Channel
@ozonru
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,080,745subscribers
+31,941 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001517312714 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ozonru |
| Description | Официальный канал маркетплейса Ozon для покупателей. Чат-бот поддержки в Max: https://max.ru/ozon_support_bot Правила группы: https://ozon.ru/t/75Pn9dd Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://s.ozon.ru/6Drw8Qw |
| Created | 15 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ozonru |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
On 2 of the 54 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0051 reactions per view.
| Post | Over | Views | Reactions | Expected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| /904230 Sept 2026, 14:01 UTC | 3 days | 37,800 → 44,300at least +6,400 | 175 → 182at most +8 | +32.6 |
| /909412 Oct 2026, 08:31 UTC | 3 days | 43,200 → 50,100at least +6,800 | 141 → 146at most +6 | +34.6 |
Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 27 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 13:55 | 1,080,745 | -612 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 13:20 | 1,081,357 | -624 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 13:31 | 1,081,981 | -693 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 14:30 | 1,082,674 | -876 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:18 | 1,083,550 | -1,021 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 1,084,571 | -874 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 06:10 | 1,085,445 | -710 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:00 | 1,086,155 | -784 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 04:27 | 1,086,939 | -717 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 02:18 | 1,087,656 | -692 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 00:28 | 1,088,348 | -942 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 02:07 | 1,089,290 | -819 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 23:21 | 1,090,109 | -2,624 |
| 10 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 1,092,733 | -4,236 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 12:17 | 1,096,969 | -4,893 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 07:59 | 1,101,862 | -14,586 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 1,116,448 | -3,790 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 1,120,238 | -5,480 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 02:37 | 1,125,718 | -12,070 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 07:00 | 1,137,788 | first reading |
656 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 226 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 656 (23 January 2026 – 27 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,440,520 |
| Reactions total | 14,138 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Oct 2026, 08:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 46 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 55 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 52 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 17 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 25.9% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 60.3% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 27,150 views — 2.51% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 29,700).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /916527 Oct 2026, 08:00 UTC | 135 minutes – 35 minutes old | 4,920 views ~27 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /915626 Oct 2026, 14:02 UTC | 2124 minutes – 19 hours old | 22,300 views ~183 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,930 → 3.0 hours: 11,400 interp. → 6.0 hours: 15,500 → 12 hours: 17,400still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /915526 Oct 2026, 11:04 UTC | 2585 seconds – 22 hours old | 24,500 views ~308 reactions | 60 minutes: 7,378 interp. → 3.0 hours: 12,000 → 6.0 hours: 17,898 interp. → 12 hours: 21,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.9 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /915426 Oct 2026, 08:00 UTC | 295 minutes – 25 hours old | 26,400 views ~141 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,680 → 3.0 hours: 11,300 → 6.0 hours: 17,600 → 12 hours: 23,400 → 24 hours: 26,000still climbing at last reading | 26,000measured | 3.5 hours |
| /915324 Oct 2026, 09:02 UTC | 7363 minutes – 3 days old | 38,000 views ~337 reactions | 60 minutes: 5,750 → 3.0 hours: 9,910 → 6.0 hours: 13,800 → 12 hours: 18,900 → 24 hours: 22,500 → 2 days: 31,200still climbing at last reading | 22,500measured | 13 hours |
| /914623 Oct 2026, 14:00 UTC | 884 minutes – 4 days old | 36,800 views ~221 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,204 interp. → 3.0 hours: 10,721 interp. → 6.0 hours: 14,300 → 12 hours: 16,200 → 24 hours: 23,800 → 2 days: 29,700still climbing at last reading | 23,800measured | 17 hours |
| /914523 Oct 2026, 11:03 UTC | 8874 seconds – 4 days old | 31,500 views ~362 reactions | 60 minutes: 6,811 interp. → 3.0 hours: 11,800 → 6.0 hours: 16,243 interp. → 12 hours: 19,000 → 24 hours: 22,700 → 2 days: 26,800still climbing at last reading | 22,700measured | 5.5 hours |
