Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for А что, если ДА?

Channel

А что, если ДА?

@and_what_if_YES

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,360subscribers

-248 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001526463918
TypeChannel
Username@and_what_if_YES
DescriptionРекламные инструменты в построении личных отношений В закрепе статья с моей анкетой с СЗ. Забирайте, знакомьтесь с лучшими и будьте счастливы (как я❤️) Автор (и по рекламе) @EvgeniyaZakharova7980 Сайт http://andwhatifyes.ru
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/and_what_if_YES

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,3608,6088,4847 August 2026 — 8,608 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,608 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,607 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,594 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,575 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,561 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,555 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,538 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,524 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,525 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,507 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,499 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,500 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,492 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,474 subscribers28 September 2026 — 8,459 subscribers6 October 2026 — 8,448 subscribers12 October 2026 — 8,427 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,418 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,410 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,408 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,401 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,393 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,382 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,370 subscribers6 November 2026 — 8,360 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net -248. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,323–8,645 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 05:348,360-10
3 Nov 2026, 14:568,370-12
31 Oct 2026, 05:188,382-11
28 Oct 2026, 12:358,393-8
25 Oct 2026, 14:578,401-7
22 Oct 2026, 19:578,408-2
19 Oct 2026, 09:568,410-8
16 Oct 2026, 07:458,418-9
12 Oct 2026, 22:448,427-21
6 Oct 2026, 03:418,448-11
28 Sept 2026, 20:188,459-15
18 Sept 2026, 15:578,474-18
14 Sept 2026, 05:598,492-8
10 Sept 2026, 20:198,500+1
5 Sept 2026, 19:218,499-8
1 Sept 2026, 23:338,507-18
30 Aug 2026, 00:248,525+1
26 Aug 2026, 18:488,524-14
24 Aug 2026, 03:468,538-17
20 Aug 2026, 22:078,555first reading

Engagement

89 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.5%
avg views ÷ 8,360 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,300
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 89 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held89 (29 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total32,414
Reactions total2,273
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Nov 2026, 00:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,890
Videos
≈301
Links
≈634

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 50s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

7,030 reactions across 88 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,98142.4%
🔥1,57322.4%
❤1,41420.1%
👍6829.70%
🙈2173.09%
🤪1291.83%
💔210.299%
🤝130.185%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,030 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.12%
1 of 89 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
1,270
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,300
over 88 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvBRj7Z120 August 202620 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

8 Nov 2026, 13:46 UTC491 views38 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

🔥 Чрезвычайно важная новость! Австралийские пожарные разделись на 2027 год. Девочки, пора провести инспекцию. В этом году календари на любой вкус. С котятами, щенками, лошадками, вомбатами…. Но есть и специальный выпуск для нас, взрослых девчонок, понимающих толк в технике безопасности выноса из горящего дома. Нашла в сети шесть месяцев. Нужна независимая женская экспертиза. Выбираем, естественно, исключительно душ…

❤17👍11🔥10

Signed Евгения Захарова

7 Nov 2026, 10:44 UTC742 views94 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Стретчинг - это растяжка. Всего доброго. (Переписка из сети👆) Девочки, а ведь сколько любовных драм начинается с невинного желания понравиться! Он увлекается альпинизмом? Обожаю горы! Читает Ницше? Мой любимый! Бегает по утрам? Да я вообще родилась в кроссовках! А Женечка молодец! Приговорила в себе женщину чужой мечты, рукой не дрогнула. Могла бы ведь через полгода сидеть в Торонто, тянуть шпагат, ненавидеть поэз…

❤59🔥26👍5🤣4

Signed Евгения Захарова

6 Nov 2026, 12:10 UTC790 views75 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Своим подайте знак! Помним главное - в знакомствах нам нужен не просто хороший человек, а свой. Такой, с кем можно ржать над одной и той же ерундой, понимать друг друга с полуслова и не объяснять, почему это смешно. А значит, сигналы надо подавать им вам обоим понятные. Хотите по хозяйственным ценностям: «Умею разводить костёр для шашлыка и скручивать счётчики, так что ты со мной не пропадёшь». Хотите по способу…

❤66👍6🔥3

Signed Евгения Захарова

5 Nov 2026, 12:01 UTC961 views132 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Ничего не обещаю, ничего не исключаю Девочки, какой мне Антон попался! Нравится. Ни тебе «меркантильным мимо», ни «женщин с прицепом не беспокоить», ни ведра требовательных зловоний. Никого не отбраковывает. Люфт по возрасту внушительный. Хоть замуж не зовёт, но и не зарекается. Точно приятный человек! 😂 Конечно, Антон может оказаться хитрым жуком, который заранее снимает с себя все обязательства. Но мне нравится,…

🔥82🤣31❤19

Signed Евгения Захарова

4 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC≈1,010 views73 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Единство без прелюдий Девочки, в такой праздничный день грех не поговорить о тяге некоторых граждан к объединению. Мне явно попался смелый и заботливый. Ведь если подумать, МЖМ гораздо благороднее, чем ЖМЖ. И опять же конкуренции не боится. Одним словом предложение нишевое, с таким прогревы не нужны. Либо объединяемся, либо мимо. Как считаете, есть женщины соглашающиеся в наше смутное время на такие мероприятия?

