Мой YouTube: https://youtube.com/c/DashaLebedeva
А здесь мы общаемся, тестируем косметику, обсуждаем запуски, находим классные украшения, одежду и делимся полезными советами 24/7 💎
Сотрудничество: @lebedeva_ad
А+ канал внесен в РКН: https://vk.cc/cEM21w
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 91 days, net +23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 24,182–24,730 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 14:29
24,318
-17
4 Nov 2026, 11:26
24,335
-25
3 Nov 2026, 14:06
24,360
-10
2 Nov 2026, 11:56
24,370
-2
1 Nov 2026, 09:15
24,372
+7
31 Oct 2026, 11:49
24,365
-16
30 Oct 2026, 13:31
24,381
-9
29 Oct 2026, 13:38
24,390
+36
28 Oct 2026, 11:00
24,354
+32
27 Oct 2026, 07:40
24,322
-36
26 Oct 2026, 07:37
24,358
-22
25 Oct 2026, 09:58
24,380
-25
24 Oct 2026, 12:09
24,405
-21
23 Oct 2026, 13:46
24,426
-30
22 Oct 2026, 14:34
24,456
-23
21 Oct 2026, 10:56
24,479
-16
20 Oct 2026, 08:16
24,495
+6
19 Oct 2026, 05:58
24,489
+6
18 Oct 2026, 06:36
24,483
+5
17 Oct 2026, 10:10
24,478
first reading
Engagement
150 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 133 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.26%
avg views ÷ 24,318 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,770
50 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
50
of 150 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
150 (2 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
88,251
Reactions total
5,764
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 04:56 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈5,900
Videos
≈932
Links
≈1,170
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
19m 56s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,644 reactions across 150 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
7,936
47.7%
❤🔥
3,400
20.4%
🥰
1,379
8.29%
😁
937
5.63%
🍓
791
4.75%
😍
321
1.93%
💋
304
1.83%
💯
253
1.52%
👍
232
1.39%
🔥
230
1.38%
🐳
213
1.28%
😢
149
0.895%
💔
133
0.799%
🙏
120
0.721%
🤩
93
0.559%
😈
36
0.216%
💅
27
0.162%
🤝
21
0.126%
💘
19
0.114%
🍾
15
0.09%
6 further kinds
35
0.21%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 150 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,644 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 150 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 150 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @lebedeva_dari_live. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 150 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 50 posts held from the last 30 days (6.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Видите эту мокрую салфетку?
Это мой пот 🤣
Считаю, что сегодня случилось одно из лучших и главное — показательных затестов фиксирующего спрея. Задача была не из легких — прийти с полным макияжем на силовой пилатес, отзаниматься в пыточной целый час и остаться с фреш лицом. И о да, это произошло. Я такое вообще первый раз вижу — когда пот течет не вместе с макияжем, а поверх него каплями. Посмотрите на салфетку — ни е…
Огромное количество горячих новинок Cartice мне приехали из Улыбки Радуги — с большим удовольствием убегаю снимать для вас видео-обзор. Совсем скоро вернусь с новостями — что больше всего понравилось и что нам прям надо 👌
Успели что-нибудь уже попробовать?)
У бренда Pitkina началась распродажа на все — включая мою любимую рубашку. На мне Classy blue shirt, я брала даже со скидкой дороже, чем перечеркнутые 10к — так что в контексте бренда это правда выгодная сделка 😁
Рубашка дорогая, но стоит каждого рубля — после стирок выглядит как новая, не мнется и отлично держит форму. Носила ее все лето вторым, а на фото — даже и третьим слоем. Все спрашивали, откуда — вот рассказ…
Обещала показать вам мою корзину на распродаже Sephora — она справа. Не удержалась и заказала нам сияющую палеточку от Патрика, новый жидкий бронзер от Haus Labs, и всякого по мелочам. Из приятного — в пробниках тот самый фиг эротик, который искала зимой по всему Таиланду))
Набор с малюсенькой розовой косметичкой от Шарлотт увели буквально из-под носа, пропала из корзины за ночь. Но мы не из робких, пришлось перепла…
Я не шутила. Девочки, нахожусь в жесточайшем восторге — тотальнейше окошатилась, коллаборация Ganni и Lululemon невероятно кайфовая. Очень красивый благородный леопард, дороговато, конечно, но качество не подвело.
