Меня зовут Крис, я основательница сервиса анализа кожи Openface и автор этого канала. По вопросам сотрудничества: @alex_angelina
Канал включен в реестр РКН: https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=6738c705b5d2ec30cf759f66®istryType=bloggersPermission
#P8LFC
Created
16 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 42 days, net +27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,360–53,025 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 10:18
52,518
-9
15 Sept 2026, 12:59
52,527
-33
13 Sept 2026, 18:41
52,560
-17
11 Sept 2026, 22:14
52,577
-83
9 Sept 2026, 09:18
52,660
-126
5 Sept 2026, 22:36
52,786
-28
3 Sept 2026, 23:36
52,814
-41
2 Sept 2026, 12:27
52,855
-18
1 Sept 2026, 09:55
52,873
-43
31 Aug 2026, 07:24
52,916
-2
30 Aug 2026, 08:37
52,918
+102
29 Aug 2026, 05:03
52,816
-45
28 Aug 2026, 04:58
52,861
-48
27 Aug 2026, 01:27
52,909
-39
26 Aug 2026, 04:53
52,948
+11
25 Aug 2026, 05:13
52,937
+128
24 Aug 2026, 06:17
52,809
+8
22 Aug 2026, 16:28
52,801
+25
21 Aug 2026, 07:36
52,776
+6
20 Aug 2026, 09:56
52,770
first reading
Engagement
44 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.0%
avg views ÷ 52,518 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,600
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 44 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
44 (27 July 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
315,540
Reactions total
5,845
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 16:53 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,990
Videos
≈274
Links
≈1,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,340 reactions across 44 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
5,436
40.7%
🔥
1,594
11.9%
✍
1,169
8.76%
😁
1,160
8.70%
🍾
1,061
7.95%
🎉
959
7.19%
👍
751
5.63%
💯
588
4.41%
😍
359
2.69%
😢
56
0.42%
😭
45
0.337%
👀
42
0.315%
💔
22
0.165%
😱
15
0.112%
👏
11
0.082%
❤🔥
9
0.067%
⚡
8
0.06%
💅
8
0.06%
🤩
8
0.06%
💊
7
0.052%
10 further kinds
32
0.24%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,340 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 44 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @krisistyping. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 44 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
А помните, мы с вами голосовали за питательные кремы для тела, способные пробудить к жизни самую сухую кожу?
Я готова пополнить этот список ещё одной банкой: разглаживающим баттером Payot Baume Corps Lissant Jeunesse. Не поскуплюсь на похвалу — он отличный. Правда, без шуток. Щедро питает, умасливает, смягчает кожу. В составе — масло ши, триглицериды, бакучиол.
Это не тот плотный твёрдый баттер, который приходится …
Sweet Not Sweat — теперь ещё лучше!
Наш бестселлер и ваш фаворит, дезодорант-антиперспирант Sweet Not Sweat прокачался и изменил текстуру — с кремовой на гелевую.
Мы взяли на заметку вашу обратную связь и улучшили формулу, оставив самое важное на месте. Состав не изменился (обещаем!), эффект всё так же длится 24 часа, зато новая гелевая текстура быстрее впитывается, легче распределяется и невесома на коже.
Сухокожие, общий сбор в комментариях под этим постом
Внимание, это не учебная тревога: если вы на системных ретиноидах, если недавно сделали пилинг или лазерное омоложение, если ваша кожа стала сухой, как у зомби Игги Попа в фильме Джармуша «Мёртвые не умирают» — обратите внимание на этот продукт.
Ох, не зря он зовется Skin Food: это не крем для лица в привычном смысле, а супер питательный барьерный sos-бальзам (ко…
«Я открываюсь под конец»
Эту фразу из «Гарри Поттера и Даров Смерти» я вспомнила, когда нашла в сумке блоттер In Petto Volute Éclairé. Утром, на презентации, я пыталась его расслушать — и в нос попали мускатный орех и апельсиновая корка. Вечером, когда всё утихло, поднялся чарующий шлейф табака, сухих листьев и папиросной бумаги. Меня это вздурманило и я облилась Volute Éclairé ещё три раза.
In Petto — молодой фран…
Вопрос: месяцами не могу избавиться от комедона — сидит на месте и не уходит, хотя пользуюсь и кислотами, и ретиноидами. Что я делаю не так?
