Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЗАМЕТКИ БЬЮТИГОЛИКА 🌝

Channel

ЗАМЕТКИ БЬЮТИГОЛИКА 🌝

@sem_skin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,491subscribers

-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001661488996
TypeChannel
Username@sem_skin
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sem_skin

Growth

12,49112,63512,5637 August 2026 — 12,502 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,502 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,572 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,583 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,592 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,611 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,635 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,622 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,619 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,593 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,580 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,571 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,574 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,571 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,563 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,558 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,546 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,542 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,531 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,526 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,528 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,513 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,509 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,491 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
24 measurements spanning 27 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,469–12,657 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 15:0112,491-18
2 Sept 2026, 05:1212,509-4
1 Sept 2026, 03:4712,513-15
31 Aug 2026, 04:4712,528+2
30 Aug 2026, 02:4412,526-5
29 Aug 2026, 02:5512,531-11
27 Aug 2026, 23:2312,542-4
26 Aug 2026, 20:1212,546-12
25 Aug 2026, 22:0312,558-5
25 Aug 2026, 00:5412,563-8
23 Aug 2026, 10:2612,571-3
21 Aug 2026, 20:3712,574+3
20 Aug 2026, 18:3612,571-9
19 Aug 2026, 21:4512,580-13
18 Aug 2026, 21:1212,593-26
17 Aug 2026, 19:4812,619-3
16 Aug 2026, 17:3312,622-13
15 Aug 2026, 00:1612,635+24
13 Aug 2026, 13:5812,611+19
12 Aug 2026, 15:5812,592first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.5%
avg views ÷ 12,491 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,310
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.85%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held42 (27 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total71,690
Reactions total4,912
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 13s
Average length
37s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,629 reactions across 42 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣2,19433.1%
❤‍🔥2,05130.9%
🔥1,67625.3%
1191.80%
💯1141.72%
🍓691.04%
🥰630.95%
💔510.769%
🙏510.769%
🐳470.709%
🏆430.649%
💘420.634%
🤝370.558%
👏290.437%
🤩210.317%
😍140.211%
🤗70.106%
😘10.015%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,629 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 42 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sem_skin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 42 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 14:44 UTC950 views100 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ну всё, началось. У нас уже целых два дня осень, и блогеры автоматически перешли в режим постов про «самый лучший ретинол — я в шоке, не узнаю себя в зеркале». Видимо, главная косметическая матка дала отмашку, что наконец-то наступило «время переходить на ретиноиды». А мы с вами с них и не слазили — у морщин и прыщей, к сожалению, каникул не бывает. Так что этот пост скорее для тех, кто не может определиться, что ку

🔥80🏆9🍓5🤩5❤‍🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,260 views183 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ну наконец-то я в прайме — уже четыре пера 😍😍 Вы как там, заматерелые матерЯ, живы, нет, после вчерашнего? ПЕРЕКЛИЧКА

🤣152❤‍🔥19🏆9🍓3

31 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈1,720 views92 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Когда я отправляла пробирку с биоматериалом на генетический тест MyExpert, я думала, что в результатах напишут что-то простое и понятное. Ну, типа: «вы на 70% лошадь, на 30% бык, в общем — и баба, и мужик». Но всё оказалось горааааздо сложнее, глубже — я бы даже сказала, мои глаза несколько раз вываливались из орбит, пока читала заключение. А сейчас всё внимание сюда. Я за пару минут популярно объясню (в отличие от

❤‍🔥62🔥17🐳9💔2🤣1🙏1

31 Aug 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,640 views147 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Под постом ВКонтакте, где я писала про сильный гиперкератоз на лице, в комментариях прилетело следующее: «ОГО, первый раз вижу блогера с таким диагнозом».... А это, блин, не диагноз. Это — симптом, или по умному — патоморфологический процесс. Если разобрать логически, получится: «гипер» — слишком много, «кератоз» — что-то связанное с кератином и роговым слоем, так? То есть буквально это избыточное утолщение роговог

❤‍🔥106🔥31🐳6💘4

31 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC≈1,690 views113 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026

Есть два типа бьюти-блогеров. Первые — многолюбы на контрактах: показали красивенько россыпь банок, получили денежку и хай на них, пусть дальше валяются в коробках. И есть я. Человек с тяжёлой формой косметической моногамии и навязчивым расстройством одних и тех же рекомендаций. Я буду пихать вам под нос каждую банку, которая искренне мне понравилась. К третьему месяцу ежедневных упоминаний вы начнёте узнавать их в

❤‍🔥76🔥28🤣9

28 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC≈2,120 views101 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

