Если кто-то попросит перевести деньги, не делайте этого !

Channel
Любовь и покорность
@pokornosttt
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
42,199subscribers
-3,139 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001513187864 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pokornosttt |
| Description | Основано на реальных событиях Женственность | lifestyle Вдохновляю на платья и корсеты купить рекламу, по любым вопросам : @kupi_reklamy предложения: @aaalice_bot менеджер: @manag_m Канал в РКН |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pokornosttt |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 42,199 | -65 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:21 | 42,264 | -53 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 42,317 | -60 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 42,377 | -79 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 21:17 | 42,456 | -158 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 19:21 | 42,614 | -324 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 19:22 | 42,938 | -225 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:26 | 43,163 | -24 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:25 | 43,187 | -42 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 43,229 | +2,762 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 40,467 | -50 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 40,517 | -17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 40,534 | -251 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:04 | 40,785 | -3,395 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:29 | 44,180 | -21 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 00:06 | 44,201 | -721 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:48 | 44,922 | -56 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 44,978 | -254 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 45,232 | -32 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 45,264 | first reading |
Engagement
112 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 94 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.1%
- avg views ÷ 42,199 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,370
- 64 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.18%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 64
- of 112 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 63 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 112 (5 August 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 407,541 |
| Reactions total | 8,891 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 00:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈9,680
- Videos
- ≈1,860
- Links
- ≈733
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 6m 33s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
15,779 reactions across 111 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7,356 | 46.6% | |
| 🔥 | 3,940 | 25.0% | |
| 👏 | 3,451 | 21.9% | |
| ❤🔥 | 465 | 2.95% | |
| 🥰 | 414 | 2.62% | |
| 😁 | 68 | 0.431% | |
| 💋 | 45 | 0.285% | |
| 💘 | 14 | 0.089% | |
| 💔 | 11 | 0.07% | |
| 😈 | 7 | 0.044% | |
| 😘 | 4 | 0.025% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 0.025% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 111 of the 112 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,779 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 112 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 112 we hold a reading for · 0.9%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pokornosttt. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 112 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
САМЫЕ ПРОЧНЫЕ ПАРЫ вообще не одинаковые: и вот, ПОЧЕМУ: - Один копит, другой тратит. И оба правы - потому что без накоплений не выжить, а без впечатлений незачем. - Различия в подходах сближают. Различия в ценностях - разрушают. - Один тормозит, другой жмёт на газ. По отдельности они либо стоят, либо разбиваются. - Интроверт даёт глубину, экстраверт - широту. Каждый восстанавливается по-своему, и за …
❤85🔥33👏26🥰15💋3❤🔥1
😮💨
❤70🔥41👏16❤🔥7🥰4
