Делаю Яндекс Директ.
Услуги, другие соцсети и тд - все тут - https://taplink.cc/blogstrokova
Ютуб - https://youtube.com/@blogstrokova
Курс - https://яндекс-директ-настройка.рф/direkt-bez-vody/?utm_source=tg
Created
Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net +179. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,381–7,616 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 09:37
7,589
+6
3 Nov 2026, 04:08
7,583
+4
28 Oct 2026, 08:05
7,579
+7
25 Oct 2026, 00:58
7,572
+6
21 Oct 2026, 18:36
7,566
+14
18 Oct 2026, 20:58
7,552
+14
15 Oct 2026, 12:29
7,538
+14
12 Oct 2026, 11:44
7,524
+13
5 Oct 2026, 13:17
7,511
+27
28 Sept 2026, 00:42
7,484
+25
18 Sept 2026, 16:42
7,459
+12
14 Sept 2026, 16:37
7,447
+8
10 Sept 2026, 20:39
7,439
+6
5 Sept 2026, 21:39
7,433
+10
1 Sept 2026, 15:42
7,423
+1
29 Aug 2026, 09:23
7,422
+4
26 Aug 2026, 18:34
7,418
+1
23 Aug 2026, 15:25
7,417
-8
19 Aug 2026, 23:57
7,425
-3
16 Aug 2026, 21:35
7,428
first reading
Engagement
33 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
70.1%
avg views ÷ 7,589 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,320
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 33 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held
33 (30 March 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total
26,610
Reactions total
278
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 00:42 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
90
Videos
3
Links
42
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
1,635 reactions across 32 posts, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🫡
1,635
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,635 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
40
across the posts below
Posts paid on
18
of 33 we hold a reading for · 55%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yandex_direct_strokov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 33 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 March 2026 to 2 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
3.03%
1 of 33 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
6,800
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
6,290
over 32 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGjZwVK
1
28 May 2026
28 May 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 2 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (80.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
У кого БЕГЕТ хостинг - держите штанишки - он помер. Че он помер - я хз, не оповестили. Но что-то серьезное.
Я вас просто курсану: если мониторинг сайта не включен - вы денюжку сливаете. Проверьте
По рынку вроде есть чуть оживления. Кто-то где-то даже покупать начал.
У меня даже запуски какие то приятно беспроблемные были.
(ашалеть посты интересные в последнее время)
Давайте хоть на вопросы ПО РЕКЛАМЕ поотвечаю в к…
Заработало вроде
И плашка желтая висит, мол восстановлено
Кому там чо настроить\повести - пишите менеджеру @Manager_Strokov
УПД: картинку заменил через коммандер, сработало
Директ работает с ограничениями: доступны просмотр, запуск и остановка кампаний, а также пополнение счёта. Статистика может быть неполной.
Добавить кампанию пока нельзя, а вот пополнить можно самому.
Статистика грузится долго, изменений как будто не сделаешь пока
(А вы боялись, даже юбка не помялась)
Про пару дней не повезло, но чо мы можем.
У кого реклама работает - можете в техподдержку писать - https://yandex.ru/support/direct/ru/troubleshooting/other
Они могут выставить счет на пополнение
"Пришлите, пожалуйста: — логин, который нужно пополнить; — номер последнего оплаченного счёта из Баланса."
(или в приложухе банка посмотреть)
"Мы можем выставить вам новый счёт на основе ранее оплаченного счёта № Б-6079…
Товарищи, дата центры уронили, по слухам пару дней на восстановление.
Реклама крутится, вы ниче не сделаете.
Идите курить
‘ кто политику и срач начинает - ловит пермобан
У меня за последние пару месяцев отвалилось процентов 30 ведения (новые приходят, но темпы отвала обгоняют). И вообще впервые в жизни третий месяц подряд доход просаженный. Недвижка почти вся встала и ушла, хотя и другим нишам достается.
У меня ноль грусти, потому что уходят клиенты, которые активно пытались что-то сделать. Времени много освободилось от этих активностей - второй канал поведу, в доту поиграю.
Кто-то…
В директе НЕ РАБОТАЕТ зайти и ПОСМОТРЕТЬ.
Это давно не реклама для первонахов с легким входом. И не для товаров по 500 рублей.
Если настрой "щас за первые 5 тыщ бюджета поймем как работает, потом если чо докинем", то сразу скажу - не надо, не получится.
У меня сидят улыбаются клиенты, у которых бюджета на 10-20 заявок в день. И сразу голова была с пониманием, КАК продавать.
Вот щас если в пул моих проектов глянуть, …
ИИ поработит человечество
ИИ заменит людей
ИИ делает продажи
(ИИ пока заменило делателей превьюшек для ютуба, кстати. я за тупой промт норм превью получаю, но спам от дезигнеров еще не остановился)
Салямалейкум, товарищи. Месяц, получается, ниче не писал.
Я бы с радостью чем-то поделился, да как будто все сказал в видосе последнем - https://youtu.be/SxEfAs0wZCA
Работа превратилась в попытки объяснить клиенту почему все плохо и когда все починится.
Не знаю)) В день по 5 человек бывают пишут, мол давай чето делать.
Еще одно занятие - уговариваю прикрутить квал лид новым, прикрутить какой-нить антиспам (тестируе…
ЕЩЕ ПОДСКАЗКА по управлению кампаниями.
Я вам талдычу про обучения кампаний и квал лиды. А вы заметили, что в новом мастере отчетов НЕТ (по стандарту) показателя CTR и CPC ? (кликабельность и стоимость клика)
Яндекс намекает вам, что эти ВТОРИЧНЫЕ ПАРАМЕТРЫ ВАС НЕ ВОЛНУЮТ. Ориентируйся только на цели.
Какой смысл от низкого CPC, и высокого CTR, если ТВОЯ ЖЕНЩИНА ПЛАЧЕТ И КАРМАН ПУСТОЙ? Вот и думайте.
Еще короче, какие цели плохие, какие пойдут:
Автоцель: Отправка формы (похоже, нажатие кнопки трекает) - параша.
Автоцель: Заполнил контактные данные - с натяжкой пойдет, ибо заполнил не равно отправил
Автоцель: Отправил контактные данные - 99%, что норм трекает.
Автоцель: Клик по номеру - в поиске с лютой натяжкой сойдет (10 тыков - 5 звонков на самом деле) для анализа на уровне "если даже тычков нет, то жопа", в р…
У меня есть ТЕОРИЯ, которую советую проверить.
Цели про глубину просмотров, контакты и прочую поведенческую дичь:
1. Не ведут к продажам (как бы вам этого не хотелось)
2. Учитываются, даже если не добавлены в стратегию.
Опыт 1. У студентика рся дуру дала и понесла тык по номеру, я пошел смотреть - в стратегии ее не было прописано, но именно с этой цели кампания забалдела и научилась ботов под этот клик в номер приво…
🫡50
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @yandex_direct_strokov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Для меня до сих пор загадка.
Вам клиенты в какие мессенджеры пишут?
Телега51%
Макс28%
Вацап8%
ПОСМОТРЕТЬ РЕЗУЛЬТАТ38%
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 2 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Яндекс Реклама ПРО @yndx_ed · 55,964 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 August 2026
Яндекс Реклама @YANtech · 53,894 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 26 August 2026
Полина Бондарева про контекст @pbondareva · 19,520 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Яндекс Директ - Блог Строкова” (@yandex_direct_strokov), 7,589 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yandex_direct_strokov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.