🤣60❤13

Signed Евгения Захарова

3 Nov 2026, 11:24 UTC≈1,230 views98 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Дейтинг-выгорание. Дорогу знаете? Нет-нет да и подташнивает с этих ваших сайтов знакомств - было? Причина прозаична. Часто не потому, что мужчины не те, а потому, что сами толком не понимаем, чего хотим. Если на метафорических пальцах, то как-то так: Захотели вы новый диван. Большой, красивый, чтобы лежать на нём звездой и радоваться жизни. Но старый выбрасывать не собираетесь. Стол двигать не хотите. И вообще, в…

❤44🔥39🤣7💔6👍2

Signed Евгения Захарова

2 Nov 2026, 14:29 UTC≈1,090 views91 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Муза, а не обуза! Сколько же яда в анкетах мужских и женских. Тошненько. И зачем? Люди на сайтах и так уставшие. Любая резкость считывается моментально, даже если за ней стоят вполне разумные пожелания. Вот Серёга, например. Ну чтобы не написать ему: «Ищу женщину, с которой будем радоваться друг другу, а не пытаться переделать жизнь другого под себя. Хочу отношений для двоих, без планов на совместное воспитание дет…

❤47🤣26👍15🙈3

Signed Евгения Захарова

1 Nov 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,240 views38 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Удачи тебе! Девочки, а как вы прощаетесь с мужчиной, если пообщались и поняли, что не ваше? Я за то, чтобы со всеми бережно и по-доброму. Не совпали - бывает. Мы на сайте все не в санатории. Но зачем напоследок объяснять человеку, что именно с ним не так? Он ведь для кого-то вполне может оказаться подарком судьбы. Есть хорошая фраза, чтобы и надежд не оставлять, и не обидеть?

❤38

Signed Евгения Захарова

1 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC≈1,250 views93 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Video

Три признака благополучия взрослого мальчика. Любимое дело, доверительные отношения с матерью и костюм по фигуре 😂

🤣75🙈11❤3🔥3🤪1

Signed Евгения Захарова

31 Oct 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,360 views78 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Женщина женщине всё же дом Заживём теперь. Узнала про приложение Tea - американское вроде, но значит скоро и у нас такое появится. Там женщины оставляют отзывы на мужчин. В том числе с сайтов знакомств. Собралась на свидание? Загружаешь его фото: «Девочки, кто знаком с прекрасным?» И ждёшь подробностей от тех, кто уже сходил. Или даже замужем за ним)) О том, как всё прошло, женат ли, стоит ли связываться, можно ра…

❤45🙈20🔥10🤣3

Signed Евгения Захарова

30 Oct 2026, 14:39 UTC≈1,400 views162 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

Приииивет, Андрей. (Читать голосом Аллегровой) Девочки, первая часть анкеты шик и блеск. Читается на одном дыхании. Лёгкий на подъём, отсутствие бытовой инвалидности, цигун с йогой, искренность ценит. Если не считать, что он Близнецы, то идеальный мужчина, что ли? А потом дочитываешь до конца и… Женат. Ах, ёпт! Настоящий Близнец! Ну кто из зодиаков еще так может? Напишу ему шалость: «Андрей, ваша жена просила пе…

🤣139🔥17❤6

Signed Евгения Захарова

29 Oct 2026, 15:25 UTC≈1,370 views140 reactionsread 9 November 2026

Любовник нужен! Девочки, человеческий глаз из любого текста первым делом выхватывает самое провокационное слово. Если такого нет, то всё ему белый шум. В анкете тоже прекрасно сработает. Начинайте графу «О себе» без стеснения, чтобы молнией на месте пронзало и до конца читал бы уже на одном дыхании. Типа так: «Ищу любовника. Мужа, друга и сообщника в одном лице. Вакансию на полставки не рассматриваю». Забирайте ф…

❤65🔥52🤣23

Signed Евгения Захарова

Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @and_what_if_YES. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

В поиске того самого
@lvira_lina_up · 18,842
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 4 October 2026
Бачинская
@bachinskaya_oxana · 70,070
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Быть одной — ЗБС
@homealoneee · 27,533
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 September 2026
TANIA_GOVORIT
@tania_govorit_channel · 20,680
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 26 September 2026
АЛЕКСАНДРА АЛЕКСЕЕВА - путь к процветанию
@psyaal · 38,348
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Кирилл Гавриличев
@gavrilichevkirill · 20,730
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 September 2026
Юлия Свияш Психолог
@jsviyash · 19,198
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 2 October 2026
Психолог Прокопова Ольга
@olga_prokopova_s · 121,387
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Записки какого-то мужика
@zapiski_man3 · 31,240
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
Максимально наша
@maximalno_nasha · 25,469
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“А что, если ДА?” (@and_what_if_YES), 8,360 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/and_what_if_YES.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.