Вот сижу думаю, а не примерить ли нам это все во влоге на ютуб?)
Девочки, я просто в восторге — чувствую себя настоящей оторвой, я же жадничала на третью тренировку на реформере в студии — а теперь делаю примерно то же самое, только дома и бесплатно. Конечно, немного отличается от студийного метода, но если купить новомодные ленты от Bala (они недавно выпустили крепления, которые имитируют движения реформера) — этот курс станет еще круче. Хотя он и так хорош.
Во-первых, трачу сто…
На этой неделе похудение без изменений — я в той самой фазе, когда и грустно, и холодно, и есть все подряд хочется. Ну вы поняли! Поэтому по цифрам отчитываться пока не буду, зато покажу приятный сухой шампунь из нашей студии. Они походу сотрудничают с la biosthetique, но попробовать пока успела только его. Хотя мой стилист по волосам еще очень хвалила их распутывалку для мокрых волос — пушистикам на заметку.
О шамп…
Друзья, доброе утро! Показываю свой бокс, который мы разыгрываем с девочками в конкурсе — официально заявляю, что здесь одни из лучших баночек Holika Holika, крем и гель повторяю из раза в раз, очень люблю. Шикарная сыворотка от Tocobo. И не только! Принимайте участие ❤️
Друзья, новое видео на канале!
Бьюти-индустрия снова подкинула нам поводов для обсуждений! 💗 Скандал вокруг жидкого бронзера Haus Labs, подозрительно одинаковые патчи для глаз у Fenty Beauty, Huda Beauty и Glow Recipe, а Дима Билан внезапно стал лицом корейского бренда Celimax! Что вообще происходит?
Сегодня обсуждаем громкие бьюти-скандалы, новые палетки Natasha Denona, косметику Patrick Ta, Makeup by Mario и Yves…
Я невероятный фанат вселенной Гарри Поттера, последнюю часть из-за нежелания прощаться с маленьким мирком смотрела в кинотеатре четыре раза. Играла во всевозможные ролевые игры в детстве. Несмотря на все предубеждения, очень жду новый сериал, чтобы вернуть беззаботное время, когда мир был сказочным и самое плохое, что может случиться — контрольная по геометрии и отсутствие карманных денег для похода в Рив Гош. Какое …
❤101❤🔥24🥰10💋3💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 150 posts we hold for @lebedeva_dari_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 15 posts on @lebedeva_dari_live as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
27 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
6
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
RISHA MAKEUP @rishamakeup · 29,176 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 8 September 2026
Красота | Бьюти Мышь🤫🐭 @apriorimakeupp · 24,834 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 15 September 2026
MARINA SUYA @marinasuya · 21,395 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 September 2026
КЛУБ РОСКОШНЫХ @sharina_mua · 21,717 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 September 2026
Бьюти | Guzanova Nadi @guzanova_nadi · 20,183 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 27 September 2026
Красавица и Уходище @beautybyliza · 21,669 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 September 2026
BEAUTY HUB @immelybeauty · 22,950 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
Подборки от Романовской @PODBORKI_PLUS_SIZE · 22,812 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 18 September 2026
SHIKstudio @shikcosmetics · 52,109 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 9 September 2026
BEAUTY PLEASURE✨ @beauty_pleasure · 34,518 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Химичу и разбираю косметику @dushechkacosm · 20,832 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 26 September 2026
ANANASSKIN🧴PRO КОЖУ И УХОД @ananasskin · 36,660 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Бесит всё @beauty_besit · 29,878 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
Болтушка от прыщей @sovaznaet · 23,156 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
BEAUTY BY GUBICHM @gubichmmmmm · 25,012 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
kriv.da, что нового❓ @dari_krivda · 29,316 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Stellary @stellary_cosmetics · 16,319 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 October 2026
фрисби @skidka_wow · 33,858 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 September 2026
бьютисóфия @beautysophia · 19,286 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 October 2026
Пополняю косметички @olyssblog · 26,609 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
Ненудный нюд @makeup_stories · 26,788 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Алла Бьюти @alla_bty · 62,842 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
Косметический маньяк @cosmetman_com · 27,060 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Правьте балом! @beautyarch · 22,383 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dasha Lebedeva ✨ макияж/косметика/бьюти/скидки” (@lebedeva_dari_live), 24,318 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/lebedeva_dari_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.