«Надо было влюбляться в Колю, а не в Лешу» Начало учебного года, все выкладывают в соцсети своих детей на линейках и офигевают от того, какие это лоси…🥹💔 А еще от того, что ты сама еще вроде та еще секси лосиха 😹 как же так-то А еще — пускаются в воспоминания, кто в кого был влюблён в классе, и кто кому теперь не пара, Володенька. Я тоже прикинула: конечно, влюбляться надо было в весёлого, красивого, белозубого М…

Channel
Быть одной — ЗБС
@homealoneee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
28,031subscribers
-249 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001369714164 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @homealoneee |
| Description | Реанимация брошенок и разведенок 👌🏻💋 номер заявления: 4805016539 Обсудить — с @ellie_parker |
| Created | 1 January 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/homealoneee |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:05 | 28,031 | -8 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:34 | 28,039 | -12 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:14 | 28,051 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 28,059 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 28,060 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 28,062 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 28,067 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 28,072 | -15 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:05 | 28,087 | -15 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:07 | 28,102 | -18 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:06 | 28,120 | -23 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:33 | 28,143 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 28,147 | -14 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 28,161 | -13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 28,174 | -16 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 28,190 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 28,199 | -14 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 28,213 | -15 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 28,228 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 28,243 | first reading |
Engagement
39 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 10.1%
- avg views ÷ 28,031 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,840
- 23 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 23
- of 39 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 39 (2 July 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 65,396 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 1 Sept 2026, 21:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 129
- Videos
- 37
- Links
- 841
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 38s
- Average length
- 49s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
- Ad load
- 2.56%
- 1 of 39 posts carry an ad marker
- Regulatory tokens
- 1
- posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
- Median views · ads
- 3,020
- over 1 measured post
- Median views · rest
- 3,430
- over 38 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2W5zFGQ11rR | 1 | 17 August 2026 | 17 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Мой фаворит этого лета Эти упакованные ждут своего часа. За кадром в пользовании еще один (белый). Перед ним был еще один. Премию «Лучшие дезодоранты этого лета и вообще» точно отдаю бренду Openface! Признаюсь честно, они очень вкусно пахнут, это меня и подкупило. Но оказалось, что и работают верно и надёжно — а я проверяла, у меня шесть тренировок в неделю. Поняла, в чем главное отличие от вкусных дезиков из масс-…
Ушла из дейтинга по философским соображениям Давайте сегодня о духовном 🙏🏽 #ЗБСгуру Как-то так получилось, что с закрытием летнего сезона я закрываю и сезон дейтинга. Нет, не потому, что кого-то нашла (хотя вполне могла бы — это не приосанивание, просто считаю, что если прижмёт и РЕАЛЬНО НАДО, то ты РЕАЛЬНО ДЕЛАЕШЬ и не ебешь себе мозг, а не играешься годами сидишь). И не потому, что надоело (наоборот, это было хор…
Еще одна бабская боль в дейтинге, или Мужчина и фон Еще одна бабская боль, когда ты заходишь в дейтинг — это та самая дуальность, вечный диссонанс: 🍌 Либо фотки вылизанные, красивые, яркие — вот он я, и чтец, и жнец, и на серфе, и в пиджаке, и в красных шортах на пляже, и на фоне мировых столиц — только вот сам герой тебе не очень(( 😱 Либо герой идеально вписывается в твои представления о симпатичных мужиках, но э…
Как не выгореть от дейтинга Вчера обсуждали, что никто не против романтики, отношений, да и даже секс-онли — если жизнь сразу положит это на блюдечке. А знакомиться, перерабатывать руду в дейтинге, общаться — это лениво… Говорят мне многие, а сами в овуляцию всё равно не удаляют приложения и нет-нет да и заходят. Я пишу этот пост для того, чтобы облегчить нашу участь. Как не выгореть? Как преодолеть этот зазор межд…
«Устали притворяться заинтересованными» Мужчины вздыхают 👆🏽 Для того, чтобы познакомиться и заполучить в объятия тёплую вкусно пахнущую красивую живую женщину, надо притворяться заинтересованными (С). Про быть заинтересованными, я так понимаю, речи вообще нет. Хотя бы притвориться — чтоб заполучить. А они устали. Ни заинтересованности, ни женщины, только усталость (от притворства в том числе). И я задумалась: многи…
Дефицит опытных подруг В последнее время постоянно гоняю мысль о том, что в мире, где царит культ молодости и секса, таким, как я безумно остро не хватает других ролевых моделей. Не, секс и молодость это прекрасно! Пусть держатся в жизни каждого как можно дольше)) Но как же хочется больше примеров для вдохновения среди тех, кто уже набрался опыта, но при этом имеет на себя и свою жизнь большие планы! Каких-то стар…
Любовь приходит и уходит. Страдания сегодня есть завтра нет. А накачанная жопа останется всегда. Я так щетаю 🤷♀️ Мнения?) Себя красивых тоже покидайте!
-9 лет и +10 сантиметров: мужчины на сайтах знакомств Вообще, о том, как лихо в дейтинге скручивают пробег, рассуждали здесь 😅 Сегодня же хотела поговорить о конкретике. Эмпирическим путем свайпов, свиданий и последующей (конечно, субъективной) аналитики было выявлено, что в среднем мужчина занижает в анкете свой возраст на 9 лет. Не 52, а 43. Не 38, а 29. Не 45, а 36. (Иногда об этом сами и пишут в анкетах: мол, н…
Нанять себе няню, как этот парень, или Забота в аренду Напоминаю предысторию, там ребята платят женщинам-«антикоучам» деньги за то, чтобы те напоминали им поесть, погулять и отлипнуть от телеграма — и растут в доходе. Что мне понравилось в этой конфигурации? То, что часть невидимого женского труда наконец была вынесена в видимую плоскость и хоть как-то оплачена. Это — уже победа! Но я о другом. Девочки под постом р…
«У тебя своя грудь? Просто интересно»🤡 Им ПРОСТО интересно. Чисто детское любопытство такое. А что это на улице? Это экскаватор. А какие это сиси? Силиконовые. И такие вопросы задают не врачи и прочие специалисты в контексте, где это действительно необходимо — а рандомные мужики в первых трёх фразах после мэтча на сайте знакомств! Честно, я так устала от этих вопросов, что стала говорить прямо: чувак, это не красны…
Нанял себе няню вместо того, чтобы жениться или жить с мамой Пациенты, кажется, запутались в показаниях: у них всё-таки просранная взрослость возвращается — или это структурная замена инфантилизма? А вообще… Мужчины не просто не хотят взрослеть, но и видят в этом экономические выгоды🤬😅 Ведь чтобы жениться и получать это бесплатново + секс — надо всё-таки хоть как-то уметь в отношения. Что подразумевает некие усили…
Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @homealoneee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@homealoneee edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 31 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 31 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,435,894 of 1,629,535 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@no_drama_plz · 36,888
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 1 September 2026
@vanilchannel · 58,833
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@baryshnya_shutit · 45,793
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
@olga_prokopova_s · 126,392
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@fantastic_mouse · 43,813
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@m_sovetnik · 59,653
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
@bachinskaya_oxana · 69,901
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
@lovergolubev · 113,968
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@mortalbeauty · 46,746
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
@KrasnovaNatasha_official · 74,509
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 19 August 2026
@pokornosttt · 43,187
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
@females · 555,881
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Быть одной — ЗБС” (@homealoneee), 28,031 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/homealoneee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.