Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Истина в уходе

Channel

Истина в уходе

@istina_v_uhode

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,404subscribers

+654 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001306723663
TypeChannel
Username@istina_v_uhode
DescriptionЮлия I’m fucking gold, but if you prefer silver thats okay 💅 https://t.me/skinjestique - официальный канал бренда
Created5 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/istina_v_uhode

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,7507,4737,111.57 August 2026 — 6,750 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,753 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,812 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,850 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,867 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,872 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,931 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,956 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,349 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,035 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,965 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,923 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,919 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,900 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,874 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,848 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,829 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,818 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,808 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,802 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,106 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,280 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,473 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,437 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,404 subscribers7,4047 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net +654. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,642–7,581 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 06:277,404-33
4 Nov 2026, 02:577,437-36
1 Nov 2026, 09:547,473+193
29 Oct 2026, 12:467,280+174
26 Oct 2026, 12:157,106+304
23 Oct 2026, 14:556,802-6
20 Oct 2026, 11:456,808-10
14 Oct 2026, 13:586,818-11
11 Oct 2026, 11:186,829-19
5 Oct 2026, 09:156,848-26
27 Sept 2026, 14:566,874-26
18 Sept 2026, 16:016,900-19
13 Sept 2026, 21:416,919-4
9 Sept 2026, 22:196,923-42
4 Sept 2026, 21:216,965-70
1 Sept 2026, 02:187,035-314
29 Aug 2026, 06:057,349+393
26 Aug 2026, 15:136,956+25
23 Aug 2026, 18:036,931+59
20 Aug 2026, 13:366,872first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 7,404 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,450
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held70 (3 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total36,231
Reactions total1,831
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 02:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈12,900
Videos
≈2,880
Links
≈2,780

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 12s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,133 reactions across 69 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,22443.3%
🔥1,15422.5%
💔5109.94%
💯4378.51%
❤‍🔥2274.42%
🤩1412.75%
🙏1262.45%
✍771.50%
💅661.29%
🤝410.799%
🐳390.76%
💘290.565%
🕊250.487%
⚡140.273%
🫡140.273%
🎉90.175%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,133 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (8.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 12:35 UTC738 views51 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Я вообще в восторге от того, КАКАЯ у нас умная аудитория (приятно осознавать, что работаешь для лучших ❤️). Обожаю, когда люди понимают, что даже ради классного эффекта (а у падов он именно такой) не стоит частить с применением. А еще знают, что кислоты надо закрывать чем-то увлажняющим, ну песня 🤌

🔥32❤19

7 Nov 2026, 06:39 UTC993 views76 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Три бьюти привычки, за которые я себе благодарна: 1. Широкая маска для сна Мы часто делаем для своей красоты очень много дополнительных штук, но абсолютно упускаем фундамент, на котором все строится. Белок, качественный сон, контроль стресса. Сначала они, а потом все остальное. И вот сон почему-то самый недооценённый бьюти-ритуал. Причём спать важно именно в темноте (!) Свет ночью может подавлять выработку мелатони…

❤69🔥7

6 Nov 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,060 views45 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Пора! Пора уже вводить пилинги в рутину. Активное солнце прошло, а значит мы можем получить максимум пользы от кислот 🤌🏻 И все это ЗА МИНУТУ на коже. Для тех, кто хочет: А. Получить эффект с первого раза (сияние кожи, осветление пигментации, больше упругости) Б. Не тратить много времени на уход (реально пилинг не стоит держать дольше 60 секунд) 📍главное помним, что пилинг — продукт ночной рутины и требует восстан…

🔥29❤16

6 Nov 2026, 06:11 UTC≈1,140 views51 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Люблю повеселиться, особенно пожрать Идите в эти московские рестораны и заказывайте блюда из этого поста. Не пожалеете (если у вас хороший вкус, конечно). 1. КрабыКутабы (1,2 фото) И их шаурма с крабом. Чертовски хороша. Все годы (три-четыре) качество блюда не меняется. Все также прекрасно 😊 Супер питательная (я даже закуски никакие не беру потому что шаурма насыщает на весь день). Сочно, много соуса и краба, а ещ…

❤36🔥15

5 Nov 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,200 views71 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Иногда важно спрашивать себя поистине важные вещи. Например: а не охуела ли я, считая, что моя кожа ✨всегда была красивой✨? Я вот храню фото тех времен, когда акне было не пролечено, Skinjestique был не изобретен, перманент бровей не был выведен, а ортогнатическая операция не была проведена. ОТРЕЗВЛЯЕТ. И еще раз убеждаюсь, что если бы Skinjestique не был изобретен, его пришлось бы придумать:) На втором фото вы …