Это была моя личная драма. Много месяцев я давила, ковыряла и пыталась отшелушить один бугорок на щеке: перепробовала все виды кислот, сменила три банки ретиноидов — а эта дрянь сидела как приклеенная. Дошла до Никиты Артемова в Bella Skin Clinic и выяснила, что дело было вообщ…
Достаем двойные листочки…
и записываем в них название Comfort Zone Essential Milk. Это очищающее молочко удаляет остатки макияжа, загрязнения и избыток себума, оставляя кожу чистой и мягкой. Так что если вы, как Ассоль, все еще вглядываетесь в даль, ожидая корабль с алыми парусами возвращения мягкой умывалки CeraVe, — прекращайте. Этот продукт умеет все то же, что умела она. Особых активов в составе нет (да и не нуж…
Прыщ не побить сывороткой или кремом (то есть, косметическим средством), говорили они. Ведь часть природы акне — бактериальная и с этим справляются только медикаменты...
Да, но как насчет азелаиновой кислоты?
В отличие от других косметических ингредиентов, она умеет подавлять рост бактерий C. acnes, ответственных за воспалительный процесс. И при этом у бактерий не развивается резистентность (как в случае с антибиот…
Вопрос: почему обезболивающие часто действуют на женщин слабее, чем на мужчин?
Боль — одна из самых древних жалоб в истории медицины. И тысячелетиями её лечили по одному принципу: как будто мы все — один и тот же пациент в одном и том же теле. Лишь недавно наука официально признала важный факт: женщины ощущают боль сильнее, чем мужчины, и, как следствие, хуже реагируют на стандартное лечение.
Исследования показываю…
Вот и она: долгожданная новинка — выравнивающая сыворотка с витамином С и миндальной кислотой All Bright ✨
Причины тревог и усталости мы побороть пока не в силах, зато создали сыворотку, с которой и в самые непростые дни кожа будет выглядеть живой и отдохнувшей. Даже если не всё allright, отражение в зеркале об этом не узнает.
1️⃣ Две стабильные формы витамина С заметно осветлят все виды пигментации, вернут сияние …
Очень уж неповоротливый я инфлюенсер: вот и лето прошло, а я только августовские рассылки сфотографировала. Но! Зато мы с вами посмотрим на новинки (прислали немало любопытных продуктов) и вскоре их обсудим. Потому что я как непутевый повар: пока готовила — все понадкусывала (потестировала)😅 Поехали!
• Blithe напомнили мне: что бы ни случилось — нельзя гасить свой внутренний свет. И прислали сыворотку с транексамово…
Запахи, которые возвращают в детство
В романе Пруста «По направлению к Свану» есть любопытный момент: главный герой приходит в гости к тетушке и ест бисквитное печенье «мадлен». Вкус и запах печенья, размоченного в липовом чае, напоминают ему о доме и погружают в воспоминания о детстве. Это называется феноменом Пруста — когда определенный запах или вкус могут вызвать воспоминания и эмоции, связанные с прошлым.
Для …
❤150👍12✍9🔥4💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @krisistyping. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@krisistyping edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Бьюти суета @klavagolman · 51,565 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
BeautyAD Anna Dycheva @Beauty_AD · 26,084 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 September 2026
сияй, Эля, сияй @gloweblow · 30,114 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 7 September 2026
don't touch my face @donttouchmyface · 55,148 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
Доктор Афинская @liza_afinskaia · 71,170 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 August 2026
Доктор Щербатова @JuliaSherbatova · 38,540 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Geltek за стеклом @geltek_cosmetics · 38,613 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Косметический маньяк @cosmetman_com · 27,021 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Запишите меня @doctor_lekomtseva · 29,738 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Ксения Вебер @xeniaweber · 31,019 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
Караван Бьюти Ченэл @fursanastasia · 47,741 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 August 2026
Мне только кончики @kkkmarya · 24,334 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 September 2026
Lab.Vera @beauty_blogers · 53,759 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
FLACON MAGAZINE @flacon_mag · 46,445 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 27 August 2026
СЕРГЕЙ НАУМОВ @naumita · 60,091 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Из порося в карася @imho_katerina · 42,353 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Виктория Моисеева @koffkamk · 24,868 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 September 2026
очень много косметики @myatnayajvachka · 26,105 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
Взгляд химика на крем @Lenaprokosmetiku · 52,558 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
Жертвы красоты @zhertvykrasoty · 23,409 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
IRINAMEYK @irinameyk · 133,252 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Бьюти-телеграммы @beauty_goldman · 22,025 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026
ART\FACT @artfactproducts · 25,211 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 28 here — alongside 27 others — read 14 September 2026
Так и ходи @freethecurls · 46,140 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
This channel appears in 97 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крис печатает...” (@krisistyping), 52,518 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/krisistyping.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.