Научу как с помощью переговоров повысить качество жизни!
• Официальный сайт: https://ryzov.ru/
• Забирайте 🎁 руководство «Переговоры на каждый день» https://clck.ru/3QkKC6
Created
Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net -99. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46,871–47,108 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 22:39
46,970
-4
16 Sept 2026, 15:17
46,974
-8
14 Sept 2026, 15:20
46,982
+20
13 Sept 2026, 03:18
46,962
+14
11 Sept 2026, 08:00
46,948
+22
8 Sept 2026, 10:58
46,926
+28
5 Sept 2026, 04:39
46,898
-9
3 Sept 2026, 09:16
46,907
+4
2 Sept 2026, 03:33
46,903
-12
1 Sept 2026, 01:38
46,915
+9
30 Aug 2026, 22:08
46,906
-4
29 Aug 2026, 22:04
46,910
-23
28 Aug 2026, 23:14
46,933
-20
27 Aug 2026, 21:25
46,953
+1
26 Aug 2026, 22:46
46,952
-25
25 Aug 2026, 20:43
46,977
-8
24 Aug 2026, 22:06
46,985
-18
23 Aug 2026, 08:34
47,003
+1
21 Aug 2026, 21:58
47,002
+5
20 Aug 2026, 18:43
46,997
first reading
Engagement
58 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.80%
avg views ÷ 46,970 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,250
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 58 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 September 2026
Posts held
58 (21 July 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Views total
60,815
Reactions total
738
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Sept 2026, 15:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,140
Videos
≈540
Links
≈980
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 51s
Average length
1m 13s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,718 reactions across 53 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
513
29.9%
👍
463
26.9%
🔥
389
22.6%
💯
159
9.25%
😁
43
2.50%
🤯
42
2.44%
👎
34
1.98%
🤬
30
1.75%
👌
19
1.11%
👏
10
0.582%
🤔
5
0.291%
❤🔥
4
0.233%
😢
3
0.175%
🤣
3
0.175%
🙏
1
0.058%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 54 of the 58 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,718 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 19 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 58 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ryzov_igor. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 58 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Полезные ролики по переговорам 👇🏼
Друзья, всем отличной субботы! Ловите свежую подборку роликов на YouTube:
1. Как ответить хаму одним вопросом
Что делать, если вас пытаются унизить или поставить в неловкое положение? Разбираю вопрос, который выбивает хама из привычного сценария и помогает вернуть контроль над разговором.
2. Как вернуть человека к теме, если он переводит стрелки
«А ты сам…», «А вот у других…», «…
Интересно, как в жизни все меняется
Давным-давно, лет 40 назад, я первый раз попал в город Санкт-Петербург (мне кажется, еще тогда был Ленинград)
И он на меня произвел очень плохое впечатление. Много нищих, ободранный город. Я помню, что возненавидел его всей душой.
И сегодня, спустя много лет, Питер для меня один из самых любимых городов России!
Вот сегодня утром перед тренингом нашел время просто пройтись, прог…
Питер! Последние 10 билетов на тренинг уже в эту пятницу
Друзья, уже в эту пятницу встречаемся на моем обновлённом тренинге «Жесткие переговоры 2.0»
Мы будем разбирать реальные ситуации, учиться работать с давлением, агрессией и манипуляциями, направлять разговор в нужное русло и сохранять свою позицию даже с очень сильным оппонентом. В программе в том числе 15 приёмов работы с жёстким манипулятором, которые мы сра…
Не поверил, если бы не сам не увидел.
Самолет, бизнес класс, шторку открывает дама лет за 60, трясет за плечо парня, он снимает наушники.
«Молодой человек, уступите свое место моей дочери, она на 7м месяце, в экономе не удобно»
Молодой человек, удивлено:
«Нет. Это мое место, я купил его»
Далее кино: у вас нет сердца, тебе что жалко? Откуда у такого сопляка деньги.
Стюардессы стоят в сторонке. Все бы продолжалось,…
Немного про Дубай.
Hills Mall, 9 утра, полно народа. Хотите знать почему?
Все просто: открыли в ТЦ площадку для бегунов, поставили бесплатную воду. Детские площадки и мамы с колясками.
И кафе в итоге забиты. Вот вам отличный пример win-win 👍🏼
Психотрюк, после которого 90% переговорщиков уступают
Есть очень простой приём: показать гнев, раздражение или презрение так, чтобы второй человек почувствовал давление и первым пошёл на уступку. Особенно сильно это работает, если от этого человека зависит важная для вас сделка.
И в этот момент большинство начинает делать одно и то же: смягчаться
«Давайте попробуем договориться».
«Хорошо, здесь мы можем уступить».
…
Как вернуть человека в разговор, когда он переводит стрелки?
🎙️Подкаст #слушать_рызова
Вы задаёте конкретный вопрос, а в ответ слышите:
— «А вы сами в прошлом году…»
— «А вот у других вообще всё хуже»
— «А почему вы тогда сделали вот так?»
И через пару минут уже сами объясняетесь и оправдываетесь, хотя разговор вообще был не об этом.
Это называется whataboutism – приём, когда вместо ответа человек переключает ваш…
❤33🔥24👍16🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 58 posts we hold for @ryzov_igor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@ryzov_igor edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
21 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 120%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 58 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 19 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 27 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ольга Абрамова про переговоры @HRD_mediator · 28,633 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
Гений переговоров | Ольга Грищенко @kotperegovor · 43,649 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
Виталий Голицын @VitalyGolitzyn · 26,600 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Игорь Манн @mann_igor · 29,383 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
Владимир Якуба @vyakuba · 48,591 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
Радислав Гандапас @radislavgandapascom · 53,031 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Олег Шевелев @olegcloser · 35,044 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Школа кинетического имиджа Валентина Шишкина @valentin_shishkin · 25,831 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
Король Говорит! Ораторское @korolgovorit_school · 23,842 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 17 September 2026
Михаил Дементьев. Кинетический интеллект @kintellect · 36,355 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
В найме норм! @Vnaime_norm · 81,195 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Ицхак Пинтосевич - Психология Торы @Isaac_Pintosevich · 26,927 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Александр Высоцкий @alexander_visotsky · 36,863 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи” (@ryzov_igor), 46,970 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ryzov_igor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.