по своей сути, любые отношения - это всегда такие, в которых один партнер берет на себя ведущую или доминирующую роль, в то время как другой предпочитает поддерживать или подчиняться. другой вопрос, если мы говорим про отношения мужчины и женщины, то не каждому мужчине хочется подчиняться, не каждого слушать и не за каждым идти. порой наблюдаю картину в магазинах/аэропортах - либо у женщины все борозды правления - …
❤79👏36🔥34🥰5❤🔥3
а что, если для свидания выбрать не просто ужин, а путешествие с историей? семь блюд, семь чудес, семь миров. я красила пирамиду настоящим сусальным золотом... ела камчатского краба у подножия Александрийского маяка... а под конец вокруг цвели сады Семирамиды. гастротеатр - отличный вариант, если хочется чего-то кроме классического «просто поужинать». здесь ужин превращается в целое представление, а свидание - в ист…
❤67🔥35👏31❤🔥8🥰5💋1
вечеринки, на которых я теперь бываю, мне даже нравятся 💙 это первое такое красивое гендер-пати на котором я была, поэтому, даже почитала откуда такая традиция вообще появилась. определение пола ребёнка с помощью УЗИ стало возможным только в конце 1990-х годов, а традиция гендер пати появилась только в 2000-х годах считается, что одна из первых широко известных гендерных вечеринок состоялась в США в 2008 году. Джен…
❤80👏34🔥33❤🔥8🥰1
🌚
❤64🔥37👏22❤🔥12
очень люблю такой формат одноразовых тканевых масок. быстро приводят в порядок лицо с утра (храню в холодильнике ) На смену маскам от VT для сияния, взяла с PDRN для увлажнения - мгновенно успокаивает, увлажняет и восстанавливает кожу. удобное лекало, весь состав на маске после использования быстро впитывается, не оставляя липкости. после нахождения на солнце, эта коробочка тоже идеальный вариант ;)
❤59👏28🔥26❤🔥3🥰3💋1
Название обманчиво. Женщин там мало. По сути, их всего две: мимолетная красавица в ресторане, с которой полковник танцует танго, и элитная жрица любви, с которой он проводит ночь. Остальное - мужской мир. Мир, где мужчины разговаривают с мужчинами о самом сокровенном: о страхе, о чести, о смерти и о том, ради чего вообще стоит просыпаться по утрам, когда тебе за пятьдесят, ты слеп и никому не нужен 1992 🍿
❤77🔥47👏28🥰7❤🔥1
СРОЧНО ИЩУ МЕНЕДЖЕРА❗️ без опыта работы, рассмотрим всех Вопрос, который я чаще всего слышу от знакомых блогеров «Пожалуйста, дай контакт своего менеджера по рекламе🥹» Да, у меня правда лучший менеджер🙈 она настолько классная, что уже не успевает брать новых клиентов и всех передает ученикам - уже в первый месяц с 0 они получают от 50к в месяц, работая 2-3ч в день. Если кратко - менеджеры общаются с рекламодателями…
❤48👏29🔥27❤🔥3🥰2😁2
игра фактур и оттенков, вдохновленных классической французской эстетикой. шелк, кружево, мех, корсеты, перья - LETTYMURR создает настроение современного кабаре ;) хочется рассматривать, чувствовать, носить и устраивать ретро-свидания где-нибудь в Палаццо 🏛️
❤67🔥45👏27❤🔥5🥰5💋1
я была ещё та драма QUEEN переехать жить к парню в 19 лет, потому что так хотелось взрослой жизни начинать несколько раз всё с 0, нет, с минусов собирать постоянно шмотки, уходить, потом раскладывать обратно, уходить вникуда с 0 на карте ходить на ненавистную работу. и такое было рыться в телефоне у бывшего и получать тот самый результат !конечно же, что-то, да находилось устраивать скандалы и истерики не заво…
❤92🔥33👏30🥰5❤🔥4💋4
Showing the 12 most recent of 112 posts we hold for @pokornosttt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@pokornosttt edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 29 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 29 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@beautywitch1 · 10,6811 postГинеколог-хирург Юлия Чернышева | О женском здоровье с заботой
@chernysheva_gin · 14,0391 postᴅᴇʟɪɴᴀ.ʙᴇᴀᴜᴛʏ
@delinabeautyy · 1381 postПроводник 🚇
@hrambassador · 2,2671 postLOUIS
@jazzclublouis · 9,7421 postТвой психолог-Любовь Воронова
@luvoronova · 11,3921 postМалина про ВБ | Wildberries
@malinaprowb · 4,9101 postнеполный фэшн
@nepolnyyfashion · 7,1891 postСчастье быть собой 💖
@nikalocy · 2,1101 postМинистерство фэшн дел
@olia_lebe · 12,9731 postПикник на обочине
@picnicelena · 28,0801 postГОТОВЫЕ СЦЕНАРИИ СТОРИС | REELS | ГОТОВЫЕ ПРОМТЫ
@scenariistoris · 22,8741 postЦветы и подарки «Вместо слов»
@slovvmesto · 5751 postWAU
@waubeauty · 31,5651 postЖенский фестиваль 15 августа 💓
