУКОВОДИТЕЛЬ
@iRukovoditel · 30,972
#78
Павел Ширяев 🧠 Маркетинг и нейросети
@pavelshiriaev · 18,959
#79
Гавриков Говорит про: маркетинг, бизнес, саморазвитие
@gavrikovgovorit · 12,713
#80
Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 172,326
#81
Фанат Сервиса
@fanat_servisa · 16,567
#82
Пётр Осипов | записки о развитии
@petrosipovprivate · 48,112
#83
Про Управление
@ProYpravlenca · 34,149
#84
Лидмашина
@leadmachine · 3,495
#85
Виталий Крылов - Команда А
@howtomake10x · 17,070
#86
Медникова про менеджмент
@mednikova_management · 15,610
#87
Филипп Гузенюк I Счастье в деятельности
@guzenuk · 22,053
#88
Пинчер: двигатель для отделов продаж
@egorlivadin · 2,442
#89
Берегулина Светлана про маркетинг и рост
@marketingmass · 9,881
#90
Михаил Дементьев. Кинетический интеллект
@kintellect · 35,926
#91
Дизраптор
@disruptors_official · 72,557
#92
Вадим Орехов | Бизнес-тренер | Агент
@orehov_vv · 2,666
#93
Высшая Лига Продаж | Василий Рыжако
@masterskaya_prodazh · 1,950
#94
НАТАЛЬЯ ЕГОРОВА | Люди и Бизнес
@all_about_motivation · 535
#95
Катерина Ленгольд
@Katerinalengold · 71,168
#96
Александр Фридман & Регулярный менеджмент
@asfridman · 7,924
#97
🌱Ильдар Хусаинов
@khusainov_ildar · 24,639
#98

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ольга Абрамова про переговоры
@HRD_mediator · 28,323
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
Гений переговоров | Ольга Грищенко
@kotperegovor · 42,874
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Виталий Голицын
@VitalyGolitzyn · 26,748
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Игорь Манн
@mann_igor · 27,469
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
Владимир Якуба
@vyakuba · 49,137
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Радислав Гандапас
@radislavgandapascom · 52,630
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Олег Шевелев
@olegcloser · 35,368
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Максим Батырев
@Maxim_Batyrev · 20,711
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
Алекс Яновский
@AlexYanovsky · 20,428
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
Школа кинетического имиджа Валентина Шишкина
@valentin_shishkin · 26,129
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
Король Говорит! Ораторское
@korolgovorit_school · 24,090
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
Михаил Дементьев. Кинетический интеллект
@kintellect · 35,926
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
В найме норм!
@Vnaime_norm · 80,395
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Ицхак Пинтосевич - Психология Торы
@Isaac_Pintosevich · 27,425
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Александр Высоцкий
@alexander_visotsky · 36,719
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи” (@ryzov_igor), 46,663 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ryzov_igor.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.