22 страны, 162 выступления в 2025-м
Курс«ProПродажи Yakuba.online.
Собственникам: РОП в аренду
VladimirYakuba.ru
Связь: @vladimir_yakuba
А+ Включена РКН clck.ru/3ReBC2
Created
Between 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
47 measurements spanning 77 days, net -788. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,194–50,077 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Oct 2026, 21:57
49,072
-5
20 Oct 2026, 15:35
49,077
-17
19 Oct 2026, 18:40
49,094
-42
18 Oct 2026, 15:28
49,136
+5
17 Oct 2026, 17:57
49,131
-28
16 Oct 2026, 16:59
49,159
-2
15 Oct 2026, 15:50
49,161
-76
14 Oct 2026, 19:08
49,237
-16
13 Oct 2026, 09:39
49,253
+477
9 Oct 2026, 07:02
48,776
+178
4 Oct 2026, 17:39
48,598
-315
26 Sept 2026, 17:58
48,913
+322
19 Sept 2026, 16:38
48,591
+180
17 Sept 2026, 06:40
48,411
-55
15 Sept 2026, 04:18
48,466
-42
13 Sept 2026, 13:37
48,508
-40
11 Sept 2026, 17:59
48,548
-64
9 Sept 2026, 03:38
48,612
-91
5 Sept 2026, 20:02
48,703
-48
3 Sept 2026, 17:57
48,751
first reading
Engagement
160 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 156 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
5.00%
avg views ÷ 49,072 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,460
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.87%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 160 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 October 2026
Posts held
160 (31 July 2026 – 21 October 2026)
Views total
142,435
Reactions total
2,669
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Oct 2026, 03:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,550
Videos
≈701
Links
≈1,090
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
23m 12s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,946 reactions across 157 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
2,619
37.7%
❤
2,316
33.3%
👍
1,311
18.9%
😁
190
2.74%
💯
164
2.36%
🙏
120
1.73%
👏
103
1.48%
😍
47
0.677%
👀
37
0.533%
🥰
27
0.389%
🤣
12
0.173%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 160 of the 160 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,132 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 21 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 160 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vyakuba. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 160 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 21 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Знаю, что среди моих подписчиков много риелторов🤫
🚨Поэтому этот выпуск подкаста точно стоит посмотреть!🚨
Я прилетел в Тюмень, чтобы увидеться с Ильдаром Хусаиновым - основателем «Этажей», одной из крупнейших сетей агентств недвижимости в России)
Мы знакомы, думаю лет 10. Это интервью планировали 1,5 года.
Ильдар начал заниматься бизнесом ещё в 15 лет - торговал бананами вместе с мамой в Новом Уренгое. Сегодня «Эт…
Сегодня в 18:00 выйдет подкаст, который особенно советую посмотреть тем, кто работает с недвижимостью 👀
Но даже если вы не риелтор - не пролистывайте
Там как минимум история про то, как человек начинал с торговли бананами, а потом построил бизнес с оборотом в триллионы🤯
И ещё несколько мыслей, которые заставляют по-другому посмотреть на масштабирование бизнеса.
В 18:00. Не пропустите 🎙️
Иногда менеджер думает, что проявляет настойчивость. А клиент в этот момент думает: «Господи, опять он» 😅
И вот здесь интересный момент.
Сам факт, что вы позвонили клиенту второй, третий или даже пятый раз, ещё ничего не говорит о вашей навязчивости.
Вопрос в другом: что изменилось с прошлого контакта?
Если вы просто снова спрашиваете, принял ли клиент решение - вы давите!
Если пришли с новой информацией, предло…
Утро вторника)
И первое, что мы делаем - проверяем, что там уже «горит» 🔥
Телефон ещё не успел толком включиться, а там уже:
«Срочно ответьте»
«Нужно сегодня»
«Очень важно»
И всё. Человек уже понёсся что-то решать 😅
Хотя давайте честно: не всякая срочность - настоящая…
Иногда это просто чужая спешка, которую зачем-то пытаются сделать вашей.