На прошлой неделе мне пришли результаты генетического теста, где было черным по белому написано, что я склонна к зависимостям 🙄 Благо моя эпигенетика в основном влияет на покупку банок, иначе кто знает, в каких сводках вы бы увидели моё отёкшее лицо. Одна из самых тяжёлых форм зависимости, которыми располагает ваш покорный слуга — медно-пептидная aka copper addiction. Скоро я реально буду их за воротник столовой лож

❤‍🔥73🥰17🍓11

28 Aug 2026, 09:13 UTC≈2,180 views136 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Явно у каждого блогера есть несколько преданных подписчиков, которые жёстко загоняются, куда пропал админ и почему давно не выкладывает фотки своей рутины. Что с ней случилось? Не дай бог человека парализовало: лежит, бедолага, некому банку подать. Хоть бы она просто познала тщетность бьюти-бытия, выбросила кольцевую лампу в окно и уехала автостопом в тайгу к старообрядцам. Сидит теперь такая на завалинке, умывается

❤‍🔥99🤣20😍14🔥2🥰1

27 Aug 2026, 18:46 UTC≈2,270 views212 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Прошу всех выключить телефоны, отложить оформление заказов и вместе со мной почтить минутой молчания покойную сыворотку Theramid со старым составом 🙏 К своему прискорбию вынуждена сообщить, что я лично присутствовала при её кончине. Последние дни она сильно ослабела, тяжело нажималась и всё чаще плевалась воздухом. Сегодня в 00.00 по Омскому времени она издала хриплый звук, выбросила на ладонь последнюю синюю каплю

🤣133💔49🙏17🤗7🔥5💯1

27 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC≈2,180 views133 reactionsread 2 September 2026

всем добрый денек! хочу сказать спасибо этому чатику, у меня спало обострение малассезии и я могу без слез смотреться в зеркало 🥺 правда теперь кожа очень чувствительная и от каждого прыща остаются красные пятна… мб можно ввести какой-то тонер или что-то успокаивающее кроме крема цераскин? использую азелаинку, но она сейчас не справляется Прекрасно понимаю, что часть аудитории заглядывает ко мне в блог только ради д

🔥85❤‍🔥34🥰94🍓1

26 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC≈2,240 views133 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Photo

Сейчас меня поймут только женщины, которые постоянно смотрят на себя в зеркало и не понимают, чего же в себе поменять. Вроде прям до смерти хочется что-то сделать со своими волосами, но непонятно что. Каре? Да вроде никаких серьезных жизненных потрясений не было... Каскад? Явно буду как облезлая собака... Чёлку-шторку? Чёлку-жалюзи? Тогда уж сразу рольставни во всю морду, шоб не видеть куда катится этот мир. Вот и

❤‍🔥97🤣22🤩13🥰1

25 Aug 2026, 08:32 UTC≈2,360 views219 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

— Мне, пожалуйста, лавандовый раф тридцативосьмилетней выдержки, объёмом 158мл 🙂‍↕️ Да, я планирую даже в сорок одеваться как пятнадцатилетняя, и что вы мне сделаете?

❤‍🔥149🔥36🥰26🤣5🤝3

24 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈2,280 views118 reactionsread 31 August 2026
Photo

Слышали у блогеров это их любимое: «и как я раньше жила без этого?» Действительно, как? Не жизнь, а существование, в самом деле. Я тоже думала, что они, мягко говоря, преувеличивают, а потом у меня появился ОН. Так сказать, сел на шею, и я категорически отказываюсь его снимать 🤍 Встречайте, дорогие падписщики, моя новая EMS-ная любовь — массажёр для шеи QYRON MN301. Всё, девки, не нужны теперь мне эти ваши «сильные

❤‍🔥89🍓20🥰9

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @sem_skin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ANANASSKIN🧴PRO КОЖУ И УХОД
@ananasskin · 34,854
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 2 September 2026
Взгляд химика на крем
@Lenaprokosmetiku · 52,240
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
Доктор Амина
@dr_amina_pirmanova · 130,409
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Алла Бьюти
@alla_bty · 54,642
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 23 August 2026
Крис печатает...
@krisistyping · 52,814
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Бьюти суета
@klavagolman · 51,812
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
BEAUTY PLEASURE✨
@beauty_pleasure · 33,854
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Дерматология Быканова
@dr_bykanov · 62,478
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Косметичка Бо Хян
@Bonyabohyun · 52,943
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026
Lab.Vera
@beauty_blogers · 53,924
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЗАМЕТКИ БЬЮТИГОЛИКА 🌝” (@sem_skin), 12,491 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sem_skin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.