28 measurements spanning 29 days, net +185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,203–24,606 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 15:00
24,543
+5
3 Sept 2026, 01:15
24,538
+5
2 Sept 2026, 02:13
24,533
-9
1 Sept 2026, 01:35
24,542
-16
31 Aug 2026, 01:43
24,558
-1
29 Aug 2026, 23:54
24,559
+13
29 Aug 2026, 03:23
24,546
+28
28 Aug 2026, 06:44
24,518
+9
27 Aug 2026, 03:38
24,509
+8
26 Aug 2026, 07:08
24,501
-6
25 Aug 2026, 08:42
24,507
+2
24 Aug 2026, 10:58
24,505
+16
22 Aug 2026, 19:45
24,489
+3
21 Aug 2026, 07:02
24,486
+3
20 Aug 2026, 08:27
24,483
+90
19 Aug 2026, 09:18
24,393
-6
18 Aug 2026, 11:33
24,399
+85
17 Aug 2026, 12:55
24,314
+65
16 Aug 2026, 05:14
24,249
-4
14 Aug 2026, 13:55
24,253
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.1%
avg views ÷ 24,543 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,890
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.50%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
30 (16 June 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
89,620
Reactions total
4,930
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
12,339 reactions across 30 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
4,347
35.2%
❤
3,476
28.2%
😁
2,292
18.6%
🔥
1,152
9.34%
👍
382
3.10%
❤🔥
207
1.68%
😱
173
1.40%
💯
96
0.778%
😭
36
0.292%
✍
31
0.251%
👏
21
0.17%
🤝
20
0.162%
😢
14
0.113%
☃
13
0.105%
🤨
13
0.105%
🥴
9
0.073%
🤷♀
8
0.065%
🗿
7
0.057%
👎
5
0.041%
😐
5
0.041%
14 further kinds
32
0.259%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,339 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 30 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @callme_back. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 31 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
13.3%
4 of 30 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
6,710
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
8,440
over 26 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzquphdrB
1
25 August 2026
25 August 2026
2VtzqusfAh1
1
6 August 2026
6 August 2026
2Vtzqwm7u1d
1
21 August 2026
21 August 2026
2W5zFGgbLdF
1
12 August 2026
12 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 31 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Сегодня вечером я могла бы написать про пампкин спайс латте с корицей, и что в одном ухе уже должен лаять Джейкоб, а в другом быть «ЛевиОса, а не ЛевиосА!», но не буду.
Вместо этого заглянем в реальную статистику откликов крупного финтеха. Знаете сколько откликов получил Сбер за последние 8 месяцев?
Варианты ответа:
А - 500 000
Б - 750 000
В - 1 500 000
Г - давно тебе 17, Белла?
Правильный ответ:
вариант «Ж» - 4 0…
Недавно встретила в офисе своего кандидата (теперь уже коллегу), и у нас произошел диалог:
Коллега: «Слушай, а у нас в оупен спейсе на любом месте можно сесть работать? А то недавно забронировал стол в укромном уголке, пришел, а там были чьи-то вещи. Это нормально? Я хотел дождаться и выгнать, но не стал»
Я: «А что за стол это был?»
Коллега: «В конце коридора слева, возле красивой пальмы»
Я: «Так это кабинет CEO……
Mood на сегодня: врубаем трек из улицы разбитых фонарей и разбираем вопрос про проверку службой безопасности.
Здравствуйте! Подскажите, сколько обычно занимает проверка СБ? Первый раз прохожу этот опыт, прошло уже больше 2 недель. С hr на связи, говорит, что процесс затягивается
В идеальном процессе найма кандидат должен не заметить 3 момента:
1) Проверку СБ.
2) Других кандидатов.
3) Желание рекрутера сидеть не на …
Топ три необычных спасибо, которые я получала:
3 место - подарили ящик черного перца, паприки и сухого чеснока.