- Клиенту нужен ответ прямо сейчас. А что будет, если через час?
- Колл…
«Позовите кого-нибудь из мужчин» - уверен, что тут есть те, кто слышал такое…
И что же отвечать, если клиент не воспринимает вас всерьёз?
Представьте: вы продаёте авто или промышленное оборудование, а клиент вместо обсуждения сделки просит позвать мужчину…
Просто потому, что не верит в вашу компетентность
И как реагировать?
Понимаю, что может появится желание вступить в конфликт, обидеться или пытаться доказать с…
Если бы меня спросили, какой навык будет особенно важен в ближайшие годы, думаю, что поставил бы на «Growth Mindset».
Не программирование. Не английский. Не умение работать с нейросетями.
Хотя всё это тоже важно)
Growth Mindset - это когда ты не воспринимаешь «не получилось» как окончательный ответ.
Не умею - научусь
Не получилось - попробую ещё раз
Не знаю как - найду способ разобраться
И вот это, на мой взгляд…
Клиент молчит.
Вы звоните ещё раз.
И ещё.
А он - всё дальше!
В Москве разбираю кейс Романа, руководителя отдела продаж компании по поставкам литиевых батарей.
Его клиент затягивает решение и не выходит на связь. Роман хотел понять, как его всё-таки довести до оплаты.
Но оказалось, что проблема в самой тактике: чем сильнее продавец наседает, тем больше клиент закрывается))
Показываю, как вместо «дожима» перевести …
Поверьте, много раз видел одну и ту же историю: предприниматель придумывает что-то новое и уверен - ну это же очевидно круто, почему люди не покупают?
А потому что новое - это не только про продукт.
Это ещё про новую привычку)
Человек привык делать по-старому. И даже если ваш вариант удобнее, быстрее и выгоднее, ему сначала нужно понять: а зачем мне вообще менять то, что я уже делаю?
Вспомните, как появлялись прил…
Иногда бизнес упирается не в рынок. Он упирается в самого владельца.
В Минске разбираю сразу два кейса 🔥👇🏻
Андрей развивает веб-студию, хочет расти и нанимать людей, но упирается в потолок дохода. Разбираем, почему продавать сайты недостаточно и как говорить с клиентом через результат для его бизнеса.
У Сергея, владельца «Вольт Моторс», другая проблема - бизнес растёт, а сил на него всё меньше. Здесь разбираем дел…
«А можете сделать скидку?»
Кажется, что ответить проще простого: дать скидку - закрыть сделку - получить деньги 💰
Но в этот момент иногда начинается совсем другая история…
Клиент привыкает покупать дешевле. А потом появляется конкурент, который готов уступить ещё больше)
И вы уже соревнуетесь не качеством, сервисом или результатом, а кто сильнее снизит цену.
Я не против скидок как инструмента. Вопрос в другом - …
Окно. Кухня. Нижний. С этим видом я вырос. Мама скинула фотку с вопросом: «как тебе занавески?».
Мне - круто. Вам как? Пишите мнение. Мама читает)
❤63🔥18👍11🥰4
Showing the 12 most recent of 160 posts we hold for @vyakuba. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@vyakuba edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
23 September 2026
Most recent edit
23 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 160 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 21 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Виталий Голицын @VitalyGolitzyn · 26,682 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 September 2026
Игорь Рызов | Переговоры и продажи @ryzov_igor · 46,759 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Олег Шевелев @olegcloser · 35,161 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 September 2026
Максим Батырев @Maxim_Batyrev · 20,703 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 September 2026
Радислав Гандапас @radislavgandapascom · 52,811 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Игорь Манн @mann_igor · 29,201 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 September 2026
Максим Левченко @levchenko_realty · 25,100 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Владимир Якуба” (@vyakuba), 49,072 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vyakuba.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.