Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Быть одной — ЗБС

Channel

Быть одной — ЗБС

@homealoneee

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,031subscribers

-249 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001369714164
TypeChannel
Username@homealoneee
DescriptionРеанимация брошенок и разведенок 👌🏻💋 номер заявления: 4805016539 Обсудить — с @ellie_parker
Created1 January 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/homealoneee

Growth

28,03128,28028,155.56 August 2026 — 28,280 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,276 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,261 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,249 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,243 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,228 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,213 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,199 subscribers14 August 2026 — 28,190 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,174 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,161 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,147 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,143 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,120 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,102 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,087 subscribers24 August 2026 — 28,072 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,067 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,062 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,060 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,059 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,051 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,039 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,031 subscribers6 August 20261 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 26 days, net -249. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,994–28,317 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 15:0528,031-8
31 Aug 2026, 18:3428,039-12
30 Aug 2026, 16:1428,051-8
29 Aug 2026, 15:5528,059-1
28 Aug 2026, 18:5528,060-2
26 Aug 2026, 22:1328,062-5
26 Aug 2026, 01:3328,067-5
24 Aug 2026, 22:3728,072-15
23 Aug 2026, 06:0528,087-15
21 Aug 2026, 20:0728,102-18
20 Aug 2026, 13:0628,120-23
19 Aug 2026, 13:3328,143-4
18 Aug 2026, 15:4628,147-14
17 Aug 2026, 15:0628,161-13
16 Aug 2026, 04:5628,174-16
14 Aug 2026, 16:4628,190-9
13 Aug 2026, 09:2428,199-14
12 Aug 2026, 07:5628,213-15
11 Aug 2026, 05:4228,228-15
10 Aug 2026, 05:3028,243first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 2 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 28,031 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
23
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held39 (2 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total65,396
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 21:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
129
Videos
37
Links
841

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 38s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Advertising

Ad load
2.56%
1 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
3,020
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,430
over 38 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFGQ11rR117 August 202617 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC806 viewsread 1 September 2026

«Надо было влюбляться в Колю, а не в Лешу» Начало учебного года, все выкладывают в соцсети своих детей на линейках и офигевают от того, какие это лоси…🥹💔 А еще от того, что ты сама еще вроде та еще секси лосиха 😹 как же так-то А еще — пускаются в воспоминания, кто в кого был влюблён в классе, и кто кому теперь не пара, Володенька. Я тоже прикинула: конечно, влюбляться надо было в весёлого, красивого, белозубого М

31 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,370 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Мой фаворит этого лета Эти упакованные ждут своего часа. За кадром в пользовании еще один (белый). Перед ним был еще один. Премию «Лучшие дезодоранты этого лета и вообще» точно отдаю бренду Openface! Признаюсь честно, они очень вкусно пахнут, это меня и подкупило. Но оказалось, что и работают верно и надёжно — а я проверяла, у меня шесть тренировок в неделю. Поняла, в чем главное отличие от вкусных дезиков из масс-

30 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 1 September 2026

Ушла из дейтинга по философским соображениям Давайте сегодня о духовном 🙏🏽 #ЗБСгуру Как-то так получилось, что с закрытием летнего сезона я закрываю и сезон дейтинга. Нет, не потому, что кого-то нашла (хотя вполне могла бы — это не приосанивание, просто считаю, что если прижмёт и РЕАЛЬНО НАДО, то ты РЕАЛЬНО ДЕЛАЕШЬ и не ебешь себе мозг, а не играешься годами сидишь). И не потому, что надоело (наоборот, это было хор

28 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,220 viewsread 1 September 2026

Еще одна бабская боль в дейтинге, или Мужчина и фон Еще одна бабская боль, когда ты заходишь в дейтинг — это та самая дуальность, вечный диссонанс: 🍌 Либо фотки вылизанные, красивые, яркие — вот он я, и чтец, и жнец, и на серфе, и в пиджаке, и в красных шортах на пляже, и на фоне мировых столиц — только вот сам герой тебе не очень(( 😱 Либо герой идеально вписывается в твои представления о симпатичных мужиках, но э

27 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC≈2,300 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Как не выгореть от дейтинга Вчера обсуждали, что никто не против романтики, отношений, да и даже секс-онли — если жизнь сразу положит это на блюдечке. А знакомиться, перерабатывать руду в дейтинге, общаться — это лениво… Говорят мне многие, а сами в овуляцию всё равно не удаляют приложения и нет-нет да и заходят. Я пишу этот пост для того, чтобы облегчить нашу участь. Как не выгореть? Как преодолеть этот зазор межд

