13 measurements spanning 34 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,648–4,682 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Sept 2026, 13:01
4,678
+5
3 Sept 2026, 04:19
4,673
+21
31 Aug 2026, 03:27
4,652
-3
28 Aug 2026, 05:17
4,655
+2
24 Aug 2026, 20:18
4,653
-9
21 Aug 2026, 16:14
4,662
-4
18 Aug 2026, 04:33
4,666
+7
15 Aug 2026, 02:58
4,659
+7
11 Aug 2026, 22:42
4,652
-6
9 Aug 2026, 03:11
4,658
+3
6 Aug 2026, 09:11
4,655
-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:52
4,657
no change
5 Aug 2026, 19:57
4,657
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.12%
avg views ÷ 4,678 subscribers
Avg views / post
333
1 post measured
Reaction rate
8.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
18 (10 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
333
Reactions total
29
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
378 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
146
38.6%
🔥
145
38.4%
👏
24
6.35%
💯
21
5.56%
👍
17
4.50%
🗿
12
3.17%
🤝
6
1.59%
😁
3
0.794%
👎
2
0.529%
🤨
2
0.529%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 396 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 18 we hold a reading for · 22%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ask_kira. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
11.1%
2 of 18 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,060
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,090
over 16 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzquvpLJv
1
30 July 2026
30 July 2026
2Vtzqw6heQh
1
10 July 2026
10 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Как правильно входить в хату, в процессы на новой работе и успешно пройти испыталку?
Периодически приходят менти с вопросом, как пройти испыталку.
Лучше всего получается, когда этот вопрос возникает в процессе менторинга: человек пришел искать работу, где-то в середине менторинга ее нашел, и дальше мы уже доделываем встречи по адаптации на новом месте.
Итак, простые рекомендации, которые плюс-минус универсальны дл…
Ваша карта бита!
А давайте сегодня перекинемся в карьерные картишки?
Правила простые: я выкладываю карту, то есть пишу один-единственный навык соискателя. Первый человек в комментариях должен последующим навыком «перебить» предыдущий и описать один навык второго кандидата, круче первого.
Следующий человек отвечает уже первому комментатору, пишет еще более крутой навык или обстоятельство еще одного кандидата, чтобы …
Можно ли ходить по собеседованиям, пока работаешь на работе?
Тут есть два ответа. Один пацанский, другой человеческий.
Пацанский: умри, но не давай поцелуя собеседования без любви.
Ну то есть, если уж ходишь по собеседованиям, будь готов к реальному процессу. Не просто посмотреть, сколько стоишь на рынке, не просто потренироваться отвечать на вопросы, а правда рассматривать переход.
А по-человечески, конечно, все…
Ахах, отличный коммент прислали про вайб:
Veronica P.
Я в такой ситуации давала соискателям «тестовое»: прислать 5 мемов, с которых искренне угораешь, а потом всей командой дизайнеров смотрели и с чьих больше всего ржали, тот и принят. Потому что совпадение юмора — это база вайба)
А поделитесь своими мемами! 5 не обязательно, можно по одному. Я тоже пришлю свои в комменты, давайте посмотрим, совпадаем ли мы на кана…
Что вы понимаете под вайбом команды?
На прошлой неделе обсуждали с вами много чего, а особенно вайб. Он есть у каждой команды и компании, вы можете в него попасть, а можете не попасть.
Мне очень понравился этот комментарий на тему того, что это вообще такое:
Нилюфар Рахимова
Кажется, это произведение подходов к работе * взгляды на жизнь * ауру.
Примеры со стороны соискателя:
1) На созвоне с потенциальным лидом уст…
В 12.30 начинаем прямую трансляцию нашего разговора с Максимом Ильяховым.
Тема: «У нас была великая эпоха»
Обсудим прошлое, настоящее и будущее редактуры, а также как Ильяхов жестко переобулся с нейросетями.
Присоединяйтесь! Можно будет задавать вопросы в чат Телемоста.
https://telemost.yandex.ru/live/a3b49bb269674b5aabb26c06e588ab5b
Как у вас дела с английским языком?
На днях обсуждали с вами, что важно нанимающему лиду и что должно быть у кандидата в качестве форы. Про вайб и софты мы с вами еще поговорим, а сейчас хочу немного сказать про английский. Он в опросе занял, как мне кажется, незаслуженно предпоследнее место. Хотя исследования хх говорят об обратном — мол, ЗП у англоговорящих сотрудников на 18% больше.
Я учу английский, кажется, вс…
«Я бы с ним в разведку не пошел»
Я тут услышала в разговоре эту древнюю, но до сих пор рабочую метафору. И сразу стала думать, а с кем бы я пошла в разведку?
Это ведь не про роли даже, а про доверие. А еще это хорошо ложится на работу — на вашу команду и, особенно, на вашего лида.
Поэтому предлагаю вам провести вот такой мысленный эксперимент. Закрыть глаза и представить, что вы с вашим лидом идете в разведку. Что…
Внезапный мудацкий прием переговоров — «ленинский прищур»
Мы с вами разобрали смену контекста и туман, теперь еще один
Используется в ситуации, когда непонятно, что отвечать, но очень хочется выглядеть умным, важным и уверенным в себе.
Как работает. Собеседник задает вопрос или формулирует тезис. В ответ человек делает этот самый ленинский прищур, принимает самодовольное выражение лица и с легкой ухмылкой говорит:…
🔥31❤13🤝6💯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ask_kira. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Адовый UX @uxfromhell · 50,288 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
Кинжал @Le_kinzhal · 46,700 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
Максим Ильяхов (Главред) @glvrdru · 69,662 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 20 August 2026
Работа в медиапроектах Т-Банка @tj_collega · 31,809 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 5 September 2026
Паша и его прокрастинация @abbsol · 29,505 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Записки редакторки @zapiski_redaktorki · 94,599 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Работа с текстами — вакансии @work_editor · 31,101 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 6 September 2026
Вакансии для копирайтеров @copywriter_vacancies · 29,641 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Молянов @molyanov_blog · 29,827 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 8 September 2026
Копирайтер, редактор — удаленная работа @self_ma · 33,397 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 4 September 2026
Норм удалёнка @normremote · 30,826 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Спросите Киру” (@ask_kira), 4,678 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ask_kira.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.