Channel
@irenmake
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
4,259subscribers
-23 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001047954869 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @irenmake |
| Created | 1 April 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/irenmake |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 4,259 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:28 | 4,261 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 4,263 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 4,265 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 4,266 | +2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 4,264 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 4,271 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:35 | 4,275 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 4,276 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 4,279 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:05 | 4,282 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 4,282 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
248 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5357579953497983889 | 99 | 39.9% | |
| 🥴 | 44 | 17.7% | |
| 🔥 | 43 | 17.3% | |
| 💔 | 32 | 12.9% | |
| 😭 | 21 | 8.47% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 3.63% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 248 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @irenmake. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 June 2026 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
доехали вчера до поп-ап pauline’s, я очень хотела попробовать трайфлы (десерты в коробочках), печенья я не люблю. но взяли попробовать мы все. печенья суховаты, на 6 из 10, из трайфлов мне понравился только «наполеон», а подруге, которая любит банан в десертах - баноффи. в целом долгого стояния в очередях это точно не стоит, когда мы приехали, очередь была из 4 человек всего 🗿
💔8
как думаете, сколько времени занимает съёмка одного выпуска «альманаха» в БЕЗФИЛЬТРОВ? я точно могу сказать, что больше, чем вы думаете 😅 в этот раз от начала макияжа насти и до команды «стоп-камера» прошло 10 часов. в 8 утра настя села на мейк, а закончили мы только после 6 вечера я очень люблю «альманах». люблю внимание насти к деталям, люблю то, насколько тщательно прорабатывается каждый выпуск, сколько мелочей…
🔥10custom 53575799534979838893💔1🥴1
наверное, я в меньшинстве, но очень люблю мероприятия с дресс-кодом. мне намного проще придумать лук под тему, чем придумать его из головы. поэтому вчера на ивент motion (это модельное агентство и сейчас они так же запустили направление талантов/инфлюенсеров) и core mio я с удовольствием пришла упакованная в дресс-код «итальянская мафия» деньги - выдали за съемки, сегодня буду переводить команде гонорары…. 🫠
💔16custom 53575799534979838897🔥4
всем спасибо и хорошего дня ✨✨✨✨🥰🥰🥰🥰🎀🎀🎀🎀💅💅💅
🔥13custom 53575799534979838898
запишу курс «как перестать ныть и начать работать», состоять он будет из одного 5-секундного видео, на котором я говорю «перестаньте ныть и начните работать» следующий урок «как найти работу» будет тоже очень коротким: «ищите до тех пор, пока не найдете. не нашли? плохо ищете» и еще урок «что делать если я не могу найти работу» — см. урок 2
custom 535757995349798388934
меня раздражает тот факт, что некоторые люди жалуются на отсутствие работы, и вот я из своего сочувствия проникаюсь, зову на проект человека, а он плохо работает… и видимо работы у него нет поэтому…. а не из-за кризиса. мне это непонятно максимально, по моей логике, если тебе нужны деньги, ты наоборот пашешь, а не ноешь! осуждаю!
🥴21custom 53575799534979838893
что такое ugc? если очень просто, то ugc (user generated content) — это контент, который снимает не бренд своей командой, а отдельный креатор почему эта аббревиатура стала такой популярной? потому что для бизнеса это один из самых дешёвых способов получать контент. профессиональные ugc-креаторы могут стоить довольно дорого, но это всё равно чаще всего дешевле, чем организовать полноценную съёмку своими силами ино…
как перестать называть Befree "бифрулька"... это все тик-токеры меня погубили
😭21
начала зачистку канала, удаляю кучи таких вот спам-подписок, удивилась, что их много
😱9
мы на дачке, ожидаем ливень
custom 535757995349798388934
Ночные новости заказывали😎 https://youtu.be/qKaaxxVHNYM?is=NNL0Ljz0Uxs6qP6B
это вау!!!
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @irenmake. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“продюсер вообще всего” (@irenmake), 4,259 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/irenmake.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.