@womenfestival · 3,3001 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@moscowtinderr · 740,982#1
@fantastic_mouse · 40,912#2
@lovergolubev · 112,886#3
@fladesire · 25,409#4
@femalememes · 408,921#5
@askmargot · 9,655#6
@uraspura · 15,617#7
@svet_n1 · 15,433#8
@females · 538,293#9
@nat_zhelannaya_ya · 12,989#10
@Comm_W · 2,414#11
@sempre_sexy · 9,099#12
@zapiski_man3 · 31,606#13
@buduarnaya · 20,583#14
@kosti · 562,293#15
@nnastika · 26,084#16
@big_city_l · 31,587#17
@princessaverandot · 54,801#18
@svelasuma_vibe · 3,311#19
@naumita · 60,091#20
@zamizh_za_bogatogo · 8,665#21
@daryabagaevaa · 12,958#22
@merzkiej · 33,275#23
@me28sb · 2,199#24
@tenerezza18 · 9,631#25
@evkasup13 · 103,801#26
@womenspace_21 · 6,914#27
@lauralovepsu · 957#28
@LIYA_RUSS · 9,206#29
@kami_omut · 5,726#30
@chyndrachychyndra1234 · 15,648#31
@dateideasspp · 46,293#32
@irena_ponaroshku · 282,390#33
@mmargosavchuk · 119,670#34
@gavrilichevkirill · 22,895#35
@istominakarina · 157,537#36
@planyputany · 2,646#37
@fantastic_thats_you_tg · 4,929#38
@wozbudila · 1,609 (as read 30 August 2026)#39
@fladesirecourse · 2,025#40
@girl_humor · 54,349#41
@borodapodruga · 15,190#42
@TvoimiiGlazami · 37,933#43
@homealoneee · 27,892#44
@olga_prokopova_s · 125,185#45
@pravdadirty · 1,368,903#46
@luka_ebkov · 431,305#47
@sensemedancecom · 64,689#48
@veronikastepanova20011 · 474,884#49
@mash · 3,096,804#50
@igormaisto · 103,538#51
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693#52
@strelets_molodec · 355,464#53
@bloodysx · 1,158,879#54
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141#55
@splendorvictoria · 2,813#56
@sncmag · 301,518#57
@ama_lilit08 · 3,278#58
@spletni_tg · 187,774#59
@imnotbozhena · 504,326#60
@margo_stan · 2,588#61
@milanapetrovaqueen · 202,336#62
@campberg · 3,258#63
@klaragavrilovnanews · 157,156#64
@AlexKalinina · 6,105#65
@kureelka · 124,870#66
@elya_bulochka · 49,447#67
@KRISTINA_AMYR · 7,876#68
@NechaevaBlog · 43,516#69
@neposlednielyudi · 57,679#70
@ksbchk · 372,627#71
@teledama1 · 1,503 (as read 30 August 2026)#72
@nakablukee · 12,716#73
@Peopletalkru · 182,678#74
@kruzhevompotelu · 3,731#75
@dauotkysit · 271,838#76
@mos_glyanec · 121,985#77
@SDNVS · 2,554#78
@Avodonaeva · 145,447#79
@twitt_ota · 332,521#80
@fashion_mur · 208,487#81
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@olga_prokopova_s · 125,185
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
@ElizavetaUstyugova · 25,222
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 September 2026
@fantastic_mouse · 40,912
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 1 September 2026
@gavrilichevkirill · 22,895
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
@females · 538,293
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@o_svidaniyah_tg · 28,194
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
@oskolkiblok · 58,807
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
@vanilchannel · 58,352
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
@lovergolubev · 112,886
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
@zapiski_man3 · 31,606
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@lubimova_kate · 33,827
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 3 September 2026
@fladesire · 25,409
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 14 September 2026
@makarenko_mariia · 32,777
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 5 September 2026
@Denis_Baiguzhin · 21,931
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 22 September 2026
@sensemedancecom · 64,689
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
@moscowtinderr · 740,982
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 August 2026
@merzkiej · 33,275
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 September 2026
@TvoimiiGlazami · 37,933
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 31 August 2026
@evacubbu · 39,380
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
@Marialogvinovaofficial · 31,215
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Любовь и покорность” (@pokornosttt), 42,199 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pokornosttt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.