2 место - неожиданно вызвали на сцену, чтобы вручить приз лучшего сотрудника квартала, когда я тихо сидела в уголке и ела арахис.
1 место - бабушка кандидата поставила за меня свечку.
А если вам нужно еще больше идей , то коллеги из Яндекс Практикума собрали гайд из 30 способов похвалы, которые реально ра…
Чистосердечное признание: я листаю перед сном не рилсы, не вб и даже не рыбный раздел Вкусвилла, а хэдхантер. Ищу забавные вакансии, никак не связанные со сферой моей работы. Если вы проводите время на hh по-другому, то давайте уже как-то соберитесь. Для чего он еще нужен-то!
Я пока вот что нашла:
Методолог в блок «Риски» в индийский Сбер.
Да, слова «Индия» и «Сбер» и «Риски» не ожидали, что когда-нибудь окажутся в…
Напутствие всем менеджерам, которые нанимают к себе сотрудников:
Однажды вы встретите громкого кандидата, который расскажет кучу смешных историй и предложит сыграть для вас на губной гармошке. В этот момент важно выбрать того, кто готов молча выполнять свою работу.
Напутствие тому самому трудолюбивому сотруднику без гармошки:
Не перегибайте с подходом «выполняю свою работу и не отсвечиваю». Я уже несколько раз пис…
Добрый день! Вы просто прелесть, спасибо большое за контент и подачу, читаю с удовольствием и пользой)💛 Конечно, пришла за советом, потому что ситуация такая у меня впервые за все собесы… Итак, ко мне вышел hr очень крупной и известной компании, предложил отличную вакансию. Пообщались супер, легко и быстро, так же прошел и собес с руклем: очень интересно (да-да, это не опечатка!) и позитивно. Позвали в офис, где прям…
Забавный факт, который вы не знали: при отклике на карьерном портале кандидаты вместо резюме иногда прикрепляют не тот файл (по ошибке, я надеюсь). Например, на прошлой неделе мне попались договор на обучение массажу и два билета в кино.
Поэтому я обожаю смотреть отклики на карьерном. Каждый раз не знаю, что меня ждет: резюме или инструкция к пароварке.
Это я написала пост со своей позицией об озвучивании зарплатных ожиданий, а потом подумала: «да нафиг».
Поэтому моя рекомендация на сегодня: холодное какао без сахара на миндальном молоке.
Мы с вами зрелые и проработанные люди. Мы можем легко обсуждать любые темы. Срач? Мы не знаем, что это такое.
Все, мантра закончилась, голосуем и делимся аргументами (если получится. Если не получится, сремся):
❤️ Работодатель должен первым озвучивать вилку зарплаты.
🔥 Кандидат должен первым озвучивать зарплатные ожидания.
❤️🔥 Воздержусь от голосования. Я выше всего этого. Но за срачем понаблюдаю.
Спорим, вы постоянно слышите, что ИИ - это идеальный помощник в работе, но ваши запросы выглядят так же, как и мои (цитирую):
- «Если я делаю что-то из войлока, я ваяю?».
- «Выбери 7 чисел от 1 до 35».
- «Какую мышцу растягивать, если я не могу сесть на корточки, не подняв пятки?».
Да, я разносторонний человек с нерастянутой камбаловидной мышцой, и что вы мне сделаете?
Если хотите освоить ИИ и использовать его чут…
Сегодня разбираемся, что отвечать на странные вопросы рекрутера / нанимающего менеджера.
Почему их могут задавать? На мой взгляд, причины может быть две:
Причина 1 - Объективная.
Например, компания ищет айтишника на поддержку вип клиентов, которые полный ноль в IT. Интервьюеру нужно проверить, что кандидат доброжелательно ответит даже на самый тупой вопрос, и на его лице не будет написано «Святая Гваделупа, что у …
🤣259❤78😁48👍10🔥8👏1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @callme_back. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@callme_back edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мы вам не перезвоним” (@callme_back), 24,543 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/callme_back.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.