| /914423 Oct 2026, 08:04 UTC | 79under a minute – 3 days old | 31,400 views ~176 reactions | 60 minutes: 7,070 → 3.0 hours: 11,500 → 6.0 hours: 17,600 → 12 hours: 22,200 → 24 hours: 24,400 → 2 days: 28,300still climbing at last reading | 24,400measured | 4.6 hours |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
48,971 reactions across 160 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18,162 | 37.1% | |
| 👍 | 8,854 | 18.1% | |
| 🔥 | 4,900 | 10.0% | |
| 👎 | 4,073 | 8.32% | |
| 🙏 | 2,628 | 5.37% | |
| 🤣 | 2,602 | 5.31% | |
| 😱 | 2,014 | 4.11% | |
| 😁 | 1,077 | 2.20% | |
| 🥰 | 1,016 | 2.07% | |
| 😢 | 937 | 1.91% | |
| ❤🔥 | 663 | 1.35% | |
| 🤔 | 335 | 0.684% | |
| 🕊 | 264 | 0.539% | |
| ☃ | 252 | 0.515% | |
| 👏 | 209 | 0.427% | |
| 😍 | 208 | 0.425% | |
| 🌚 | 181 | 0.37% | |
| 🤯 | 154 | 0.314% | |
| 🐳 | 116 | 0.237% | |
| 🎉 | 87 | 0.178% | |
| 5 further kinds | 239 | 0.488% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 652 of the 656 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 445,679 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 656 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 27 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ozonru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 656 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 January 2026 to 27 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
💌 В заметках телефона пустота вместо списка подарков? Сертификат Ozon — и вопрос закрыт! Осталось выбрать формат: ✨ Сертификат-открытка — если хотите поздравить лично. Подпишите сертификат, вложите в конверт и вручите из рук в руки. ✨ Электронный сертификат — если праздник уже на носу. Доставим на почту получателю мгновенно. Выбрать подарок проще, чем кажется: дарите сертификат Ozon
❤14👍8🔥3👎2
🧛 Не читайте это на ночь! Хотя кого мы обманываем? Читать про всякую мистику в темноте куда интереснее. Пока не раздастся подозрительный шорох из соседней комнаты. 🕸️ В подборке нашлось место и настоящим кошмарам, и историям, над которыми можно посмеяться. #ozon_подборки 💙 Подписывайтесь на Ozon в MAX
❤100👍47🔥19👎13😢3☃1
Разыграется или нет, вот в чём вопрос 🤔 Приходите на эфир Фортунаты в Морковске в 15:00 — узнайте, поймает ли кто-нибудь куш! Сегодня разыгрываем: 🥕 30 000 000 ₽ 🥕 мно-о-ого баллов Ozon 🥕 и морковки Желаем, чтобы фортуна заметила вас сегодня 🍀
❤133🔥51👎47👍25🙏22🎉9😁7🐳6
🍂 Интерьерные детали в духе осени Когда на улице всё чаще хочется ускорить шаг, дома, наоборот, приятно замедлиться. А ещё — окружить себя красивыми вещами, добавить деталей и наконец обустроить те уголки квартиры, до которых никак не доходили руки. ✨ Товары из видео — по ссылке. #ozon_подборки 💙 Подписывайтесь на Ozon в MAX
👍76❤50👎8🔥2😢2☃1❤🔥1🕊1
Знакомьтесь: ИНЖИРБОНЫ 🤩 Воздушные булочки в форме улиток с нежным творожным кремом, грецкими орехами и инжиром. Ингредиенты оставили ниже, а приготовление показали в видео. Вам понадобится: • 10 шт. инжира • 30 г грецких орехов • 150 г творожного сыра • 500 г слоёного теста • 1 ст. л. мёда Любители инжира, вы здесь? С вас лайк в виде эмодзи 👇🏻
🔥184❤79👍38❤🔥15🤩8🎉4👎4🤣2
🧣 В режиме мягкости: 6 трикотажных образов на холода Вышли на полчасика, потом решили пройтись через парк, встретили друзей — и вот уже два часа на улице. Стилист Ирина Сивкова знает, как одеться для таких случаев: выбираем тёплый трикотаж и расслабленные сочетания, в которых хочется гулять дальше. ✨ Образ 1 ✨ Образ 2 ✨ Образ 3 ✨ Образ 4 ✨ Образ 5 ✨ Образ 6 #ozon_подборки 💙 Подписывайтесь на Ozon в MAX
❤130👍51🔥12🕊7🤣6👎5🙏3🐳2
Морковки? К деньгам! 💰 Подключайтесь к эфиру Фортунаты в Морковске в 15:00, чтобы узнать судьбу джекпота. Сегодня в игре: 🥕 15 000 000 ₽ 🥕 тысячи баллов Ozon 🥕 ящик морковок Желаем, чтобы ваш билет оказался выигрышным!
🤣168👍58❤43🙏31👎28🔥14🐳7👏4
🫑 Запах корицы, тыквенный латте и тёплый плед… Это осень! Кажется, она уже освоилась: заняла лучшие места и навела свои порядки. Осталось только поддержать её настроение — слегка сказочное, немного загадочное и очень домашнее. ✨ Настроение октября в декоре — по ссылке. #ozon_подборки 💙 Подписывайтесь на Ozon в MAX
❤112👍32🔥17❤🔥8👎2😍2☃1🤔1
Posted without readable text
❤186🔥99👍41❤🔥23👎9🕊3🤯3😍3
Они пропали на целый год… Но сегодня вернулись — это легендарные загребуки на распродаже года 11.11 ❤️🔥 Теперь всю страну ждут грандиозные скидки до 90% на одежду, электронику, всё для красоты и ещё миллионы товаров. Заходите и выгодно берите!
👎104❤81👍44😁11☃6😍5🔥4🤣3
🌠 Уюта добавляем, свет приглушаем Собираем интерьер, в котором приятно пить чай, читать и проводить долгие вечера дома. ✨ Маленькие детали осеннего настроения — по ссылке. #ozon_подборки 💙 Подписывайтесь на Ozon в MAX
❤118👍39❤🔥25👎7🔥4☃2🤯2
Потяните за шарф и забирайте идеи, как согреться этой осенью 🍁👇🏻 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩⚫Шапки 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩⚫Перчатки 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩⚫Шарфы 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩 🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩🧩
❤110👍35🤔18☃8👎5🔥2🤯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 656 posts we hold for @ozonru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@ozonru edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 73 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
18 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OZON” (@ozonru), 1,080,745 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ozonru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.