❤58🔥13

5 Nov 2026, 07:53 UTC≈1,260 views46 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Но, если что, то мы заранее предупреждаем кандидатов, которые будут в непосредственном контакте со мной:

❤40🔥6

5 Nov 2026, 07:27 UTC≈1,290 views66 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Я: ну, в целом еще никто ни разу не уволился из-за меня, да и ругаю я вперемешку с похвалой Рилс обо мне: 🥹🥲

🔥37❤‍🔥21❤4🐳2🫡2

5 Nov 2026, 06:25 UTC≈1,270 views42 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Есть спектакли, на которые ходить НАДО. Обязательно. И вот «Гастроли в Ленинград» — тот самый случай, когда я искренне считаю, что лучше один раз это увидеть своими глазами, чем прочитать сотню восторженных рецензий. Железный занавес. Мечты о том, что жизнь после смерти Сталина станет простой и приятной, а пока народ придавливает огромное количество правил и ограничений. Как вдруг в Советы приезжают американцы, еще…

❤42

4 Nov 2026, 17:39 UTC≈1,410 views90 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Я уже не знаю, что может удивить меня после 2026 года. Люди в своих резюме представляются нашими ТОПами (мы их никогда в жизни не видели), а они рассказывают, как выводили наш бренд в лидеры продаж на разных площадках и создавали банки с нуля 😊 На маркетплейсах пиздят наш товар, подсовывая дешевую херню вместо наших продуктов. Вчера вот пришел человек на собеседование из большого косметического бренда и с гордостью…

💔71❤13🐳6

4 Nov 2026, 17:33 UTC≈1,390 views37 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💔29❤8

4 Nov 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,440 views60 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Можно много рассказывать о том, зачем нужен пилинг для кожи головы, а можно не ебать вам мозг и просто показать его в действии 🥸 Это результат после первого применения, если что. Понимаете теперь, что кислоты нужны не только нашему лицу, но и телу, и даже коже головы?

❤56🔥4

4 Nov 2026, 06:25 UTC≈1,560 views105 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Охо-хо Будем сплетничать и обЗирать обозревать европейские банки 🤓 Короче. Попалась мне сторис Собчак, где она показывает пустую банку со словами «лучший ретиноловый крем», а я человек простой: я ВСЕГДА смотрю составы, чтобы оставаться в контексте и понимать, куда идет индустрия и, что вообще сейчас интересненького выпускают. Естественно побежала смотреть, что же там за формы ретиноидов и с чем их вообще подают. В…

🔥86❤19

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @istina_v_uhode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@istina_v_uhode edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
6 November 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @istina_v_uhode as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTCAnonymous Poll313 voters

Лечитесь ретиноидами? (Системными, типа акнекутана, или топическими, типа эффезела/аклиф)?

  1. Да13%
  2. Нет73%
  3. Прошел/ла лечение, все ок11%
  4. Прошел/ла лечение, кожа стала чувствительной и суше3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 7 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SkinProbiotic: бьюти по науке
@skinprobiotic · 20,566
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 September 2026
BLACK MORION
@blackmorion · 28,541
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 9 September 2026
Болтушка от прыщей
@sovaznaet · 23,166
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
Косметический маньяк
@cosmetman_com · 27,042
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Алла Бьюти
@alla_bty · 68,683
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
Гели всея Руси
@geltek_skincare · 37,262
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
BEAUTY PLEASURE✨
@beauty_pleasure · 34,539
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Geltek за стеклом
@geltek_cosmetics · 41,243
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
очень много косметики
@myatnayajvachka · 25,778
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 September 2026
Ксения Вебер
@xeniaweber · 30,544
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 6 September 2026
Пополняю косметички
@olyssblog · 26,592
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
Крис печатает...
@krisistyping · 52,183
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
ChemCream
@chemcream · 19,988
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 September 2026
BEAUTY BY GUBICHM
@gubichmmmmm · 25,002
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
1001 маска
@maska1001 · 21,188
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 September 2026
бьютисóфия
@beautysophia · 19,286
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 October 2026
Правьте балом!
@beautyarch · 22,370
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
ANANASSKIN🧴PRO КОЖУ И УХОД
@ananasskin · 36,267
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Бьюти суета
@klavagolman · 51,094
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Химичу и разбираю косметику
@dushechkacosm · 20,823
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
Кожаная Госпожа
@skingospozha · 32,457
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 16 September 2026
BEAUTY HUB
@immelybeauty · 22,947
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
Dasha Lebedeva ✨ макияж/косметика/бьюти/скидки
@lebedeva_dari_live · 24,294
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 September 2026
Бьюти-телеграммы
@beauty_goldman · 21,656
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 September 2026

This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Истина в уходе” (@istina_v_uhode), 7,404 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/istina_v_uhode.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.