26 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈2,310 viewsread 1 September 2026

«Устали притворяться заинтересованными» Мужчины вздыхают 👆🏽 Для того, чтобы познакомиться и заполучить в объятия тёплую вкусно пахнущую красивую живую женщину, надо притворяться заинтересованными (С). Про быть заинтересованными, я так понимаю, речи вообще нет. Хотя бы притвориться — чтоб заполучить. А они устали. Ни заинтересованности, ни женщины, только усталость (от притворства в том числе). И я задумалась: многи

25 Aug 2026, 07:02 UTC≈2,410 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Дефицит опытных подруг В последнее время постоянно гоняю мысль о том, что в мире, где царит культ молодости и секса, таким, как я безумно остро не хватает других ролевых моделей. Не, секс и молодость это прекрасно! Пусть держатся в жизни каждого как можно дольше)) Но как же хочется больше примеров для вдохновения среди тех, кто уже набрался опыта, но при этом имеет на себя и свою жизнь большие планы! Каких-то стар

24 Aug 2026, 16:50 UTC≈2,460 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Любовь приходит и уходит. Страдания сегодня есть завтра нет. А накачанная жопа останется всегда. Я так щетаю 🤷‍♀️ Мнения?) Себя красивых тоже покидайте!

22 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC≈3,240 viewsread 1 September 2026

-9 лет и +10 сантиметров: мужчины на сайтах знакомств Вообще, о том, как лихо в дейтинге скручивают пробег, рассуждали здесь 😅 Сегодня же хотела поговорить о конкретике. Эмпирическим путем свайпов, свиданий и последующей (конечно, субъективной) аналитики было выявлено, что в среднем мужчина занижает в анкете свой возраст на 9 лет. Не 52, а 43. Не 38, а 29. Не 45, а 36. (Иногда об этом сами и пишут в анкетах: мол, н

20 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈2,630 viewsread 1 September 2026

Нанять себе няню, как этот парень, или Забота в аренду Напоминаю предысторию, там ребята платят женщинам-«антикоучам» деньги за то, чтобы те напоминали им поесть, погулять и отлипнуть от телеграма — и растут в доходе. Что мне понравилось в этой конфигурации? То, что часть невидимого женского труда наконец была вынесена в видимую плоскость и хоть как-то оплачена. Это — уже победа! Но я о другом. Девочки под постом р

20 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,550 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

«У тебя своя грудь? Просто интересно»🤡 Им ПРОСТО интересно. Чисто детское любопытство такое. А что это на улице? Это экскаватор. А какие это сиси? Силиконовые. И такие вопросы задают не врачи и прочие специалисты в контексте, где это действительно необходимо — а рандомные мужики в первых трёх фразах после мэтча на сайте знакомств! Честно, я так устала от этих вопросов, что стала говорить прямо: чувак, это не красны

19 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC≈2,860 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

Нанял себе няню вместо того, чтобы жениться или жить с мамой Пациенты, кажется, запутались в показаниях: у них всё-таки просранная взрослость возвращается — или это структурная замена инфантилизма? А вообще… Мужчины не просто не хотят взрослеть, но и видят в этом экономические выгоды🤬😅 Ведь чтобы жениться и получать это бесплатново + секс — надо всё-таки хоть как-то уметь в отношения. Что подразумевает некие усили

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @homealoneee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@homealoneee edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
31 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,435,894 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Катины секреты
@no_drama_plz · 36,888
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
Счастливые люди
@vanilchannel · 58,833
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
Барышня шутить изволит
@baryshnya_shutit · 45,793
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
Психолог Прокопова Ольга
@olga_prokopova_s · 126,392
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Дорогая Мышка
@fantastic_mouse · 43,813
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
Психолог Сексолог МАКС БЛЭК
@m_sovetnik · 59,653
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Бачинская
@bachinskaya_oxana · 69,901
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Любовник Голубев
@lovergolubev · 113,968
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
НЕПРОЗАМУЖ
@mortalbeauty · 46,746
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Krasnova_Natasha
@KrasnovaNatasha_official · 74,509
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
Любовь и покорность
@pokornosttt · 43,187
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
в тренде у девочек
@females · 555,881
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Быть одной — ЗБС” (@homealoneee), 28,031 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/homealoneee.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.